Previous Article | Next Article 
J Virol, February 1998, p. 1534-1541, Vol. 72, No. 2
0022-538X/98/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1998, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Structural Localization of the E3 Glycoprotein in
Attenuated Sindbis Virus Mutants
A. M.
Paredes,1,*
H.
Heidner,2
P.
Thuman-Commike,3
B. V.
Venkataram Prasad,1
R. E.
Johnston,2 and
W.
Chiu1
National Center for Macromolecular Imaging,
Verna and Marrs McLean Department of Biochemistry, Baylor College of
Medicine, Houston, Texas 770301;
Department of Microbiology and Immunology, School of Medicine,
University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
275992; and
Department of Computational
and Applied Mathematics, The W. M. Keck Center for Computational
Biology, Rice University, Houston, Texas 77005-18923
Received 23 June 1997/Accepted 16 October 1997
 |
ABSTRACT |
We have determined the three-dimensional structures of the
wild-type Sindbis virus and two of its mutants that retain the E3
sequence within PE2. Using difference imaging between these mutants and
the wild-type virus, we have assigned a location for the 64-amino-acid
sequence corresponding to E3 in the mutant spike complex. In the
wild-type virus, the spike is composed of an E1-E2 heterotrimer. The E3
protein was found to protrude midway between the center of the spike
complex and the tips. Based on these results and the work of others, we
propose a distribution for the functional domains of the spike proteins
within the structure of wild-type Sindbis virus. Within the structure
of the virus, the E1 domains form the central portion of the spike
complex, while the tips are formed by the E2 domains that flare out
from the center of the complex. The structural similarity between these
Sindbis virus mutants and Ross River virus suggests that E3 may also be
present in the latter, which is also a member of the
Alphavirus genus.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Sindbis virus is a member of the
Alphavirus genus within the Togaviridae family.
Alphaviruses are a small group of RNA viruses that are enveloped by a
host cell-derived lipid membrane. In contrast to the loose and
unorganized envelopes of the orthomyxovirus and paramyxovirus families,
the envelope of alphaviruses is a highly organized icosahedral
structure of transmembranal virus glycoproteins and a lipid bilayer
(18). Sindbis virus is composed of a 49S positive-sense RNA
genome and 240 copies each of three structural proteins: two
transmembranal glycoproteins (E1 and E2) and an internal capsid (C)
protein (41, 45). The structural proteins assemble into two
concentric icosahedral shells arranged about the genome in a T=4
icosahedral lattice (6, 22, 37). The inner lattice is the
nucleocapsid, which has an outer radius of approximately 200 Å and
consists of 240 copies of capsid protein (7, 9, 37, 38). The
envelope extends from an inner radius of 200 Å to an outer radius of
325 Å and is composed of 80 trimers of E1/E2 heterodimers which are
embedded in a lipid bilayer (37). The (E1/E2)3
heterotrimers protrude 50 Å from the surface of the virus and flare
out into three distinct lobes forming a trimer 230 Å in diameter
(37).
The structural proteins are translated from a 26S subgenomic RNA as a
130-kDa precursor protein that is subsequently processed into its
individual components. The 30-kDa capsid protein, the first structural
protein to be translated, is autocatalytically cleaved from the nascent
polypeptide shortly after synthesis. After release from the ribosome
translation complex, the capsid protein condenses onto newly
synthesized genomic RNA to form nucleocapsids in the cytoplasm of the
infected cell. The cleavage of capsid from the growing polypeptide
chain exposes a signal sequence that delivers the polypeptide to the
endoplasmic reticulum, where protein synthesis continues and
glycosylation begins. Translation of protein from the mRNA into the
rough endoplasmic reticulum produces PE2, the precursor of E2, and E1
spike proteins, which associate rapidly into PE2/E1 heterodimers and
then almost immediately into (PE2/E1)3 heterotrimers
(24, 34, 57). PE2 contains a 64-amino-acid-long E3 sequence
preceding the 423-amino-acid-long E2 glycoprotein (42, 46).
The cleavage between E3 and E2 occurs in a post-Golgi compartment prior
to the delivery of the spike trimers to the plasma membrane. This
cleavage, mediated by a cellular protease, occurs at a position
immediately after a four-amino-acid motif characterized as
basic-X-basic-basic (13, 15, 36, 40, 54). Although the
cleaved E3 glycoprotein is not present in Sindbis virus, it is found in
the structure of one alphavirus, Semliki Forest virus, as a
virion-associated nontransmembranal spike protein.
Despite previous three-dimensional reconstructions of Sindbis virus by
electron cryomicroscopy, the organization of the E1 and E2 spikes
within the trimer remains unclear (21, 37). Determination of
the locations of the functional domains for both of these proteins is
important because during specific stages in the virus life cycle, these
proteins perform vital functions. In the case of E2, both host cell
recognition and attachment have been associated with this protein
(14). Antibodies directed against E2 are often neutralizing,
and mutations in E2 affect both virus binding and virulence (43,
49). The relative importance of E2 in host cell binding and
receptor recognition also has been demonstrated by the identification
of mutants in Sindbis virus which fail to bind to chicken embryo
fibroblasts (17). An additional function of E2 is the
stabilization of spike-nucleocapsid interactions during assembly of
progeny and destabilization of these same interactions during the next
round of attachment and penetration (8, 28).
E1 appears to maintain the integrity of the icosahedral lattice
(2, 3). E1 is folded into a compact metastable structure that is stabilized by intramolecular disulfide bridges, and these are
essential for the integrity of the icosahedral lattice of E1-E2
associations (3, 34). In addition to the integrity of the
icosahedral lattice, a domain in E1 has been linked with the ability of
the virus membrane to fuse with the host cell (23). Thus,
the E1 spike protein is probably responsible for the fusion event that
follows attachment and introduces the virus nucleocapsid into the
cytoplasm.
In this paper, we examined the organization of the glycoproteins within
the trimer by three-dimensional structural analyses of wild-type
Sindbis virus and two mutants which fail to cleave PE2, leaving E3 as
an unambiguous 64-amino-acid structural tag covalently associated with
the amino terminus of E2. From this and the work of others, we have
inferred the probable locations of E2 and E1 (as well as E3) functional
domains within the trimeric spike complex and used these observations
to propose a model for virus attachment and penetration.
 |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
Sindbis virus and PE2 mutants.
