Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
J Virol, February 1998, p. 1210-1218, Vol. 72, No. 2
Institute for Molecular Virology, University
of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin 53706-1596
Received 2 July 1997/Accepted 16 October 1997
Three drug-dependent mutants of human rhinovirus 16 (HRV16) were
characterized by sequence analyses of spontaneous mutant isolates and
were genetically reconstructed from a parental cDNA plasmid. These
mutants formed plaques in the presence but not in the absence of the
selecting antiviral drug, WIN 52035, which binds to the capsid of
wild-type virus and inhibits its attachment to the host cell. The
drug-dependent phenotype of each mutant was caused by a single amino
acid substitution in the VP1 coat protein. The three independent
mutations conferring drug dependence are M1103T, T1208A, and V1210A.
Single-step growth experiments involving rescue of one of the three
mutants (V1210A) by delayed drug addition suggested (i) that the drug
dependence lesion is at the stage of virus assembly and (ii) that one
or more components of the viral assembly pool decay in the absence of
drug. RNA accumulation and infectivity were unaffected by the absence
of drug in all three mutants, suggesting that the labile assembly
component is coat protein.
Human rhinoviruses (HRV) are the
single most important causative agents of common colds in humans. They
cause one-third to one-half of all acute respiratory disease (11,
13, 18). HRV16, a major-group serotype that utilizes ICAM-1
(intercellular adhesion molecule-1) on the host cells as its cellular
receptor (17, 45), is a good model for clinical studies
since it reproducibly causes cold symptoms in human volunteers (4,
6, 28). For example, HRV16 has been used as a model for studying
the transmission of colds (12, 33) and the exacerbation of
asthma (4, 5, 28). It is also ideal for structural and
genetic studies since its crystal structure (19, 37) and
cDNA are available.
Rhinoviruses are members of the family Picornaviridae, which
also includes poliovirus, encephalomyocarditis virus, and
foot-and-mouth disease virus. These viruses are small nonenveloped
icosahedral particles containing one single-stranded message-sense
genomic RNA. The capsid is made up of 60 copies each of four
polypeptides (VP1, VP2, VP3, and VP4) which are symmetrically organized
into promoters, pentamers, and icosahedral shells (40).
Surrounding each fivefold icosahedral vertex of the virus particle
there is a canyonlike depression on the virion surface, which is mostly contributed by the structure of the VP1 peptides and is the binding site for cellular receptor (9, 10, 39, 44). The VP4 peptides lie at the inner surface of the capsid and are in contact with the
genomic RNA (15, 22, 39, 40). The structure of VP1 within
each protomer also harbors a pocket, which lies just beneath the canyon
floor and has a pore leading to the surface of the particle. Some
electron density, called pocket factor, has been observed by
crystallography in the pockets of some human picornaviruses such as
HRV16, HRV1A, and poliovirus types 1 and 3 (15, 22, 23, 37).
The chemical identity and biological function of pocket factor are not
known.
Human rhinoviruses, like other picornaviruses, multiply in the
cytoplasm of their host cells. The infection cycle includes attachment,
uncoating, RNA and protein synthesis, virion assembly, and exit from
cells. The initial cellular attachment step is mediated by recognition
and binding of receptors via the canyon. The virus particle then
undergoes several conformational changes resulting in penetration of
the membrane and release of the genomic RNA into the cell (uncoating).
The uncoated RNA serves as the message for viral protein translation
and as the template for minus-strand RNA synthesis. Capsid proteins and
plus-strand RNA accumulate in the cell and assemble through multiple
steps into noninfective 150S provirions, which then mature (by cleavage
of VP0 to VP4 plus VP2) into infective 150S virions and exit the host
cell upon cell lysis.
Capsid-binding drugs, such as the WIN drugs (after Sterling-Winthrop
Pharmaceuticals Research Division), are currently the most promising
antiviral agents against human rhinoviruses and human enteroviruses
(3, 14, 31, 34). They are small hydrophobic molecules that
inhibit virus infectivity by blocking its attachment to cells (as in
HRV14 or HRV16) or uncoating (as in HRV1A, HRV2, or poliovirus 3)
(16, 35, 41, 47). Crystallographic studies have shown that
these drugs bind in the VP1 pocket underneath the canyon and that drug
binding elevates the pocket roof on the canyon floor of HRV14
(43) but does not deform the canyon floor of HRV16
(37). This finding suggests that proper seating of cellular
receptor requires deformation of the canyon floor downward (37). Control of the canyon floor has now become the working model for explaining how WIN drugs block attachment. In addition, affecting rearrangement of the capsid proteins offers a model for
explaining the block of uncoating.
Drug-resistant mutants provide tools for studying picornavirus capsid
functions. Mapping drug resistance mutations has been proposed as a way
of identifying regions within the viral coat protein that are critical
for cellular attachment or uncoating (21). Previous studies
in our lab have revealed two phenotypic classes of picornavirus
drug-resistant mutants: drug-dependent and nondependent (20,
35). Drug-dependent mutants form plaques in the presence of drug
but not in its absence, while nondependent mutants form plaques with
approximately equal levels of efficiency in the presence and absence of
drug. Drug-dependent mutants are particularly useful tools for
dissecting the picornavirus infection mechanism because the
capsid-binding drugs, as experimental reagents, play a positive role in
their life cycle.
