Previous Article | Next Article 
J Virol, February 1998, p. 1314-1323, Vol. 72, No. 2
0022-538X/98/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1998, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Reovirus Induction of and Sensitivity to Beta
Interferon in Cardiac Myocyte Cultures Correlate with Induction of
Myocarditis and Are Determined by Viral Core Proteins
Barbara
Sherry,*
Johann
Torres, and
Mary Ann
Blum
Department of Microbiology, Pathology, and
Parasitology, College of Veterinary Medicine, North Carolina State
University, Raleigh, North Carolina 27606
Received 31 July 1997/Accepted 4 November 1997
 |
ABSTRACT |
Reovirus-induced acute myocarditis in mice serves as a model to
investigate non-immune-mediated mechanisms of viral myocarditis. We
have used primary cardiac myocyte cultures infected with a large panel
of myocarditic and nonmyocarditic reassortant reoviruses to
identify determinants of viral myocarditic potential. Here, we report
that while both myocarditic and nonmyocarditic reoviruses kill cardiac
myocytes, viral myocarditic potential correlates with viral spread
through cardiac myocyte cultures and with cumulative cell death. To
address the role of secreted interferon (IFN), we added
anti-IFN-
/
antibody to infected cardiac myocyte cultures. Antibody benefited nonmyocarditic more than myocarditic virus spread
(P < 0.001), and this benefit was associated with the
reovirus M1 and L2 genes. There was no benefit for a differentiated
skeletal muscle cell line culture (C2C12 cells), suggesting cell type
specificity. IFN-
induction in reovirus-infected cardiac myocyte
cultures correlated with viral myocarditic potential
(P = 0.006) and was associated with the reovirus M1,
S2, and L2 genes. Sensitivity to the antiviral effects of IFN-
/
added to cardiac myocyte cultures also correlated with viral
myocarditic potential (P = 0.004) and was associated
with the same reovirus genes. Several reoviruses induced IFN-
levels
discordant with their myocarditic phenotypes, and for those tested,
sensitivity to IFN-
/
compensated for the anomalous induction
levels. Thus, the combination of induction of and sensitivity to
IFN-
/
is a determinant of reovirus myocarditic potential.
Finally, a nonmyocarditic reovirus induced cardiac lesions in mice
depleted of IFN-
/
, demonstrating that IFN-
/
is a
determinant of reovirus-induced myocarditis. This provides the first
identification of reovirus genes associated with IFN induction and
sensitivity and provides the first evidence that IFN-
can be a
determinant of viral myocarditis and reovirus disease.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Acute myocarditis (1) has
most likely occurred in more than 5% of the human population
(69). It is often fatal in infants, while in older
individuals it can progress to dilated cardiomyopathy (36). A wide variety of viruses have been implicated
(35, 65), but most research has focused on enteroviruses,
responsible for 20 to 50% or more of human myocarditis
(65). While much evidence suggests that enterovirus-induced
cardiac damage in mice is mediated predominantly by the immune response
(10, 51, 69), enteroviruses are cytopathic to murine
cardiac myocytes (23) and they can induce myocarditis in
mice lacking immune cells (8). Moreover, in a large
clinical trial immunosuppressive agents were not therapeutic
(37), indicating that the role of immune cells is complex.
How do other viruses, responsible for 50% or more of human
myocarditis, induce the disease? Little is known from human studies;
however, in adenovirus- and human immunodeficiency virus-associated
myocarditis, the extent of myocardial inflammation and damage does not
correlate with the severity of cardiac dysfunction (13, 35),
suggesting that inflammatory cells may play a minimal or indirect role.
Importantly, non-immune-mediated mechanisms of cardiac tissue damage
remain largely unexplored.
Reovirus-induced acute viral myocarditis in mice is characterized by a
mild inflammatory infiltrate with marked necrosis (22, 61,
62), in contrast to the massive cellular infiltrate
characteristic of the enterovirus-induced disease (49).
Indeed, reovirus induces myocarditis in SCID mice (60) and
macrophage inflammatory protein-1
(MIP-1
) knockout mice
(61a), demonstrating that reovirus-induced myocarditis is
not immune cell mediated. Reovirus therefore presents an ideal model
for studying non-immune-mediated viral myocarditis.
The reovirus genome is composed of 10 segments of double-stranded RNA
(dsRNA), and with one exception, each gene segment encodes one protein
(reviewed in reference 44). "Reassortant"
viruses can be generated that contain mixtures of gene segments from
two virus parents, and genetic analyses with reassortant viruses have been invaluable tools in identifying gene product functions. We have
used genetic analyses to identify the determinants of reovirus-induced acute myocarditis and found that the M1 gene was implicated in every
analysis while the L1 and L2 gene associations with disease varied
among viruses (58, 59). These three genes encode viral core
proteins likely to form a structural unit involved in viral RNA
synthesis in the core. Specifically, the L1-encoded
3 protein has a
polymerase function (15, 63) and lies at the base of a
pentameric channel formed by the L2-encoded
2 protein (16, 19,
40), which is a guanylyl transferase (9, 34). The M1-encoded µ2 protein, which lies adjacent to
3 (19),
has been implicated in RNA synthesis in genetic analyses (11, 57,
70) and is an RNA-binding protein (7) associated with
nucleoside triphosphatase activity (47). Thus, the genetic
analyses suggested that viral RNA synthesis in cardiac myocytes was
likely to be involved in reovirus-induced myocarditis.
Accordingly, we used our large panel of myocarditic and nonmyocarditic
reassortant reoviruses to identify parameters of reovirus replication
in primary cardiac myocyte cultures that correlate with viral
myocarditic potential (57). While RNA synthesis in cardiac
myocytes correlated with viral myocarditic potential, the yield of
infectious virus did not (57). This suggested that some
other consequence of viral RNA synthesis, such as cytokine response,
was likely to be a determinant of the disease. One mechanism for this
would be induction of interferon (IFN).
IFNs are divided into three classes (
,
, and
) and are
synthesized by specific types of cells as one of the first responses to
viruses (reviewed in reference 68). IFN-
or -
is secreted, binds to cell receptors (the type I IFN-
/
receptor),
and, through a phosphorylation cascade, rapidly upregulates
transcription of a large family of genes (IFN-responsive genes) that
contain IFN-stimulated regulatory elements in their promoter regulatory
regions (reviewed in reference 30). While
IFN-
/
induces transcription of multiple genes that have antiviral
activities, three of these gene products remain latent until activated
(directly or indirectly) by dsRNA (reviewed in reference
27). Specifically, the dsRNA-activated protein
kinase (PKR [reviewed in reference 52]),
2',5'-oligo(A) synthetase, and RNase L (activated by the 2',5'-oligo(A)
synthetase-generated oligomers, and thus indirectly activated by dsRNA)
each remain latent until dsRNA is suitably presented. Thus, our
previous demonstration that reovirus RNA synthesis in cardiac myocyte
cultures correlates with viral myocarditic potential could reflect
differential induction of IFN and/or differential activation of the
IFN-induced antiviral proteins (i.e., differential sensitivity to IFN).
In the studies presented here, we have investigated whether
reovirus-induced IFN is a determinant of myocarditic potential. Our
results demonstrate that in cardiac myocyte cultures, nonmyocarditic viruses induce more IFN-
and are more sensitive to IFN-
/
than myocarditic viruses and that both functions are associated with viral
core proteins. Furthermore, a nonmyocarditic virus induces cardiac
lesions in mice depleted of IFN-
/
. Thus, reovirus induction of
and sensitivity to IFN-
are determinants of reovirus-induced myocarditis.
 |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
Viruses and cells.
All reovirus stocks (triply plaqued and
passaged twice in mouse L cells) were characterized previously for
their myocarditic phenotypes (58, 59). Virus 8B is a
reassortant virus derived from a mouse infected with the strains
serotype 1 Lang (T1L) and serotype 3 Dearing (T3D) (59). All
other reassortant viruses (Fig. 1) were
derived from mouse L cells infected with the indicated viruses
(59). Viruses EB121 and E3 are reassortant viruses derived from T1L and T3D. All EW-series reassortant viruses were derived from
8B and EB121, while all DB-series reassortant viruses were derived from
EW60 and E3. Viral myocarditic potentials were determined by injecting
2 × 105 to 2 × 106 (58)
and 4 × 106 to 5 × 107
(59) PFU into 2-day-old Cr:NIH(S) mice and examining their hearts for macroscopic lesions (gross myocarditis) at death or at 14 days postinjection (58, 59).