In the PE2 mutants of Sindbis
virus, PE2 cleavage was prevented by mutation of the +1 position
relative to the cleavage site (25). Conversion of this
residue from an Arg in the Sindbis virus TRSB wild-type [TRSB (wt)]
background to an Asn created a new site for N-linked glycosylation, and
the added carbohydrate abrogated PE2 cleavage. As a result, PE2 of the
mutant (TRSB-N) was incorporated into virions. The TRSB-N mutation,
however, was lethal in that these PE2-containing particles were unable
to infect other cells. Revertants of the TRSB-N mutation were isolated
after transfection of BHK cells with infectious in vitro transcripts from pTRSB-N (the cDNA clone of the mutant). One such revertant, TRSB-NE2G216, retained the PE2 cleavage defect but acquired a second
site mutation (Glu to Gly at E2 position 216) which conferred infectivity on the PE2-containing virion.
Virus purification.
The growth and purification of TRSB,
TRSB-N, and TRSB-NE2G216 have been previously described. Briefly,
infectious virus was harvested from cultures of infected BHK-21 cells
and then purified by isopycnic density gradient centrifugation on
linear 20 to 35% potassium tartrate gradients as described elsewhere
(25, 39). Noninfectious TRSB-N particles were harvested
after electroporation of pTRSB-N transcripts into BHK-21 cells. Virus
preparations were then concentrated to titers of approximating
1012 to 1014 PFU/ml, using Centricon filters.
Radiolabeling and polyacrylamide gel analysis.
Viral
proteins were 35S labeled by growing virus in the presence
of [35S]methionine. BHK-21 cells were infected with virus
at a multiplicity of infection of 10 PFU/ml or electroporated with the
transcripts from the mutant clone pTRSB-N as described elsewhere
(25). The cells were grown for 5 h in complete minimal
essential medium and starved in methionine-free minimal essential
medium supplemented with 5% donor calf serum and 1%
penicillin-streptomycin for an additional 3 h. Once the cells were
adequately starved for methionine, [35S]methionine was
added to the medium to a final specific activity of 20 µCi/ml. The
cells were incubated at 37°C for 12 h in the presence of
[35S]methionine prior to virus purification. Labeled
virus was pelleted, resuspended in 30 µl of 2× sample buffer, and
heated to 100°C for 5 min. Approximately 1.5 × 105
cpm each of wild-type and mutant virus was added separately to two
lanes of a sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS)-10% polyacrylamide gel
prepared as described previously (25). The gel was
electrophoresed for 20 h at 16-mA constant current, fixed in 40%
methanol-10% acetic acid, soaked in Amplify fluorographic solution
(Amersham), dyed, and exposed to film.
Specimen preparation.
Unlabeled virus specimens were
prepared for electron cryomicroscopy by freezing them on copper grids
coated with a film of perforated holey carbon, using established
protocols (16, 20).
Electron cryomicroscopy.
Frozen grids were transferred to a
Gatan cryo-specimen holder cooled to approximately
155°C and
examined in a JEOL 1200 electron cryomicroscope, where micrographs were
recorded at a nominal magnification of 30,000 operating at a voltage of
100 keV, using flood-beam imaging. To prevent radiation damage to the
specimens, the micrographs were recorded at low electron doses of 4 to
5 electrons per Å2. Two images per specimen area were
recorded, one aimed at approximately 1.5-µm underfocus and the second
aimed at 2.2-µm underfocus. Since images viewed closer to focus in an
electron microscope contain higher resolution detail, the 1.5-µm
micrographs were taken first to reduce the amount of damage caused by
electron irradiation. The higher-defocus micrograph, as a consequence,
recorded double the exposure, or 8 to 10 electrons per Å2
of the specimen area. The second micrographs were taken because higher-defocus images have higher contrast. By processing both negatives separately, we were able to use the orientations from the
higher-contrast images to identify the orientations of the closer-to-focus noisier images. Closer-to-focus images were used in the
three-dimensional reconstructions.
Image processing and three-dimensional reconstruction.
Following electron cryomicroscopy, micrograph focal pairs were selected
for computer processing. The criterion for selection was based on virus
concentration (greater than 100 per micrograph), uniform ice thickness,
and absence of specimen drift and image astigmatism. Selected pairs of
electron micrographs were scanned on a Perkin-Elmer microdensitometer
with a pixel size of 16 by 16 µm, corresponding to 5.33 by 5.33 Å in
the specimen. The digitized images were displayed on a Silicon Graphics
workstation, and in the case of the wild-type virus and infectious
mutant, individual particle images were interactively boxed out into
256- by 256-pixel2 areas. The same particles from both
micrographs were boxed out in the same order and given similar file
names to identify them as image pairs of the same particles. During the
processing of the last data set, that of the noninfectious mutant, an
automated particle selection method which enabled us to acquire the
boxed images of virus particles in a very short amount of time became available (48). The final images were boxed with the same
parameters as the previous data sets. Image defocus was estimated by
using the sum of the Fourier intensities of the individual selected particles (55).
Particle orientation determination and three-dimensional reconstruction
were performed by using a combination of procedures described elsewhere
(4, 10, 21, 27, 47). Specifically, following particle
selection, the digitized particle images were masked from the
background at a radius of 66 pixels (corresponding to a 352-Å radius
mask surrounding particle images) and then floated onto a uniform
background. Particle centers were estimated by cross-correlation with a
rotationally averaged reference image (35, 47). Once an
initial center was estimated, a smaller 64-pixel radius mask was placed
around the particle at the estimated center to include as much of the
signal from the specimen as possible while excluding the noise
contributed by the background.
Initially, data processing proceeded by determining the orientations of
the far-from-focus images with the goal of extrapolating
the
orientations to the close-to-focus images. In this analysis,
initial
orientations were estimated by using the self-common lines
method to
analyze the Fourier transforms of the individual particle
images
(
10). In this processing, phase residuals of Fourier
transforms of particle images of less than 65° were selected for
refinement while those above 65° were discarded. The individual
Fourier transforms were then refined against one another by using
the
cross-common lines method developed by Fuller (
21).
Particles
with average cross-common line phase residuals of less than
65°
were selected. The determined orientations were then used as
initial
orientations for the close-to-focus particles. Additional
close-to-focus
orientations were estimated by using modified
self-common lines
phase residual functions (
47). Projection
images were computed
from the low-resolution structures and used as
templates for identification
of additional particle orientations in
cross-common lines phase
residual comparisons (
12,
56).
Following identification of
additional particle orientations,
refinement was performed on
all of the particle orientations at
increasingly higher resolution
to obtain improved reconstructions. The
cycle of orientation search,
five-parameter orientation refinement,
reconstruction, and template
projection was repeated until no further
particle orientations
were identified for each sample.
Following determination of the particle orientations, the
three-dimensional reconstructions were performed by using Fourier
Bessel inversion (
10). The final reconstructions included
particle
images with cross-common line phase residuals of 65° or less
(
10).