We report here the search for and characterization of HRV16 mutants
that are dependent on WIN 52035 for plaque formation. The same drug was
previously used for selection and analyses of HRV14 drug-resistant
mutants (41).
Cells, virus, and drugs.
HeLa cells, free of mycoplasma
(25), were passaged in suspension culture in medium B as
described previously (32). HRV16 stock has been described
elsewhere (26). WIN 52035-2 (referred to as WIN 52035), WIN
52084(S) (referred to as WIN 52084), WIN 51711, and WIN 56291 were
gifts from G. Diana at the former Sterling-Winthrop Pharmaceuticals
Research Division (34, 37). R61837 (manufactured by Janssen
Pharmaceuticals) was a gift from M. G. Rossmann, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Ind. (2).
0022-538X/98/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1998, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
WIN 52035-Dependent Human Rhinovirus 16: Assembly Deficiency
Caused by Mutations near the Canyon Surface

![]()
ABSTRACT
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials & Methods
Results
Discussion
References
![]()
INTRODUCTION
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials & Methods
Results
Discussion
References
![]()
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials & Methods
Results
Discussion
References
Virus amplification and purification. Virus was propagated at 35°C in HeLa cell suspension or cell monolayers as described previously (26, 42). HeLa cells were infected at room temperature for 1 h with a multiplicity of infection (MOI) of 10 to 15 PFU per cell. Infected cell suspensions were diluted 10-fold to 4 × 106 cells/ml in prewarmed medium B and incubated at 35°C for 7 to 8 h. The cells were then pelleted and resuspended in PBS at the initial volume. Infected cell monolayers were overlaid with 2 ml of medium A, incubated at 35°C until a cytopathic effect was observed (after 30 to 40 h), and then scraped from dishes. Virus was released from cells by three cycles of freezing and thawing and then harvested as the supernatant after centrifugation to pellet cell debris.
For purification on sucrose gradients, virus was released from cells either as described above or by lysing the cells with 0.5% Nonidet P-40. The lysate was supplemented with 1% sarcosyl and 0.1% 2-mercaptoethanol and was then subjected to centrifugation through a 1-ml 30% sucrose cushion in a Beckman SW41 rotor (40,000 rpm, 16°C, 130 min). Pelleted virus was resuspended in PBS with 0.01% BSA and subjected to centrifugation on a 7.5 to 45% sucrose gradient (Beckman SW41 rotor, 40,000 rpm, 16°C, 100 min). The gradient fraction(s) containing the most concentrated virus band was collected and stored at
70°C.
Radiolabeling and sucrose gradient sedimentation of virus. HeLa cell suspensions (4 × 107 cells/ml) in PBS or PBS4A were infected with virus (MOI of 10 to 15) at room temperature for 1 h. The infected cells were diluted 10-fold in prewarmed medium B lacking all amino acids except L-glutamine and incubated at 35°C with gentle shaking. [35S]methionine was added to cell suspension (20 µCi/ml) at 4 to 4.5 h after infection. Virus was harvested after 7 to 8 h and pelleted through a 1-ml 30% sucrose cushion. The viral pellet was resuspended in PBS4A and sedimented on a 7.5 to 45% sucrose gradient as described above. The gradient was fractionated (0.4 ml per fraction) from top to bottom. Sample radioactivity was determined by liquid scintillation counting.
Plaque assay. The procedure was described by Heinz et al. (20). HeLa monolayers were prepared by plating 2.5 × 106 cells (suspended in 5 ml of medium A with serum) in each 60-mm-diameter dish and then incubating them at 37°C for 12 h. Virus samples diluted in PBS4A were pipetted onto PBS-washed monolayers and were allowed to incubate at room temperature for 1 h. The infected monolayers were overlaid first with 2.5 ml of 0.8% agar in medium P6 (42) and then with 2.5 ml of medium P6 containing 0.8% BSA, 4 mM glutamine, 4 mM oxaloacetate, 2 mM pyruvate, and 11.2 mM D-glucose. Plaques were allowed to develop at 35°C for 50 to 60 h and then visualized by crystal violet staining.
Dose-response curve. Virus was propagated in HeLa cells with an MOI of 0.1 to 0.5 PFU per cell to minimize the presence of pseudovirions (mutant genome with wild-type capsid) in the stock, which results in an underestimation of mutant frequency. A series of WIN 52035 stocks in DMSO were diluted 1,000 times in PBS4A, agar overlay, or nutrient overlay to prepare three sets of working solutions; each set contained a series of specified concentrations of the drug. Virus was diluted serially in PBS4A containing drug at each concentration and DMSO at the same concentration (0.1% or less). DMSO minus drug was the negative-drug control. Plaque assays were performed as described above. For each monolayer, the agar and nutrient overlays contained the same concentration of drug as the initial inoculum in PBS4A.
Mutant selection and amplification. The strategy of selecting drug-resistant mutants was described by Heinz et al. (20). Plaque-purified wild-type virus was plated on HeLa cell monolayers in the presence of 2 µg of WIN 52035 per ml to select for resistant plaques. These plaques were visualized by live staining with 0.01% neutral red at 35°C for 2 h. Representative individual plaques were isolated with Pasteur pipettes; each isolate was stored in 0.5 ml of PBS4A in the presence of drug. Each mutant isolate was replated both in the presence and in the absence of 2 µg of WIN 52035 per ml to determine whether it was drug dependent or nondependent.