View larger version (43K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 1.
Panel of reassortant reoviruses used for analyses. Gene
segment derivations are indicated as follows: 1, T1L origin; 3, T3D
origin; black box, myocarditic (8B) origin; white box, nonmyocarditic
(EB121) origin. Viral myocarditic potentials (expressed as the percent
of mice with gross myocarditis) were determined previously (58,
59). NON-STRUC, nonstructural.
|
|
Primary cardiac myocyte cultures were prepared as described previously
(
3). Briefly, Cr:NIH(S) term fetuses or 1-day-old
neonates
(National Cancer Institute) were sacrificed and the apical
two-thirds
of their hearts were minced and trypsinized. The cell
suspension was
plated on 6-well clusters and incubated at 37°C
in 5%
CO
2 to allow fibroblasts to adhere, at which time the
nonadherent
cells were removed to fresh 96-well clusters (myocyte
cultures
containing 5 to 15% fibroblasts as previously reported
[
3]).
The cultures were incubated in Dulbecco modified
Eagle medium
(Gibco BRL) supplemented with 7% fetal bovine serum
(HyClone)
(completed DMEM) and 0.06% thymidine.
C2C12 cells are a skeletal muscle cell line (ATCC CRL-1771
[
6]) maintained in completed DMEM (10% fetal bovine
serum, 0.1%
gentamycin). For differentiation, the cells were split 1:4
and
plated at 10
4 per well of 96-well clusters. After 2 days the serum was lowered
to 4%, and after 2 or 3 more days, more
than 90% of the cells
had differentiated into myotubes (by microscopic
examination),
which were used for infections, as for the cardiac
myocyte cultures.
Infections and harvests.
Two days after preparation of
primary cardiac myocyte cultures, or when C2C12 cells were
differentiated (see above), viable cells were counted (typically 2 × 105 to 4 × 105 per well in each case)
and infected at a multiplicity of infection (MOI) of 0.1 or 5 PFU per
cell in completed DMEM with 0.06% thymidine (myocytes only). Duplicate
wells were infected with each virus, except when assayed by MTT
(catalog no. M-5655; Sigma) (see below), in which case triplicate wells
were infected. Cultures were incubated at 37°C in 5%
CO2. If indicated, cultures (300 µl before infection, 150 µl after infection) were treated with one of the following reagents:
900 international reference units (3 µl) of IFN-
/
(catalog no.
I-1258; Sigma) or control buffer (100 mM NaCl, 10 mM Tris [pH 7.4], 1 mM EDTA); for additional daily additions (see Fig. 6 and 7), 90 international reference units (2 µl) of IFN-
/
or diluted
control buffer (15 mM NaCl, 1.5 mM Tris [pH 7.4], 0.15 mM EDTA); or 3 µl of antibody containing 165 National Institutes of Health
neutralizing units of rabbit anti-mouse IFN-
/
(catalog no. 21032;
Lee Biomolecular Research, Inc., San Diego, Calif.) or control rabbit
antibody.
Cell viability assay.
At 20 h or 5 days postinfection, 15 µl of a solution of 6 mg of MTT/ml in completed DMEM was added to
each 150-µl culture well and incubated for 4 h at 37°C in 5%
CO2. The culture plates were centrifuged (750 × g) for 8 min, supernatants were aspirated, and 100 µl of
0.04 N HCl in isopropanol was added to each well. After 15 min at room
temperature, 100 µl of H2O was added to each well and the
optical density at 550 nm was determined on an automated microplate
reader.
Plaque assays.
Culture wells were frozen at
70°C,
subjected to two additional freeze-thaw cycles, and then lysed in 0.5%
Nonidet P-40. Virus titers were determined by plating serial dilutions
on mouse L-cell monolayers, overlaying with agar, and staining with
neutral red as previously described (57).
IFN bioassay.
Supernatants were removed from the culture
wells and stored at
70°C until they were ready for assay. One-third
of each culture well supernatant was assayed as follows, with
commercial IFN-
/
treated in parallel to generate standard curves
for each assay. After diluting with MEM, reactions were acidified to pH
2 to 3 with 2 N HCl, incubated for 24 h at 4°C (to inactivate
reovirus), and then neutralized with 2 N NaOH. Duplicate aliquots
(equivalent to one-sixth culture well each) or control medium was added
to 96-well clusters containing 100 µl of completed MEM and seeded 24 h earlier with 4 × 104 mouse L cells, and
each sample was then serially twofold diluted five times. After 24 h of incubation at 37°C in 5% CO2, 4 × 105 PFU of encephalomyocarditis virus in 50 µl of
completed MEM was added to each well. After 24 h of incubation at
37°C in 5% CO2, L-cell viability was determined by MTT
assay as described above. IFN concentrations were calculated based on
standard curves generated with commercial IFN-
/
.
IFN RT-PCR.
RNA from infected cardiac myocyte cultures was
harvested 20 h postinfection as previously described
(57) with TriReagent (Molecular Research Center, Cincinnati,
Ohio). Pooled RNA samples from duplicate culture wells were treated
with RNase-free DNase, and then half of each sample was treated with
DNase-free RNase (negative controls). Mouse L-cell DNA was used as a
positive control. Samples were denatured in H2O at 70°C
for 5 min, snap cooled on ice, and then incubated for 1 h at
42°C in a reverse transcription (RT) reaction mixture [10 mM KCl, 10 mM (NH4)2SO4, 20 mM Tris (pH 8.8),
2 mM MgSO4, 0.1% Triton X-100, 1 mM dithiothreitol, 2.5 µM oligo(dT), 1 mM each deoxynucleoside triphosphate, 0.5 U of RNA
inhibitor/µl, and 15 U of avian myoblastosis virus
reverse transcriptase]. Each reaction mixture was divided into three
aliquots for PCR. Primers for PCR were as follows. For IFN-
, the
known mouse IFN-
gene sequences (murine IFN-
1 through 8)
were aligned and nucleotide regions conserved among all sequences were
identified to design an upstream primer (TCTCTCCTGCCTGAAGGAC;
bases 147 to 165) and a downstream primer
(TCCTCACAGCCAGCAGGG; bases 416 to 433) predicted to generate
a 286-bp product. For IFN-
, sequences were identified that had no
homology with any of the IFN-
genes to design an upstream primer
(TTCGGAAATGTCAGGAGCTC; bases 104 to 123) and a downstream
primer (CTGCAACCACCACTCATTCT; bases 633 to 654) predicted to
generate a 550-bp product. For glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase
(G3PDH), the upstream primer (TCACCACCATGGAGAAGGC; bases 345 to 363) and downstream primer (CAAAGTTGTCATGGATGACC; bases
526 to 545) were predicted to generate a 200-bp product. In each case,
the upstream primer was between 700 and 900 bases from the 3' end of
the mRNA. PCR was conducted in 100 µl of reaction mixture (1×
Taq DNA polymerase buffer, 1.5 mM MgCl2, 0.2 mM
each deoxynucleoside triphosphate, 1 µM each primer) overlaid
with mineral oil and hot started with 1 µl of Taq DNA
polymerase. The reactions were incubated at 99°C for 2 min, 52°C
for 1 min, and 72°C for 1 min and then were incubated for 35 cycles
at 94°C for 1 min, 52°C for 1 min, and 72°C for 1 min. Reactions
were completed with a 5-min incubation at 72°C, and then 10% was
electrophoresed on a 3% NuSieve GTG agarose-1% agarose gel and
visualized by ethidium bromide staining. RNase-treated samples
(negative controls) generated no detectable products (data not shown),
indicating that RT-PCR products were generated from RNA, not DNA,
templates.
Mouse depletion of IFN-
/
, injection, and analysis.
