Previous Article | Next Article 
Journal of Virology, December 1998, p. 9855-9864, Vol. 72, No. 12
0022-538X/98/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1998, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Study of the V3 Loop as a Target Epitope for Antibodies Involved
in the Neutralization of Primary Isolates versus T-Cell-Line-Adapted
Strains of Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1
Catherine
Spenlehauer,1,*
Sentob
Saragosti,2
Hervé J. A.
Fleury,3
André
Kirn,1
Anne-Marie
Aubertin,1 and
Christiane
Moog1
INSERM U74, Institut de Virologie, 67000 Strasbourg,1
Institut de Médecine
et d'Épidémiologie Africaine, Hôpital Bichat,
75018 Paris,2 and
Laboratoire de
Virologie, Université de Bordeaux II, 33076 Bordeaux,3 France
Received 26 May 1998/Accepted 13 August 1998
 |
ABSTRACT |
Previous studies characterized the third variable (V3) loop of the
envelope gp120 as the principal neutralizing determinant for laboratory
T-cell-line-adapted (TCLA) strains of human immunodeficiency virus type
1 (HIV-1). However, primary viruses isolated from infected individuals
are more refractory to neutralization than TCLA strains, suggesting that qualitatively different neutralizing antibodies may be
involved. In this study, we investigated whether the V3 loop
constitutes a linear target epitope for antibodies neutralizing primary isolates. By using peptides representative of the V3
regions of various primary isolates, an early, relatively specific and persistent antibody response was detected in sera from HIV-infected patients. To assess the relationship between these antibodies and
neutralization, the same peptides were used in competition and
depletion experiments. Addition of homologous V3 peptides led to a
competitive inhibition in the neutralization of the TCLA strain
HIVMN/MT-4 but had no effect on the neutralization of the autologous primary isolate. Similarly, the removal of antibodies that
bind to linear V3 epitopes resulted in a loss of HIVMN/MT-4 neutralization, whereas no decrease in the autologous
neutralization was measured. The different roles of V3-specific
antibodies according to the virus considered were thereby brought to
light. This confirmed the involvement of V3 antibodies in the
neutralization of a TCLA strain but emphasized a more pronounced
contribution of either conformational epitopes or epitopes
outside the V3 loop as targets for antibodies neutralizing primary
HIV-1 isolates. This result underlines the need to focus on new
vaccinal immunogens with epitopes able to induce broadly reactive and
efficient antibodies that neutralize a wide range of primary HIV-1 isolates.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Analysis of the immune responses
developed within weeks after infection by the human immunodeficiency
virus (HIV) suggests that the immune system may control the viral load.
Strong cellular responses are detected in patients early in infection
and provide evidence of a major role of cytotoxic T cells (CTL) in the
decline of the initial burst of viremia (13, 29). Protection
by CTL is also suggested by the existence of active and/or memory
HIV-specific CTL in long-term nonprogressors infected for more than 10 years without any development of AIDS (19, 53). Furthermore,
specific CTL are present in individuals who have been frequently
exposed to the virus without being infected (35, 54);
whether these CTL are simply markers for exposure to viral
antigens or allow resistance to infection remains to be determined. In
addition, CD8+ T lymphocytes and macrophages,
effector cells of the immune response, can secrete soluble
inhibitory factors (10, 32), including the chemokines
MIP-1
, MIP-1
, and Rantes (8), interleukin-16 (IL-16) (1), and the macrophage-derived factor
(49), which inhibit the replication of HIV-1 primary isolates.
On the other hand, neutralizing antibodies (NAb) are probably involved
in the control of viral replication, even if these antibodies are
detected only several months after infection (13, 38, 51).