The mutant isolates were first amplified on HeLa monolayers in the presence of drug, further plaque purified once or twice to remove contaminating wild-type virus, and propagated in HeLa cell suspensions. The mutant stocks, whose titers ranged from 5 × 108 to 5 × 109 PFU/ml, were stored in PBS at
70°C.
Single-step growth curves. The procedure was described by Shepard et al. (41). Virus was diluted in PBS4A. HeLa cells were washed with and resuspended in PBS. Virus (10 to 15 PFU/cell) was mixed with HeLa cells (4 × 107 cells/ml) in a 15-ml polypropylene tube and incubated at room temperature for 1 h with gentle shaking. The infected cells were then pelleted, washed with PBS (or PBS4A) to remove unattached virus, resuspended (to 4 × 106 cells/ml) in prewarmed (35°C) medium B, and incubated at 35°C with shaking. Samples were taken from infected cell suspensions at intervals, supplemented to 50 mM with HEPES buffer (pH 7.4), and frozen immediately in a dry ice-ethanol bath. Virus was released from cells by the freeze-thaw method and harvested as the supernatant after clarifying centrifugation. Infectivity was determined by plaque assay. A final WIN 52035 concentration of 2 µg/ml was used where needed.
Viral and cellular RNA preparations.
The acid guanidinium
thiocyanate and phenol-chloroform method (7) was modified
and described below. A sample of the virus preparation or infected HeLa
cells was dissolved in solution D (4 M guanidine thiocyanate, 25 mM
sodium citrate [pH 7.0], 0.5% sarcosyl, 0.5% 2-mercaptoethanol). It
was incubated on ice for 15 min with 0.1 volume of 2 M sodium acetate
(pH 4.0), 1 volume of water-saturated phenol, and 0.2 volume of (24:1)
chloroform-isoamyl alcohol and then subjected to centrifugation in a
microcentrifuge (at 14,000 rpm for 20 min). The upper (aqueous) phase
contained RNA, which was precipitated by incubation with 1 volume of
isopropanol at
20°C for 2 h or longer and then pelleted by
centrifugation. For further purification, the RNA pellet was
resuspended in solution D and reprecipitated with an equal volume of
isopropanol. For removal of residual guanidine thiocyanate, the RNA was
resuspended in diethylpyrocarbonate-treated water and then precipitated
by addition of 0.1 volume of 2 M sodium acetate (pH 4.0) and 1.1 volume
of isopropanol. Purified RNA was stored in diethylpyrocarbonate-treated water at
20°C.
RNA and DNA sequencing.
Viral RNA was sequenced by primer
extension as described by Air (1). Avian myeloblastosis
virus reverse transcriptase was purchased from Promega Inc., Madison,
Wis. A set of 21 minus-strand primers (18 to 20 nucleotides)
complementary to the viral genomic sequence and covering the coat genes
(26) was synthesized at the Biotechnology Center of the
University of Wisconsin. The RNA sample was mixed with a specific
primer, boiled for 1 min, and then cooled gradually to facilitate
annealing. Primer extension was then carried out at 42°C for 30 min
in the presence of 5 µCi of [
-35S]dATP and 3 U of
reverse transcriptase per reaction, and with a deoxynucleoside
triphosphate/dideoxynucleoside triphosphate ratio of 5, 6, 4, or 7 in
the respective A, C, G, or T reaction. Each reaction product was mixed
with FDE (95% formamide, 20 mM EDTA, 0.05% bromophenol blue, and
0.05% xylene cyanol FF), boiled for 3 min, and electrophoresed on
4.8% polyacrylamide gels, which were then fixed, dried, and
autoradiographed.
Site-directed mutagenesis. A full-length HRV16 cDNA plasmid that produces highly infectious RNA transcripts was constructed (24a). Overlapping fragments of the full-length cDNA were subcloned for use as mutagenesis cassettes. Subclones pR16-1AB (containing the HpaI/NdeI fragment), pR16-1C (NdeI/AvrII), and pR16-1D (AvrII/ClaI) collectively covered the entire viral coat gene.
The method of site-directed mutagenesis was described elsewhere (24, 25). Negative-sense, uracil-rich, and single-stranded DNA of each subclone was prepared with the Escherichia coli dut ung mutant strain (CJ236) and M13 helper phage. Positive-sense mutagenic primers (18 to 20 nucleotides) were synthesized as described above. Each primer was phosphorylated at its 5' end with T4 polynucleotide kinase and then annealed to its complementary single-stranded DNA plasmid containing the desired genomic site for the mutation. The mutagenic strand was synthesized with T4 DNA polymerase, circularized with T4 DNA ligase, and then used to transform competent E. coli DH5
cells. Plasmids containing the desired
mutation(s) were identified by dideoxy sequencing. The mutation was
then introduced through subcloning into a full-length viral cDNA
plasmid by replacing a fragment of the full-length wild-type cDNA
plasmid with the corresponding mutated fragment.
Transfection. The DEAE-dextran-facilitated transfection procedure was described elsewhere (25). Viral RNA preparation or RNA transcripts from viral cDNAs was diluted in HEPES-buffered saline containing 200 µg of DEAE-dextran per ml. HeLa cell monolayers were washed with HEPES-buffered saline. The RNA dilution was pipetted onto prewashed monolayers and incubated at room temperature for 1 h. The cell monolayers were washed with PBS to remove the DEAE-dextran, overlaid as for plaque assay, and incubated at 35°C for plaque formation.
