Previous Article | Next Article 
J Virol, March 1998, p. 1790-1796, Vol. 72, No. 3
0022-538X/98/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1998, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Effect of Passive Immunization or Maternally Transferred Immunity
on the Antibody Response to a Genetic Vaccine to Rabies Virus
Yijie
Wang,
Zhiquan
Xiang,
Susanna
Pasquini, and
Hildegund C. J.
Ertl*
The Wistar Institute, Philadelphia,
Pennsylvania
Received 24 October 1997/Accepted 24 November 1997
 |
ABSTRACT |
A plasmid vector, termed pSG5rab.gp, expressing the glycoprotein of
rabies virus was tested in young adult or neonatal mice in the presence
of maternally transferred immunity or passively administered antibodies
to rabies virus for induction of an antibody response. Mice born to
rabies virus-immune dams developed an impaired antibody response to
genetic immunization at 6 weeks of age, as had been previously observed
upon vaccination with an inactivated viral vaccine. Similarly, mice
passively immunized with hyperimmune serum showed an inhibited B-cell
response upon vaccination with the pSG5rab.gp vector, resulting in both
cases in vaccine failures upon challenge with a virulent strain of
rabies virus. In contrast, the immune responses of mice vaccinated as
neonates in the presence of maternal immunity or upon passive
immunization to rabies virus with the pSG5rab.gp construct were only
marginally affected.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Vaccines have been the most
successful biomedical invention to prevent the morbidity and mortality
of humans and animals caused by infectious diseases. Traditionally,
vaccines have been based on protein or carbohydrate antigens presented
either in the form of whole attenuated or inactivated pathogens or a
structural part thereof. The surprising finding that vectors readily
transfect cells in situ upon inoculation into skin or muscle tissue (by using either sophisticated propulsion devises or simple syringes), thus
causing expression of the encoded protein and in consequence induction
of a specific B- and T-cell-mediated immune response, led to the era of
genetic vaccines (also commonly referred to as DNA vaccines) (28,
29, 33). Such vaccines, which are small circular pieces of DNA
composed of a backbone for amplification and selection in bacteria and
a transcriptional unit for translation of a pathogen's gene in
mammalian cells, have a number of advantages over more-traditional
types of vaccines. One of the main advantages of vector vaccines, at
least for experimenters, is the ease with which they can be constructed
and manipulated. Immunologically, genetic vaccines seem to provide
their own adjuvant in the form of CpG sequences present in the
bacterial backbone (14, 16). Unlike inactivated vaccines,
DNA vaccines cause de novo synthesis of proteins in transfected cells,
leading to the association of antigenic peptides with major
histocompatibility complex class I determinants and hence, the
activation of cytolytic T cells (29). In addition, DNA
vaccines do not elicit measurable immune responses to the carrier
(i.e., the vector DNA [37]), thus allowing their
repeated use. Furthermore, in general, plasmid vectors induce an immune
response in neonates (3, 12, 30) that, due to the relative
immaturity of their immune system, respond poorly to some of the
traditional vaccines. Vaccination to many common childhood infections
is therefore delayed, rendering young infants susceptible to
infections. Neonates are partially protected against prevalent
infections by maternally transferred immune effector mechanisms, most
notably antibodies (9, 15, 18, 23). Notwithstanding,
maternally transmitted immune effector mechanisms inhibit the
offspring's immune response to active immunization (1, 25,
34), providing further impetus to delay childhood vaccinations.
This interference lasts well beyond the time span during which the
offspring is reliably protected against infection by maternal
antibodies (34), thus rendering the offspring highly susceptible to potentially fatal infectious diseases. Novel vaccines that induce a protective immune response in the presence of maternally transferred immune mechanisms in young individuals thus need to be
developed. For example, dogs, the main vector in cases of human rabies,
are not vaccinated until they are at least 3 months old in order to
avoid vaccine failure due to maternally transferred immunity.
Nevertheless, cases of human rabies, especially in children, are
commonly caused by young dogs not yet eligible for rabies virus
vaccination.
Rabies virus vaccination is generally initiated in humans after
exposure to the virus by a single dose of hyperimmune serum, given
locally to inactivate the virus and by a series of 4 to 12 shots of an
inactivated rabies virus vaccine. Antibodies to rabies virus are known
to affect the immune response to the viral vaccine (27),
thus necessitating multiple active immunizations, an expensive and
time-consuming endeavor. Although genetic vaccines are not currently
considered for postexposure vaccination to rabies virus due to the slow
kinetics of the developing antibody response that in mice requires up
to 10 weeks to reach maximal titers (37), they might
overcome the negative effect of passive immunization.
We conducted a series of experiments in either young adult or neonatal
mice to test the effects of maternally transferred immunity and
passively administered antibodies on genetic immunization of mice. Our
results show that in adult mice, passively acquired immunity, either by
maternal transfer or upon inoculation of hyperimmune serum, strongly
reduces the B-cell response to the genetic vaccine. Surprisingly, this
effect was much less pronounced upon immunization of neonates born to
immune dams or inoculated with hyperimmune serum.
 |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
Mice.
Male and female C3H/He mice were purchased from
Jackson Laboratory, Bar Harbor, Maine. They were bred by housing 2 females with one male at the Animal Facility of The Wistar Institute. Mice were separated once pregnancies were established. Pups were separated from their dams according to sex at 4 weeks of age. Mice of
both sexes equally distributed between the different groups were used
for the experiments. Experiments were done two to four times using
fairly large groups of genetically immunized mice. The number of mice
for the presented experiments is given in the figure legends. Mice of
each experiment were bled several times in monthly intervals to ensure
that potential differences were not a reflection of a shift in
kinetics.