Two-day-old randomized litters of Cr:NIH(S) mice (National Cancer
Institute) were injected intraperitoneally with 1,100 National Institutes of Health neutralizing units (20 µl) of rabbit anti-mouse IFN-
/
(see above) or control rabbit antibody. Six hours later, the mice were injected intramuscularly in the hindlimb with 20 µl of
MEM containing 2 × 105 PFU of the nonmyocarditic
reassortant reovirus DB188 (Fig. 1). At 2 and 4 days postinjection, the
mice were injected with anti-IFN-
/
or control antibody as
described above. At 7 days postinjection, the mice were sacrificed and
their hearts were removed to 10% buffered formalin for sectioning and
hematoxylin-eosin staining. Slides containing 27 to 30 sections from
each heart were scored (by an observer with no knowledge of the heart
source) for independent cardiac lesions (i.e., cardiac lesions found in
consecutive sections were scored only once).
Statistical analysis.
The nonparametric Kruskal-Wallis
analysis, provided in Systat software (SPSS Federal Systems, Chicago,
Ill.), was used. A P value less than or equal to 0.05 was
considered significant.
 |
RESULTS |
Cumulative viral CPE in primary cardiac myocyte cultures correlates
with viral myocarditic potential.
When a panel of myocarditic and
nonmyocarditic reassortant viruses was used to infect primary cardiac
myocyte cultures at an MOI of 5 PFU per cell, cytopathic effect (CPE)
at 3 days postinfection correlated with viral myocarditic potential
(3). Later experiments revealed that despite our using an
MOI statistically sufficient to infect all of the cells, only a
fraction of the cells were initially infected and additional cells were
then infected by released progeny virus (57). Thus,
measurements made several days postinfection actually reflected both
primary and secondary infections (secondary infections made possible
perhaps by the high local concentration of virus generated from primary
infections). To determine whether viral cytopathogenicity in primary
infections alone is also a determinant of viral myocarditic potential,
a panel of myocarditic and nonmyocarditic viruses was used to compare CPE in primary infections (at 20 h postinfection, sufficient for one cycle of replication [57]) with CPE following
spread to secondary infections (at 5 days postinfection). The results
(Fig. 2) confirmed our initial
observations that CPE following viral spread through the culture
correlates with viral myocarditic potential (P = 0.004). This CPE was associated with the viral M1 (P = 0.004) and S1 (P = 0.002) genes. In contrast, CPE in
primary infections did not correlate with viral myocarditic potential
(P > 0.05), despite evidence of varying CPE (killing 4 to 33% of the cells). This CPE was associated only with the S1 gene
(P = 0.001). Thus, both myocarditic and
nonmyocarditic reoviruses kill cardiac myocytes but myocarditic
reoviruses induce greater cumulative cell death, perhaps reflecting
more efficient spread between myocytes.

View larger version (56K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 2.
Cumulative cell death in primary cardiac myocyte
cultures correlates with viral myocarditic potential. Primary cardiac
myocyte cultures were infected with reoviruses at an MOI of 5 PFU per
cell. At 20 h or 5 days postinfection, cultures were harvested and
cell viability was determined by MTT metabolic assay. Results are
expressed as the mean percent viability of triplicate wells relative to
that of mock-infected controls plus the standard deviation. P
val, P value; MYOCARD, myocarditic potential.
|
|
IFN-
/
is a determinant of viral spread between cardiac
myocytes and correlates with viral myocarditic potential.
In
primary cardiac myocyte cultures, viral RNA synthesis during initial
(primary) infections and viral spread and cumulative cell death
correlate with viral myocarditic potential, irrespective of viral yield
from the primary infections (57) and of cell death during
the primary infections (above). One mechanism by which viral RNA
synthesis can determine viral spread is by induction of IFN during
primary infections, which would subsequently affect the efficiency of
secondary infections. To test whether IFN was a determinant of viral
spread, cardiac myocyte cultures were infected with a panel of viruses
at an MOI of 0.1 PFU per cell, anti-IFN-
/
antibody or control
antibody was added, and viral yields were determined at 7 days
postinfection (Fig. 3). Viral replication in cultures receiving control antibody varied 3 logs between viruses (Fig. 3A) and correlated with the potential to induce myocarditis (P < 0.001), confirming our earlier observations
(38, 58). This replication was associated with the viral M1
(P < 0.001) and L2 (P = 0.049) genes.
Anti-IFN-
/
antibody enhanced replication of every virus tested
(Fig. 3A), demonstrating that induced IFN was a determinant of
replication and spread for every virus. The benefit from
anti-IFN-
/
antibody, however, varied 1,000-fold between viruses
(Fig. 3B) and correlated with induction of myocarditis (P < 0.001) and the M1 (P < 0.001)
and L2 (P = 0.012) genes. To determine whether induced
IFN inhibits reovirus spread in other types of cells, the experiment
was repeated in a differentiated skeletal muscle cell line (C2C12
cells). In these differentiated muscle cells, viral yield in control
cultures varied only 1.5 logs between viruses (6.4 to 8.1 log10 PFU per well) and did not correlate with viral
myocarditic potential (data not shown). The benefit from
anti-IFN-
/
antibody was maximally only threefold (Fig. 3B), and
the benefit did not correlate with viral myocarditic potential.
Therefore, the role of IFN-
/
in controlling reovirus spread is
cell type specific, and in cardiac myocyte cultures, nonmyocarditic
viruses induce more IFN-
/
and/or are more sensitive to the
antiviral effects of IFN-
/
than myocarditic viruses are.

View larger version (62K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 3.
IFN- / is a determinant of viral spread between
cardiac myocytes but not between differentiated skeletal muscle cells.
Replicate wells of primary cardiac myocyte cultures or a differentiated
skeletal muscle cell line (C2C12 cells) were infected at an MOI of 0.1 PFU per cell and overlaid with anti-IFN- / antibody or control
antibody. At 7 days postinfection, the cultures were lysed and viral
titers were determined by plaque assay. (A) Results from cardiac
myocyte cultures, expressed as mean viral yield of duplicate wells plus
standard deviation (skeletal muscle cell culture data is not shown).
(B) Results from cardiac myocyte cultures and skeletal muscle cell
cultures, expressed as the ratio of viral yield in anti-IFN- /
antibody-treated wells relative to that in control-treated wells.
P val, P values; Card. Myo., cardiac myocytes;
Skel. Musc., skeletal muscle cells; Cont., control antibody; MYOCARD,
myocarditic potential.
|
|
Nonmyocarditic viruses induce more IFN-
in infected cardiac
myocyte cultures than myocarditic viruses do.
To determine whether
the anti-IFN-
/
antibody benefit to viral spread reflected
induction of IFN, cardiac myocyte cultures were infected with a panel
of viruses at an MOI of 5 PFU per cell and culture supernatants were
titered by bioassay at 10 and 20 h postinfection for IFN levels
(Fig. 4). At 10 h postinfection, 8 of 12 nonmyocarditic viruses had induced detectable levels of IFN while
only 2 of 15 myocarditic viruses had done so, and the magnitude of IFN
induction correlated with viral myocarditic potential (P = 0.006). This IFN induction was associated with the
M1 (P = 0.040), S2 (P = 0.004), and L2
(P = 0.037) genes. At 20 h postinfection, 22 of
the 27 viruses induced detectable IFN, and again, the magnitude of IFN
induction correlated with viral myocarditic potential
(P = 0.007). This IFN induction was again associated
with the M1 (P = 0.038), S2 (P = 0.012), and L2 (P = 0.044) genes. Thus,
nonmyocarditic viruses induced more IFN than myocarditic viruses did in
cardiac myocyte cultures.

View larger version (36K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 4.
Nonmyocarditic viruses induce more IFN- / in
cardiac myocytes than myocarditic viruses do. Primary cardiac myocyte
cultures were infected at an MOI of 5 PFU per cell, and supernatants
were removed at 10 and 20 h postinfection. After acidification (to
inactivate reovirus) and neutralization of samples and commercial
IFN- / standards, IFN units were determined by bioassay. P
val, P value; MYOCARD, myocarditic potential.
|
|
To distinguish between IFN-

and IFN-

, cardiac myocyte cultures
were mock infected or infected with each of three nonmyocarditic
viruses that induced high (T3D and EW29) or low (DB93A) levels
of IFN
(Fig.
4). RNA was harvested at 20 h postinfection for RT-PCR
(Fig.