This is borne out by the higher titers and broader-reactivity NAb found
in long-term nonprogressors (6, 52, 58). In a recent
publication, Shan-Lu et al. described host immune responses in two
patients infected almost simultaneously from the same source; while one
developed the disease extremely rapidly (in less than 2 years), the
other had a more average course of progression and remained
asymptomatic for 3 years postinfection (62). These authors correlated more vigorous NAb and lymphocyte proliferation responses with a slower disease progression. Interestingly, it has been shown that the presence of NAb to primary HIV-1 isolates, including autologous virus, was related to a lower risk of
mother-to-child transmission (56, 57), and it was postulated
that a broad cross-reactive NAb response may reduce the risk of
transmission of HIV-1 by controlling the maternal viral load. Overall,
these observations indicate that NAb found to be able to inhibit viral replication in vitro may very likely play a role in vivo by either preventing infection or reducing the spread of the virus and the progression of the disease. NAb would allow a low viral load to be
sustained during the asymptomatic phase and would allow HIV-1 replication that occurs throughout the entire course of infection to be
controlled. Nevertheless, despite these data, the correlates of
protection and the relative contributions of cellular and humoral responses remain unclear. Understanding them constitutes the first objective in the process of developing an effective vaccine
(20); a subsequent objective is the identification of the
antigens and target epitopes able to induce such a protective immunity.
Viral proteins of HIV-1 are highly immunogenic, and various sites on
the virion give rise to humoral responses. In particular, the envelope
glycoproteins gp120 and gp41 constitute the principal targets for NAb
(40). They contain both conserved and hypervariable domains
described as epitopes recognized by immune sera and monoclonal antibodies (14, 43). Interestingly, the third variable (V3) domain of gp120 forms an exposed, accessible loop on the surface of the
viral particles (45) and induces the production of V3 antibodies detectable either after natural infection or following specific immunization (74). Moreover, this region is a
determinant for cellular tropism and viral infectivity (21, 22,
63). V3 sequences act upon the interaction with coreceptors CXCR4
or CCR5 (12, 66), and the V3 loop takes part in the
initiation of the fusion step necessary for virus entry. Neutralizing
V3 antibodies may therefore be able to block either the attachment of
the virus to the cell or subsequent postbinding events. For these
reasons, attention has been focused on the V3 region of gp120, which
has been defined as the principal neutralizing determinant (PND) for
T-cell-line-adapted (TCLA) viruses (24, 55). In one study,
Spear et al. described V3 loop-specific antibodies as important in
mediating a major proportion of immune effector functions, including
complement activation and neutralization of the laboratory strain
HIV-1MN (64). Because such antibodies neutralized many TCLA strains (23, 64, 73) and because their presence could be correlated with the protection against homologous challenge found in chimpanzees (15), the V3 loop has been
used to elaborate vaccine and therapeutic strategies. Unfortunately, this region is hypervariable and is most often the target of
type-specific antibodies rather than broad-specificity, cross-reactive
NAb. Moreover, subsequent studies have revealed differences between TCLA strains and primary viruses isolated from infected individuals. Indeed, besides differences in tropism (macrophage-tropic versus lymphotropic), replication capacity (slow low versus rapid high), and
use of coreceptors (CXR5 versus CXCR4) (2, 12, 44), it is
clear that primary wild-type isolates are more refractory to
neutralization than TCLA strains (9, 17, 34). Higher antibody quantities, but also qualitatively different antibodies, appear to be necessary to neutralize primary isolates (33), and different epitopes may be recognized by NAb (3, 70). It
is therefore crucial to reconsider antibodies involved in the neutralization of field isolates and to determine if the V3 loop is
also a PND for primary isolates. A better knowledge of these neutralization epitopes will help in elaborating a vaccine designed to
counter primary isolates of HIV-1.
In this study we attempted to determine if, as for TCLA strains,
neutralization of primary isolates was mediated by antibodies directed
against the autologous V3 loop. The presence of V3-specific antibodies
in sera from HIV-infected patients was detected by using V3 loop
peptides with sequences similar or close to the amino acid sequences of
the V3 regions of four primary isolates. To further assess if the
antibodies binding to these V3 loop peptides were involved in the
autologous neutralization and in the neutralization of the TCLA strain
HIV-1MN, competition and depletion experiments were carried
out. The different roles of V3 loop-specific antibodies in the
neutralization of TCLA strains versus primary isolates were brought to light.
 |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
Cells, viruses, and sera.