To ensure that Fourier space was adequately sampled,
we calculated
the inverse eigenvalue spectrum during the interpolation
step
of the Fourier Bessel analysis for the final reconstructions
(
10,
11). In this calculation, small mean inverse
eigenvalues represent
a well-sampled Fourier space (
11).
Full icosahedral symmetry
was obtained for the final reconstructions by
imposing real space
threefold averaging (
21). By using the
Explorer graphics software
(NAG, Inc.), these maps were viewed and
interpreted.
 |
RESULTS |
Glycoprotein composition of the viral envelope.
The protein
compositions of both the wild type and the PE2-containing mutants were
examined by SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. To confirm the
presence of PE2 in the mutant and to determine the background amount of
E2 that might also be present, we ran 35S-radiolabeled TRSB
(wt) together with the infectious revertant on SDS-polyacrylamide gels
(Fig. 1). In the lane containing
wild-type virus, four bands, corresponding to the capsid protein, the
two spike proteins E1 and E2, and a weak PE2 band, were resolved. The
wild-type PE2 band is typical and is due to a small amount of uncleaved
PE2 that escapes cleavage to E2. Table 1
provides a complete summary of the protein composition, molecular
weights, and glycosylation sites of Sindbis virus. As can be seen in
Table 1, the E1 and E2 bands have similar molecular weights.
Consequently, the E1 and E2 bands were not clearly resolved in the
wild-type lane in Fig. 1.

View larger version (36K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 1.
Protein composition of wild-type and noninfections PE2
mutant (PEwt and PEmut) Sindbis virus. Samples
were 35S radiolabeled and analyzed by electrophoresis on an
SDS-10% polyacrylamide gel. Lane 1, wild-type Sindbis virus; lane 2, TRSB-NE2G216 (infectious PE2 mutant). Positions of the capsid protein,
the two spike proteins E1 and E2, the PE2mut, and a weak
PE2wt band are shown. The PE2wt band is typical
and is due to a small amount of uncleaved PE2 that escapes cleavage to
E2. PE2mut runs as a higher-molecular-weight band due to an
extra glycosylated site. The E1 and E2 bands run as a smear in the
wild-type lane because of their similar molecular weights (Table 1).
|
|
The wild-type and mutant PE2 glycoproteins were easily distinguishable
from one another. The mutant PE2 has a higher molecular
weight than the
wild-type PE2 because of the added carbohydrate
side chain present in
the mutant PE2 (see Materials and Methods).
The presence of the PE2
band and the complete absence of the E2
band in the mutant lane confirm
that the only major biochemical
difference between the wild type and
the infectious mutant is
in the forced incorporation of the E3 protein
into the mutant
virus caused by the prevention of PE2 cleavage. The
protein profile
of the noninfectious TRSB-N mutant was identical to
that of the
infectious mutant (data not shown).
Electron cryomicroscopy.
Figure
2 shows selected regions of the
higher-defocus micrographs of the wild-type (Fig. 2A), noninfectious
(Fig. 2B), and infectious (Fig. 2C) specimens. Figures 2A and B
demonstrate that superficially the PE2 mutants and the wild-type virus
are not significantly different from one another at the level of virus images on the micrographs. The images of the infectious particles also
display characteristics similar to those seen in Fig. 2A and B
(higher-magnification comparison of the infectious mutant not shown).
However, in the case of the infectious specimen, empty and collapsed
envelopes (Fig. 2C, white arrows) and free nucleocapsids (black arrows)
are seen significantly more often than in the other two specimens. Free
nucleocapsids were observed less frequently than empty or collapsed
envelopes, presumably because they quickly disintegrate in the
environment.

View larger version (74K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 2.
Selected regions of 100-kV flood-beam electron
cryomicrographs of TRSB (wt) (A), TRSB-N (noninfectious mutant) (B),
and TRSB-NE2G216 (infectious mutant) (C). In the case of the infectious
mutant, the magnification is lowered to display a larger field of the
specimen area. The white arrows indicate collapsed virus envelopes,
while the black arrows indicate free nucleocapsids. Black scale bars,
700 Å; white scale bar, 1,000 Å.
|
|
Wild-type and mutant structures.
The three-dimensional
reconstructions (Fig. 3) were each
determined from single micrographs corresponding to approximately 1.5-µm underfocus for the wild type, 1.0-µm underfocus for the noninfectious PE2 mutant, and 1.5-µm underfocus for the infectious PE2 mutant. All reconstructions were performed to a nominal resolution of 25 Å, which was within the first contrast transfer function zero
for all images. Examination of the mean inverse eigenvalue distribution
shows that at 25 Å, all of the mean inverse eigenvalues were less than
0.1 for all three of the reconstructions. Furthermore, the percentage
of mean inverse eigenvalues less than 0.01 range from 81 to 85 for the
three sets of data. Thus, Fourier space is sufficiently sampled for all
three reconstructions.

View larger version (159K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 3.
Surface representation of three-dimensional
reconstructions shown from a threefold view: TRSB (wt), TRSB-N
(noninfectious mutant), and TRSB-NE2G216 (infectious mutant). The
appropriate contour level for surface rendering was determined for the
T=4 virus envelopes by assuming a protein density of 1.325 g/cm3 and by using the published molecular weights of the
viral components compiled from the sources shown in Table 1.
|
|
The numbers of particle images used for each reconstruction were 69, 57, and 69, respectively, for TRSB (wt) and for the noninfectious
and
infectious PE2 mutants. To evaluate the consistency of these
reconstructions, the complete set of determined particle orientations
for each three-dimensional map was divided into three subsets
from
which we performed independent reconstructions. The sets
of independent
reconstructions for each data set were similar
in overall structural
features, confirming the consistency of
each structure.
The wild-type and mutant viruses all measure approximately 680 Å in
diameter and show the characteristic T=4 lattice of 80
trimers on the
surface of the viral envelopes (Fig.
3). Along
the strict twofold edges
are openings in the mass density of the
icosahedral lattice. These
openings measure approximately 40 by
50 Å and appear as either oval
holes or clefts, depending on the
absence or presence of a small
density in independent reconstructions.
During data analysis, the
presence of this density was inconsistent,
and thus it likely results
from minor differences between the
individual particle images.
The trimers in these structures emerge from the polar head groups of
the virus membrane outer leaflet at a radius of 250 Å
and extend 90 Å to a final radius of 340 Å. The base of each trimer
appears as a stalk
with a diameter of about 85 Å. The stalk is
triangular in shape and
extends to a radius of 302 Å, where the
trimer then separates into
three independent appendages radiating
from the center at an angle of
120° from each other (Fig.
4, yellow).