For production of virus, the transfected cell monolayers were incubated in medium A at 35°C until cytopathic effect was observed (after 40 to 50 h). Virus was harvested from cells scraped from dishes as described above.| |
RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Effect of drug concentration on plating efficiency.
The
inhibitory effect of WIN 52035 appeared at about 0.1 µg/ml (Fig.
1). At higher concentrations, the plaque
titer decreased about 104-fold, leveling off at about 1 µg/ml (plateau). The relative plaquing efficiency within the plateau,
10
4, was consistent with the high mutation rate
(10
4 to 10
5) that is typically found in RNA
viruses. The dropoff at drug concentrations above 4 µg/ml was
accompanied by paler staining of the cell monolayers, suggesting a
toxic effect of the drug on HeLa cells. That the plateau consists
largely of drug-resistant mutants was confirmed by replating
representative plaque isolates both in the presence and in the absence
of drug.
|
Strategy for isolating drug-dependent mutants. The isolation procedure involved two experimental steps. (i) A collection of 118 drug-resistant isolates was selected by plating a panel of 20 independent plaque-purified wild-type HRV16 stocks on HeLa cell monolayers in the presence of 2 µg of WIN 52035 per ml. (ii) Each isolate was then replated in the presence or absence of the drug to screen for drug-dependent mutants, i.e., those forming plaques with higher efficiency in the presence of drug than in its absence. Nine of the 118 isolates were drug dependent (Table 1). The remaining isolates were nondependent, that is, formed plaques with the same efficiency in the presence or absence of drug.
|
4) after removal of
wild-type virus probably represent true revertants.
Identification of the mutations conferring drug dependence and reconstruction of mutants with cDNA. Candidate mutations were identified in each of the nine drug-dependent isolates after the viral coat genes were fully or partially sequenced. These mutations were then individually introduced into a cDNA plasmid of the parental genotype to verify whether each mutation confers drug dependence. A total of three mutations were confirmed in this way; each independently confers drug dependence by causing a single amino acid substitution in the VP1 capsid protein: M1103T (in isolate 1), T1208A (in isolate 5), and V1210A (in the other seven isolates) (Table 2). A fourth mutation, E3081Q (in isolates 3 and 4, which were originally from the same plaque-purified virus stock), was identified but proved by site-directed mutagenesis to confer the wild-type phenotype. Thus, we believe that it is a random mutation unrelated to drug dependence. For subsequent studies of the three drug-dependent mutants, the viruses derived from cDNA constructs were used since cDNAs provided defined genotypes.
|
Dose response of mutant V1210A to WIN 52035 and four other drugs. To study the precise concentration of WIN 52035 required for the rescue of the drug-dependent mutants, we analyzed the plaque-forming ability of mutant V1210A in the presence of various concentrations of WIN 52035. A detectable rescue of V1210A plaque formation by WIN 52035 was achieved above 0.1 µg/ml (Fig. 2), the same concentration at which the drug began to inhibit plaque formation of wild-type HRV16 (Fig. 1). Moreover, this drug reached maximal rescuing effect on V1210A plaque formation at about 1 µg/ml (Fig. 2), the same concentration at which the drug reached maximal inhibition of plaque formation of the wild-type virus (Fig. 1). This result suggests that the drug, despite its opposite effects on mutant and wild-type viruses, binds to their VP1 pockets with similar affinities.
|
Evidence that drug-dependent mutants attach normally but are defective in assembly in the absence of drug. To identify the step(s) at which drug-dependent mutants require WIN 52035, single-step growth experiments were carried out with progressively delayed addition of drug to the infected cell cultures. Each of the three mutants was allowed to attach to HeLa cells in the absence of drug at room temperature (23 to 25°C). The infected cells were divided into several aliquots, resuspended in prewarmed medium, and allowed to grow at 35°C. The drug was added to the cell suspensions at 0, 3, 5, and 7 h after transfer of samples to 35°C (Fig. 3).
|
Evidence that accumulation and integrity of mutant RNA are not affected by the absence of drug. To investigate whether RNA of the drug-dependent mutants is the unstable component of the viral assembly pool in the absence of drug, total RNA was isolated from samples of infected cell cultures in a set of single-step growth experiments. The amount of infective viral RNA was determined by transfecting HeLa cell monolayers with the total RNA sample and by counting plaques developed in the presence of WIN 52035.
The rise of V1210A infective RNA during the first few hours in the growth cycle demonstrated no significant differences between the presence and absence of WIN 52035 (Fig. 4). Synthesis of infective RNA by mutant V1210A was similar or slightly less than that by wild-type virus. Moreover, both mutant and wild-type RNAs remained infective in the absence of drug even after their synthesis was complete. Thus, drug was not required for synthesis of mutant RNA, nor was it required for protection of RNA infectivity. Studies of the other two drug-dependent mutants, M1103T and T1208A, gave the same results (data not shown).
|
Evidence that mutant V1210A requires WIN 52035 for virion assembly. To investigate whether the absence of progeny infectivity (Fig. 3A) was due to failure to form virions by mutant V1210A in the absence of drug, the virus was propagated in HeLa cells in the presence of [35S]methionine with or without drug. Extracts from the radiolabeled cells were sedimented through 30% sucrose cushions. The pellets were then resuspended and sedimented on 7.5 to 45% sucrose gradients to display 150S virus particles (virions and provirions).
