Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
J Virol, February 1998, p. 900-909, Vol. 72, No. 2
Molecular Microbiology and Immunology,
University of Missouri
Received 2 September 1997/Accepted 15 October 1997
chkYB-2 is a sequence-specific, single-stranded DNA binding chicken
Y-box protein that promotes Rous sarcoma virus long terminal repeat
(RSV LTR)-driven transcription in avian fibroblasts. The DNA-binding
domain of chkYB-2 has been mapped by characterizing the DNA binding
properties of purified recombinant chkYB-2 mutant polypeptides. The
data indicate that the invariant cold shock domain (CSD) is necessary
but not sufficient for association with DNA and suggest that another
conserved region, adjacent to the carboxyl boundary of the CSD, plays a
role in high-affinity DNA binding. chkYB-2 binds to a tandem repeat of
the 5'-GTACCACC-3' motif on the RSV LTR. Mutational analysis
of this recognition sequence revealed the requirement of an essentially
unaltered template for both high-affinity binding by chkYB-2 as well as maximal transcriptional activity of the RSV LTR in vivo. The
single-stranded DNA binding activity of chkYB-2 is augmented by
Mg2+. The possible significance of this finding for
transactivation by a single-strand DNA binding protein is discussed.
The chicken Y-box protein, chkYB-2,
is a sequence-specific single-stranded DNA binding protein that binds
the octanucleotide motif 5'-GTACCACC-3' present on the
noncoding strand of the Rous sarcoma virus (RSV) long terminal repeat
(LTR) (7). chkYB-2 is expressed abundantly in avian
fibroblasts and muscle tissue, the mesenchymal-lineage host cells most
permissive to infection and tumor formation by RSV. This property
combined with its ability to function as a potent activator of RSV
LTR-driven transcription in avian fibroblasts suggests an important
role for this protein in the virus life cycle (40). We
reported earlier on the cloning and characterization of chkYB-1b,
another Y-box protein that closely resembles chkYB-2 in structure as
well as in its ability to interact with specific motifs in the RSV
enhancer (21). Recently, we also described the cloning of
chkYB-1 homology protein, a potential regulator of Y-box transcription
factors (31).
The Y-box proteins are a new class of DNA and RNA binding factors that
have been shown to function as both transcriptional and translational
regulators of gene expression (39, 47, 48). Genes encoding
the eukaryotic Y-box proteins have been isolated from
Xenopus, chicken, mouse, rat, and human cells. The modular nature of these proteins resembles that of proteins from the
well-characterized families of transcription factors. What is unique,
however, is the wide range of nucleic acid structures to which Y-box
proteins have been reported to bind (2, 8, 9, 16, 18, 26, 34, 36,
42).
The nucleic acid binding properties of Y-box proteins are thought to
reside primarily in the highly conserved cold shock domain (CSD)
(14, 34, 42, 46). The CSD has been described to recognize
diverse double-stranded motifs, especially sites with purine/pyrimidine
asymmetry between strands, as well as different single-stranded DNA
sequences, particularly pyrimidine-rich ones. The CSD also contains the
RNA binding motif RNP-1 (28). While the Y-box proteins share
a near identity over the CSD, they vary widely at their amino termini.
The carboxyl termini, while diverse in primary amino acid sequence,
still retain the charge-zipper motif wherein acidic and basic residues
are organized as alternating islands (34).
Compelling evidence linking Y-box proteins to transcriptional
regulation is accumulating, as the reports on roles played by single-stranded DNA binding proteins in activating transcription. Currently, information on the domain mapping of eukaryotic Y-box proteins is largely limited to work done on the Xenopus
proteins FRGY1 and FRGY2 (4, 43), where it has been
demonstrated that the functions of DNA binding, transactivation, and
multimerization can be localized to different domains. In this report,
we describe the DNA binding properties of mutant polypeptides derived
from chkYB-2. The results indicate that similar to classic
CSD-containing proteins, chkYB-2 has an absolute requirement of the CSD
for its DNA binding ability. However, mutant proteins lacking the
carboxyl-tail domain entirely or partially either were incapable of
binding DNA or bound with markedly lower affinity, suggesting that
while the CSD is necessary, it is not sufficient for high-affinity DNA binding.
5'-GTACCACC-3', the octanucleotide recognition motif for
chkYB-2, is present as a nearly contiguous direct repeat on the
noncoding strand of the RSV LTR. In this report, we also present the
results of mutagenesis analysis of single-stranded oligonucleotides
bearing this motif and correlate the nature of chkYB-2 interactions
observed with these mutants in vitro with the transcriptional activity of RSV LTR reporter constructs carrying identical mutations.
chkYB-2 mutants.
Isolation of the chkYB-2 cDNA clone and its
transfer into the bacterial expression vector pMAL-c2 have been
described previously (7). The deletion mutants are named
according to the amino acids they retain. The derivative denoted with a
0022-538X/98/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1998, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Characterization of the DNA-Binding Domain of the Avian Y-Box
Protein, chkYB-2, and Mutational Analysis of Its Single-Strand Binding
Motif in the Rous Sarcoma Virus Enhancer
Columbia School of Medicine, Columbia,
Missouri 65212
![]()
ABSTRACT
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials & Methods
Results
Discussion
References
![]()
INTRODUCTION
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials & Methods
Results
Discussion
References
![]()
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials & Methods
Results
Discussion
References
lacks the segment delineated by the numbered amino acids. Mutant
1-169 was created by the excision of a PstI-PstI
fragment of pMAL-c2 YB-2 followed by religation. Mutant 1-167 was
constructed by first digesting mutant 1-169 with PstI and
then using T4 DNA polymerase to polish the overhang generated by
PstI. Religation then induces a frameshift such that
out-of-frame nonsense codons are translated after amino acid 167 until
a termination codon is encountered. YB-2 mutant 1-162 was generated
equivalently except that digestion was with EcoNI and end
filling was done with the Klenow fragment of DNA polymerase I. Religation then induces a frameshift as described above. To obtain
mutant 1-155, the EcoRI-ApaI fragment from the 1-169 construct was first treated with T4 DNA polymerase to polish the
ApaI 3' overhang and then subcloned in pMAL-c2.
158-222 was derived directly from
plasmid pMAL-c2 YB-2 by cutting with the restriction enzyme ApaI, which has two sites sharing the same reading frame in
the carboxyl-terminal region of the YB-2 cDNA. The N-terminal deletion mutants were constructed by first generating a PCR product. The primers
used are shown in Table 1. Primers A and
B were used as the forward and reverse primers, respectively, for
mutant YB-2 (75-230). YB-2 (75-298) was constructed by using primers A
and C. Primer pairs D-C and E-C were used for generating the YB-2 (121-298) and YB-2 (158-298) products, respectively. The PCR products were gel eluted, digested with BamHI, and cloned into the
pMAL-c2 vector. All downstream PCR primers had a translational stop
codon incorporated in the reading frame.