Cells.
Baby hamster kidney BHK-21 cells and 293 cells were
grown in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium supplemented with 10%
fetal bovine serum as described previously (30).
Viruses.
Rabies virus of the Evelyn Rokitniki Abelseth (ERA)
strain was grown on BHK-21 cells, purified, and inactivated with
betapropionolactone (BPL) (hereafter referred to as ERA-BPL)
(31). Rabies virus of the challenge virus strain CVS-24 was
propagated in the brain of suckling ICR virus and titrated in adult
C3H/He mice by intramuscular (i.m.) inoculation (32). CVS-11
virus was grown and titrated on BHK-21 cells. The E1-deleted adenovirus
recombinant expressing the rabies virus glycoprotein of the ERA strain,
termed Adrab.gp, was grown and titrated on E1-transfected 293 cells as
described previously (39).
Plasmid vector.
The pSG5rab.gp vector, which expresses the
rabies virus glycoprotein of the ERA strain under the control of the
simian virus 40 promoter, was propagated in Escherichia coli
DH5
and purified by using kits from Promega or Qiagen according to
the manufacturer's specifications. The vector was quantitated by
agarose gel electrophoresis against a known standard. Details about
construction and testing of this plasmid have been described elsewhere
(5, 37, 38).
Immunization and challenge of mice.
Adult female mice were
immunized two or three times with 5 µg of ERA-BPL virus given i.m. or
with 106 PFU of Adrab.gp virus injected subcutaneously
(s.c.) prior to mating. Male and female pups were immunized either
within 48 h of birth or at 5 to 7 weeks of age with 5 µg of
ERA-BPL virus or 50 µg of the pSG5rab.gp vector. For booster
immunizations, mice were injected with 104 PFU of Adrab.gp
virus given s.c. Neonates were immunized s.c. with 25 µl or i.m. with
10 µl applied by a Hamilton syringe, adult mice were inoculated i.m.
into the quadriceps muscle with 50 µl of vector containing saline.
For passive immunization, mice were injected intraperitoneally (i.p.)
with 10 µl (neonatal mice) or 100 µl (adult mice) of hyperimmune
serum to rabies virus containing 100 IU (per ml) of virus-neutralizing
antibodies (VNA) (determined by titration against a National Institutes
of Health (NIH) reference serum to rabies virus). Control mice were
inoculated with the same amount of a syngeneic normal mouse serum.
Experiments were conducted with groups of 4 to 15 mice.
Mice were challenged with 10 mean 50% lethal doses of CVS-24 virus
given i.m. Mice were observed daily starting 7 days later. Mice were
euthanized once they developed bilateral hind leg paralysis, a definite
symptom of a terminal rabies virus infection. Mice that survived the
infection were observed for an additional 14 days. In some experiments,
mice were subsequently bled to assess the booster effect of the
challenge.
Enzyme-linked immunoadsorbent assay (ELISA).
Titers to
rabies virus of sera obtained by retro-orbital puncture were tested at
serial dilution on plates coated with ERA-BPL virus as described in
detail previously (34). Antibody isotypes were determined by
using the Calbiochem Hybridoma Isotyping kit with some modifications
according to the manufacturer's instructions as described previously
(30).
Neutralization assay.
VNA titers were determined on BHK-21
cells infected with CVS-11 virus pretreated with serial dilution of
heat-inactivated sera as described previously (34). An NIH
reference serum to rabies virus was tested at 10 IU for comparison.
Data, expressed as international units, were calculated by dividing the
VNA titer of the experimental serum by that of the reference serum and
multiplying the result by 10.
 |
RESULTS |
Effect of maternally transferred immunity on the efficacy of a
genetic vaccine in adult mice.
We had shown previously that mouse
pups born to rabies virus-immune dams develop impaired B and T helper
cell responses upon immunization with an inactivated rabies virus
vaccine (34). This inhibition, which is seen in experimental
animals as well as in human infants to a number of different infectious
agents and vaccines (1, 8, 11), is long lasting and exceeds
the time that maternal immunity provides reliable protection to
infections of the offspring. Although the mechanism of this inhibitory
effect of maternal immunity is poorly understood, maternal antibodies have been implicated to reduce the efficacy of active immunization by
neutralization of the vaccine and/or targeting of antigen to inappropriate antigen-presenting cells. Genetic vaccines do not express
proteins until de novo synthesis is initiated in transfected cells.
Upon inoculation, they are, at the initial stage, not susceptible to
neutralization or retargeting by antibodies and might thus potentially
provide an avenue to overcome maternal interference.
To test this hypothesis, female C3H/He mice were vaccinated twice with
an inactivated rabies virus vaccine of the ERA strain.
Control mice
were inoculated with saline. Both groups of females
were mated with
syngeneic males 2 weeks after the second immunization.
Pups were
vaccinated with either 5 µg of ERA-BPL virus given s.c.
or 50 µg of
the pSG5rab.gp vector given i.m. when they were ~6
weeks old when
maternal antibodies had declined. Mice were bled
6 weeks later, and
serum antibody titers were tested by an ELISA
on plates coated with
inactivated rabies virus. As shown in Fig.