These finger-like appendages extend laterally outward, forming
the
vertices with a diameter of approximately 250 Å. The appendages
extend
from the trimer in a counterclockwise twist that is clearly
evident in
the three rendered density maps shown in Fig.
3. The
counterclockwise
handedness of the trimers, in alphaviruses, was
confirmed previously by
tilting experiments performed on Ross
River virus (
4).

View larger version (81K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 4.
Superimposition of computationally isolated trimers from
the wild type and the noninfectious PE2 mutant. The mutant trimer is
displayed in wire frame with the blue density denoting 1.325 g/cm3 and the red indicating a denser region of the
protein. The wild-type virus trimer is surface rendered in
semitransparent yellow. We have assigned the major mutant protrusion
that extends outside the wild-type trimer to the E3 region of the
mutant PE2.
|
|
The structures of the wild type and the mutants show a hole or pore in
the center of each of the trimers (Fig.
3 and
4). The
pores measure
approximately 20 Å in diameter at the top of the
trimers and extend
down 64 Å to the outer leaflet of the virus
membrane. Beneath the top
of the trimer complex, the pore expands
into a triangular cavity within
the stalk. To establish that the
pore was a structural feature and not
an artifact of contouring,
the persistence of the pore was tested at
different threshold
levels. The pores in the reconstructions persisted
over a range
of threshold values accounting for 100% of the mass of
240 copies
of E1, E2, and E3 to 180% (equivalent to 427 copies of E1,
E2,
and E3) of the mass of these proteins. In these calculations,
protein volume was calculated for the viral envelope from a radius
of
197 to 341 Å, using the molecular weights listed in Table
1 and
assuming a density of 1.325 g/cm
3. The persistence of the
pore structure to a threshold value representing
180% of the molecular
mass is a strong indication that the pore
is genuine and present within
the trimer structure.
Differences in wild-type and mutant structures.
It is in the
morphology of the trimer appendages that the mutant viruses differ
significantly from the wild-type virus. Superimposed maps of the
wild-type and noninfectious mutant viruses reveal that the mutant
appendages have a protrusion, measuring 27 by 22 by 37 Å, which
emerges from approximately the middle of each appendage (Fig. 4). The
density corresponding to the protrusion can also be observed in twofold
equatorial sections of the three-dimensional density maps (Fig.
5B, arrowheads). As can be seen in both
Fig. 4 and 5 and as confirmed by difference imaging (data not shown), the protrusion is not present in the wild-type virus structure but is
present in both mutant structures. This protrusion is the major
difference observed between the wild-type and mutant structures. Comparison of the difference in volume between the mutant structures and the wild type agrees with the volume estimated for the E3 peptide
(using the calculated molecular mass of 9.8 kDa). We deduce from this
that the E3 regions of the mutant PE2 proteins are the protrusions
observed in the trimers of the mutant structures.

View larger version (101K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 5.
Equatorial sections of the wild-type (A) and infectious
mutant (B) structures shown along the twofold axis. The arrows indicate
the densities present in the mutant which we have attributed to the E3
region of the PE2 mutant.
|
|
In addition to the major protrusion observed in the mutant trimer, more
subtle differences were observed in the inner portion
of the trimer.
The mutant densities extend farther toward the
trimer center, partially
filling in a portion of the wild-type
trimer pore. Figure
4 shows that
in the central region of the
trimer where the pore begins, many of the
densities of mutant
and wild-type trimers match. However, the outer
portions of the
trimers show differences. The mutant appendages appear
narrower
than the wild-type appendages. The narrowest point of the
mutant
appendage measures approximately 42 Å wide just outside the
portion
of the trimer containing the E3 density. In comparison, the
same
region of the wild-type appendage is approximately 49 Å wide.
This difference, however, may be too small at the resolution of
both
density maps to be considered a reliable difference. Another
difference
that can be seen in Fig.
4 is an angular shift between
the appendage
structures. The axis formed between the center of
the trimer and the
tip of the appendage is oriented differently
in the mutant and
wild-type trimers. In the wild-type trimer,
this axis seems to be
inclined more clockwise with respect to
the mutant. This angular shift
may be due more to the constriction
and redistribution of the trimer
mass than to an actual angular
rotation.
 |
DISCUSSION |
Specimen morphology.
The collapsed or empty envelopes shown in
Fig. 2C (white arrows) were observed in abundance in all micrographs of
the infectious (TRSB-NE2G216) revertant. Also present were an unusual
number of free nucleocapsids (Fig. 2C, black arrows). The presence of both free nucleocapsids and empty envelopes may be the result of a
weakening in the association between the E2 endodomains and the
underlying capsid proteins of the revertant, because it is presumably
that interaction which is responsible for attachment of the envelope to
the nucleocapsid. The putative altered E2-core association might result
from a transmembranal effect caused by the second resuscitating
mutation on the E2 ectodomain of this mutant. An analogous effect in
which a mutation in the capsid protein resulted in the alteration of
the stability of the spike ectodomains outside the virus membrane has
been demonstrated (28).
Three-dimensional reconstruction.
The structures shown here
have resolutions similar to those of the recently published structures
of Ross River virus and Semliki Forest virus (6, 22). A
comparison of these structures reveals that the structures of our
PE2-containing mutants are more similar to the structures of both Ross
River virus and Semliki Forest virus than to the parental wild-type
Sindbis virus (6, 22). Also significant is the observation
that E3 cleavage was not required for infectivity of the infectious
mutant. It had been proposed that PE2 cleavage is necessary to make the
spike trimer complex fusion competent (26). In addition, the
trimer pore observed in our reconstructions is unique to our structures
and is absent in the structures of Ross River virus and Semliki Forest
virus, whose structures were determined to a resolution comparable to that for the structures in this study. Note, however, that the absence
of the pore in the previous studies may be the result of different
imaging conditions and therefore does not exclude the possibility of
the pore's presence in those structures. The observation of a new
structural feature such as a pore is not unexpected since with both
more accurate refinement of the data and higher resolution of the
reconstructions, finer details begin to emerge.
Localization of E3 in alphaviruses.
Difference imaging between
the wild-type and mutant virus structures shows an additional
protrusion on the trimer appendages in the mutant structures. We assign
this extra density in the mutants to the E3 protein sequence. Assuming
a protein density of 1.325 g/cm3, the volume of the extra
density observed in both mutants is consistent with the estimated mass
of 9.8 kDa for E3. Discounting this presumptive E3 mass, the remaining
density closely conforms to the TRSB (wt) structure. In comparing the
structures, we find that there are no other major differences between
the structures from the core to a radius of 302 Å. Therefore, the
simplest explanation for the additional density is that this represents
the E3 amino acids covalently linked to the amino terminus of E2.