TABLE 1.
Sequences of primers used for PCR-generated
YB-2 mutants
Protein preparations. Proteins from all constructs were expressed in Escherichia coli TB1 as described previously (21). All plasmid constructs express hybrid proteins, with the maltose binding protein (MBP) of approximately 40 kDa forming the NH2 terminus in all constructs. The MBP fusion polypeptides were purified on amylose column as described earlier (21) and used in all gel shift assays. When necessary, the fusion protein was cleaved with factor Xa essentially as described by the manufacturer (New England Biolabs). All the experiments reported here have been repeated with at least two to three independent preparations of proteins.
DNA binding assays. Single-stranded oligonucleotides either containing the chkYB-2 wild-type binding site on the RSV LTR or carrying single- or double-point mutations or deletions in the core sequence were synthesized. These sequences are shown in Table 2. Electrophoretic mobility shift assays were carried out as described earlier (23). Binding reaction mixtures (total volume, 20 µl) included 0.1 ng of 32P 5' end-labeled synthetic oligonucleotide probe (~30,000 cpm), 2 µg of poly(dI-dC) · (dI-dC), and 6 to 100 ng of partially purified Mal-chkYB-2 fusion or its mutant derivatives. The binding buffer consisted of 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.0), 75 mM NaCl, 3 mM MgCl2, 100 µg of bovine serum albumin per ml, and 5% (vol/vol) glycerol. The reaction mixtures were incubated for 20 min at room temperature, applied directly onto prerun nondenaturing 6% polyacrylamide gels, and electrophoresed in Tris-glycine buffer as described earlier.
|
Cell culture. Chicken embryo fibroblasts were cultured in medium 199 supplemented with 10% tryptose phosphate broth, 10% calf serum, and 1% chicken serum in plastic dishes at 37°C and 5% CO2 in humidified air as reported earlier (21).
Reporter plasmid constructs.
The reporter vectors carrying
the chloramphenicol acetyltransferase (CAT) gene under the control of
the RSV LTR having point mutations in the chkYB-2 recognition site were
constructed by using PCR-mediated mutagenesis as described earlier
(40). The construction of E4 Del CAT, carrying a deletion in
the E4 region, has also been described earlier (40). The
incorporation of mutations in each of these constructs at the intended
sites was confirmed by double-strand sequencing of the mutant
constructs. Chicken embryo fibroblasts in the mid-log phase of growth
were then transfected with 1 µg of each of these plasmids along with
1.0 µg of pSVGal as an internal control, using Lipofectamine as
instructed by the manufacturer (Gibco BRL). CAT assays were performed
with equal amounts of extracts from these cells, normalized for
-galactosidase activity (11, 15). Transcriptional
activity of each of the LTR constructs was quantified by scraping the
silica gel corresponding to the acetylated chloramphenicol spots seen
on the X-ray autoradiogram and counting it in the scintillation liquid.
All of these experiments were repeated at least three times, and the
averages of the results are presented.
| |
RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
chkYB-2 binds to several single-stranded motifs on the noncoding
strand of the RSV LTR and acts as a potent activator of RSV LTR-driven
transcription in avian fibroblasts. To localize the polypeptide region
that is responsible for site-specific binding to single-stranded DNA,
we performed deletion mutagenesis of YB-2 cDNA. Figure
1A is a line diagram of the mutants that
were created by using standard recombinant DNA methods. Except for one
nested deletion, YB-2 (
158-222), all constructs were either
NH2-terminal or COOH-terminal deletions. The YB-2 (75-230)
mutant has deletions at both termini.
|
Wild-type and mutant YB-2 polypeptides expressed in E. coli as MBP fusion proteins were column purified on amylose,
and aliquots electrophoresed on sodium dodecyl sulfate
(SDS)-polyacrylamide gels (data not shown). In all cases, a protein
of the expected size was obtained. Wild-type and mutant YB-2 proteins
were examined for DNA binding activity by carrying out gel shift
assays, using a radiolabeled single-stranded response element from the
RSV LTR (LTR
106/
135 [Table 2]), shown in this report to be the
maximum affinity binding site of chkYB-2.
In chkYB-2, the CSD extends from amino acids (aa) 86 to 155 (Fig.
1B). The first construct that we made was YB-2 (
158-222). The
internal deletion of 66 aa in the carboxyl-tail domain created a mutant
with intact amino-terminal and CSDs. If the CSD is sufficient for DNA
binding, this mutant polypeptide would be expected to bind DNA. As seen
in Fig. 2 (lane 9), no binding to DNA was
observed in an in vitro DNA binding assay. DNA binding was tested under different salt conditions, using up to 2 µg of the protein prepared from several independent clones, as well as after cleavage of the MBP
fusion with factor Xa (data not shown). No binding was detected under
any of these conditions. There are two possible explanations for the
total abrogation of DNA binding upon the deletion of these 66 aa. This
66-aa stretch is immediate to the carboxyl side of the carboxyl
boundary (aa 155) of the CSD. Given the proximity to the
well-structured CSD, this deletion could have resulted in a major
functional deformity in the protein leading to loss of DNA binding. An
alternative explanation for the nonfunctionality of this mutant in
terms of DNA binding is that the deleted aa 158 to 222, or at least
some of them, are part of the minimum DNA binding domain, which in
chkYB-2 could extend beyond the strict confines of the conserved
residues of the CSD.
|
To map the carboxyl boundary of the DNA binding activity of chkYB-2, we constructed the YB-2 (1-169) and YB-2 (158-298) mutants and assayed their ability to bind DNA. YB-2 (158-298) expresses only the carboxyl-tail domain of YB-2, the entire CSD and amino terminus having been deleted. As seen in Fig. 2 (lane 13), the YB-2 (158-298) mutant did not bind DNA. This result indicated that the carboxyl half of the protein cannot independently bind DNA. Although the residues in the 158-222 region are critical for DNA binding, they of themselves do not confer DNA binding activity in the absence of the CSD.
Mutant YB-2 (1-169) retains the CSD and, unlike YB-2 (
158-222), has
14 residues to the immediate carboxyl side of the CSD intact. As seen
in Fig. 2 (lane 5), this polypeptide bound DNA, albeit with a
10-fold-lower affinity than the wild-type YB-2 protein (lanes 3 and 4, containing factor Xa-cleaved and MBP fusion proteins, respectively).
The partial restoration of DNA binding activity upon preservation of
residues 156 to 169 supports our belief that the domain subserving DNA
binding in YB-2 extends beyond the CSD. Construction of mutants with
their carboxyl termini at different positions between aa 169 and 298 is
currently under way. DNA binding assays with these proteins would help
in defining precisely the carboxyl boundary of the polypeptide
displaying full restoration of DNA binding activity.