5). IFN-

mRNA was amplified from each
of the three infected
cultures but not from the mock infection. In
contrast, IFN-

mRNA
was not amplified from any culture, despite the
strong positive
signal from a DNA control. The G3PDH mRNA, a control
constitutively
expressed gene, was amplified from all cultures,
verifying the
quality of the RNA harvests. Therefore, the IFN induced
by nonmyocarditic
viruses (Fig.
4) is IFN-

.

View larger version (63K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 5.
Reovirus-induced IFN in cardiac myocytes is IFN- .
Primary cardiac myocyte cultures were infected with three
nonmyocarditic reoviruses or mock infected, and at 20 h
postinfection RNA was harvested. Following DNase treatment, cDNAs were
generated with oligo(dT) and PCR amplification was performed with
primer pairs specific for IFN- , IFN- , and G3PDH genes. One RT-PCR
sample contained no RNA template (negative control), and one sample
contained mouse DNA (positive control). Samples (10%) were
electrophoresed and ethidium bromide stained. Control samples that were
RNase treated before RT-PCR generated no bands (data not shown). MW,
molecular weight standards.
|
|
Nonmyocarditic viruses are more sensitive to IFN-
/
in
infected cardiac myocyte cultures than myocarditic viruses are.
In
addition to the observed varying induction of IFN-
, the
anti-IFN-
/
benefit to viral spread could reflect varying viral sensitivity to IFN-
's antiviral effects. To measure viral
sensitivity to IFN-
/
's antiviral effects, cardiac myocyte
cultures were treated with IFN-
/
or control buffer, infected
24 h later with a panel of viruses at an MOI of 5 PFU per cell,
and titered for virus at 20 h postinfection. For every virus
tested, pretreatment with IFN-
/
decreased viral yield compared to
control treatment, indicating that all viruses were sensitive to
IFN-
/
's antiviral effects. However, the IFN-
/
inhibition
of replication varied only 1 log between viruses (Fig.
6A). Despite this narrow range, the
degree of inhibition correlated with viral myocarditic potential (P = 0.043) and was associated with the reovirus M1
gene (P = 0.043). The experiment was repeated, but in
order to amplify the effects of IFN-
/
, the infections were not
harvested until 5 days postinfection to allow multiple rounds of
infection through the culture. Because some viruses induced more
IFN-
than others (Fig. 4), the control-treated cultures received
anti-IFN-
/
antibody instead of buffer alone, so that
IFN-
/
-treated cultures could be compared to cultures devoid of
IFN. Again, IFN-
/
treatment decreased viral yield and, as
expected, did so to a greater extent than when measured at 20 h
postinfection, although the inhibition varied only 1.7 logs between
viruses. Again the degree of IFN-
/
inhibition correlated with
viral myocarditic potential (Fig. 6B) (P = 0.004), and
was associated with the reovirus M1 and S2 genes (P = 0.004 and 0.020, respectively). To further amplify the effects of
IFN-
/
, an MOI of 0.1 PFU per cell was used, IFN-
/
or
anti-IFN-
/
was added every day, and the cultures were not
harvested until 7 days postinfection. Under these conditions, the
degree of inhibition varied 4.5 logs between viruses (Fig. 6C) and
again correlated with the potential to induce myocarditis
(P = 0.006) and was associated with the reovirus M1 and
L2 genes (P = 0.006 and 0.013, respectively). The
dramatic difference in IFN-
/
effects at an MOI of 0.1 and harvested at 7 days (Fig. 6C) compared to an MOI of 5 harvested at 5 days (Fig. 6B) did not reflect differences in replication in the
presence of anti-IFN-
/
antibody (Fig.
7A) but instead reflected differences in
the effects of IFN-
/
(Fig. 7B). Replication following IFN-
/
treatment was reduced as much as 6 logs under conditions of low MOI and
longer incubation time (Fig. 7B), presumably reflecting the cumulative
effects of IFN inhibition of viral replication through multiple rounds
of infection. Thus, in addition to inducing more IFN-
in cardiac
myocyte cultures, nonmyocarditic viruses were also more sensitive to
IFN-
/
's antiviral effects in those cells than myocarditic
viruses were.

View larger version (34K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 6.
Nonmyocarditic viruses are more sensitive to IFN- /
in cardiac myocytes than myocarditic viruses are. Primary cardiac
myocyte cultures were infected under three different conditions
(duplicate wells for each data point) and lysed at the indicated times,
and viral titers were determined by plaque assay. Results are expressed
as the ratio of viral yield in control-treated cultures relative to
that in IFN-treated cultures. (A) Infected at an MOI of 5, control
cultures received control buffer, IFN-treated cultures received IFN,
and all cultures were harvested at 20 h postinfection. (B)
Infected at an MOI of 5, control cultures received anti-IFN- /
antibody and control buffer, IFN-treated cultures received control
antibody and IFN, and all cultures were harvested at 5 days
postinfection. (C) Infected at an MOI of 0.1, cultures were treated as
for panel B and harvested at 7 days postinfection. MYOCARD, myocarditic
potential. X, not determined.
|
|

View larger version (71K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 7.
IFN- / inhibition of reovirus replication is
amplified over time. The results from Fig. 6B and C are expressed as
actual viral yields rather than ratio of viral yields. The results are
expressed as the means of duplicate samples plus standard deviations.
MYOCARD, myocarditic potential.
|
|
A nonmyocarditic reovirus induces cardiac lesions in mice depleted
of IFN-
/
.
In order to determine directly whether IFN-
/
is a determinant of reovirus-induced myocarditis in mice, neonates were
injected with anti-IFN-
/
or control antibody and challenged with
a nonmyocarditic reassortant reovirus, DB188 (Fig. 1). At 7 days
postinjection, slides containing 27 to 30 cardiac sections per mouse
were examined for independent lesions (i.e., cardiac lesions found in
consecutive sections were scored only once). While none of the 86 sections from the three mice injected with control antibody contained a single cardiac lesion, each of the four mice injected with
anti-IFN-
/
antibody contained six to nine independent cardiac
lesions (Table 1 and Fig.
8). Thus, IFN-
/
is a determinant of
reovirus myocarditic potential. Since the antibody neutralized an
unknown fraction of IFN-
/
, and it is uncertain whether
neutralization was uniform throughout the tissues (including the
heart), it is likely that complete and uniform depletion would magnify
the effects seen here.

View larger version (134K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 8.
A nonmyocarditic reovirus induces cardiac lesions in
mice depleted of IFN- / . Neonatal mice were injected with
anti-IFN- / antibody or control antibody and then challenged with
the nonmyocarditic reassortant reovirus DB188 (Fig. 1). Following two
more antibody injections, mice were sacrificed at 7 days postinjection
with virus and cardiac sections were hematoxylin and eosin stained
(results are summarized in Table 1). The photograph represents a
typical lesion observed in mice injected with anti-IFN- / antibody
(magnification, ×80). While an inflammatory infiltrate is evident in
the necrotic region (arrow), our previous investigations
(60) suggest that this mediates protection rather than
damage. RV, right ventricular chamber; BV, blood vessel.
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
Reovirus-induced acute myocarditis in mice serves as a model to
investigate non-immune-mediated mechanisms of myocarditis. Previously,
we demonstrated that reovirus RNA synthesis in cardiac myocytes
correlates with viral myocarditic potential but that generation of
infectious virus does not, suggesting that some other consequence of
viral RNA synthesis determines disease. We demonstrate here that while
both nonmyocarditic and myocarditic reoviruses can kill cardiac
myocytes, viral spread through primary cardiac myocyte cultures and the
resulting cumulative cell death correlate with viral myocarditic
potential. Anti-IFN-
/
antibody has a greater effect on the spread
of nonmyocarditic than myocarditic reoviruses, and this is due to both
increased induction of IFN-
and increased sensitivity to the
antiviral effects evoked by IFN-
/
. Finally, a nonmyocarditic
reovirus induces cardiac lesions in mice depleted of IFN-
/
,
demonstrating directly that IFN is a determinant of reovirus-induced
myocarditis. These results provide the first evidence that viruses
induce IFN in cardiac myocyte cultures and that this IFN is a
determinant of viral myocarditis.