As seen in Fig. 5, mutant V1210A formed 150S particles in the presence of WIN 52035 but not in its absence. Thus, the assembly defect of drug-dependent mutant V1210A is at a step(s) prior to the formation of 150S provirions. A smaller peak sedimented in about the position expected for 80S empty shells but lacked radioactive capsid proteins when examined by sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (data not shown).
|
Evidence that WIN 56291 supports assembly of mutant V1210A virions. As shown earlier, WIN 56291 did not rescue the infectivity of mutant V1210A (Fig. 2). However, it did support assembly of 150S mutant particles (Fig. 5). That these 150S particles were infective was shown by demonstrating that they formed plaques when plated in the presence of WIN 52035. However, the specific infectivity of the particles rescued with WIN 56291 was only about 5% of that of particles rescued with WIN 52035 (data not shown). Since WIN 56291 is known to bind to HRV16 with higher affinity than WIN 52035 (37), this lower infectivity may have resulted from incomplete release of drug from virus before plating.
Virion location of drug dependence mutations. Computer imaging of the X-ray coordinates of HRV16 showed that two of the three amino acids substituted in drug-dependent mutants V1210A and M1103T are located on the surface of the canyon that surrounds the fivefold axis of each pentameric subunit of the icosahedral shell (Fig. 6A). In addition, the two wild-type residues (V1210 and M1103) appear to make contact with residues Y3183 (Fig. 6B) and Q1161 (Fig. 6C), respectively, of neighboring subunits (protomers) within one pentamer. The third drug dependence mutation, T1208A (not shown in Fig. 6), is located near the surface of the canyon and close to the V1210A mutation.
|
The drug-dependent phenotype of V1210A is independent of ICAM-1. The position of drug dependence mutations near the canyon floor, and the observation that drug binding to the pocket affects binding of ICAM-1 to the canyon (37), raised the possibility that the assembly defect is related to defective interaction of mutant subunits or nascent provirions with ICAM-1. For example, abnormal binding of ICAM-1 to mutant subunits might prevent their assembly in the absence of drug. Alternatively, failure of mutant 150S particles to accumulate in the absence of drug might be ascribed to formation of transient provirions, which are then immediately disassembled if they bind ICAM-1.
To investigate whether ICAM-1 plays a role in assembly, murine L cells, which do not encode ICAM-1 and are not susceptible to rhinovirus infection, were transfected with samples of V1210A RNA and then incubated at 35°C for 10 h in the presence or absence of WIN 52035. Infectivity that arose from these transfected L-cell samples was measured by plaque assay on HeLa cell monolayers in the presence of WIN 52035. The results showed that the same amount of transfecting viral RNA, which produced in L cells about 50 PFU in the presence of drug, produced no plaques in its absence. Thus, the drug-dependent phenotype of V1210A is unrelated to the presence of ICAM-1 in the host cells. However, the ability of HRV16 to multiply in L cells is notable. It has been generally assumed that L cells are unable to support rhinovirus replication because mice are known to be insusceptible to rhinovirus infection and because a different rhinovirus serotype (HRV2) was reported to be unable to multiply in these cells (46). We have preliminary data suggesting that wild-type HRV16 also replicates when transfected into L cells (not shown).| |
DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
We report here the isolation and characterization of three HRV16 mutants which require, for plaque formation, a capsid-binding drug which prevents attachment of the wild-type parental virus. These mutants were initially isolated in two steps: first, mutants were selected for the ability to form plaques in the presence of WIN 52035, requiring that they overcome the attachment block. Second, these drug-resistant isolates were screened for drug-dependent mutants, i.e., those with decreased plating efficiency in the absence of drug. Such mutants should require drug either for attachment or for some other viral function.
All three drug-dependent mutants described here required drug in the late stage of their growth cycle (Fig. 3). Moreover, RNA synthesis, stability, and transfection efficiency, a rigorous measure of functional integrity, were unaffected by the absence of drug (Fig. 4). At least one of these mutants (V1210A) required drug for 150S virion formation (Fig. 5), and its mature virions retained the ability to bind drug (data not shown). We have also shown (Fig. 3) that externally added drug was not required for attachment or uncoating by any of the three mutants. However, since stocks of these drug-dependent mutants required drug for propagation, the presence of residual drug in purified mutant virions is not rigorously ruled out.
Location of drug dependence mutations is influenced by the mechanism of drug action upon wild-type virus. Nine of 118 drug-resistant isolates proved to be drug dependent. Sequence analyses revealed that some of these nine isolates had identical mutations so that the total number of distinct mutations conferring drug dependence was reduced to three. Each of the three mutations was shown by site-directed mutagenesis of cDNA to confer the drug-dependent phenotype. All three drug-dependent mutations were located at or near the virion surface, in the same vicinity as mutations in several different families of poliovirus mutants with altered stability and cell entry (10, 15, 29, 38). These latter mutations have been thoroughly reviewed by Chow et al. (8).