1, upon immunization with either
vaccine, pups from rabies virus-immune
dams developed reduced antibody
titers in comparison to pups from
sham-vaccinated dams. The impairment
of the immune response to
the genetic vaccine was in several
experiments slightly less pronounced
than that to the viral
vaccine; nevertheless, maternally transferred
immunity clearly dampened
the antibody response to the rabies
virus antigen as expressed by the
plasmid vector. The pSG5rab.gp
vaccine stimulates a
monospecific response to the viral glycoprotein,
the sole
target antigen of rabies virus VNA which are the main
immune correlates
of protection (
35). The rabies virus vaccine,
on the other
hand, induces antibodies to a number of viral proteins,
most notably
the nucleoprotein in addition to the viral glycoprotein.
The same batch
of sera tested by ELISA as shown in Fig.
1 was
next tested for VNA
titers to rabies virus. The results of the
biological assay confirmed
those of the ELISA; sera of pups from
rabies virus-immune dams had
reduced antibody titers upon immunization
with either of the two
vaccines compared to the sera of control
pups. Nevertheless, VNA titers
were higher in either group of
pSG5rab.gp-vaccinated mice than in mice
immunized with inactivated
rabies virus which gave rise to measurable,
albeit low, titers
in pups from naive dams but not in pups from immune
dams (Fig.
2A). Pups immunized with the
genetic vaccine were next, i.e.,
8 weeks after immunization, challenged
with the mouse adopted
virulent CVS-24 strain of rabies virus which is
antigenically
closely related to the ERA strain. Protection paralleled
VNA titers
as expected, all of the pSG5rab.gp-vaccinated pups from
naive
dams remained symptom-free, while 20% of DNA-vaccinated pups
from
immune dams succumbed to the infection. VNA titers in surviving
pSG5rab.gp-vaccinated mice were tested 2 weeks after challenge,
injection of live virus had a clear booster effect, indicating
that the
vaccine had not induced sterilizing immunity in either
group. Again,
postchallenge titers were higher in pups born to
naive dams than in
pups from rabies virus-immune dams (Fig.
2A).

View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 1.
Antibody response to the pSG5rab.gp vector or ERA-BPL
virus of young adult mice born to naive or rabies virus-immune dams.
Groups of C3H/He mice born to naive or rabies virus-immune dams were
vaccinated with 10 µg of ERA-BPL virus or 50 µg of pSG5rab.gp
vector when the mice were 6 weeks old. Mice were bled 6 weeks later,
and serum antibody titers to rabies virus were determined by an ELISA
using sera from age-matched naive mice (nms) for comparison. The groups
of mice used were as follows: pups born to naive dams and immunized
with pSG5rab.gp (-/rab.gp) (9 pups), pups born to naive dams and
immunized with ERA-BPL (-/era) (3 pups), pups born to rabies
virus-immune dams and immunized with pSG5rab.gp (era/rab.gp) (11 pups),
and pups born to rabies virus-immune dams and immunized with ERA-BPL
(era/era) (13 pups). OD (405 nm), optical density at 405 nm.
|
|

View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 2.
Induction of VNAs and protection to challenge upon
vaccination of young adult mice. (A) The groups of mice used were as
follows: pups born to rabies virus-immune dams and vaccinated with the
inactivated rabies virus vaccine (ERA/ERA), pups born to naive dams
(inoculated with phosphate-buffered saline [PBS]) and vaccinated with
the inactivated rabies virus vaccine (PBS/ERA), pups born to rabies
virus-immune dams and vaccinated with the genetic vaccine
(ERA/pSG5rab.gp), and pups born to naive dams (inoculated with PBS) and
vaccinated with the genetic vaccine (PBS/pSG5rab.gp). Sera harvested
from age-matched control mice (NMS) were also for comparison. The same
batch of sera tested in Fig. 1 by an ELISA was tested for VNA to rabies
virus. VNA is measured in international units; 10 IU is the equivalent
of a VNA titer of 1:135. In addition, some of the groups of mice were
challenged with live rabies virus. Sera of surviving animals were
harvested 4 weeks later. Both batches of sera were tested in parallel
(prechallenge sera [ ] and postchallenge sera
[&atyp0220;]). Data
are expressed as international units calculated in comparison to the
reference serum. VNA titers in the ERA/ERA and NMS groups were below
the level of detectability. (B) Genetically vaccinated mice as well as
control mice from the same groups described above were challenged with
10 50% lethal doses of CVS-24 virus. Survival was recorded over a
4-week observation period.
|
|
To further ascertain that maternal immunity to the rabies virus
glycoprotein impaired the offspring's B-cell response to the
pSG5rab.gp vaccine, 6-week-old pups born to Adrab.gp virus-immune
dams
were vaccinated with the pSG5rab.gp construct. The Adrab.gp
virus is a
recombinant that, similar to the genetic vaccine, induces
a
monospecific response to the glycoprotein of rabies virus as
well as
responses to the adenovirus antigens (
39). Other mice
born
to the same set of Adrab.gp virus-immune dams were vaccinated
with
ERA-BPL virus. For comparison, mice from sham-vaccinated
dams were
inoculated either with the pSG5rab.gp vector or with
ERA-BPL virus.
Mice were bled 6 weeks later, and serum antibody
titers to rabies virus
were determined by an ELISA (Fig.
3).