It is interesting that the overall structures of the spikes in our PE2
mutants are similar to those seen in Semliki Forest
virus and Ross
River virus (
6,
22). In all of these structures,
the spikes
contain a knob-like structure that is absent in wild-type
Sindbis
virus. Although it was not surprising for the PE2 mutants
to be similar
to Semliki Forest virus, which is an E3-containing
alphavirus, it is
surprising that the mutants are similar to Ross
River virus. The
additional density that has been attributed to
E3, present in PE2
mutants, gives rise to pairs of densities observed
in the equatorial
section (indicated by arrowheads in Fig.
5B).
These pairs of densities
are also seen in the corresponding section
in the Ross River virus
reconstruction (
6). It may be that
like Semliki Forest
virus, Ross River virus is an E3-containing
alphavirus. In this
context, it should be noted that trace amounts
of E3 have previously
been detected in Ross River virus preparations
(
52). Further
biochemical analysis is necessary to determine
if Ross River virus is
an E3-containing virus.
The alphavirus spike.
The E1-E2 glycoprotein lattice of
alphaviruses is a highly organized structure. Structural integrity for
this lattice is derived from both the lateral interactions between
trimers and the association between the endodomain of the E2
glycoprotein with the capsid proteins of the nucleocapsid
(2). Chemical cross-linking studies have revealed that the
alphavirus spike is a trimer of E1/E2 heterodimers and that the E1
glycoproteins exist as homotrimers within the complex (2).
Fuller et al., however, have suggested a different arrangement where
the E2 glycoproteins occupy the center of the spike complex as a
triplex and the E1 proteins occupy the spaces between them (22,
51). Their model was derived from the observation that trimeric
aggregates of the E1 protein could be recovered from virus after
exposure to acid pH. This observation led to a model where the central
position of the E2 proteins in the spike prevented interactions among
E1 spikes until the virion was exposed to the low-pH environment of an
endosome. Upon exposure to low pH, as the Fuller model suggests, the
functional domains of the E1 and E2 proteins would "swivel" their
position in the spike complex, allowing the E1 glycoproteins to form
trimers that would initiate membrane fusion (22). The
three-dimensional structure of the virus lattice, however, is not
significantly affected by treatments which inactivate virus
infectivity, such as low pH and brief treatment with dithiothreitol
(3, 22). This finding suggests that although some
reconfiguration of the distal portions of the spike trimer may occur
after exposure to low pH, the complete reversal of the positions of E1
and E2 is unlikely without the loss of lateral and transmembranal
protein-protein interactions that give the virion its integrity.
Recently, reconstructions of anti-E2 Fab-labeled Sindbis and Ross River
viruses have been performed (
44). The Fabs had been
prepared
from antibodies believed to bind to the specific region
of the spike
responsible for cell receptor recognition (
30,
44,
50,
53).
The authors reported that the Fab labels were
localized at the extreme
tips of the reconstructed trimers. The
tips of the trimers are the most
outwardly exposed structure of
the virus and could be the first viral
component to interact with
the cell. Meanwhile, by comparing the
structure of the wild-type
virus to the structures of the PE2 mutants
in this study, we conclude
that the E3 amino acid sequence is located
midway between the
center of the trimer and the tip of the spike. Since
E3 is covalently
linked to the NH
2 terminus of E2, we
considered the presumptive
E3 density as an E2 tag which places a
portion of E2 between the
center of the trimer and the tips of the
spikes. Although recent
data suggest an intimate and possibly
intertwining organization
of E2 with E1, we can assume from our study,
combined with the
work of Smith et al. (
44), that the distal
portion of the spike
complex is mostly composed of the E2 glycoprotein
(
5,
33,
34).
Three observations allow us to postulate an alphavirus spike
organization (Fig.
6A). First, the tips
of the trimers contain
the antireceptors of the virus, and these
antireceptors are associated
with E2 (
44). The
colocalization of the E3 amino acid sequence
with the NH
2
terminus of E2 suggests that E2 also occupies a region
between the tip
and the center of the trimer. Finally, E1 domains
which are stabilized
by the disulfide bridges required for the
structural integrity of the
envelope reside within the spike and
are in part inaccessible to
dithiothreitol reduction due to PE2
disulfide-stabilized domains
residing at the periphery of the
spike complex (
5). Based on
these observations, we propose
a likely distribution for E1, E2, and E3
within the structure
of the spike complex (Fig.
6A). This organization
agrees with
the model proposed by the cross-linking experiments of
Anthony
and Brown (
2). Our assignment of these domains,
however, does
not exclude the possibility that the structural domains
of the
E1 and E2 proteins can coexist within the same region in the
density
map.

View larger version (28K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 6.
Proposed model for the functional domains of the spike
proteins and membrane fusion. (A) In the spike trimer, the E2
functional domain is the most outwardly exposed structural protein,
while the E1 fusigenic domain is located in the center of the spike
complex. E3 is on the outer edge of the E2 spike protein. (B) During
attachment, the tripod-like complex forms a specific and stable
three-point interaction with the host cell through interactions with
cell receptors. These interactions induce a conformational change in
the structure of the trimer in which the E2 tips are separated,
bringing the center of the spike and the E1 homotrimer closer to the
host membrane. As the trimer tips spread apart, conformational changes
that expose the fusigenic peptides of E1 occur in the spike proteins.
At the same time, the center of the spike containing the E1 trimer is
brought close to the host membrane, where the fusigenic peptides of E1
are exposed and initiate fusion.
|
|
By relating the known functions of the viral components to their
proposed distribution, we can envision a process by which
the virus
penetrates the host cell (Fig.
6B). As suggested by
both the
localization of anti-E2 Fabs and the presumptive E3 density,
E2 is the
most outwardly exposed protein of the spike complex
(Fig.
6A). Since E2
is involved in virus attachment, the trimer
complex might form a stable
tripod-like interaction between the
tips of the spikes and the surface
of the host cell, mediated
through specific host cell receptor
interactions (Fig.
6B). The
organization of E1 within trimers is such
that they occupy the
center of the spike complex, where they form the
central pore
of the trimer structure. The hydrophobic domains of the E1
proteins
required for membrane fusion remain buried within the complex
until either the spikes form a specific host interaction with
the cell
receptors or the virion is exposed to a low-pH environment
(
19,
31,
32). As interactions with the cell continue, a
conformational
rearrangement of the spike allows the E1 fusigenic
peptides to be
exposed. Simultaneously, the changes occurring
throughout the complex
separate the E2 spikes, bringing the center
of the spike complex and
the fusigenic E1 trimers closer to the
host cell membrane. Penetration
of the fusigenic E1 domains into
the host lipid bilayer along with
simultaneous thiol reduction
of E1 disulfides by thiol-disulfide
exchange reactions would initiate
fusion between the virus and host
membranes (
1,
29).