The locations of drug dependence mutations in HRV16 differ markedly from those reported for drug-dependent mutants of poliovirus 3 (Fig. 7). The different locations most likely reflect the different action of capsid-binding drugs on the two viruses. In the case of poliovirus, for example, the drug interferes with uncoating, while in HRV16 it interferes with attachment to receptor. Accordingly, the location of polioviral drug dependence mutations in a region on the inner side of the capsid (36) reflects the importance of this region in uncoating, a transition involving major rearrangements in the capsid protein, finally resulting in release of genomic RNA (34).
|
Locations of drug dependence mutations are consistent with defects in virion assembly. Computer graphic analyses of the X-ray coordinates of HRV16 (19) have shown that all three drug dependence mutations reside at or near a protomer-protomer interface (Fig. 6). Thus, it is likely that the assembly defect of these mutants is caused by abnormal protomer-protomer interaction. With this model, occupancy of drug in the binding pockets would correct a surface deformation at the mutant protomer-protomer contact, resulting in the rescue of assembly. Elsewhere (27a) we will provide evidence that one of the mutants is blocked at the step where pentamers are assembled into shells (27).
All three drug dependence mutations in HRV16 are replacements with amino acids whose side chains are smaller (Table 2). Consistent with this trend, another engineered mutant T1208G is also drug dependent, in a manner similar to that of T1208A (data not shown). This finding suggests that the presence of drug in the capsid compensates for the reduction of side chain size in each mutant.Evidence that the drug-dependent assembly defect of HRV16 is probably not an artifact of virion instability. It has been previously shown that the drug-dependent phenotype of poliovirus 3 Sabin strain (P3/Sabin) is linked to virion instability (35). This does not necessarily preclude the possibility that the protein subunits of this poliovirus mutant are also partially defective in assembly in the absence of drug. Indeed, the virus yield in the drug-dependent mutants of P3/Sabin are all 10-fold lower than in their wild-type parent.
That the phenotype of drug-dependent HRV16 mutants is due primarily to an assembly defect, rather than to virion instability, is suggested by the rapid appearance of infectious virus which occurred in the growth of the dependent HRV16 mutants after addition of drug (Fig. 3), making it highly likely that an assembly intermediate is synthesized in the absence of drug but is unable to assemble until drug is added. Decay in virus yield with delayed addition of drug could be explained by instability of the unassembled mutant subunits. All three mutants were stable at physiological temperature (35°C) in the absence of added drug (data not shown). This finding supports our conclusion that the dependence mutations affect assembly, not virion stability. However, the possible presence of drug molecules retained in the capsid after propagation in drug-supplemented medium has not yet been excluded, because there is no way to produce mutants in the absence of drug. The simplest interpretation is that HRV16 virions never form in the absence of drug.Does pocket factor play a role in assembly? Capsid-binding drugs are inhibitory analogs of pocket factor (43). The observations that particular drugs repair the assembly defect of drug-dependent HRV16 as reported here and that they modulate uncoating of type 3 poliovirions (35) are compatible with suggestions that natural pocket factors play a role in picornavirus infection (15, 19, 23, 30, 37). While drug-dependent mutants represent tempting models for gaining further insights into the role(s) of pocket factor, studies with natural pocket factors are probably the only reliable way of accomplishing this goal.
| |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
We thank Jean-Yves Sgro for invaluable assistance in computer graphics, Michael Rossmann for providing R61837 and the X-ray coordinates of HRV16, Guy Diana and Mark McKinlay for providing the WIN drugs, and Max Nibert and Ann Palmenberg for helpful discussions of this work.
This work was supported by National Institutes of Health grant AI31960 to R.R.R. and by the Lucille P. Markey charitable trust (grant 92-24).
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Institute for Molecular Virology, University of Wisconsin, 1525 Linden Dr., Madison, WI 53706-1596. Phone: (608) 262-6949. Fax: (608) 262-7414. E-mail: agmosser{at}facstaff.wisc.edu.
Present address: Department of Biological Sciences, Purdue
University, West Lafayette, IN 47907-1392.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| 1. | Air, G. M. 1979. Nucleotide sequence coding for the "signal peptide" and N terminus of the hemagglutinin from an Asian (H2N2) strain of influenza virus. Virology 97:468-472[Medline]. |
| 2. |
Al-Nakib, W.,
P. G. Higgins,
G. I. Barrow,
D. A. Tyrrell,
K. Andries,
G. Vanden Bussche,
N. Taylor, and P. A. Janssen.
1989.
Suppression of colds in human volunteers challenged with rhinovirus by a new synthetic drug (R61837).
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
33:522-525 |
| 3. | Andries, K. 1995. Anti-picornaviral agents, p. 287-319. In D. J. Jeffries, and E. DeClercq (ed.), Antiviral chemotherapy. John Wiley & Sons, New York, N.Y. |
| 4. | Bush, R. K., W. Busse, D. Flaherty, D. Warshauer, E. C. Dick, and C. E. Reed. 1978. Effects of experimental rhinovirus 16 infection on airways and leukocyte function in normal subjects. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 61:80-87[Medline]. |
| 5. | Busse, W. W., C. L. Anderson, E. C. Dick, and D. Warshauer. 1980. Reduced granulocyte response to isoproterenol, histamine, and prostaglandin E1 after in vitro incubation with rhinovirus 16. Am. Rev. Respir. Dis. 122:641-646[Medline]. |
| 6. | Calhoun, W. J., C. A. Swenson, E. C. Dick, L. B. Schwartz, R. F. Lemanske, Jr., and W. W. Busse. 1991. Experimental rhinovirus 16 infection potentiates histamine release after antigen bronchoprovocation in allergic subjects. Am. Rev. Respir. Dis. 144:1267-1273[Medline]. |
| 7. | Chomczynski, P., and N. Sacchi. 1987. Single-step method of RNA isolation by acid guanidinium thiocyanate-phenol-chloroform extraction. Anal. Biochem. 162:156-159[Medline]. |
| 8. | Chow, M., R. Basavappa, and J. M. Hogle. 1997. The role of conformational transitions in poliovirus pathogenesis, p. 157-186. In W. Chiu, R. M. Burnett, and R. L. Garcea (ed.), Structural biology of viruses. Oxford University Press, New York, N.Y. |
| 9. |
Colonno, R. J.,
J. H. Condra,
S. Mizutani,
P. L. Callahan,
M.-E. Davis, and M. A. Murcko.