We were curious to know if all of the 14 residues in the short carboxyl
tail of YB-2 (1-169) were necessary for DNA binding activity or whether
small truncations in this region would be tolerated. Progressive
C-terminal deletions of YB-2 (1-169) yielded the mutants YB-2 (1-167)
and YB-2 (1-162). Gel shift assays were carried out with these mutant
polypeptides to determine their ability to bind DNA. As seen in Fig. 2
(lanes 6 and 7), YB-2 (1-167) bound less avidly than YB-2 (1-169) and
YB-2 (1-162) bound even less than YB-2 (1-167), showing that
progressive deletions were deleterious to DNA binding. This effect was
clearly seen when DNA binding was totally lost with the YB-2 (1-155)
mutant (lane 8). The deletion in YB-2 (1-155) removes the entire
carboxyl-tail domain of YB-2 up to the carboxyl boundary of the CSD.
The total absence of DNA binding with the YB-2 (1-155) protein is
similar to the behavior of the YB-2 (
158-222) mutant. Taken
together, these results indicate that in chkYB-2, the CSD is
necessary but not sufficient for DNA binding activity.
Interestingly, in gel shift assays, the DNA-protein complexes formed by the YB-2 (1-169), (1-167), and (1-162) mutants migrated more slowly than the complexes formed by the full-size protein. The YB-2 (1-162) protein in fact forms two complexes, one a faster-migrating complex similar to the wild-type YB-2 protein and the other a slower-migrating complex similar to those formed by the YB-2 (1-169) and (1-167) proteins. This was surprising, considering the fact that on SDS-polyacrylamide gels the migration of these polypeptides was proportional to their molecular weights. This pattern was reproduced even when DNA binding assays were carried out with factor Xa-cleaved protein, ruling out any artifacts introduced by the MBP moiety. The formation of multimeric complexes is a likely explanation for the above observation. Further experiments are, however, required to demonstrate unequivocally if these mutant proteins do indeed exist as multimers, either in solution or upon binding DNA.
We also constructed YB-2 mutants lacking portions of their N termini. The mutant YB-2 (121-298) disrupts the CSD and as expected showed negligible DNA binding ability (Fig. 2, lane 12). The mutant YB-2 (75-298), while carrying a large deletion at its amino terminus, still retains the entire CSD and could be expected to bind DNA. However, this mutant protein also showed minimal ability to bind DNA. A possible explanation for this could be the proximity of the deletion to the CSD. Given the behavior of this mutant, it was not surprising that the double-deletion mutant YB-2 (75-230) demonstrated no ability to bind DNA (Fig. 2, lane 10). We also tested the ability of the YB-2 (1-169) mutant to bind a series of unrelated single-stranded and double-stranded DNA oligonucleotides to which wild-type YB-2 had not bound. No binding was observed (data not shown). We also examined the ability of this mutant to bind the different RSV LTR mutant oligonucleotides shown in Table 2. The relative binding affinity of YB-2 (1-169) to these mutants (data not shown) always paralleled the results obtained with the full-size protein, indicating that although YB-2 (1-169) binds with less affinity than the wild-type YB-2, there is no relaxation in the sequence specificity. The components of the YB-2 protein molecule that are involved in sequence-specific recognition probably reside within the 1-169 region.
In summary, the DNA binding studies with the chkYB-2 mutants described above indicate that the CSD is important for DNA binding and that the carboxyl-terminal charge-zipper domain has no independent ability to bind DNA. The CSD mediates sequence-specific recognition as well as binding to single-stranded DNA. It is also evident that unlike the bacterial cold shock proteins wherein the CSD alone is adequate for DNA binding, the residues that make up the CSD in chkYB-2 are necessary but not sufficient for DNA binding. Apparently, the residues to the carboxyl side of CSD, even if not part of the binding domain, contribute to the generation of stable complexes with DNA, at least in vitro.
Some Y-box proteins are known to bind DNA more avidly in the presence
of magnesium (18). Magnesium also appears to play a role in
the nucleic acid interactions of several other RNA binding proteins
(27). We carried out gel shift assays to examine the effects
of different concentrations (0 to 20 mM) of several divalent cations
(Mg2+, Ca2+, Mn2+, and
Zn2+), as well as spermidine, a polyvalent cation. The
results of these gel shift assays are shown in Fig.
3. Addition of magnesium chloride to
final concentrations of 3 to 10 mM in the binding reaction increased
DNA binding more than 10-fold, with maximum effect seen at 5 mM; 20 mM
MgCl2, however, had an inhibitory effect. A similar effect
was noted with spermidine. While 3 or 5 mM CaCl2 stimulated
binding severalfold, concentrations of 10 mM and above were inhibitory.
MnCl2 at 3 and 5 mM promoted binding, although less than
for the other ions. As found for CaCl2, MnCl2
concentrations of 10 mM or more were inhibitory. In contrast to the
stimulatory effects of these cations, the addition of even 3 mM
ZnCl2 was inhibitory to the formation of DNA-protein
complexes, with higher ionic strengths essentially eliminating
binding. Figure 3 (lane 2) shows the binding of 6 ng of
chkYB-2 protein to the radiolabeled LTR oligonucleotide
106/
135, in the absence of any divalent cation. Lanes 3 and 4 show
the remarkable increase in DNA binding upon the addition of 5 mM
MgCl2 or spermidine, respectively. Lanes 6 and 7 show
the stimulation of binding in the presence of 3 mM CaCl2
and 3 mM MnCl2, respectively. ZnCl2 at 3 mM
inhibited binding (lane 8). This inhibition was, however,
neutralized upon the addition of either 3 mM MgCl2 (lane 9)
or 3 mM each MgCl2 and spermidine (lane 10) to the
reaction.
|
The exact significance of the effect of a cationic environment on chkYB-2-DNA interactions is not known. We are not aware of any specific metal ion binding motifs on the chkYB-2 protein. We were curious to know if these results could be reproduced with any of the YB-2 mutants that we have made. We tested the DNA binding activity of the YB-2 (1-169) mutant protein either in the absence of cations or in the presence of MgCl2, spermidine, or CaCl2. As shown in Fig. 4, the addition of 5 mM MgCl2 (lane 3), 5 mM spermidine (lane 4), or 3 mM CaCl2 (lane 5) significantly promoted DNA binding compared to DNA binding carried out in the absence of any of these ions (lane 2). Lanes 2 to 5 contained 10 ng of the protein. The same effect was repeated when 50 ng of the protein was used in each binding reaction (lanes 7 to 10).
|
Effects of point mutations in the core binding site for chkYB-2. We have shown earlier that the E4 region in the RSV LTR is important for maximal enhancer activity (40). We also reported that the recognition motif for chkYB-2, the octamer 5'-GTACCACC-3', is located in this region. Also, transfection experiments using E4-deleted LTR constructs and chkYB-2 antisense oligonucleotides had demonstrated that the ability of chkYB-2 to act as an activator was mediated primarily through this octanucleotide motif. Our earlier work had shown that this protein bound with various affinities several different single-stranded oligonucleotides spanning the RSV LTR. We aligned the sequences of all these oligonucleotides to which chkYB-2 had bound and looked for a consensus sequence. This comparison revealed that the 12-mer 5'-TCGTACCACCTT-3' is the common motif. This is essentially the previously described octamer 5'-GTACCACC-3' extended by two nucleotides each in the 5' and 3' directions.