Conclusions.
Difference imaging between the three-dimensional
structures of Sindbis virus TRSB and the mutant viruses TRSB-N and
TRSB-NE2G216 indicated that the E3 protein is attached to the outer
side of the flared portions of the spike trimer, between the distal
tips and the center of the spike complex. This observation, along with the epitope mapping studies of Smith et al. (44) on Sindbis and Ross River viruses, strongly suggests that the flaring portions of
the spike are composed predominantly of the E2 glycoprotein. By
comparison, we also find that the E3 protein in Semliki Forest virus is
in a location comparable to the E3 density present in our PE2 mutants
and that a similar density exists on the spike of Ross River virus.
These observations suggest that Ross River virus may, like Semliki
Forest virus, contain E3.
Based on these results and those of others, we propose a distribution
for the functional domains within the alphavirus spike.
In the proposed
spike, the functional domains of E1 form the central
portion of the
spike complex and the appendages are formed by
the flaring of E2 from
the center of the trimer. This model provides
a mechanism for virus
attachment through the receptor binding
domains of the most outwardly
exposed portion of E2, while penetration
or fusion is initiated by
conformational changes induced by receptor
binding that exposes the
fusigenic E1 domains.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
We thank Dennis Brown, North Carolina State University, for
helpful discussions and Jaap Brink for help in editing the manuscript.
This work was supported by the National Science Foundation minority
fellowship program (BIR-9406849), the National Library of Medicine
(training grant LM07093), and the National Institutes of Health
fellowship program (F32-AI09015) and PHS grants (AI22186, AI36040, and
RR02250).
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
Corresponding author. Mailing address: National Center
for Macromolecular Imaging, Verna and Marrs McLean Department of
Biochemistry, Baylor College of Medicine, One Baylor Plaza, Houston, TX
77030. Phone: (713) 798-6989. Fax: (713) 796-9438. E-mail:
angel{at}tiger.3dem.bioch.bcm.tmc.edu.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Abell, B. A., and D. T. Brown.
1993.
Sindbis virus membrane fusion is mediated by reduction of glycoprotein disulfide bridges at the cell surface.
J. Virol.
67:5496-5501[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 2.
|
Anthony, R. P., and D. T. Brown.
1991.
Protein-protein interactions in the alphavirus membrane.
J. Virol.
65:1187-1194[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 3.
|
Anthony, R. P.,
A. M. Paredes, and D. T. Brown.
1992.
Disulfide bonds are essential for the stability of the Sindbis virus envelope.
Virology
190:330-336[Medline].
|
| 4.
|
Baker, T. S.,
J. Drak, and M. Bina.
1988.
Reconstruction of the three-dimensional structure of simian virus 40 and visualization of chromatin core.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
85:422-426[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 5.
|
Carleton, M. O., and D. T. Brown.
1996.
Disulfide bridge-mediated folding of Sindbis virus glycoproteins.
J. Virol.
70:5541-5547[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 6.
|
Cheng, R. H.,
R. J. Kuhn,
N. H. Olson,
M. G. Rossmann,
H.-K. Choi,
T. J. Smith, and T. S. Baker.
1995.
Nucleocapsid and glycoprotein organization in an enveloped virus.
Cell
80:621-630[Medline].
|
| 7.
|
Choi, H. K.,
L. Tong,
W. Minor,
P. Dumas,
U. Boege,
M. G. Rossmann, and G. Wengler.
1991.
Structure of Sindbis virus core protein reveals a chymotrypsin-like serine proteinase and the organization of the virion.
Nature
354:37-43[Medline].
|
| 8.
|
Coombs, K.,
B. Brown, and D. T. Brown.
1984.
Evidence for a change in capsid morphology during Sindbis virus envelopment.
Virus Res.
1:297-302[Medline].
|
| 9.
|
Coombs, K., and D. T. Brown.
1987.
Organization of the Sindbis virus nucleocapsid as revealed by bifunctional cross-linking agents.
J. Mol. Biol.
195:359-371[Medline].
|
| 10.
|
Crowther, R. A.
1971.
Procedures for three-dimensional reconstruction of spherical viruses by Fourier synthesis from electron micrographs.
Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B
261:221-230[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 11.
|
Crowther, R. A.,
D. J. DeRosier, and A. Klug.
1970.
The reconstruction of a three-dimensional structure from projections and its application to electron microscopy.
Proc. R. Soc. Lond.
317:319-340.
[Abstract/Free Full Text] |
| 12.
|
Crowther, R. A.,
N. A. Kiselev,
B. Bottcher,
J. A. Berriman,
G. P. Borisova,
V. Ose, and P. Pumpens.
1994.
Three-dimensional structure of hepatitis B virus core particles determined by electron cryomicroscopy.
Cell
77:943-950[Medline].
|
| 13.
|
Dalgarno, L.,
C. M. Rice, and J. H. Strauss.
1983.
Ross River virus 26S RNA: complete nucleotide sequence and deduced sequence of the encoded structural proteins.
Virology
129:170-187[Medline].
|
| 14.
|
Dalrymple, J. M.,
S. Schlesinger, and P. K. Russell.
1976.
Antigenic characterization of two Sindbis envelope glycoproteins separated by isoelectric focusing.
Virology
69:93-103[Medline].
|
| 15.
|
De Curtis, I., and K. Simons.
1988.
Dissection of Semliki Forest virus glycoprotein delivery from the trans-Golgi network to the cell surface in permeabilized BHK cells.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
85:8052-8056[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 16.
|
Dubochet, J.,
M. Adrian,
J. J. Chang,
J. C. Homo,
J. Lepault,
A. W. McDowall, and P. Schultz.
1988.
Cryo-electron microscopy of vitrified specimens.
Q. Rev. Biophys.
21:129-228[Medline].
|
| 17.
|
Dubuisson, J., and C. M. Rice.
1993.
Sindbis virus attachment: isolation and characterization of mutants with impaired binding to vertebrate cells.
J. Virol.
67:3363-3374[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 18.
|
Fields, B. N., and D. M. Knipe.
1996.
.
Virology, 3rd ed., vol. 1.
Raven Press, New York, N.Y.
|
| 19.
|
Flynn, D. C.,
W. J. Meyer,
J. M. Mackenzie, Jr., and R. E. Johnston.
1990.
A conformational change in Sindbis virus glycoproteins E1 and E2 is detected at the plasma membrane as a consequence of early virus-cell interaction.
J. Virol.
64:3643-3653[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 20.
|
Fukami, A., and K. Adachi.