Mice
born to Adrab.gp-immune dams immunized with either vaccine showed
a strongly reduced antibody response which was below the level
of
detectability in pups vaccinated with the vector. A neutralization
assay conducted with the same set of sera confirmed these results;
pups
born to immune dams vaccinated with either construct developed
VNA
titers of 1:15 which are at the lowest level of reliable detectability,
while pups from naive dams vaccinated with the viral vaccine or
the
vector had VNA titers of 1:135 and 1:405, respectively.

View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 3.
Effect of maternal immunization with a recombinant
vaccine expressing the rabies virus glycoprotein on the B-cell response
to genetic immunization. Prior to mating, female C3H/He mice were
immunized twice with 106 PFU of Adrab.gp virus or with
phosphate-buffered saline (PBS). When the pups were 6 weeks old, they
were vaccinated with 5 µg of ERA-BPL virus or with 50 µg of
pSG5rab.gp vector. Pups were bled 6 weeks later, and serum antibody
titers were determined by an ELISA using sera from age-matched naive
mice (NMS) for comparison. The groups of mice used were as follows:
pups born to naive dams and vaccinated with pSG5rab.gp
(-/pSG5rab.gp) (4 pups), pups born to Adrab.gp-immune dams
and vaccinated with pSG5rab.gp (Adrab.gp/pSG5rab.gp) (4 pups), pups
born to naive dams and vaccinated with ERA-BPL (-/ERA-BPL) (3 pups),
and pups born to Adrab.gp-immune dams and vaccinated with ERA-BPL
(Adrab.gp/ERA-BPL) (4 pups). OD (405 nm), optical density at 405 nm.
|
|
Effect of passive immunization on the immune response to the DNA
vaccine.
To test if passively transferred antibodies directly
affect the efficacy of the genetic vaccine, we tested the immune
response to the pSG5rab.gp vector in mice inoculated with hyperimmune
serum to rabies virus. Groups of adult C3H/He mice were injected
i.p. with 100 µl of a syngeneic hyperimmune serum derived from
ERA-BPL virus-immune mice. This serum contained 100 IU of VNA to rabies virus per ml. Control mice were inoculated with an equivalent dose of
normal C3H/He mouse serum. Resulting serum VNA titers were determined
the following day; mice inoculated with the hyperimmune serum had 3 IU
of circulating VNA, and control mice had no VNA. Four days following
passive immunization, mice were vaccinated either with 50 µg of the
pSG5rab.gp vector given i.m. or with 10 µg of ERA-BPL virus given
s.c. Serum antibody titers to rabies virus were tested 6 weeks later by
an ELISA. As shown in Fig. 4, mice
inoculated with serum to rabies virus developed an impaired antibody
response upon vaccination with the inactivated viral vaccine as
described previously (34). Inhibition was also seen upon
genetic vaccination, confirming the results obtained in mice born to
rabies virus-immune dams. Upon challenge with CVS-24
virus, all of the passively immunized mice vaccinated with the
pSG5rab.gp construct succumbed to infection, while genetically
vaccinated control animals were completely protected.

View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 4.
Effect of passive transfer of antibodies to rabies virus
on the antibody response of young adult mice. Mice (8 to 10 weeks old)
were inoculated with 100 µl of hyperimmune serum to rabies virus
containing 100 IU of neutralizing antibodies per ml, resulting in a
serum antibody titer of 3 IU measured 24 h later. Control
mice received an equivalent dose of a control serum preparation. Four
days later, mice were vaccinated with 10 µg of ERA-BPL virus or
50 µg of pSG5rab.gp vector. (A) Antibody titers were
determined by an ELISA 6 weeks later using a normal mouse serum
for comparison. The genetic vaccine pSG5rab.gp and inactivated rabies
virus vaccine ERA-BPL were used. NMS, transfer of normal mouse serum;
HIS, transfer of hyperimmune serum; OD (405 nm), optical density at 405 nm. (B) Genetically immunized mice and age-matched naive (control) mice
were challenged with 10 50% lethal doses of CVS-24 virus, and survival
was recorded. NMS, transfer of normal mouse serum; HS, transfer of
hyperimmune serum.
|
|
Effect of maternal immunity on the immune response of neonatal mice
to genetic immunization.
The pSG5rab.gp vector has been shown
previously to induce an immune response upon injection into neonatal
mice (30). The immune system is in several aspects immature
at birth (4, 10), and a vaccine given before immunological
maturation might be affected differently by maternal immunity than one
given thereafter. We therefore tested the effect of maternal immunity
on the B-cell response upon genetic vaccination of neonatal mice. Pups
born to ERA-BPL virus or sham-vaccinated C3H/He dams were inoculated with 50 µg of the pSG5rab.gp vector given s.c. within 48 h of birth. The ERA-BPL virus, which induces a poor immune response in
neonatal mice, was not included in this set of experiments. At the
earliest time point tested, i.e., 1 month after immunization, antibody
titers were much higher in pups born to rabies virus-immune dams, which
is most likely a reflection of residual maternal antibodies. These
antibodies decreased 2 months after vaccination but were still
detectable. Later on, at 4, 6, and 8 months of age, the antibody titers
of pups from immune dams eventually declined below those of pups from
naive dams (Fig. 5A); nevertheless, the
differences in titers were marginal compared to that seen upon
immunization of 6-week-old pups from naive or rabies virus-immune dams
or upon passive transfer of antibodies prior to genetic immunization of adult mice. To ensure that the slight difference observed in pups from
immune dams, shown in three separate experiments, was not within the
limits of natural variability (which is rather high upon genetic
immunization), 10-week-old mice were given booster immunizations of low
doses (i.e., 104 pfu) of an E1-deleted adenovirus
recombinant that we have previously reported to boost the immune
response to the pSG5rab.gp vaccine (36). As shown in Fig.