The 21-mer oligonucleotide E4C1, bearing this motif and corresponding to the region from
103 to
123 on the noncoding strand of the RSV
LTR, was hence used as the wild-type binding motif, and systematic
point mutations spanning the entire motif were introduced (Table 2).
End-labeled oligonucleotides, adjusted for specific activity, were then
used in gel shift assays. A summary of the binding results is presented
in Table 2. The gel shift assay shown in Fig.
5 is representative of some of the
oligonucleotides used. It is evident from these results that the
binding of YB-2 to its recognition motif was abolished upon the
introduction of any mutation in the core octamer, except for the mutant
oligonucleotide E4C2 M101, where replacement of G with a C at position
3 appeared to be well tolerated. The other exception was the mutant
E4C2 M106, where replacement of C with a T at position 9 did not affect binding. However, when the adjacent C was also replaced by a T, to
yield the double mutant E4C2 M111, binding was abolished. Nucleotides at positions 11 and 12 did not appear to be critical, as shown by
binding equivalent to wild-type binding by the mutant E4C2 M107.
Binding to oligonucleotides with mutations at positions 1 and 2 (E4C2
M108 and E4C2 M109, respectively) was significantly less than binding
to E4C1. These results indicate that the single-stranded DNA binding
protein chkYB-2 binds its ligand in a sequence-specific manner and
that maximum binding affinity requires the presence of at least the
5'-TCGTACCACC-3' decamer motif.
|
112 to
119), revealed the presence of an almost identical
5'-CTACCACC-3' (
123 to
130) motif. Also, the gel shift
assays described above had shown that the replacement of the nucleotide
G in the motif with a C, as in the mutant E4C2 M101, did not decrease
the affinity of chkYB-2 binding (Table 2). Hence, the
112 to
130 region of the RSV LTR can be viewed as providing two potential
sites for high-affinity binding by chkYB-2. To examine the affinity of chkYB-2 to DNA bearing such a double motif, we synthesized the
oligonucleotide LTR
106/
135 (Table 2). Unlike the oligonucleotide E4C1 (extending from
103 to
123), which has only the first octamer motif, this new oligonucleotide, by extending from
106 to
135, incorporates both the 5' and 3' octamer motifs. The gel shift assay
(Fig. 5) showed that the ability of chkYB-2 to bind LTR
106/
135
(lane 8) was severalfold greater than that observed with E4C1 (lane 1).
As found for X2/E4C1, another slower-migrating complex was also seen as
a minor component. Surprisingly, the size of the major protein-DNA
complex formed with the double-motif oligonucleotide was comparable to
the one found with the single-motif DNA. This finding suggests that
only a monomer was complexing with the LTR
106/
135 oligonucleotide
to form the major retarded species. These results suggest that it would
be more accurate to consider these 5'-GTACCACC-3' repeats as
providing two half-sites, rather than two full motifs, for chkYB-2
binding. It is also evident that binding to this native double-octamer
motif on the RSV LTR is comparable to the binding observed with the
synthetic construct X2/E4C1, carrying a perfect repeat of the 12-mer
5'-TCGTACCACCTT-3' motif (lane 7). These experiments with
X2/E4C1 and LTR
106/
135 were done with limiting amounts (6 ng) of
the chkYB-2 protein. When these experiments were repeated with
progressively larger amounts of protein, there was only a slight
increase in the amount of the slower-migrating complex (data not
shown). Since the formation of the faster-migrating species is an
apparent prerequisite for the formation of the second, more slowly
migrating species, these probably represent one and two molecules of
chkYB-2, respectively. However, considering the low rate at which
the slower-migrating complex forms, the binding of the second molecule
is apparently not cooperative in nature. Curiously, chkYB-2
demonstrated good binding to another 30-mer oligonucleotide that had
the same sequence as the oligonucleotide LTR
106/
135 except that it
was synthesized in the antiparallel direction (Fig. 5, lane 9). We are
not aware whether this apparent ability to bind the recognition motif
without regard to its polarity has been reported earlier for other
single-stranded DNA binding proteins.
Considering the above results, which we obtained with the LTR
106/
135 oligonucleotide, we wished to explore by mutational analysis whether point mutations introduced in one of the motifs adversely affected the ability of chkYB-2 to interact with the second motif. Toward this end, we designed mutant oligonucleotides (E4M
series [Table 2]) representing the
109 to
135 region, such that
identical point mutations were introduced in either the 5' or 3'
octanucleotide motif alone or in both motifs simultaneously. One set of
mutant oligonucleotides was designed based on the negligible protein
binding that we had observed with the E4C2 M103 mutant (Fig. 5, lane
2). The same A
G change was made in either the 5' or 3' motif or both
motifs (E4M103-1C, E4M103-2C, or E4M103-3C, respectively). The other
set of mutants was based on the E4C2 M106 mutant, wherein a C
T
change apparently did not affect the formation of DNA-protein complexes
(Fig. 5, lane 6). The oligonucleotides E4M106-1C, E4M106-2C, and
E4M106-3C thus represent a C
T change in the 5', 3', and both 5' and
3' octanucleotide motifs, respectively. The results of chkYB-2
binding to these mutant constructs compared to the wild type are
presented in Fig. 6a. chkYB-2 showed
reduced affinity for both M103-1C and M103-2C, indicating the
contribution of both motifs for maximal binding. Not surprisingly,
negligible binding was observed with the double mutant M103-3C. In
contrast, binding to the E4M106 set of mutants was essentially
unaffected.
|
112 to
130
region described earlier as the site of two motifs for chkYB-2
binding. Furthermore, the point mutations introduced in these six
constructs reflect exactly the changes made in either the 5' or 3'
octamer motif or both binding motifs while designing the E4M series of
mutant oligonucleotides.
Chicken embryo fibroblasts were chosen for the transfection
experiments, as chkYB-2 is expressed abundantly in these cells and
has been demonstrated to activate RSV LTR-driven transcription in these
cells, primarily through its interaction with recognition motifs
present within the
112 to
130 region (40). Cells in the
mid-log phase of growth were transfected with 1 µg of each of these
plasmids, along with 1 µg of the internal control plasmid, pSVGal.