1965.
A new method of preparation of a self-perforated micro plastic grid and its application (I).
J. Electron Microsc.
14:112-118[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 21.
|
Fuller, S. D.
1987.
The T=4 envelope of Sindbis virus is organized by interactions with a complementary T=3 capsid.
Cell
48:923-934[Medline].
|
| 22.
|
Fuller, S. D.,
J. A. Berriman,
S. J. Butcher, and B. E. Gowen.
1995.
Low pH induces swiveling of the glycoprotein heterodimers in the Semliki Forest virus spike complex.
Cell
81:715-725[Medline].
|
| 23.
|
Garoff, H.,
A.-M. Frischauf,
K. Simons,
H. Lehrach, and H. Delius.
1980.
Nucleotide sequence of cDNA coding for Semliki Forest virus membrane glycoproteins.
Nature
288:236-241[Medline].
|
| 24.
|
Hashimoto, K., and B. Simizu.
1982.
A temperature-sensitive mutant of Western equine encephalitis virus with an altered envelope protein E1 and a defect in the transport of envelope glycoproteins.
Virology
119:276-287[Medline].
|
| 25.
|
Heidner, H. W.,
K. L. McKnight,
N. L. Davis, and R. E. Johnston.
1994.
Lethality of PE2 incorporation into Sindbis virus can be suppressed by second site mutations in E3 and E2.
J. Virol.
68:2683-2692[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 26.
|
Kenney, J. M.,
M. Sjöberg,
H. Garoff, and S. D. Fuller.
1994.
Visualization of fusion activation in the Semliki Forest virus spike.
Structure
2:823-832[Medline].
|
| 27.
|
Lawton, J. A., and B. V. V. Prasad.
1996.
Automated software package for icosahedral virus reconstruction.
J. Struct. Biol.
116:209-215[Medline].
|
| 28.
|
Lee, H., and D. T. Brown.
1994.
Mutations in an exposed domain of Sindbis virus capsid protein result in the production of noninfectious virions and morphological variants.
Virology
202:390-400[Medline].
|
| 29.
|
Levy-Mintz, P., and M. Kielian.
1991.
Mutagenesis of the putative fusion domain of the Semliki Forest virus spike protein.
J. Virol.
65:4292-4300[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 30.
|
Mendoza, Q. P.,
J. Stanley, and D. E. Griffin.
1988.
Monoclonal antibodies to the E1 and E2 glycoproteins of Sindbis virus: definition of epitopes and efficiency of protection from fatal encephalitis.
J. Gen. Virol.
70:3015-3022[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 31.
|
Meyer, W. J.,
S. Gidwitz,
V. K. Ayers,
R. J. Schoepp, and R. E. Johnston.
1992.
Conformational alteration of Sindbis virion glycoproteins induced by heat, reducing agents, or low pH.
J. Virol.
66:3504-3513[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 32.
|
Meyer, W. J., and R. E. Johnston.
1993.
Structural rearrangement of infecting Sindbis virions at the cell surface: mapping of newly accessible epitopes.
J. Virol.
67:5117-5125[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 33.
|
Mulvey, M., and D. T. Brown.
1996.
Assembly of the Sindbis virus spike protein complex.
Virology
219:125-132[Medline].
|
| 34.
|
Mulvey, M., and D. T. Brown.
1994.
Formation and rearrangement of disulfide bonds during maturation of the Sindbis virus E1 glycoprotein.
J. Virol.
68:805-812[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 35.
|
Olgen, N. H., and T. S. Baker.
1989.
Magnification calibration and the determination of spherical virus diameters using cryoEM.
Ultramicroscopy
30:281-298[Medline].
|
| 36.
|
Orci, L.,
M. Ravazzola,
M. Amherdt,
A. Madsen,
A. Perrelet,
J. D. Vassalli, and R. G. W. Anderson.
1986.
Conversion of proinsulin to insulin occurs coordinately with acidification of maturing secretory vesicles.
J. Cell Biol.
103:2273-2281[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 37.
|
Paredes, A. M.,
D. T. Brown,
R. Rothnagel,
W. Chiu,
R. J. Schoep,
R. E. Johnston, and B. V. V. Prasad.
1993.
Three-dimensional structure of a membrane-containing virus.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
90:9095-9099[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 38.
|
Paredes, A. M.,
M. L. Simon, and D. T. Brown.
1992.
The mass of the Sindbis virus nucleocapsid suggests it has T=4 icosahedral symmetry.
Virology
187:329-332[Medline].
|
| 39.
|
Renz, D., and D. T. Brown.
1976.
Characterization of Sindbis virus temperature-sensitive mutants in cultured BHK-21 and Aedes albopictus (mosquito) cells.
J. Virol.
19:775-781[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 40.
|
Rice, C. M., and J. H. Strauss.
1981.
Nucleotide sequence of the 26S mRNA of Sindbis virus and deduced sequence of the encoded virus structural proteins.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
78:2062-2066[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 41.
|
Schlesinger, S., and M. Schlesinger.
1986.
.
The Togaviridae and Flaviviridae.
Plenum Press, New York, N.Y.
|
| 42.
|
Schlesinger, S., and M. J. Schlesinger.
1972.
Formation of Sindbis virus proteins: identification of a precursor of one of the envelope proteins.
J. Virol.
10:925-932[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 43.
|
Schoepp, R. J., and R. E. Johnston.
1993.
Directed mutagenesis of a Sindbis virus pathogenesis site.
Virology
193:149-159[Medline].
|
| 44.
|
Smith, T. J.,
R. H. Cheng,
N. H. Olson,
P. Peterson,
E. Chase,
R. J. Kuhn, and T. S. Baker.
1995.
Putative receptor binding sites on alphaviruses as visualized by cryoelectron microscopy.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
92:10648-10652[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 45.
|
Strauss, E. G.,
C. M. Rice, and J. H. Strauss.
1984.
Complete nucleotide sequence of the genomic RNA of Sindbis virus.
Virology
133:92-110[Medline].
|
| 46.
|
Strauss, J. H.,
B. W. Burge,
E. R. Pfefferkorn, and J. E. Darnell.
1968.
Identification of the membrane protein and core protein of Sindbis virus.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
59:533-537[Free Full Text].
|
| 47.
|
Thuman-Commike, P., and W. Chiu.
1997.
Improved common line-based icosahedral particle image orientation estimation algorithms.
Ultramicroscopy
68:231-255[Medline].
|
| 48.
|
Thuman-Commike, P., and W. Chiu.
1996.
PTOOL: a software package for the selection of particles from electron cryomicroscopy spot-scan images.
J. Struct. Biol.
116:41-47[Medline].
|
| 49.
|
Tucker, P. C., and D. E. Griffin.