1988.
Evidence for the direct involvement of the rhinovirus canyon in receptor binding.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
85:5449-5453 |
| 10. | Colston, E., and V. R. Racaniello. 1994. Soluble receptor-resistant poliovirus mutants identify surface and internal capsid residues that control interaction with the cell receptor. EMBO J. 13:5855-5862[Medline]. |
| 11. | Couch, R. B. 1990. Rhinoviruses, p. 607-629. In B. N. Fields, D. M. Knipe, R. M. Chanock, et al. (ed.), Virology, 2nd ed. Raven Press, New York, N.Y. |
| 12. | D'Alessio, D. J., J. A. Peterson, C. R. Dick, and E. C. Dick. 1976. Transmission of experimental rhinovirus colds in volunteer married couples. J. Infect. Dis. 133:28-36[Medline]. |
| 13. | Dick, E. C., and S. L. Inhorn. 1992. Rhinoviruses, p. 1507-1532. In R. D. Feigin, and J. D. Cherry (ed.), Textbook of pediatric infection diseases, 3rd ed. W. B. Saunders Co., Philadelphia, Pa. |
| 14. | Eggers, H. J. 1977. Selective inhibition of uncoating of echovirus 12 by rhodanine. Virology 78:241-252[Medline]. |
| 15. | Filman, D. J., R. Syed, M. Chow, A. J. Macadam, P. D. Minor, and J. M. Hogle. 1989. Structural factors that control conformational transitions and serotype specificity in type 3 poliovirus. EMBO J. 8:1567-1579[Medline]. |
| 16. |
Fox, M. P.,
M. J. Otto, and M. A. McKinlay.
1986.
The prevention of rhinovirus and poliovirus uncoating by WIN 51711: a new antiviral drug.
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
30:110-116 |
| 17. | Greve, J. M., G. Davis, A. M. Meyer, C. P. Forte, S. C. Yost, C. W. Marlor, M. E. Kamarck, and A. McClelland. 1989. The major human rhinovirus receptor is ICAM-1. Cell 56:839-847[Medline]. |
| 18. | Gwaltney, J. M., Jr. 1989. Rhinoviruses, p. 593-615. In A. S. Evans (ed.), Viral infection of humans, 3rd ed. Plenum Press, New York, N.Y. |
| 19. | Hadfield, A. T., W.-M. Lee, R. Zhao, M. A. Oliveira, I. Minor, R. R. Rueckert, and M. G. Rossmann. 1997. The refined structure of human rhinovirus 16 at 2.15 A resolution: implications for the viral life cycle. Structure 5:427-441[Medline]. |
| 20. |
Heinz, B. A.,
R. R. Rueckert,
D. A. Shepard,
F. J. Dutko,
M. A. McKinlay,
M. Fancher,
M. G. Rossmann,
J. Badger, and T. J. Smith.
1989.
Genetic and molecular analyses of spontaneous mutants of human rhinovirus 14 that are resistant to an antiviral compound.
J. Virol.
63:2476-2485 |
| 21. | Heinz, B. A., D. A. Shepard, and R. R. Rueckert. 1990. Escape mutants analysis of a drug-binding site can be used to map functions in the rhinovirus capsid, p. 173-186. In G. Laver, and G. Air (ed.), Use of X-ray crystallography in the design of antiviral agents. Academic Press, New York, N.Y. |
| 22. |
Hogle, J. M.,
M. Chow, and D. J. Filman.
1985.
Three-dimensional structure of poliovirus at 2.9 A resolution.
Science
229:1358-1365 |
| 23. | Kim, S., T. J. Smith, M. S. Chapman, M. G. Rossmann, D. C. Pevear, F. J. Dutko, P. J. Felock, G. D. Diana, and M. A. McKinlay. 1989. Crystal structure of human rhinovirus serotype 1A (HRV1A). J. Mol. Biol. 210:91-111[Medline]. |
| 24. | Kunkel, T. A., J. D. Roberts, and R. A. Zakour. 1987. Rapid and efficient site-directed mutagenesis without phenotypic selection. Methods Enzymol. 154:367-382[Medline]. |
| 24a. | Lee, W.-M. Unpublished data. |
| 25. |
Lee, W.-M.,
S. S. Monroe, and R. R. Rueckert.
1993.
Role of maturation cleavage in infectivity of picornaviruses: activation of an infectosome.