We have shown here that both myocarditic and nonmyocarditic reoviruses
can kill cardiac myocytes in culture (Fig. 2). While we have not
directly assayed for apoptosis, our previous electron microscopic
studies of infected cardiac sections were consistent with necrosis
alone (61). Reovirus pathogenesis in the mouse has been well
studied (66, 67), and recent evidence has demonstrated that
reoviruses can induce apoptosis in central nervous system cells
(48) and in other cell types (50); we will
directly address apoptosis in future investigations. This is a
particularly intriguing possibility, given our previous evidence that
viral RNA synthesis in cardiac myocytes correlates with viral
myocarditic potential and the recent report that dsRNA in vaccinia
virus-infected cells induces apoptosis (28).
While both nonmyocarditic and myocarditic reoviruses kill cardiac
myocytes, viral spread and the resulting cumulative cell death
correlate with viral myocarditic potential (Fig. 2). While this could
have merely reflected efficiency of infection during the initial
infections and/or yield of virus from the initial infections, we have
shown that neither of those parameters correlates with viral
myocarditic potential (57). Instead, our previous evidence
suggested that viral RNA synthesis in the initial infections determines
spread and viral myocarditic potential (57), consistent with
a model where reovirus-induced IFN in initial infections controlled the
spread of the virus to neighboring cells. Indeed, in the present study
we found that in cardiac myocyte cultures, anti-IFN-
/
antibody
had a greater effect on the spread of nonmyocarditic reoviruses than
myocarditic reoviruses (Fig. 3A). Interestingly, anti-IFN-
/
had
little effect on virus spread in the C2C12 differentiated skeletal
muscle cell culture (Fig. 3B). The range of viral yields from control
treated C2C12 cells was similar to that in anti-IFN-
/
antibody-treated cardiac myocyte cultures, suggesting that virus spread
through C2C12 cell cultures occurred as if in the absence of IFN. We
are currently investigating whether this reovirus behavior in C2C12
cells reflects failure to induce IFN, resistance to IFN, or both.
Using a bioassay (Fig. 4) and RT-PCR (Fig. 5), we demonstrated that
nonmyocarditic reoviruses induced more IFN-
than myocarditic reoviruses did in cardiac myocyte cultures. Several nonmyocarditic viruses induced less IFN than would be expected (DB93A, DB93B, DB188, EW27, EW46, and EW116) given the overall correlation between high IFN induction and low myocarditic potential. Five of those six
viruses were tested for sensitivity to the antiviral effects of IFN
(Fig. 6) (DB93B was not tested). Of those five, four were among the
most IFN sensitive of the 27 viruses tested. The remaining virus (EW46)
was the most sensitive under one set of conditions (Fig. 6A), was
intermediate under another set (Fig. 6B), and was not tested in the
third set (Fig. 6C). Thus, while some nonmyocarditic reoviruses may
induce only moderate levels of IFN, their marked sensitivity to IFN
apparently compensates to control virus spread and myocarditis. Two
myocarditic reoviruses (EW25 and 8B) induced more IFN than would be
expected; the IFN sensitivity of one (8B) was tested (Fig. 6), and it
was among the least IFN sensitive of the 27 viruses tested. Thus,
resistance to IFN can also compensate for IFN induction to determine
virus spread and myocarditis. Reoviruses have been shown to induce IFN
in several cell lines (18, 29, 33), but reovirus induction
of IFN in differentiated cells or primary cell cultures has not
previously been investigated. Indeed, IFN induction in cardiac myocyte
cultures has not been investigated previously for any viruses. IFN-
transcription is stimulated by a number of viruses and by dsRNA and is
controlled by a complex panel of positive and negative regulatory
factors (reviewed in reference 24). We are currently
investigating the role of several regulatory factors in reovirus
induction of IFN in cardiac myocyte cultures.
Using three different infection conditions, we found that
nonmyocarditic reoviruses were more sensitive to IFN-
/
added to cardiac myocyte cultures than myocarditic reoviruses were (Fig. 6).
Reoviruses are sensitive to IFN treatment in many cell types. As
described in the introduction, PKR, 2',5'-oligo(A) synthetase, and
RNase L are all induced by IFN but are only activated (directly or
indirectly) in the presence of dsRNA (27), which is
stimulatory even when provided only as a local secondary structure in
single-stranded RNA. Reoviruses activate PKR in fibroblast cell lines,
resulting in phosphorylation of the
subunit of eukaryotic
initiation factor 2 and inhibition of host protein synthesis (21,
25, 32). While many studies have demonstrated that PKR activation
can inhibit viral replication, including reovirus replication (12,
41, 45, 54), 2',5'-oligo(A) synthetase can be critical to the IFN-induced antiviral state and the anti-reoviral state as well (2, 46). The relative importance of each of these effectors to the antiviral effect is virus strain specific and cell specific. For
example, IFN-
treatment of mouse L929 cells inhibits reovirus strain
Dearing replication more than it does reovirus strain Lang replication
(26). While PKR mediates the antiviral effect in mouse L929
cells (5, 53), IFN-
can inhibit reovirus replication in
other mouse cell lines without concomitant elevation of PKR activity
(31) and IFN treatment of HeLa cells results in RNase L-mediated cleavage of reovirus RNA (2, 46). We are
currently investigating the mediators of reovirus sensitivity to IFN in cardiac myocyte cultures.
Both induction of and sensitivity to IFN-
in cardiac myocyte
cultures were associated with the viral M1, S2, and L2 genes (Fig. 4
and 6). The M1-encoded µ2 protein is an RNA-binding protein, the
L2-encoded
2 protein is a guanylyl transferase, and both proteins
are found at the icosahedral vertices of the core in a complex that
likely functions in core viral RNA synthesis (see the introduction).
The S2-encoded
2 protein is an abundant core protein (reviewed in
reference 44) with no known function, but which has
limited homology with an Escherichia coli RNA polymerase (14). Together, the data are consistent with a mechanism
where reovirus RNA synthesis determines both induction of IFN-
and sensitivity to IFN-
/
. In our studies of viral RNA synthesis in
cardiac myocyte cultures (57), however, we found that
myocarditic reoviruses generate single-stranded RNA and dsRNA faster
than nonmyocarditic viruses. Those results are inconsistent with a mechanism where the rate of reovirus dsRNA synthesis directly determines induction of and sensitivity to IFN. An alternative explanation is that the rate of reovirus synthesis determines the
availability of reovirus mRNA for translation and that the latter
determines reovirus induction of and sensitivity to IFN. Indeed, the
reovirus S4-encoded
3 protein inhibits PKR, a mediator of the
antiviral effects of IFN. Specifically, genetic analyses have
identified the reovirus S4 gene as determining the level of inhibition
of host protein synthesis (56), and multiple studies have
demonstrated that
3 can bind dsRNA to abrogate activation of PKR
(4, 25, 32) and therefore abrogate phosphorylation of the
subunit of eukaryotic initiation factor 2 and inhibition of protein
synthesis. The association of
3 with the M2-encoded µ1c protein
inhibits
3 binding to dsRNA, and consequently
3-µ1c association
is also a determinant of PKR activation and inhibition of protein
synthesis (55, 71). Given these
3 and µ1c functions, why weren't the S4 and M2 genes identified as determinants of reovirus
induction of and sensitivity to IFN in our genetic analyses? One likely
explanation is that the
3 proteins encoded by the T1L- and
T3D-derived S4 genes function quite similarly to each other in
inhibition of protein synthesis compared to the
3 proteins from
other reovirus strains (55), and thus a genetic analysis of
these two alleles would not identify them as determinants of the degree
of inhibition of protein synthesis. Thus, while previous studies have
implicated particular reovirus proteins (
3 and µ1c) in regulating
cell functions that are activated by dsRNA, our results suggest that
the kinetics of reovirus protein synthesis (as determined by viral RNA
synthesis kinetics) are also important determinants of these cell
functions. Indeed, our results are completely consistent with previous
evidence that the degree of inhibition of host protein synthesis
correlates with the kinetics of reovirus protein synthesis but not with
the final yield of virus (43).