CAT assays were performed with protein extracts normalized to
-galactosidase activity. A representative autoradiogram (Fig. 6b)
and the average results of three identical experiments (Fig. 6c) are
presented. These results reveal that point mutations in either the 5'
or 3' motif (M103-1CAT or M103-2CAT, respectively) reduced the
transcriptional activity of the RSV LTR by about 20 to 25%. The
decrease in transcriptional activity upon the introduction of point
mutations in the two separate motifs is synergistic, as evidenced by
the much greater reduction in transcriptional activity of the double
mutant (M103-3CAT) compared with either single mutant alone. The
activity of this double mutant (mutations are at positions
114 and
125) was, however, much higher than that observed with E4 Del CAT, an
RSV LTR construct carrying a 14-nucleotide deletion (
114 to
127)
that encompasses both chkYB-2 binding motifs. A possible
interpretation of this finding is that although in vitro chkYB-2
bound negligibly to this double mutant (M103-3C [Fig. 6a]), in vivo,
low-affinity interactions with this mutant YB-2 motif probably occur
and contribute to transactivation of the LTR, albeit less efficiently.
Even these low-affinity interactions apparently cannot take place when
both motifs are completely deleted, as in E4 Del CAT. Alternatively,
this result could reflect the fact that protein-DNA interactions, other
than those mediated by chkYB-2, contribute to transactivation from
this deleted region. Figure 6c also shows that compared to the M103-CAT
constructs, the M106-CAT constructs did not show significant reductions
in transcriptional activity, with even the double mutant M106-CAT displaying transcriptional activity comparable to wild-type RSV LTR.
In summary, the results presented above show a correlation between the
transcriptional activities of RSV LTR constructs carrying point
mutations in the chkYB-2 binding motifs and the relative affinities
of the corresponding mutant oligonucleotides as assayed by DNA-protein
complex formation in vitro. Additionally, our results also show that
(i) both of the chkYB-2 recognition motifs contribute to RSV
LTR-driven transcription and (ii) the interaction of chkYB-2 with
these adjacent motifs is probably just additive and not cooperative in
nature, since the reduction in transcription observed from the double
mutant (M103-3CAT) was not more than the cumulative reduction in
transcriptional activities of the single mutants. These results are
also in agreement with our interpretation of the chkYB-2 binding
assays with LTR
106/
135, which suggested that the
112 to
130
region is best viewed as providing a single high-affinity binding site
for chkYB-2, with each octamer motif behaving as a half-site.
| |
DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
chkYB-2 was originally isolated by screening a chicken embryo
fibroblast cDNA expression library by using a probe corresponding to
the U3 enhancer region of the RSV LTR (7). We have
since demonstrated that purified, recombinant chkYB-2
specifically recognizes the 5'-GTACCACC-3' single-stranded
motif on the noncoding strand of the RSV enhancer and acts as an
activator of RSV LTR-driven transcription in avian fibroblasts
(40). An understanding of the mechanism by which a factor
like chkYB-2, which binds only single-stranded DNA templates yet
acts as a transcriptional activator, would be facilitated by studies
delineating the functional domains in the protein involved in DNA
binding, multimerization, and transactivation. As a first step toward
this, we report here the DNA binding properties of bacterially
expressed and partially purified, recombinant chkYB-2 mutant
polypeptides to a single-stranded response element (
106 to
135) of
the RSV enhancer.
The specific DNA binding activities of several transcription factors have been localized to relatively small domains consisting of 60 to 100 aa. chkYB-2, an avian Y-box protein, is a 298-aa polypeptide. Like other Y-box transcription factors, chkYB-2 is characterized by the presence of the invariant CSD located in an intermediate position and flanked by variable amino and carboxyl-terminal domains. Wistow (46) initially proposed that the CSD is a structural motif involved in protein-nucleic acid interactions. The CSD is 43% identical to CS7.4, the 70-aa major cold shock protein of E. coli (14). Unlike the Y-box proteins, the E. coli cold shock proteins do not have the additional tail domain. CS7.4, nevertheless, binds DNA in a sequence-specific manner, suggesting that this domain is adequate for DNA binding. Studies on CspB (38), a cold shock protein of Bacillus subtilis, revealed the three-dimensional structure of its nucleic acid binding domain and suggested that the structural organization of the CSD was best suited for interaction with single-stranded nucleic acids.
Mutagenesis analysis of Xenopus Y-box proteins had shown the CSD to be the primary domain responsible for both DNA and RNA binding (43). However, there are few data on the domain analysis of other eukaryotic Y-box proteins. Notwithstanding the strong conservation of the CSD, a remarkable feature of the Y-box proteins characterized thus far has been their ability to bind diverse double- and single-stranded DNA sequences, as well as RNA. It is hence likely that although the highly conserved amino acids in the CSD confer a structural framework for DNA binding, the determinants of binding specificity reside in the variable amino and carboxyl regions of the protein. The highly hydrophilic, carboxyl-tail domain (Fig. 1B) is a more likely candidate because, despite the divergence in primary amino acid sequence (e.g., only 50% identity between chkYB-2 and chkYB-1b), the organization of the residues into alternating clusters of acidic and basic residues to create a charge-zipper motif is a feature that is conserved among all Y-box proteins.
Similarities between classic Y-box proteins and chkYB-2 predicted that DNA binding would be mediated by CSD. However, a mutant chkYB-2 protein, lacking a 60-aa region in the carboxyl-tail domain, was found incapable of binding DNA. It therefore became interesting to determine the potential contribution of the carboxyl domain for interactions with DNA. The data presented in this study provide evidence that even in chkYB-2, the CSD is indeed indispensable but not sufficient for DNA binding. While low-affinity, site-specific binding is obtainable with carboxyl-domain truncation mutants that have an intact CSD and as few as 10 to 14 adjacent residues of the carboxyl tail, high-affinity binding requires that apart from the CSD, larger segments of the carboxyl domain remain intact in the protein.
Tafuri and Wolffe (43) had reported that progressive deletion of the carboxyl terminus of FRGY2, a Xenopus Y-box protein, resulted in a reduction in the number of complexes formed with DNA. Binding to DNA, however, remained specific, even where the entire carboxyl-tail domain was removed. Removal of the CSD, however, led to a loss of specific DNA binding. They obtained similar results with the closely related FRGY1 protein and concluded that the CSD was essential for specific DNA binding, whereas the hydrophilic carboxyl-tail domain facilitated the formation of multiple protein-DNA complexes. It was also demonstrated that in both FRGY1 and FRGY2, the CSD was adequate for stimulation of transcription, both in vitro and in vivo (35, 42, 43).
In chkYB-2, the CSD extends from aa 86 to 155. However, we detected no DNA binding with the mutant chkYB-2 (1-155), which has an intact CSD but no carboxyl tail. Low-affinity DNA binding ability returned incrementally upon the progressive lengthening of the carboxyl tail, as evidenced by the complexes formed by the chkYB-2 mutants (1-162), (1-167), and (1-169). Significantly, we found no evidence of a relaxation in site specificity when the chkYB-2 (1-169) mutant was tested for its ability to bind several unrelated oligonucleotides, both single stranded and double stranded. While the lack of binding of the YB-2 (1-155) mutant could be explained by the proximity of the truncation to the carboxyl boundary of the CSD, the fact that even the chkYB-2 (1-169) mutant bound with only a 10-fold-lower affinity than the wild type suggests that the residues in the carboxyl domain beyond the CSD either are part of an extended DNA binding domain or contribute indirectly to the ability of chkYB-2 protein to complex with DNA. This possibility is further strengthened by our finding that the strong amino acid sequence conservation between eukaryotic Y-box proteins was not confined to the 70-aa CSD alone. A comparison of the sequence of the carboxyl-tail domain of chkYB-2 with those of other vertebrate Y-box proteins revealed an additional 32-aa conserved region contiguous with the carboxyl boundary of the classic CSD. Except for a single amino acid change, the aa 156-187 region showed 100% identity to human dbpA and greater than 70% identity to the Xenopus, chicken, mouse, and human YB-1 proteins.