All cell cultures were maintained
at 37°C in 5% CO2.
MT-4 cells (a human T4 lymphoid cell line) were cultured in RPMI 1640 containing 10% fetal calf serum (FCS). This cell line supports the
replication of the TCLA strain HIV-1MN, a
syncytium-inducing strain obtained through the AIDS Research and
Reference Program, Division of AIDS, National Institute of
Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health,
and amplified on the MT-4 cell line to constitute a viral stock
(HIV-1MN/MT-4). The TCLA strain HIV-1MN was
also produced on peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC), and a
single passage was enough to produce a viral stock of
HIV-1MN/PBMC.
PBMC were isolated from buffy coats of healthy HIV-seronegative donors
by Ficoll gradient purification. The cells, suspended in RPMI 1640 containing 10% FCS, were stimulated for 3 days with 2 µg of
phytohemagglutinin A (Sigma) per ml and then frozen in RPMI containing
20% FCS and 40% dimethyl sulfoxide. One day before their use in the
neutralization assay, PBMC from five random donors were thawed, pooled,
and cultured for 24 h in RPMI 1640 supplemented with 10% FCS and
20 U of IL-2 (Boehringer Mannheim) per ml.
The HIV-1 primary isolates Bx08, Bx16, Bx17, and Bx26 were isolated
early after seroconversion by cocultivation of PBMC from
seropositive
individuals with PBMC from healthy seronegative donors
(
51).
To constitute viral stocks, we amplified these viruses
as described
before (
38,
39) by one or two passages of the
isolates
exclusively on
PBMC.
The sera studied were collected from the same seropositive patients at
various times after seroconversion. Their autologous
and heterologous
neutralizing activities have been described elsewhere
in a longitudinal
study of early humoral responses detected during
the first years of HIV
infection (
38). The sera for which we
detected an autologous
neutralizing activity were selected to
further characterize
NAb.
V3 loop sequences of primary isolates and V3 peptides.
RNAs
isolated from the viral stocks of primary isolates, amplified once on
PBMC, were converted into cDNA and then amplified with primer 5' (V5,
5'-ATGAATTCGCTGTTRAATGGCAGTCTAGGCAGA-3') and primer 3' (V3, 5'-ATGAATTCATTTCTGGGTCCCCTCCTGAGGA-3').
Amplified products were digested with the restriction enzyme
EcoRI and cloned in an M13mp18 vector. Five to seven clones
were sequenced with the dye-primer sequencing kit (Applied Biosystems).
A very low intravariability (less than 0.5%) was observed in the C2V3
region, a feature expected for viruses isolated early after
seroconversion. The amino acid sequences were derived from the
individual nucleotide sequences.
Two 21-mer peptides corresponding to the V3 loops of the HIV-1 primary
isolate Bx08 and of the TCLA strain HIV-1
MN were
synthesized
by the solid-phase method of Merrifield with the
9-fluorenylmethoxycarbonyl
alternative (
36). A third
peptide, R21, having the V3 loop sequence
of a Rwandese subtype A
primary isolate, which is very close to
the sequence of the Bx17
isolate, has also been used. Sequences
of the peptides and viruses are
represented in Fig.
1, aligned
and
compared to the French V3 loop consensus sequence (
7).

View larger version (10K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 1.
V3 loop amino acid sequences of peptides and viruses
used in the study, aligned with the subtype B (United States/European)
consensus sequence.
|
|
Detection of anti-V3 loop antibodies by enzyme-linked
immunosorbent assay (ELISA).