5B, both groups of mice rapidly developed an anamnestic B-cell response
to the rabies virus antigen that was clearly superior in mice born to
naive dams.

View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 5.
Effect of maternally transferred immunity on the B-cell
response upon genetic immunization of neonates. (A) Pups born to rabies
virus-immune dams (left panel) (14 pups) or sham-vaccinated (right
panel) (8 pups) dams were inoculated within 48 h of birth with the
pSG5rab.gp vector. Mice were bled 1, 2, 4, 6, and 8 months (mo.) later,
and serum antibody titers were determined by an ELISA with normal mouse
serum (NMS) from 8- to 10-week-old mice for comparison. (B) The same
groups of pups were given booster immunizations of an E1-deleted
adenoviral recombinant expressing the rabies virus glycoprotein when
they were 10 months old. Serum antibody titers before the boost
(pre-boost) and 5 (5 d post boost) and 10 (10 d post boost) days
following vaccination with the adenovirus recombinant are shown. NMS,
normal mouse serum. OD (405 nm), optical density at 405 nm.
|
|
Effect of passive immunization on the immune response of neonatal
mice to genetic immunization.
To further evaluate the effect of
preexisting antibodies on the immune response of mice inoculated as
neonates with the pSG5rab.gp vaccine, groups of C3H/He mice were
injected within 48 h of birth with 1 IU of a hyperimmune serum to
rabies virus or with an equivalent dose of a normal mouse serum. Both
sera were derived from syngeneic donors. Mice were then vaccinated with
50 µg of the pSG5rab.gp vaccine. Antibody titers to rabies virus were
tested 3 and 6 months later by an ELISA. As shown in Fig.
6, at both time points, titers from pups
vaccinated in the presence of antibodies to rabies virus or a normal
serum preparation were indistinguishable, which is in stark contrast to
the results obtained upon genetic vaccination of passively immunized
adult mice.

View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 6.
Effect of passive immunization of neonates on the
antibody response to a genetic vaccine. Pups born to naive dams were
inoculated within 48 h of birth with 10 µl of hyperimmune serum
to rabies virus containing 100 IU of neutralizing antibodies per ml
(HIS) (9 pups) or an equivalent dose of normal mouse serum (NMS) (6 pups). Pups were bled 3 and 6 months later, and serum antibody titers
to rabies virus were determined by an ELISA using sera from age-matched
naive mice (NMS) for comparison. OD (405 nm), optical density at 405 nm.
|
|
Effect of maternal immunity on the isotype profile of the antibody
response to genetic vaccination.
The isotype profiles of
antibodies to rabies virus from mice immunized as neonates with the
pSG5rab.gp vaccine were determined to establish if the presence of
maternally transferred immunity had shifted the type of the response.
Sera harvested from pups born to naive or rabies virus-immune dams
vaccinated as neonates with the pSG5rab.gp construct were tested by an
ELISA on ERA-BPL-coated plates 5 and 7 months later for the
distribution of isotypes of antibodies. As shown in Fig.
7, both groups of mice had the same antibody isotype profile to rabies virus, with immunoglobulin G2a
(IgG2a) being clearly predominant and indicative of a Th1 type
response.

View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 7.
Effect of maternally transferred immunity on the isotype
profile of antibodies to rabies virus induced by the genetic vaccine.
Sera of mice immunized within 48 h of birth with the pSG5rab.gp
vector as described in the legend to Fig. 4 were tested for the isotype
distribution of antibodies to rabies virus. Sera were negative for IgM
and IgA (not shown). Sera of pups from immune dams harvested at 6 ( ) and 8 ( ) months of
age. Sera of pups from naive dams harvested at 6 (&atyp0220;) and 8 ( ) months of age. Data are the means and standard deviations of
three measurements.
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
Several studies using different pathogens have shown that
passive immunization, either by iatrogenic inoculation of
hyperimmune sera or monoclonal antibodies or by maternal transfer
of immune effector mechanisms, impairs the immune response to active
immunization (8, 34). The pathways through which passively
acquired immunity impedes stimulation of a primary immune response are
currently still ill defined. Antibodies are thought to play a pivotal
role by neutralizing the antigen or by forming immunocomplexes on
specific, naive B cells, thus causing their tolerization. In addition,
upon processing of the antibody-antigen complexes, such naive B cells might present antigen fragments to virgin T cells, resulting in their
tolerance (17). Immune dams transmit antibodies and
lymphocytes to their offspring through the placenta as well as by
lactation. In inbred mice, such lymphocytes might conceivably persist
for extended periods of time affecting the pup's primary immune
response. Additional mechanisms, such as induction of regulatory T
cells in the offspring by maternal immune effector mechanisms, as has been suggested in a mouse malaria model (11), have been
postulated.
Genetic vaccines (that at least upon immunization of young adult mice
induce an impaired immune response in the presence of maternal
antibodies or a passively administered hyperimmune serum) do not
express the antigen until de novo synthesis is initiated in transfected
cells. The vaccine itself can thus not be affected by maternally or
passively transferred antibodies. The antigen used for our studies,
i.e., the rabies virus glycoprotein, is firmly anchored in the cell
membrane and is thus unavailable for retargeting by antibodies.