Finally, a nonmyocarditic reovirus induced multiple cardiac lesions in
each of four mice depleted of IFN-
/
(Table 1 and Fig. 8),
demonstrating directly that IFN-
/
is a determinant of
reovirus-induced myocarditis. In many virus systems, IFN-
/
plays
a critical role in determining survival of the infected host, as
demonstrated with anti-IFN-
/
antiserum (20) and, more
recently, knockout mice that eliminate IFN activity (17, 39, 42,
64). Currently, we are using IFN-
/
receptor knockout mice
to continue our investigations of the role of IFN-
/
in reovirus-induced myocarditis.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
We are grateful to Bob Johnston, Nancy Davis, William Klimstra,
Fred Fuller, and Diana Noah for many invaluable discussions.
This research was supported by Public Health Service grant AI-31250
from the NIAID and grant 204743 from the North Carolina State
University College of Veterinary Medicine.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
Corresponding author. Mailing address: Department of
Microbiology, Pathology, and Parasitology, College of Veterinary
Medicine, North Carolina State University, 4700 Hillsborough St.,
Raleigh, NC 27606. Phone: (919) 515-4480. Fax: (919) 515-3044. E-mail: barbara_sherry{at}ncsu.edu.
This article is dedicated to Bernie Fields, who knew long ago that
IFN would prove to be critical in reovirus disease.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Aretz, H. T.,
M. E. Billingham,
W. D. Edwards,
S. M. Factor,
J. T. Fallon,
J. J. Fenoglio,
E. G. J. Olsen, and F. J. Schoen.
1986.
Myocarditis: a histopathologic definition and classification.
Am. J. Cardiovasc. Pathol.
1:3-14.
|
| 2.
|
Baglioni, C.,
A. De Benedetti, and G. J. Williams.
1984.
Cleavage of nascent reovirus mRNA by localized activation of the 2'-5'-oligoadenylate-dependent endoribonuclease.
J. Virol.
52:865-871[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 3.
|
Baty, C. J., and B. Sherry.
1993.
Cytopathogenic effect in cardiac myocytes but not in cardiac fibroblasts is correlated with reovirus-induced acute myocarditis.
J. Virol.
67:6295-6298[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 4.
|
Beattie, E.,
K. L. Denzler,
J. Tartaglia,
M. E. Perkus,
E. Paolettie, and B. L. Jacobs.
1995.
Reversal of the interferon-sensitive phenotype of a vaccinia virus lacking E3L by expression of the reovirus S4 gene.
J. Virol.
69:499-505[Abstract].
|
| 5.
|
Bischoff, J. R., and C. E. Samuel.
1989.
Mechanism of interferon action. Activation of the human P1/eIF-2 alpha protein kinase by individual reovirus s-class mRNAs: s1 mRNA is a potent activator relative to s4 mRNA.
Virology
172:106-115[Medline].
|
| 6.
|
Blau, H. M.,
C. Choy-Pik, and C. Webster.
1983.
Cytoplasmic activation of human nuclear genes in stable heterokaryons.
Cell
32:1171-1180[Medline].
|
| 7.
| Brentano, L., D. Noah, E. G. Brown, and B. Sherry. The reovirus protein mu 2, encoded by the M1 gene, is an
RNA-binding protein. Submitted for publication.
|
| 8.
|
Chow, L. H.,
K. W. Beisel, and B. M. McManus.
1992.
Enteroviral infection of mice with severe combined immunodeficiency. Evidence for direct viral pathogenesis of myocardial injury.
Lab. Invest.
66:24-31[Medline].
|
| 9.
|
Cleveland, D. R.,
H. Zarbl, and S. Millward.
1986.
Reovirus guanylyltransferase is L2 gene product lambda 2 protein.
J. Virol.
60:307-311[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 10.
|
Cook, D. N.,
M. A. Beck,
T. M. Coffman,
S. L. Kirby,
J. F. Sheridan,
I. B. Pragnell, and O. Smithies.
1995.
Requirement of MIP-1 alpha for an inflammatory response to viral infection.
Science
269:1583-1585[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 11.
|
Coombs, K.
1996.
Identification and characterization of a double-stranded RNA reovirus temperature-sensitive mutant defective in minor core protein mu2.
J. Virol.
70:4237-4245[Abstract].
|
| 12.
|
De Benedetti, A.,
G. J. Williams,
L. Comeau, and C. Baglioni.
1985.
Inhibition of viral mRNA translation in interferon-treated L cells infected with reovirus.
J. Virol.
55:588-593[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 13.
|
De Castro, S.,
G. D'Amati,
P. Gallo,
D. Cartoni,
P. Santopadre,
V. Vullo,
A. Cirelli, and G. Migliau.
1994.
Frequency of development of acute global left ventricular dysfunction in human immunodeficiency virus infection.
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.
24:1018-1024[Abstract].
|
| 14.
|
Dermody, T. S.,
L. A. Schiff,
M. L. Nibert,
K. M. Coombs, and B. N. Fields.
1991.
The S2 gene nucleotide sequences of prototype strains of the three reovirus serotypes: characterization of reovirus core protein 2.
J. Virol.
65:5721-5731[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 15.
|
Drayna, D., and B. N. Fields.
1982.
Activation and characterization of the reovirus transcriptase: genetic analysis.
J. Virol.
41:110-118[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 16.
|
Dryden, J. A.,
G. Wang,
M. Yeager,
M. L. Nibert,
K. M. Coombs,
D. B. Furlong,
B. N. Fields, and T. S. Baker.
1993.
Early steps in reovirus infection are associated with dramatic changes in supramolecular structure and protein conformation: analysis of virions and subviral particles by cryoelectron microscopy and image reconstruction.
J. Cell Biol.
122:1023-1041[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 17.
|
Durbin, J. E.,
R. Hackenmiller,
M. C. Simon, and D. E. Levy.
1996.
Targeted disruption of the mouse STAT1 gene results in compromised innate immunity to viral disease.
Cell
84:443-450[Medline].
|
| 18.
|
Ellis, M. N.,
C. S. Eidson,
J. Brown, and S. H. Kleven.
1983.
Studies on the interferon induction and interferon sensitivity of avian reoviruses.
Avian Dis.
27:927-936[Medline].
|
| 19.
|
Farsetta, D. L.,
K. A. Dryden, and M. L. Nibert.
1996.
Identification of three proteins in reovirus top component particles that contribute to an internal structure seen by cryo-electron microscopy and image reconstruction, abstr. W10-9..
Scientific program and abstracts. American Society for Virology annual meeting
.
|
| 20.
|
Gresser, I.,
M. G. Tovey,
C. Maury, and M.-T. Bandu.
1976.
Role of interferon in the pathogenesis of virus diseases in mice as demonstrated by the use of anti-interferon serum. II. Studies with herpes simplex, Moloney sarcoma, vesicular stomatitis, Newcastle disease, and influenza viruses.
J. Exp. Med.
144:1316-1322[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 21.
|
Gupta, S. L.,
S. L. Holmes, and L. L. Mehra.
1982.
Interferon action against reovirus: activation of interferon-induced protein kinase in mouse L929 cells upon reovirus infection.
Virology
120:495-499[Medline].
|
| 22.
|
Hassan, S. A.,
E. R. Rabin, and J. L. Melnick.
1965.
Reovirus myocarditis in mice: an electron microscopic, immunofluorescent, and virus assay study.
Exp. Mol. Pathol.
4:66-80.
|
| 23.
|
Herzum, M.,
V. Ruppert,
B. Kuytz,
H. Jomaa,
I. Nakamura, and B. Maisch.
1994.
Coxsackievirus B3 infection leads to cell death of cardiac myocytes.
J. Mol. Cell. Cardiol.
26:907-913[Medline].
|
| 24.
|
Hiscott, J.,
H. Nguyen, and R. Lin.
1995.
Molecular mechanisms of interferon beta gene induction.
Semin. Virol.
6:161-174.
|
| 25.
|
Imani, F., and B. Jacobs.
1988.
Inhibitory activity for the interferon-induced protein kinase is associated with the reovirus serotype 1 sigma 3 protein.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
85:7887-7891[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 26.
|
Jacobs, B. L., and R. E. Ferguson.
1991.
The Lang strain of reovirus serotype 1 and the Dearing strain of reovirus serotype 3 differ in their sensitivities to beta interferon.