The basic islands in the carboxyl-tail domain contain arginine clusters, which are frequently found in several RNA binding proteins and are thought to increase the potential for nucleic acid binding (5). We have recently demonstrated that chkYB-2 binds single-stranded RNA in a sequence-specific manner and that YB-2 mutants [including YB-2 (1-169)] that lack the carboxyl tail fail to bind RNA (unpublished results). These results are in agreement with the recent report by Bouvet et al. (4) which shows that RNA binding by FRGY2 is facilitated by both the amino- and carboxyl-terminal regions flanking the CSD, indicating contributions from regions beyond the CSD for optimal nucleic acid interactions.
The chkYB-2 (158-298) mutant did not bind DNA, showing that the carboxyl-tail domain had no independent ability to bind DNA. This is similar to the results obtained by Murray (30), who found that recombinant FRGY2 proteins expressing only the carboxyl-tail domain were incapable of binding DNA. In contrast to FRGY2, wherein the presence of the carboxyl-tail domain facilitated the formation of multiple protein-DNA complexes (43), we found that chkYB-2 mutants lacking the carboxyl-tail domain appeared to multimerize upon DNA binding.
The ability of Y-box factors to bind both single- and double-stranded DNA distinguishes them from other transcription factors. Impressive evidence implicating Y-box proteins in transcriptional regulation has accumulated in recent years. Reports of Y-box factors transactivating from viral promoters include the role of EF1A (12, 17) and chkYB-2 (40) in RSV LTR transcription and that of YB-1 in stimulating transcription from the human T-cell lymphotropic virus type 1, human immunodeficiency virus, and JCV virus promoters (22, 24). Y-box factors are also involved in the regulation of cellular genes. For example, YB-1 represses transcription of major histocompatibility complex class II genes (44) and acts as an activator of the MDR1 gene (1), and FRGY2 promotes transcription from the Xenopus hsp70 promoter (43).
Our earlier experiments have shown that chkYB-2 binds the
single-stranded motif 5'-GTACCACC-3' on the noncoding strand
of the RSV enhancer and promotes RSV LTR-driven transcription. In this
study, we present the results of systematic mutational analysis of this
motif. Gel shift assays using a series of oligonucleotides carrying
point mutations spanning the entire 5'-GTACCACC-3' motif revealed that almost every nucleotide in the octamer was absolutely essential for high-affinity binding. A closer examination of the RSV
LTR sequence showed that this octanucleotide motif
(5'-[G/C]TACCACC-3') was in fact present as a tandem
repeat in the
112 to
130 region. DNA binding assays carried out
with a single-stranded oligonucleotide spanning this region showed a
severalfold augmentation of DNA binding compared to oligonucleotides
bearing a single motif. Also, the nature of complexes formed on gel
shift assays suggested that the repeats behave more like two half-sites
rather than two independent binding motifs. The importance of this
region for chkYB-2 binding was further confirmed by introducing
point mutations in the two half-sites in RSV LTR reporter constructs.
Our results clearly demonstrate that mutations that decreased binding
affinity in vitro also led to a decrease in the transcriptional
activity of the corresponding mutant RSV LTR constructs.
chkYB-2 binds single- but not double-stranded DNA. The B. subtilis Y-box protein CspB has been shown to be capable of binding single-stranded but not double-stranded DNA (38). Also, NSEP-1 binds pyrimidine-rich single-stranded DNA (26), and YB-1 binds single-strand motifs with greater affinity than double-strand ones (29, 33). Apart from the Y-box proteins, the characterization of several other eukaryotic single-stranded DNA binding proteins has been reported (37, 41, 45). Other members of this growing family include the single-strand binding protein that complexes with the noncoding strand of the TSH receptor gene promoter and stimulates transcription (32), a pyrimidine single-strand-specific protein (ssPyrBF) that interacts with the androgen receptor gene promoter (6), and FUSE-binding protein, a single-stranded DNA binding protein whose role in transcription regulation of the c-myc gene has been well documented (10).
Experiments carried out to determine the effect of magnesium on DNA binding revealed the remarkable increase in affinity upon the addition of 3 to 5 mM Mg2+. Enhancement of DNA binding upon the addition of MgCl2 has been reported for two closely related Y-box proteins, human dbpA and dbpB (18). The effect of magnesium on FRGY2 binding to RNA has also been described (27). While the authors found Mg2+ to interfere with binding by the CSD over a range of 1 to 5 mM, it appeared to favor binding by the tail domains. Unr is a recently described DNA and RNA binding protein that is characterized by the presence of a fivefold repeat of the CSD but with no tail domains (20). Interestingly, the interaction of Unr with either DNA or RNA was very sensitive to even low concentrations of magnesium. Addition of Mg2+ markedly decreased the affinity of binding, which was in contrast to the results we observed with chkYB-2. In fact, even chkYB-2 (1-169), a mutant with a large truncation in the tail domain, demonstrated increased DNA binding in the presence of Mg2+.
Magnesium is the most abundant intracellular divalent cation and is known to be required for the activity of several DNA repair enzymes. A recent report (13) that describes the effect of Mg2+ on protein binding and structural transitions in a retroviral promoter, however, suggests that Mg2+ may also be physiologically relevant for the optimum activity of single-stranded DNA binding transactivators. The authors reported that in the presence of Mg2+, the binding of a nuclear factor to a polypurine/polypyrimidine DNA sequence element (NRE1) in the mouse mammary tumor virus LTR led to the appearance of single-stranded regions upstream. Also, factor binding to single-stranded DNA was facilitated by the presence of Mg2+. As the authors pointed out, in order for single-strand binding proteins to successfully bind and regulate transcription, there needs to be a mechanism that will expose single-stranded regions in the promoters of genes. Binding of a protein factor(s) that induces Mg2+-dependent structural transitions that allows a second, Mg2+-dependent single-stranded DNA binding factor(s) to make contact with the exposed single strand is a possible solution to this problem.
chkYB-2 binds selectively to the pyrimidine-rich strand of the
112 to
130 region of the RSV LTR. The only other region (
142 to
161) in the LTR exhibiting a greater degree of purine/pyrimidine strand asymmetry is located about 10 bp upstream. Regions of strong purine/pyrimidine strand asymmetry that can assume an H-DNA
conformation have been identified in the promoter elements of the
c-myc and
-globin genes (19, 25). The
pyrimidine-rich single strand is apparently accessible for interactions
with proteins in these H-DNA regions. YB-1 has been shown to induce or
stabilize single-stranded regions in a major histocompatibility complex
class II gene promoter (29), and FUSE-binding protein has
been reported to induce targeted melting of c-myc promoter
prior to binding its single-strand recognition element on the noncoding
strand (3). The regions of strand asymmetry in the RSV LTR
may be too short to form H-DNA. However, localized melting of
double-stranded DNA could expose the CT-rich strand for chkYB-2
binding.