Passively transferred antibodies might bind to the surface-expressed
protein and mask B-cell epitopes. Alternatively, these antibodies might
eliminate antigen-expressing cells by triggering complement-mediated
cytolysis or antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC), thus
reducing the antigenic load and the duration of antigen expression, two
parameters that are presumably crucial for the efficacy of a DNA
vaccine. Upon genetic immunization given i.m., the majority of antigen
is expressed by non-antigen-presenting cells such as muscle cells. Bone
marrow-derived cells, such as dendritic cells, are required to initiate
the immune response upon genetic immunization (6). Either of
these cells can be transfected by the vector DNA, or they can
conceivably reprocess antigen derived from other transfected cells.
Reprocessing of cleaved antigen could be affected by antibodies, but
considering that the majority of B-cell epitopes of the rabies virus
glycoprotein are highly conformation dependent, interactions between
antibodies and cleaved fragments of the rabies virus glycoprotein are
unlikely to have a major impact.
Surprisingly, the interference of induction of a primary antibody
response by maternally or passively administered antibodies was much
less pronounced upon genetic vaccination of neonates. Neonates born to
rabies virus-immune dams or injected shortly after birth with a fairly
high dose of hyperimmune serum to rabies virus developed upon
vaccination with the pSG5rab.gp vector antibody titers to rabies virus
that were comparable to those of control mice. It is unclear why young
adult mice and neonatal mice responded differently to the genetic
vaccine given in the presence of passively acquired immunity. We have
shown previously that immunization of neonates with the pSG5rab.gp
vector resulted in a T helper cell response and antibodies to the
rabies virus glycoprotein that were indistinguishable from those seen
in adult mice (30). Others have reported comparable results
demonstrating induction of cytolytic T cells and protective immunity
upon genetic vaccination of newborn mice (3, 12).
Nevertheless, data presented here clearly indicate a qualitative
difference in the effect of preexisting antibodies on genetic
vaccination.
The neonatal immune system is anatomically in place, yet immature in
several aspects. Neonates are relatively deficient in production of
some cytokines such as gamma interferon (4). Immunoglobulin-negative pre-B cells that are more susceptible to
tolerization are commonly found in neonates (21);
nevertheless, neonates also have mature B cells that secrete specific
antibodies upon activation. Cytolytic T effector cells show variably
decreased effector functions (10, 22). Functionally, the
neonatal immune system is incapable of generating antibody responses to
polysaccharide antigens due to a developmental delay in maturation of
the corresponding B-cell subset (20). Alloantigens expressed
on lymphoid cells can induce tolerance in some mouse strain
combinations, thus allowing successful skin transplantations later on
(2, 13). The induction of tolerance to alloantigen can be
circumvented by presenting such antigens on dendritic cells, indicating
that the induction of neonatal tolerance in this system is a reflection
of a relative lack of stimulator cells rather than an immaturity of the
responding T-cell populations (24). Other antigens such as a
mouse retrovirus were shown to induce at high doses an apparent
tolerance of cytolytic T cells by inducing Th2 type responses; using
lower doses for immunization results in a protective CD8+
T-cell response, again suggesting that the T cells are functionally mature (26). Using hen egg lysosyme at tolerogenic doses,
another group also demonstrated induction of a Th2 response and
concluded that neonatal T cells are not particularly prone to tolerance but respond with a preferential Th1 or Th2 type response, depending on
the dose of the antigen (7). Inoculation of neonatal mice with lymphocytic choriomeningitis virus (LCMV) causes tolerance of
cytolytic T cells with concomitant activation of B cells, resulting in
viral persistence (22). We assume that the inability of
passively administered antibodies to interfere with the genetic
immunization of neonates reflects a relative immaturity of an innate
immune effector mechanism of the host, such as complement or ADCC
effector cells mediating antibody-dependent cellular cytolysis that
together with the antibodies, either eliminate vector-transfected cells or alternatively down-regulate expression of the vector-encoded antigen. A similar observation, i.e., lack of inhibition of induction of an immune response upon genetic immunization of neonates was made in
a mouse LCMV system where pups born to naive or immune dams developed
protective cytolytic T-cell responses to vaccination with a plasmid
vector expressing the nucleoprotein of LCMV (12). In
contrast, another study showed that piglets born to immune sows failed
to respond to a genetic vaccine expressing the glycoprotein of
pseudorabies virus (19).
Neonatal mice are immunologically far less mature than human infants,
which in many aspects reach the same stage of immunological development
at the end of their first trimester. Additional studies in other
species that are developmentally more closely related to humans are
thus needed to confirm that genetic vaccination of neonates is
efficacious in the presence of maternally transferred immunity.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
This work was supported by grants from NIAID.
We thank Wynetta Giles-Davis for excellent technical assistance and
Andrew G. Assalian for preparation of the manuscript.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
Corresponding author. Mailing address: The Wistar
Institute, 3601 Spruce St., Philadelphia, PA 19104-4268. Phone: (215)
898-3863. Fax: (215) 898-3953. E-mail:
Ertl{at}wista.wistar.upenn.edu
Present address: NYU Medical Center, Skirball Institute, New York,
NY 10016.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Albrecht, P.,
F. A. Ennis,
E. J. Saltzman, and S. Krugman.
1977.
Persistence of maternal antibodies in infants beyond 12 months: mechanism of measles vaccine failure.
J. Pediatr.
91:715-719[Medline].
|
| 2.
|
Billingham, R. E.,
L. Brent, and P. B. Medawar.
1953.