J. Virol.
65:5102-5104[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 27.
|
Jacobs, B. L., and J. O. Langland.
1996.
When two strands are better than one: the mediators and modulators of the cellular responses to double-stranded RNA.
Virology
219:339-349[Medline].
|
| 28.
|
Kibler, K. V.,
T. Shors,
K. B. Perkins,
C. C. Zeman,
M. P. Banaszak,
J. Biesterfeldt,
J. O. Langland, and B. L. Jacobs.
1997.
Double-stranded RNA is a trigger for apoptosis in vaccinia virus-infected cells.
J. Virol.
71:1992-2003[Abstract].
|
| 29.
|
Lai, M.-H. T., and W. K. Joklik.
1973.
The induction of interferon by temperature-sensitive mutants of reovirus. UV-irradiated reovirus, and subviral reovirus particles.
Virology
51:191-204[Medline].
|
| 30.
|
Levy, D. E.
1995.
Interferon induction of gene expression through the JAK-STAT pathway.
Semin. Virol.
6:181-190.
|
| 31.
|
Lewis, J. A.
1988.
Induction of an antiviral state by interferon in the absence of elevated levels of 2,5-oligo(A) synthetase and eIF-2 kinase.
Virology
162:118-127[Medline].
|
| 32.
|
Lloyd, R. M., and A. J. Shatkin.
1992.
Translational stimulation by reovirus polypeptide 3: substitution for VAI RNA and inhibition of phosphorylation of the subunit of eukaryotic initiation factor 2.
J. Virol.
66:6878-6884[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 33.
|
Long, W. F., and D. C. Burke.
1971.
Interferon production by double-stranded RNA: a comparison of interferon induction by reovirus RNA to that by a synthetic double-stranded polynucleotide.
J. Gen. Virol.
12:1-11[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 34.
|
Mao, Z. X., and W. K. Joklik.
1991.
Isolation and enzymatic characterization of protein lambda 2, the reovirus guanylyltransferase.
Virology
185:377-386[Medline].
|
| 35.
|
Martin, A.,
S. Webber,
F. Fricker,
R. Jaffe,
G. Demmler,
D. Kearney,
Y.-H. Zhang,
J. Bodurtha,
B. Gelb,
J. Ni,
T. Bricker, and J. A. Towbin.
1994.
Acute myocarditis: rapid diagnosis by PCR in children.
Circulation
90:330-339[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 36.
|
Martino, T. A.,
P. Liu, and M. J. Sole.
1994.
Viral infection and pathogenesis of dilated cardiomyopathy.
Circ. Res.
74:182-188[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 37.
|
Mason, J. W.,
J. B. O'Connell,
A. Herskowitz,
N. R. Rose,
B. M. McManus,
M. E. Billingham,
T. E. Moon, and Myocarditis Treatment Trial Investigators.
1995.
A clinical trial of immunosuppressive therapy for myocarditis.
N. Engl. J. Med.
333:269-275[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 38.
|
Matoba, Y.,
B. Sherry,
B. N. Fields, and T. W. Smith.
1991.
Identification of the viral genes responsible for growth of strains of reovirus in cultured mouse heart cells.
J. Clin. Invest.
87:1628-1633.
|
| 39.
|
Meraz, M. A.,
J. M. White,
K. C. F. Sheehan,
E. A. Bach,
S. C. Rodig,
A. S. Dighe,
D. H. Kaplan,
J. K. Riley,
A. C. Greenlund,
D. Campbell,
K. Carver-Moore,
R. N. DuBois,
R. Clark,
M. Aguet, and R. D. Schreiber.
1996.
Targeted disruption of the STAT1 gene in mice reveals unexpected physiologic specificity in the JAK-STAT signalling pathway.
Cell
84:431-442[Medline].
|
| 40.
|
Metcalf, P.,
M. Cyrklaff, and M. Adrian.
1991.
The three-dimensional structure of reovirus obtained by cryo-electron microscopy.
EMBO J.
10:3129-3136[Medline].
|
| 41.
|
Miyamoto, N. G.,
B. L. Jacobs, and C. E. Samuel.
1983.
Mechanism of interferon action. Effect of double-stranded RNA and the 5'-O-monophosphate form of 2',5'-oligoadenylate on the inhibition of reovirus mRNA translation in vitro.
J. Biol. Chem.
258:15232-15237[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 42.
|
Muller, U.,
U. Steinhoff,
L. F. L. Reis,
S. Hemmi,
J. Pavlovic,
R. M. Zinkernagel, and M. Aguet.
1994.
Functional role of type I and type II interferons in antiviral defense.
Science
264:1918-1921[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 43.
|
Munemitsu, S. M., and C. E. Samuel.
1984.
Biosynthesis of reovirus-specified polypeptides. Multiplication rate but not yield of reovirus serotypes 1 and 3 correlates with the level of virus-mediated inhibition of cellular protein synthesis.
Virology
136:133-143[Medline].
|
| 44.
|
Nibert, M. L.,
L. A. Schiff, and B. N. Fields.
1996.
Reoviruses and their replication, p. 1557-1596. In
B. N. Fields, D. M. Knipe, and P. M. Howley (ed.), Fields virology, 3rd ed., vol. 2.
Lippincott-Raven, Philadelphia, Pa.
|
| 45.
|
Nilsen, T. W.,
P. A. Maroney, and C. Baglioni.
1982.
Inhibition of protein synthesis in reovirus-infected HeLa cells with elevated levels of interferon-induced protein kinase activity.
J. Biol. Chem.
257:14593-14596[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 46.
|
Nilsen, T. W.,
P. A. Maroney, and C. Baglioni.
1982.
Synthesis of (2'-5')oligoadenylate and activation of an endoribonuclease in interferon-treated HeLa cells infected with reovirus.
J. Virol.
42:1039-1045[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 47.
|
Noble, S., and M. L. Nibert.
1997.
Core protein µ2 is a second determinant of nucleoside triphosphatase activities by reovirus cores.
J. Virol.
71:7728-7735[Abstract].
|
| 48.
|
Oberhaus, S. M.,
R. L. Smith,
G. H. Clayton,
T. S. Dermody, and K. L. Tyler.
1997.
Reovirus infection and tissue injury in the mouse central nervous system are associated with apoptosis.
J. Virol.
71:2100-2106[Abstract].
|
| 49.
|
Rabin, E. R.,
S. A. Hassan,
A. B. Jenson, and J. L. Melnick.
1964.
Coxsackievirus B3 myocarditis in mice. An electron microscopic, immunofluorescent and virus-assay study.
Am. J. Pathol.
44:775-797.
|
| 50.
|
Rodgers, S. E.,
E. S. Barton,
S. M. Oberhaus,
B. Pike,
C. A. Gibson,
K. L. Tyler, and T. S. Dermody.
1997.
Reovirus-induced apoptosis of MDCK cells is not linked to viral yield and is blocked by Bcl-2.
J. Virol.
71:2540-2546[Abstract].
|
| 51.
|
Rose, N. R., and S. L. Hill.
1996.
The pathogenesis of postinfectious myocarditis.
Clin. Immunol. Immunopathol.
80:S92-S99[Medline].
|
| 52.
|
Samuel, C. E.
1993.
The eIF-2alpha protein kinases, regulators of translation in eukaryotes from yeast to humans.
J. Biol. Chem.
268:7603-7606[Free Full Text].
|
| 53.
|
Samuel, C. E.,
R. Duncan,
G. S. Knutson, and J. W. Hershey.
1984.
Mechanism of interferon action. Increased phosphorylation of protein synthesis initiation factor eIF-2 alpha in interferon-treated reovirus-infected mouse L929 fibroblasts in vitro and in vivo.
J. Biol. Chem.
259:13451-13457[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 54.
|
Samuel, C. E., and G. S. Knutson.
1982.
Mechanism of interferon action. Kinetics of decay of the antiviral state and protein phosphorylation in mouse fibroblasts treated with natural and cloned interferons.
J. Biol. Chem.
257:11796-11801[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 55.
|
Schmechel, S.,
M. Chute,
P. Skinner,
R. Anderson, and L. Schiff.
1997.
Preferential translation of reovirus mRNA by a sigma 3-dependent mechanism.