The V3 loop peptides were immobilized
on Nunc Maxisorp microplates by an overnight incubation at 4°C of 100 µl of peptide per well diluted at 2 µg/ml in 50 mM bicarbonate
buffer (pH 9.6). Unbound peptides were removed by washing once with
phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) containing 0.05% Tween 20 (wash
buffer), and the plates were blocked with 200 µl of PBS containing
5% nonfat dry milk. Coated plates were washed four times and dried for
1 h at 37°C. At this stage, the plates could be frozen at
20°C for subsequent use or immediately used with the addition of
100 µl of serum (dilution, 1/20) for 1 h at 37°C. After five
washings, bound V3-specific antibodies were detected by the addition of
100 µl of peroxidase-rabbit anti-human immunoglobulin conjugate
(Dako) diluted 1/50,000 in PBS containing 5% nonfat dry milk and 0.3%
Tween 20. Immune complexes were revealed with tetramethyl benzidine
substrate, and the colorimetric reaction was stopped by the addition of
H2SO4. The optical density was read at 450 nm
against 650 nm (OD450-650), and the binding activity was
detected by comparison with the OD450-650 obtained after
the incubation of a serum from a consensus negative individual provided
by the National Institutes of Health. The cutoff was defined as the
OD450-650 of this negative serum plus 0.05.
Depletion of V3 loop-specific antibodies.
In order to remove
V3-specific antibodies from the sera, six to eight passages on V3
peptide-coated wells were carried out by using the ELISA binding
protocol with some modifications. First, we increased the binding
capacity by coating the plates with 200 µl of 20-µg/ml V3 peptide.
Second, to avoid the deleterious effects of detergent in subsequent
cell cultures, the Tween 20 in the wash solution was replaced by 5%
FCS. Third, sequential twofold dilutions of sera were incubated for
several (six to eight) successive passages on coated wells until the
V3-specific antibodies were eliminated. For this purpose, after 1 h of incubation at 37°C, the sera were removed by pipetting and
further incubated on other coated wells for an additional hour. For
controls, the sera were also mock depleted by serial passages on plates
treated in parallel but not coated with V3 peptides. The antibodies
removed from the sera and bound to the peptide-coated wells were then
detected as described above with the tetramethyl benzidine chromogene
substrate followed by the addition of the stop solution
H2SO4. The diminution in OD450-650
throughout the successive passages could be monitored and correlated to
the sequential depletion in V3-specific antibodies. For the lowest
dilution of serum tested, a depletion percentage was calculated as
follows: percent depletion = 100
[100 × (OD450-650 at the last passage/OD450-650 at
the first passage)]. After the last passage, the different depleted
fractions of sera were filtered through 0.45-µm-pore-size filters
(µstar; Costar) before being tested for their neutralizing activity.
Neutralization assays.
The neutralization of primary
isolates and of the TCLA strain HIV-1MN was studied by
using two different protocols.
In MT-4 cells, the replication of the TCLA strain HIV-1
MN
induces a cytopathogenic effect characterized by the formation of
syncytia followed by cellular death. The neutralizing activity
of the
serum was detected as an inhibition of this virus-induced
cytopathogenicity. The neutralization assay was performed in 96-well
flat-bottom tissue culture plates (Costar 3596) by incubating
50 µl
of an appropriate dilution of virus with 50 µl of serial
dilutions of
sera. After 1 h at 37°C, 4 × 10
4 MT-4 cells
were added and the cultures were maintained for 5
days. Cell viability
was then measured as described previously
(
50) with a
colorimetric reaction based on the capacity for
mitochondrial
dehydrogenase of living cells to reduce
3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium
bromide into
formazan. The quantity of formazan produced was measured
by
OD
540 and was correlated with the number of living cells
(
50).
For each serum dilution the experiment was done
in triplicate,
and the mean value was used to calculate the percentage
of protection
according to Pauwels' formula (
50). The
neutralization titer
of the serum was defined as the serum dilution
that allowed 50%
protection against the cytopathogenic
effect.
To detect the neutralizing activities of sera against primary isolates,
the neutralization assay was performed with PBMC as
target cells. This
previously described test (
39) combines serial
dilutions of
virus with serial dilutions of serum and is based
on detecting a
10-fold virus titer reduction in the presence of
the immune serum.