Activity acquired tolerance of foreign cells.
Nature (London)
172:603-615[Medline].
|
| 3.
|
Bot, A.,
S. Bot,
A. Garcia-Sastre, and C. Bona.
1996.
DNA immunization of newborn mice with a plasmid-expressing nucleoprotein of influenza virus.
Viral Immunol.
9:207-210[Medline].
|
| 4.
|
Brysen, Y. J.,
H. S. Winter, and S. E. Gard.
1980.
Deficiency of immune interferon production by leukocytes of normal newborns.
Cell. Immunol.
55:191-200[Medline].
|
| 5.
|
Burger, S. R.,
A. T. Remaley,
J. M. Danley,
R. J. Muschel,
W. H. Wunner, and S. L. Spitalnik.
1997.
Stable expression of rabies virus glycoprotein in Chinese hamster ovary cells.
J. Gen. Virol.
72:359-367[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 6.
|
Condon, C.,
S. C. Watkins,
C. M. Celluzzi,
K. Thompson, and F. L. D. Falo, Jr.
1996.
DNA-based immunization by in vivo transfection of dendritic cells.
Nat. Med.
2:1122-1128[Medline].
|
| 7.
|
Forsthuber, T.,
H. C. Yip, and P. V. Lehmann.
1996.
Induction of TH1 and TH2 immunity in neonatal mice.
Science
271:1728-1730[Abstract].
|
| 8.
|
Francis, M. J., and L. Black.
1986.
Response of young pigs to foot-and-mouth disease upon oil emulsion vaccination in the presence and absence of maternally derived neutralizing antibodies.
Res. Vet. Sci.
41:33-39[Medline].
|
| 9.
|
Gough, P. M.,
C. J. Frank,
D. G. Moore,
M. A. Sagona, and C. J. Johnson.
1983.
Lactogenic immunity to transmissible gastroenteritis virus induced by a subunit immunogen.
Vaccine
1:37-41[Medline].
|
| 10.
|
Granberg, C.,
K. Manninen, and P. Toivanen.
1976.
Cell-mediated lympholysis by human neonatal lymphocytes.
Clin. Immunol. Immunopathol.
6:256-263[Medline].
|
| 11.
|
Harte, P. G., and J. H. L. Playfair.
1983.
Failure of malaria vaccination in mice born to immune mothers. Induction of specific suppressor cells by maternal IgG.
J. Clin. Exp. Med.
51:157-164.
|
| 12.
|
Hassett, D. E.,
J. Zhang, and J. L. Whitton.
1997.
Neonatal DNA immunization with a plasmid encoding an internal viral protein is effective in the presence of maternal antibodies and protects against subsequent viral challenge.
J. Virol.
71:7881-7888[Abstract].
|
| 13.
|
Holan, V.,
J. Chutna, and M. Hasek.
1978.
Participation of H-2 regions in neonatally induced transplantation tolerance.
Immunogenetics
6:397-403.
|
| 14.
|
Klinman, D. M.,
A. K. Yi,
S. L. Beaucage,
J. Conover, and A. M. Krieg.
1996.
CpG motifs present in bacterial DNA rapidly induce lymphocytes to secrete interleukin 6, interleukin 12 and interferon- .
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
93:2879-2883[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 15.
|
Kohl, S., and L. S. Loo.
1984.
The relative role of transplacental and milk immune transfer in protection against neonatal herpes simplex virus infection in mice.
J. Infect. Dis.
149:38-42[Medline].
|
| 16.
|
Krieg, A. M.,
A.-K. Yi,
S. Matson,
T. J. Waldschmidt,
G. A. Bishop,
R. Teasdale,
G. A. Koretsky, and D. M. Klinman.
1995.
CpG motifs in bacterial DNA trigger direct B-cell activation.
Nature (London)
374:546-549[Medline].
|
| 17.
|
Lassila, O.,
O. Vainio, and P. Matzinger.
1988.
Can B cells turn on virgin T cells?
Nature (London)
334:253-255[Medline].
|
| 18.
|
Lifely, M. R.,
J. Esdaile, and C. Moreno.
1989.
Passive transfer of meningococcal group B polysaccharide antibodies to the offspring of pregnant rabbits and their protective role against infection with Escherichia coli.
Vaccine
7:17-21[Medline].
|
| 19.
|
Monteil, M.,
M. F. Le Potier,
J. Guillotin,
R. Cariolet,
C. Houdayer, and M. Eliot.
1996.
Genetic immunization of seronegative one-day-old piglets against pseudorabies induces neutralizing antibodies but not protection and is ineffective in piglets from immune dams.
Vet. Res.
27:443-452[Medline].
|
| 20.
| Mosier, D. E., N. M. Zaldivar, E. Goldings, J. Mond, I. Scher, and W. E. Paul. 1977. Formation of antibody
in the newborn mouse: study of T-cell-independent antibody response.
J. Infect. Dis. 136(Suppl.):S14-S19.
|
| 21.
|
Nossal, G. L. V.
1996.
Choices following antigen entry: antibody formation or immunological tolerance.
Annu. Rev. Immunol.
13:1-27[Medline].
|
| 22.
|
Oldstone, M. B. A., and F. J. Dixon.
1967.
Lymphocytic choriomeningitis: production of antibody by tolerant infected mice.
Science
158:1193-1195[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 23.
|
Reumann, P. D.,
C. M. A. Paganini,
E. M. Ayoub, and P. A. Small.
1983.