J. Virol.
67:2110-2122 |
| 26. | Lee, W.-M., W. Wang, and R. R. Rueckert. 1994. Complete sequence of the RNA genome of human rhinovirus 16, a clinically useful common cold virus belonging to the ICAM-1 receptor group. Virus Genes 9:177-181. |
| 27. | Lee, W.-M., W. Wang, and R. R. Rueckert. 1996. Is pocket factor required to activate assembly of picornaviral capsids?, p. 144. Scientific Program & Abstracts of the American Society for Virology 15th Annual Meeting. University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada. |
| 27a. | Lee, W.-M., et al. Unpublished data. |
| 28. | Lemanske, R. F., Jr., E. C. Dick, C. A. Swenson, R. F. Vrtis, and W. W. Busse. 1989. Rhinovirus upper respiratory infection increases airway hyperreactivity and late asthmatic reactions. J. Clin. Invest. 83:1-10. |
| 29. | Macadam, A. J., C. Arnold, J. Howlett, A. John, S. Marsden, F. Taffs, P. Reeve, N. Hamada, K. Wareham, J. Almond, et al. 1989. Reversion of the attenuated and temperature-sensitive phenotypes of the Sabin type 3 strain of poliovirus in vaccinees. Virology 172:408-414[Medline]. |
| 30. |
Macadam, A. J.,
G. Ferguson,
C. Arnold, and P. D. Minor.
1991.
An assembly defect as a result of an attenuating mutation in the capsid proteins of the poliovirus type 3 vaccine strain.
J. Virol.
65:5225-5231 |
| 31. | McKinlay, M. A., F. J. Dutko, D. C. Pevear, M. G. Woods, G. D. Diana, and M. G. Rossmann. 1990. Rational design of antipicornavirus agents, p. 366-372. In M. A. Brinton, and F. X. Heinz (ed.), New aspects of positive-strand RNA viruses. American Society for Microbiology, Washington, D.C. |
| 32. | Medappa, K. C., C. McLean, and R. R. Rueckert. 1971. On the structure of rhinovirus 1A. Virology 44:259-270[Medline]. |
| 33. | Meschievitz, C. K., S. B. Schultz, and E. C. Dick. 1984. A model for obtaining predictable natural transmission of rhinoviruses in human volunteers. J. Infect. Dis. 150:195-201[Medline]. |
| 34. | Mosser, A. G., and R. R. Rueckert. 1996. Capsid-binding agents, p. 13-40. In D. D. Richman (ed.), Antiviral drug resistance. John Wiley & Sons Ltd., Chichester, England. |
| 35. |
Mosser, A. G., and R. R. Rueckert.
1993.
WIN 51711-dependent mutants of poliovirus type 3: evidence that virions decay after release from cells unless drug is present.
J. Virol.
67:1246-1254 |
| 36. |
Mosser, A. G.,
J.-Y. Sgro, and R. R. Rueckert.
1994.
Distribution of drug resistant mutations in type 3 poliovirus identifies three regions involved in uncoating functions.
J. Virol.
68:8193-8201 |
| 37. | Oliveira, M. A., R. Zhao, W.-M. Lee, M. J. Kremer, I. Minor, R. R. Rueckert, G. D. Diana, D. C. Pevear, F. J. Dukto, M. A. McKinlay, and M. G. Rossmann. 1993. The structure of human rhinovirus 16. Structure 1:51-68[Medline]. |
| 38. |
Racaniello, V. R.
1996.
Early events in poliovirus infection. Virus-cell interactions.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
93:11378-11381 |
| 39. | Rossmann, M. G., E. Arnold, J. W. Erickson, E. A. Frankenberger, J. P. Griffith, H.-J. Hecht, J. E. Johnson, G. Kamer, M. Luo, A. G. Mosser, R. R. Rueckert, B. Sherry, and G. Vriend. 1985. Structure of a human common cold virus and functional relationship to other picornaviruses. Nature 317:145-153[Medline]. |
| 40. | Rueckert, R. R. 1996. Picornavirus structure and multiplication, p. 609-654. In B. N. Fields, D. M. Knipe, P. M. Howley, et al. (ed.), Virology, 3rd ed. Raven Press, Ltd., New York, N.Y. |
| 41. |
Shepard, D. A.,
B. A. Heinz, and R. R. Rueckert.
1993.
WIN 52035-2 inhibits both attachment and eclipse of human rhinovirus 14.
J. Virol.
67:2245-2254 |
| 42. |
Sherry, B., and R. Rueckert.
1985.
Evidence for at least two dominant neutralization antigens on human rhinovirus 14.
J. Virol.
53:137-143 |
| 43. |
Smith, T. J.,
M. J. Kremer,
M. Luo,
G. Vriend,
E. Arnold,
G. Kamer,
M. G. Rossman,
M. A. McKinlay,
G. D. Diana, and M. J. Otto.
1986.
The site of attachment in human rhinovirus 14 for antiviral agents that inhibit uncoating.
Science
233:1286-1293 |
| 44. |
Smith, T. J.,
M. H. Olsen,
R. H. Cheng,
E. S. Chase, and T. S. Baker.
1993.
Structure of a human rhinovirus-bivalently bound antibody complex: implications for viral neutralization and antibody flexibility.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
90:7015-7018 |
| 45. | Staunton, D. E., V. J. Merluzzi, R. Rothlein, R. Barton, S. D. Marlin, and T. A. Springer. 1989. A cell adhesion molecule, ICAM-1, is the major surface receptor for rhinoviruses. Cell 56:849-853[Medline]. |
| 46. |
Yin, F. H., and N. B. Lomax.
1983.
Host range mutants of human rhinovirus in which nonstructural proteins are altered.
J. Virol.
48:410-418 |
| 47. | Zeichhardt, H., M. J. Otto, M. A. McKinlay, P. Willingmann, and K.-O. Habermehl. 1987. Inhibition of poliovirus uncoating by disoxaril. Virology 160:281-285[Medline]. |
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»