1991.
Mechanism of altered Sindbis virus neurovirulence associated with a single-amino-acid change in the E2 glycoprotein.
J. Virol.
65:1551-1557[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 50.
|
Ubol, S., and D. E. Griffin.
1991.
Identification of a putative alphavirus receptor on mouse neural cells.
J. Virol.
65:6913-6921[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 51.
|
Vénien-Bryan, C., and S. D. Fuller.
1994.
The organization of the spike complex of Semliki Forest virus.
J. Mol. Biol.
236:572-583[Medline].
|
| 52.
|
Vrati, S.,
S. G. Faragher,
R. C. Weir, and L. Dalgarno.
1986.
Ross River virus mutant with a deletion in the E2 gene: properties of the virion, virus-specific macromolecule synthesis, and attenuation of virulence for mice.
Virology
151:222-232[Medline].
|
| 53.
|
Vrati, S.,
C. A. Fernon,
L. Dalgarno, and R. C. Weir.
1988.
Location of a major antigenic site involved in Ross River neutralization.
Virology
162:346-353[Medline].
|
| 54.
|
Watson, D. G.,
J. M. Moehring, and T. J. Moehring.
1991.
A mutant CHO-K1 strain with resistance to Pseudomonas exotoxin A and alphaviruses fails to cleave Sindbis virus glycoprotein PE2.
J. Virol.
65:2332-2339[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 55.
|
Zhou, Z. H.,
S. Hardt,
B. Wang,
M. B. Sherman,
J. Jakana, and W. Chiu.
1996.
CTF determination of images of ice-embedded single particles using a graphics interface.
J. Struct. Biol.
116:216-222[Medline].
|
| 56.
|
Zhou, Z. H.,
B. V. V. Prasad,
J. Jakana,
F. Rixon, and W. Chiu.
1994.
Protein subunit structure in the herpes simplex virus A-capsid determined from 400 kV spot-scan electron cryomicroscopy.
J. Mol. Biol.
242:456-469[Medline].
|
| 57.
|
Ziemiecki, A.,
H. Garoff, and K. Simons.
1980.
Formation of the Semliki Forest virus membrane glycoprotein complexes in the infected cell.
J. Gen. Virol.
50:111-123[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
J Virol, February 1998, p. 1534-1541, Vol. 72, No. 2
0022-538X/98/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1998, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Wu, S.-R., Haag, L., Sjoberg, M., Garoff, H., Hammar, L.
(2008). The Dynamic Envelope of a Fusion Class II Virus: E3 DOMAIN OF GLYCOPROTEIN E2 PRECURSOR IN SEMLIKI FOREST VIRUS PROVIDES A UNIQUE CONTACT WITH THE FUSION PROTEIN E1. J. Biol. Chem.
283: 26452-26460
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Zaitseva, E., Mittal, A., Griffin, D. E., Chernomordik, L. V.
(2005). Class II fusion protein of alphaviruses drives membrane fusion through the same pathway as class I proteins. JCB
169: 167-177
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Zhang, W., Mukhopadhyay, S., Pletnev, S. V., Baker, T. S., Kuhn, R. J., Rossmann, M. G.
(2002). Placement of the Structural Proteins in Sindbis Virus. J. Virol.
76: 11645-11658
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Strauss, E. G., Lenches, E. M., Strauss, J. H.
(2002). Molecular Genetic Evidence that the Hydrophobic Anchors of Glycoproteins E2 and E1 Interact during Assembly of Alphaviruses. J. Virol.
76: 10188-10194
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Schulke, N., Vesanen, M. S., Sanders, R. W., Zhu, P., Lu, M., Anselma, D. J., Villa, A. R., Parren, P. W. H. I., Binley, J. M., Roux, K. H., Maddon, P. J., Moore, J. P., Olson, W. C.
(2002). Oligomeric and Conformational Properties of a Proteolytically Mature, Disulfide-Stabilized Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 gp140 Envelope Glycoprotein. J. Virol.
76: 7760-7776
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Binley, J. M., Sanders, R. W., Master, A., Cayanan, C. S., Wiley, C. L., Schiffner, L., Travis, B., Kuhmann, S., Burton, D. R., Hu, S.-L., Olson, W. C., Moore, J. P.
(2002). Enhancing the Proteolytic Maturation of Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Envelope Glycoproteins. J. Virol.
76: 2606-2616
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Smit, J. M., Klimstra, W. B., Ryman, K. D., Bittman, R., Johnston, R. E., Wilschut, J.
(2001). PE2 Cleavage Mutants of Sindbis Virus: Correlation between Viral Infectivity and pH-Dependent Membrane Fusion Activation of the Spike Heterodimer. J. Virol.
75: 11196-11204
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Heil, M. L., Albee, A., Strauss, J. H., Kuhn, R. J.
(2001). An Amino Acid Substitution in the Coding Region of the E2 Glycoprotein Adapts Ross River Virus To Utilize Heparan Sulfate as an Attachment Moiety. J. Virol.
75: 6303-6309
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Boehme, K. W., Popov, V. L., Heidner, H. W.
(2000). The Host Range Phenotype Displayed by a Sindbis Virus Glycoprotein Variant Results from Virion Aggregation and Retention on the Surface of Mosquito Cells. J. Virol.
74: 11398-11406
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Phinney, B. S., Blackburn, K., Brown, D. T.
(2000). The Surface Conformation of Sindbis Virus Glycoproteins E1 and E2 at Neutral and Low pH, as Determined by Mass Spectrometry-Based Mapping. J. Virol.
74: 5667-5678
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Hernandez, R., Lee, H., Nelson, C., Brown, D. T.
(2000). A Single Deletion in the Membrane-Proximal Region of the Sindbis Virus Glycoprotein E2 Endodomain Blocks Virus Assembly. J. Virol.
74: 4220-4228
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Boehme, K. W., Williams, J. C., Johnston, R. E., Heidner, H. W.
(2000). Linkage of an alphavirus host-range restriction to the carbohydrate-processing phenotypes of the host cell. J. Gen. Virol.
81: 161-170
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Baker, T. S., Olson, N. H., Fuller, S. D.
(1999). Adding the Third Dimension to Virus Life Cycles: Three-Dimensional Reconstruction of Icosahedral Viruses from Cryo-Electron Micrographs. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev.
63: 862-922
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Klimstra, W. B., Heidner, H. W., Johnston, R. E.
(1999). The Furin Protease Cleavage Recognition Sequence of Sindbis Virus PE2 Can Mediate Virion Attachment to Cell Surface Heparan Sulfate. J. Virol.
73: 6299-6306
[Abstract]
[Full Text]