In summary, we have characterized the functional domains in chkYB-2 responsible for its DNA binding activity, examined the effects, both in vitro and in vivo, of mutations in its binding motif, and discussed the possible relevance of Mg2+-dependent binding for transcriptional activation by a sequence-specific, single-stranded DNA binding protein.
| |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
We thank K. Krishnaveni for technical assistance and the University of Missouri DNA Core Facility for automated sequencing. We also thank D. Pintel for comments and Karen Ehlert for help in preparation of the manuscript.
This work was supported by a NIH grant 1 RO1 CA54192 to R.V.G.
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
*
Corresponding author. Mailing address: Molecular
Microbiology and Immunology, University of Missouri
Columbia School of
Medicine, M616 Medical Sciences Bldg., Columbia, MO 65212. Phone:
(573) 882-7139. Fax: (573) 882-4287. E-mail:
guntaka{at}showme.missouri.edu.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| 1. | Bargou, R. C., K. Jurchott, C. Wagener, S. Bergmann, S. Metzner, K. Bommert, M. Y. Mapara, K. J. Winzer, M. Dietel, B. Dorken, and H. D. Royer. 1997. Nuclear localization and increased levels of transcription factor YB-1 in primary human breast cancers are associated with intrinsic MDR1 gene expression. Nat. Med. 3:447-450[Medline]. |
| 2. |
Bayarsaihan, D.,
B. Enkhmandakh, and L. N. Lukens.
1996.
Y-box proteins interact with the S1 nuclease-sensitive site in the chicken 2(I) collagen gene promoter.
Biochem. J.
319:203-207.
|
| 3. |
Bazar, L.,
D. Meighen,
V. Harris,
R. Duncan,
D. Levens, and M. Avigan.
1995.
Targeted melting and binding of a DNA regulatory element by a transactivator of c-myc.
J. Biol. Chem.
270:8241-8248 |
| 4. |
Bouvet, P.,
K. Matsumoto, and A. P. Wolffe.
1995.
Sequence-specific RNA recognition by the Xenopus Y-box proteins.
J. Biol. Chem.
270:28297-28303 |
| 5. |
Burd, C. G., and G. Dreyfuss.
1994.
Conserved structures and diversity of functions of RNA binding proteins.
Science
265:615-621 |
| 6. |
Chen, S.,
P. C. Supakar,
R. L. Vellanoweth,
C. S. Song,
B. Chatterjee, and A. K. Roy.
1997.
Functional role of a conformationally flexible homopurine/homopyrimidine domain of the androgen receptor gene promoter interacting with Sp1 and a pyrimidine single-strand DNA binding protein.
Mol. Endocrinol.
11:3-15 |
| 7. | Cleavinger, P. J., B. A. Shin, J. C. Kandala, A. Nambiar, S. K. Swamynathan, and R. V. Guntaka. 1996. Cloning of Rous Sarcoma virus enhancer factor genes II. RSV-EF-II, abundantly expressed in fibroblasts and muscle tissue, binds to an octamer sequence, 5'-GTACCACC-3' in the noncoding strand of RSV enhancer. Virology 222:133-143[Medline]. |
| 8. |
Cohen, I., and W. F. Reynolds.
1991.
The Xenopus YB3 protein binds the B-box element of the class III promoter.
Nucleic Acids Res.
19:4753-4759 |
| 9. | Didier, D. K., J. Schiffenbauer, S. L. Wolffe, M. Zacheis, and B. D. Schwartz. 1992. Characterization of the cDNA encoding a protein binding to the major histocompatibility complex class II Y-box. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 85:7322-7326. |
| 10. |
Duncan, R.,
L. Bazar,
G. Michelotti,
T. Tomonaga,
H. Krutzsch,
M. Avigan, and D. Levens.
1994.
A sequence-specific, single-strand binding protein activates the far upstream element of c-myc and defines a new DNA binding motif.
Genes Dev.
8:465-480 |
| 11. | Eustice, D. C., P. A. Feldman, A. M. Colberg-Poley, R. M. Buckery, and R. H. Neubauer. 1991. A sensitive method for the detection of beta-galactosidase in transfected mammalian cells. BioTechniques 11:739-742. |
| 12. |
Faber, M., and L. Sealy.
1990.
Rous sarcoma virus enhancer factor I is a ubiquitous CCAAT transcription factor highly related to CBF and NF-Y.
J. Biol. Chem.
265:22243-22254 |
| 13. | Giffin, W., and R. J. G. Haché. 1995. Nuclear factor binding to a DNA sequence element that represses MMTV transcription induces a structural transition and leads to the contact of single-stranded binding proteins with DNA. DNA Cell Biol. 14:1025-1035[Medline]. |
| 14. |
Goldstein, J.,
N. S. Pollitt, and M. Inouye.
1990.
Major cold shock protein of Escherichia coli.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
87:283-287 |
| 15. |
Gorman, C. M.,
L. F. Moffat, and B. H. Howard.
1982.
Recombinant genomes which express chloramphenicol acetyl transferance in mammalian cells.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
2:1044-1051 |
| 16. |
Grant, C. E., and R. G. Deeley.
1993.
Cloning and characterization of chicken YB-1: regulation of expression in liver.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
13:4186-4196 |
| 17. | Gruel, B. T., L. Sealy, and J. E. Majors. 1990. Transcriptional activity of the Rous sarcoma virus long terminal repeat correlates with binding of a factor to an upstream CCAAT box in vitro. Virology 177:33-43[Medline]. |
| 18. |
Hasegawa, S. L.,
P. W. Doetsch,
K. K. Hamilton,
A. M. Martin,
S. A. Okenquist,
J. Lenz, and J. M. Boss.
1991.
DNA binding properties of YB-1 and dbpA: binding to double-stranded, single-stranded, and abasic site containing DNAs.
Nucleic Acids Res.
19:4915-4920 |
| 19. |
Horwitz, E. M.,
K. A. Maloney, and T. J. Ley.
1994.
A human protein containing a cold shock domain binds specifically to H-DNA upstream from the human gamma-globin genes.
J. Biol. Chem.
269:14130-14139 |
| 20. |
Jacquemin-Sablon, H.,
G. Triqueneaux,
S. Deschamps,
M. LeMaire,
J. Doniger, and F. Dautry.
1994.