Virology
232:62-73[Medline].
|
| 56.
|
Sharpe, A. H., and B. N. Fields.
1982.
Reovirus inhibition of cellular RNA and protein synthesis: role of the S4 gene.
Virology
122:381-391[Medline].
|
| 57.
|
Sherry, B.,
C. J. Baty, and M. A. Blum.
1996.
Reovirus-induced acute myocarditis in mice correlates with viral RNA synthesis rather than generation of infectious virus in cardiac myocytes.
J. Virol.
70:6709-6715[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 58.
|
Sherry, B., and M. A. Blum.
1994.
Multiple viral core proteins are determinants of reovirus-induced acute myocarditis.
J. Virol.
68:8461-8465[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 59.
|
Sherry, B., and B. N. Fields.
1989.
The reovirus M1 gene, encoding a viral core protein, is associated with the myocarditic phenotype of a reovirus variant.
J. Virol.
63:4850-4856[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 60.
|
Sherry, B.,
X.-Y. Li,
K. L. Tyler,
J. M. Cullen, and H. W. Virgin, IV.
1993.
Lymphocytes protect against and are not required for reovirus-induced myocarditis.
J. Virol.
67:6119-6124[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 61.
|
Sherry, B.,
F. J. Schoen,
E. Wenske, and B. N. Fields.
1989.
Derivation and characterization of an efficiently myocarditic reovirus variant.
J. Virol.
63:4840-4849[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 61a.
| Sherry, B., and D. Cook. Unpublished data.
|
| 62.
| Stangl, E., W. Aschauer, J. Zahringer, and G. Hubner. 1987. Reovirus myocarditis. Eur. Heart J. 8(Suppl. J):407-409.
|
| 63.
|
Starnes, M. C., and W. K. Joklik.
1993.
Reovirus protein lambda 3 is a poly(C)-dependent poly(G) polymerase.
Virology
193:356-366[Medline].
|
| 64.
|
Steinhoff, U.,
U. Müller,
A. Schertler,
H. Hengartner,
M. Aguet, and R. M. Zinkernagel.
1995.
Antiviral protection by vesicular stomatitis virus-specific antibodies in alpha/beta interferon receptor-deficient mice.
J. Virol.
69:2153-2158[Abstract].
|
| 65.
|
Tracy, S.,
N. M. Chapman,
B. M. McManus,
M. A. Pallansch,
M. A. Beck, and J. Carstens.
1990.
A molecular and serologic evaluation of enteroviral involvement in human myocarditis.
J. Mol. Cell. Cardiol.
22:403-414[Medline].
|
| 66.
|
Tyler, K. L., and B. N. Fields.
1996.
Reoviruses, p. 1597-1624. In
B. N. Fields, D. M. Knipe, and P. M. Howley (ed.), Fields virology, 3rd ed., vol. 2.
Lippincott-Raven, Philadelphia, Pa.
|
| 67.
|
Virgin, H. W.,
K. L. Tyler, and T. S. Dermody.
1997.
Reovirus, p. 669-702. In
N. Nathanson (ed.), Viral pathogenesis.
Lippincott-Raven, New York, N.Y.
|
| 68.
|
Welsh, R. M., and G. Sen.
1997.
Non-specific host responses to viral infection, p. 109-142. In
N. Nathanson (ed.), Viral pathogenesis.
Lippincott-Raven, New York, N.Y.
|
| 69.
|
Woodruff, J. F.
1980.
Viral myocarditis, a review.
Am. J. Pathol.
101:427-479.
|
| 70.
|
Yin, P.,
M. Cheang, and K. M. Coombs.
1996.
The M1 gene is associated with differences in the temperature optimum of the transcriptase activity in reovirus core particles.
J. Virol.
70:1223-1227[Abstract].
|
| 71.
|
Yue, Z., and A. J. Shatkin.
1997.
Double-stranded RNA-dependent protein kinase (PKR) is regulated by reovirus structural proteins.
Virology
234:364-371[Medline].
|
J Virol, February 1998, p. 1314-1323, Vol. 72, No. 2
0022-538X/98/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1998, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Kobayashi, T., Ooms, L. S., Chappell, J. D., Dermody, T. S.
(2009). Identification of Functional Domains in Reovirus Replication Proteins {micro}NS and {micro}2. J. Virol.
83: 2892-2906
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Zurney, J., Kobayashi, T., Holm, G. H., Dermody, T. S., Sherry, B.
(2009). Reovirus {micro}2 Protein Inhibits Interferon Signaling through a Novel Mechanism Involving Nuclear Accumulation of Interferon Regulatory Factor 9. J. Virol.
83: 2178-2187
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Zurney, J., Howard, K. E., Sherry, B.
(2007). Basal Expression Levels of IFNAR and Jak-STAT Components Are Determinants of Cell-Type-Specific Differences in Cardiac Antiviral Responses. J. Virol.
81: 13668-13680
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Holm, G. H., Zurney, J., Tumilasci, V., Leveille, S., Danthi, P., Hiscott, J., Sherry, B., Dermody, T. S.
(2007). Retinoic Acid-inducible Gene-I and Interferon-beta Promoter Stimulator-1 Augment Proapoptotic Responses Following Mammalian Reovirus Infection via Interferon Regulatory Factor-3. J. Biol. Chem.
282: 21953-21961
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Smith, J. A., Schmechel, S. C., Raghavan, A., Abelson, M., Reilly, C., Katze, M. G., Kaufman, R. J., Bohjanen, P. R., Schiff, L. A.
(2006). Reovirus Induces and Benefits from an Integrated Cellular Stress Response. J. Virol.
80: 2019-2033
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Rudd, P., Lemay, G.
(2005). Correlation between interferon sensitivity of reovirus isolates and ability to discriminate between normal and Ras-transformed cells. J. Gen. Virol.
86: 1489-1497
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Stewart, M. J., Smoak, K., Blum, M. A., Sherry, B.
(2005). Basal and Reovirus-Induced Beta Interferon (IFN-{beta}) and IFN-{beta}-Stimulated Gene Expression Are Cell Type Specific in the Cardiac Protective Response. J. Virol.
79: 2979-2987
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Xu, W., Patrick, M. K., Hazelton, P. R., Coombs, K. M.
(2004). Avian Reovirus Temperature-Sensitive Mutant tsA12 Has a Lesion in Major Core Protein {sigma}A and Is Defective in Assembly. J. Virol.
78: 11142-11151
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Hermann, L. L., Coombs, K. M.
(2004). Inhibition of Reovirus by Mycophenolic Acid Is Associated with the M1 Genome Segment. J. Virol.
78: 6171-6179
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Forrest, J. C., Dermody, T. S.
(2003). Reovirus Receptors and Pathogenesis. J. Virol.
77: 9109-9115
[Full Text]
-
Murphy, J. A., Duerst, R. J., Smith, T. J., Morrison, L. A.
(2003). Herpes Simplex Virus Type 2 Virion Host Shutoff Protein Regulates Alpha/Beta Interferon but Not Adaptive Immune Responses during Primary Infection In Vivo. J. Virol.
77: 9337-9345
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Gonzalez-Lopez, C., Martinez-Costas, J., Esteban, M., Benavente, J.
(2003). Evidence that avian reovirus {sigma}A protein is an inhibitor of the double-stranded RNA-dependent protein kinase. J. Gen. Virol.
84: 1629-1639
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
White, L. J., Wang, J.-G., Davis, N. L., Johnston, R. E.
(2001). Role of Alpha/Beta Interferon in Venezuelan Equine Encephalitis Virus Pathogenesis: Effect of an Attenuating Mutation in the 5' Untranslated Region. J. Virol.
75: 3706-3718
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
DeBiasi, R. L., Edelstein, C. L., Sherry, B., Tyler, K. L.
(2001). Calpain Inhibition Protects against Virus-Induced Apoptotic Myocardial Injury. J. Virol.
75: 351-361
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Noah, D. L., Blum, M. A., Sherry, B.
(1999). Interferon Regulatory Factor 3 Is Required for Viral Induction of Beta Interferon in Primary Cardiac Myocyte Cultures. J. Virol.
73: 10208-10213
[Abstract]
[Full Text]