Maternal infant transfer of influenza specific immunity in the mouse.
J. Immunol.
130:932-936[Abstract].
|
| 24.
|
Ridge, J. P.,
E. J. Fuchs, and P. Matzinger.
1996.
Neonatal tolerance revisited: turning on newborn T cells with dendritic cells.
Science
271:1723-1726[Abstract].
|
| 25.
|
Rowley, D. A.,
F. W. Fitch,
F. P. Stuart,
H. Kohler, and H. Cosenza.
1973.
Specific suppression of immune responses by antibody directed against either antigen or receptors for antigen can suppress immunity specifically.
Science
181:1133-1141[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 26.
|
Sarzotti, M. D.,
D. S. Robbins, and P. M. Hoffman.
1996.
Induction of protective CTL responses in newborn mice by a murine retrovirus.
Science
271:1726-1728[Abstract].
|
| 27.
|
Schumacher, C. L.,
B. Dietzschold,
H. C. J. Ertl,
H.-S. Niu,
C. E. Rupprecht, and H. Koprowski.
1989.
Use of mouse anti-rabies monoclonal antibodies in postexposure treatment of rabies.
J. Clin. Invest.
84:971-975.
|
| 28.
|
Tang, D.,
M. DeVit, and S. A. Johnston.
1992.
Genetic immunization is a simple method for eliciting an immune response.
Nature (London)
356:152-154[Medline].
|
| 29.
|
Ulmer, J. B.,
J. J. Donnelly,
S. E. Parker,
G. H. Rhodes,
P. L. Felgner,
V. J. Dwarki,
S. H. Gromkowski,
R. R. Deck,
C. M. DeWitt,
A. Friedman,
L. A. Hawe,
K. R. Leander,
D. Martinez,
H. C. Perry,
J. W. Shiver,
D. L. Montgomery, and M. A. Liu.
1993.
Heterologous protection against influenza by injection of DNA encoding a viral protein.
Science
259:1745-1749[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 30.
|
Wang, Y.,
Z. Xiang,
S. Pasquini, and H. C. J. Ertl.
1997.
Immune response to neonatal genetic immunization.
Virology
228:278-284[Medline].
|
| 31.
|
Wiktor, T. J.
1973.
Tissue culture methods.
WHO Monogr. Ser.
23:101-120.
|
| 32.
|
Wiktor, T. J.,
B. Dietzschold,
N. Leamson, and H. Koprowski.
1977.
Induction and biological properties of defective interfering particles of rabies virus.
J. Virol.
21:626-633[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 33.
|
Wolff, J. A.,
J. J. Ludtke,
G. Acsadi,
P. Williams, and A. Jani.
1992.
Long-term persistence of plasmid DNA and foreign gene expression in mouse muscle.
Hum. Mol. Genet.
1:363-369[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 34.
|
Xiang, Z. Q., and H. C. J. Ertl.
1992.
Maternally transferred antibodies cause long-term impairment of the specific immune response of the offspring.
Virus Res.
24:297-314[Medline].
|
| 35.
|
Xiang, Z. Q.,
B. B. Knowles,
J. W. McCarrick, and H. C. J. Ertl.
1995.
Immune effector mechanisms required for protection to rabies virus.
Virology
214:398-404[Medline].
|
| 36.
|
Xiang, Z. Q.,
S. Pasquini,
Z. He,
H. Deng,
Y. Wang,
M. Blaszczyk-Thurin, and H. C. J. Ertl.
1997.
Genetic vaccines a revolution in vaccinology?
Springer Semin. Immunopathol.
12:257-268.
|
| 37.
|
Xiang, Z. Q.,
S. Spitalnik,
J. Cheng,
J. Erikson,
B. Wojczyk, and H. C. J. Ertl.
1995.
Immune responses to nucleic acid vaccines to rabies virus.
Virology
209:569-579[Medline].
|
| 38.
|
Xiang, Z. Q.,
S. Spitalnik,
M. Tran,
W. H. Wunner,
J. Cheng, and H. C. J. Ertl.
1994.
Vaccination with a plasmid vector carrying the rabies virus glycoprotein gene induces protective immunity against rabies virus.
Virology
199:132-140[Medline].
|
| 39.
|
Xiang, Z. Q.,
Y. Wang,
J. M. Wilson, and H. C. J. Ertl.
1996.
A replication-defective human adenovirus recombinant serves as a highly efficacious vaccine carrier.
Virology
219:220-227[Medline].
|
J Virol, March 1998, p. 1790-1796, Vol. 72, No. 3
0022-538X/98/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1998, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Pertmer, T. M., Oran, A. E., Moser, J. M., Madorin, C. A., Robinson, H. L.
(2000). DNA Vaccines for Influenza Virus: Differential Effects of Maternal Antibody on Immune Responses to Hemagglutinin and Nucleoprotein. J. Virol.
74: 7787-7793
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Schlereth, B., Germann,, P.-G., ter Meulen, V., Niewiesk, S.
(2000). DNA vaccination with both the haemagglutinin and fusion proteins but not the nucleocapsid protein protects against experimental measles virus infection. J. Gen. Virol.
81: 1321-1325
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Hassett, D. E., Zhang, J., Slifka, M., Whitton, J. L.
(2000). Immune Responses following Neonatal DNA Vaccination Are Long-Lived, Abundant, and Qualitatively Similar to Those Induced by Conventional Immunization. J. Virol.
74: 2620-2627
[Abstract]
[Full Text]