Nucleic acid binding and intracellular localization of unr, a protein with five cold shock domains.
Nucleic Acids Res.
22:2643-2650 |
| 21. | Kandala, J. C., and R. V. Guntaka. 1994. Cloning of Rous sarcoma virus enhancer factor genes. 1. Evidence that RSV-EF-I is related to Y-box (inverted CCAAT) binding proteins and binds to multiple motifs in the RSV enhancer. Virology 198:514-523[Medline]. |
| 22. |
Kashanchi, F.,
J. F. Duvall,
J. Dittmer,
A. Mireskandari,
R. L. Reid,
S. D. Gitlin, and J. N. Brady.
1994.
Involvement of transcription factor YB-1 in human T-cell lymphotropic virus type I basal gene expression.
J. Virol.
68:561-565 |
| 23. | Kenny, S., and R. V. Guntaka. 1990. Localization by mutational analysis of transcription factor binding sequences in the U3 region of Rous sarcoma virus LTR. Virology 176:483-493[Medline]. |
| 24. |
Kerr, D.,
C. F. Chang,
N. Chen,
G. Gallia,
G. Raj,
B. Schwartz, and K. Khalili.
1994.
Transcription of a human neurotropic virus promoter in glial cells: effect of YB-1 on expression of the JC virus late gene.
J. Virol.
68:7637-7643 |
| 25. |
Kinniburgh, A. J.
1989.
A cis-acting transcription element of the c-myc gene can assume an H-DNA conformation.
Nucleic Acids Res.
17:7771-7778 |
| 26. |
Kolluri, R.,
T. A. Torrey, and A. J. Kinniburgh.
1992.
A CT promoter element binding protein: definition of a double-strand and a novel single-strand DNA binding motif.
Nucleic Acids Res.
20:111-116 |
| 27. |
Ladomery, M., and J. Sommerville.
1994.
Binding of Y-box proteins to RNA: involvement of different protein domains.
Nucleic Acids Res.
22:5582-5589 |
| 28. |
Landsman, D.
1992.
RNP-1, an RNA binding motif is conserved in the DNA-binding cold shock domain.
Nucleic Acids Res.
20:2861-2864 |
| 29. |
MacDonald, G. H.,
Y. Itoh-Lindstrom, and J.-P. Y. Ting.
1995.
The transcriptional regulatory protein, YB-1 promotes single stranded regions in the DRA promoter.
J. Biol. Chem.
270:3527-3533 |
| 30. | Murray, M. T. 1994. Nucleic acid binding properties of the Xenopus oocyte Y-box protein mRNP 3+4. Biochemistry 33:13910-13917[Medline]. |
| 31. | Nambiar, A., J. C. Kandala, J. Svoboda, and R. V. Guntaka. Cloning of a novel Y-box homology protein (chk-YB-1HP) cDNA lacking the cold-shock domain. Biochim. Biophys. Acta, in press. |
| 32. |
Ohmori, M.,
M. Ohta,
H. Shimura,
Y. Shimurat,
K. Suzuki, and L. D. Kohn.
1996.
Cloning of the single-strand DNA binding protein important for maximal expression and thyrotropin (TSH)-induced negative regulation of the TSH receptor.
Mol. Endocrinol.
10:1407-1424 |
| 33. |
Ohmori, M.,
H. Shimura,
Y. Shimura, and L. D. Kohn.
1996.
A Y-box protein is a suppressor factor that decreases thyrotropin receptor gene expression.
Mol. Endocrinol.
10:76-89 |
| 34. |
Ozer, J.,
M. Faber,
R. Chalkley, and L. Sealy.
1990.
Isolation and characterization of a cDNA clone for the CCAAT transcription factor EF1A reveals a novel structural motif.
J. Biol. Chem.
265:22143-22152 |
| 35. |
Ranjan, M.,
S. Tafuri, and A. P. Wolffe.
1993.
Masking mRNA from translation in somatic cells.
Genes Dev.
7:1725-1736 |
| 36. | Sakura, H., T. Maekawa, F. Imamoto, K. Yusuda, and S. Ishii. 1988. Two human genes isolated by a novel method encoding DNA-binding proteins containing a common region of homology. Gene 73:499-507[Medline]. |
| 37. |
Santoro, I. M.,
T. M. Yi, and K. Walsh.
1991.
Identification of single-stranded DNA binding proteins that interact with muscle gene elements.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
11:1944-1953 |
| 38. | Schindelin, H., M. A. Marahiel, and U. Heinemann. 1993. Universal nucleic acid-binding domain revealed by crystal structure of the B. subtilis major cold-shock protein. Nature 364:164-168[Medline]. |
| 39. | Sommerville, J., and M. Ladomery. 1996. Masking of mRNA by Y-box proteins. FASEB J. 10:435-443[Abstract]. |
| 40. | Swamynathan, S. K., A. Nambiar, and R. V. Guntaka. 1997. Chicken YB-2, a Y-box protein, is a potent activator of Rous sarcoma virus long terminal repeat-driven transcription in avian fibroblasts. J. Virol. 71:2873-2880[Abstract]. |
| 41. |
Tada, H., and K. Khalili.
1992.
A novel sequence-specific DNA binding protein, LCP-1, interacts with single-stranded DNA and differentially regulates early gene expression of the human neurotropic JC virus.
J. Virol.
66:6885-6892 |
| 42. |
Tafuri, S. R., and A. P. Wolffe.
1990.
Xenopus Y-box transcription factors: molecular cloning, functional analysis, and developmental regulation.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
87:9028-9032 |
| 43. | Tafuri, S. R., and A. P. Wolffe. 1992. DNA-binding, multimerization and transcription stimulation by the Xenopus Y-box in vitro. New Biol. 4:349-359[Medline]. |
| 44. |
Ting, J.-P. Y.,
A. Painter,
N. J. Zeleznik-Le,
G. MacDonald,
T. M. Moore,
A. Brown, and B. D. Schwartz.
1994.
YB-1 DNA binding protein represses interferon gamma activation of class II major histocompatibility complex genes.
J. Exp. Med.
179:1605-1611 |
| 45. |
Wang, Z. Y.,
X. H. Lin,
M. Nobuyoshi, and T. F. Deuel.
1993.
Identification of a single-stranded DNA binding protein that interacts with an S1 nuclease-sensitive region in the platelet-derived growth factor A-chain gene promoter.
J. Biol. Chem.
268:10681-10685 |
| 46. | Wistow, G. 1990. Cold shock and DNA binding. Nature 344:823-824[Medline]. |
| 47. | Wolffe, A. P. 1994. Structural and functional properties of the evolutionarily ancient Y-box family of nucleic acid binding proteins. Bioessays 16:245-251[Medline]. |
| 48. | Wolffe, A. P., S. Tafuri, M. Ranjan, and M. Familari. 1992. The Y box factors: a family of nucleic acid binding proteins conserved from Escherichia coli to man. New Biol. 4:290-298[Medline]. |
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»