Briefly, 50 µl of four fourfold dilutions of
virus was incubated for
1 h at 37°C with 50 µl of serial serum
dilutions in a 96-well
filtration plate (Durapor-Dv 0.65µ; Millipore,
Molsheim, France)
before addition of 10
5 phytohemagglutinin A-stimulated PBMC
(a pool from five seronegative
donors). After 2 h at 37°C,
extensive washings were done (three
times with 200 µl of RPMI 1640),
and cells were cultured in 200
µl of RPMI 1640 containing 10% FCS
and 20 U of IL-2 per ml. Half
of the medium was changed at 4 days
postinfection, and viral production
was measured at 7 days
postinfection. For each serum dilution
the assay was performed in
quadruplicate, and the HIV-positive
wells were identified by the
quantity of p24 antigen (ELISA kit
from Du Pont or Innogenetics) in the
culture supernatants. This
allowed the viral titer (50% tissue culture
infective dose) to
be calculated in the presence (Vn) and in the
absence (Vo) of
the serum, according to the Reed-Muench method. The
neutralization
titer of the serum was defined as the serum dilution
that resulted
in a 10-fold decrease in the viral titer (Vn/Vo = 0.1). For a
given dilution of serum, a neutralization percentage
could also
be defined as follows: percent neutralization = 100

(Vn/Vo ×
100).
Competition assays.
In order to evaluate the participation
of V3-specific antibodies in neutralization, the neutralization assays
were adapted. For this purpose, V3 loop peptides were preincubated for
1 h at 37°C with the serum before the neutralization test was
performed as described above. The competition assay combined serial
concentrations of peptide (0.4 to 50 µM) and serial twofold dilutions
of serum. Data obtained with the serum dilution whose reciprocal was
twofold the neutralization titer were chosen for the presentation of
the results. A competition was observed when the addition of peptide resulted in a decrease in the neutralizing capacity of the serum.
 |
RESULTS |
Neutralization of primary isolates and of the TCLA strain
HIV-1MN.
Viruses from four early-stage HIV-1-infected
individuals and the corresponding autologous sera were analyzed in this
study. Neutralizing activities of these sera collected at different
times after seroconversion have been determined and described
previously (38). The sera, obtained about 1 1/2 years after
seroconversion in the cases of patients Bx16, Bx17, and Bx26 and 3 years after seroconversion in the case of patient Bx08, vary in their
efficiency of neutralization of the autologous virus isolated early (2 to 8 months) after seroconversion (Table
1). For example, serum Bx17(1.5
years) has a neutralization titer of 500, whereas a titer of
only 10 was measured for serum Bx08(3 years). Heterologous neutralizing activities against several primary isolates have also been
studied (38). Among the sera for which data are presented here, serum Bx26(1.5 years) was the only one to display a
cross-neutralizing activity, given that 4 of the 17 primary isolates
tested were neutralized. Nevertheless, the heterologous neutralization
titers, ranging from 10 to 40 (data not shown), were lower than the
autologous titer (140). Moreover, the four sera neutralized the TCLA
strain HIV-1MN on the MT-4 cell line (Table 1). The
relatively high neutralization observed [neutralization titers ranging
from 150 for Bx16(1.5 years) to 870 for Bx26(1.5
years)] was consistent with other studies, as the neutralizing
activity against the laboratory strain HIV-1MN was usually
strong and easy to detect compared with the neutralization of primary
viruses.
Detection of V3 loop-specific antibodies.
Serial serum samples
obtained at various times after seroconversion were analyzed for the
presence of specific antibodies directed against the hypervariable V3
region of the envelope protein gp120. These V3 loop-specific antibodies
were detected by ELISA, using peptides with sequences identical or
close to those of the viruses used in the neutralization assays (Fig.
1). The peptides Bx08-1 and MN are homologous to the United
States/European consensus V3 sequence and mimic the V3 loops of the
primary isolates Bx08, Bx16, and Bx26, classified as subtype B viruses.
In particular, the peptide Bx08-1 is identical to Bx08's V3 loop. The
peptide R21 contains several substitutions compared to the consensus
sequence and is very close to the V3 loop of the primary isolate Bx17. In particular, it shares with this isolate the amino acids V(312), R(313), and Q(318) at the top (crown) of the V3 loop. Given their positions, these nonsynonymous substitutions have been described as
playing an important role in determining the properties of the viruses,
particularly their tropism (63), antibody binding (31), and sensitivity to neutralization (27).
Consequently, peptide R21 can be considered quite different from
peptides MN and Bx08-1.
As represented in Fig.
2, antibodies of
the sera Bx08, Bx16, and Bx26 bound to the related peptides Bx08-1 and
MN. They were
already detected at the first time point analyzed, or at
7 months
postseroconversion for Bx16, and remained detectable
throughout
the period studied (until 3 years after seroconversion).
Nevertheless,
for patient Bx08, the antibody binding to V3 peptides
decreased
after 35 months. In contrast, in the serum from patient Bx17,
we found a very low level of antibodies able to react with the
heterologous peptides Bx08-1 and MN. When peptide R21 was used
in the
ELISA, binding of antibodies from patient Bx17 could be
detected
throughout the period of infection considered (from 5
months to 3 years
after seroconversion). Only a very weak reactivity,
close to the cutoff
level, was detected in the sera from patients
Bx08 and Bx16, but
significant binding to this heterologous peptide
was found in the serum
from patient Bx26. Among those tested,
serum Bx26
(1.5
years) was also the only one to display a cross-reactive
neutralizing activity (Table
1).

View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 2.
Temporal development of immunoglobulin reactivity to
peptides representative of different V3 loops of gp120. V3-specific
antibodies were detected by ELISA in sequential sera of seropositive
individuals at various times after seroconversion. The
OD450-650 values are the means from three separate
experiments performed with the sera from patients Bx08 ( ), Bx16
( ), Bx17 ( ), and Bx26 ( ). Solid line, cutoff value.
|
|
This binding assay allowed the antibodies directed towards the
homologous V3 peptide to be detected in all of the sera tested,
except
in serum Bx16 collected very early (5 months) after seroconversion.
Accordingly, these results confirm the immunogenicity of the gp120
V3
domain and the capacity of the immune system to produce an
early,
relatively specific, and persistent antibody response to
the V3 loop of
the autologous primary
isolate.
Competition experiments.
To examine a possible correlation
between V3-specific antibodies and neutralization, we investigated the
functional importance of these antibodies in the neutralization of
primary isolates. For this purpose, we first performed competition
experiments by adding 0.4 to 50 µM V3 loop peptides in the
neutralization assays. In this way we examined the effects of the
capture of V3 loop-specific antibodies on neutralization.
For all of the sera tested, the addition of up to 50 µM
peptide had no effect on the neutralization of the autologous primary
isolate (Fig.
3A). In other words,
whatever the dilutions of serum
tested, the percentages of
neutralization were equivalent in the
presence or absence of peptide,
and this was true whether the
peptide was homologous or heterologous
(data not shown and Fig.
3A).

View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 3.
Effect of the addition of V3 loop peptides in
neutralization assays involving autologous primary isolates (A) or
the TCLA strain HIV-1MN/MT-4 (B). Peptide solutions at
concentrations ranging from 0.4 to 50 µM were preincubated with
serial dilutions of serum before the neutralization test was performed.
The reciprocal dilution of serum corresponding to twice the
neutralization titer of the serum was chosen for presenting the
results. Values representative of those from at least three separate
experiments with the MT-4 cell line and two separate experiments
with PBMC are shown. , no peptide; , 50 µM Bx08-1;
, 50 µM R21; , 2 µM peptide; , 10 µM peptide;
, 50 µM peptide.
|
|
As these results were not consistent with those of previously published
competition studies with TCLA strains (
64), we analyzed
the
addition of the same peptides in neutralization tests involving
the
TCLA strain HIV-1
MN/MT-4. In these assays, a competitive
inhibition
of neutralization was obtained. Peptide Bx08-1, added at a
concentration
as low as 2 µM, inhibited the neutralization of
HIV-1
MN/MT-4 by
the sera Bx08
(3 years),
Bx16
(1.5 years), and Bx26
(1.5 years) (Fig.
3B).
Addition of a lower concentration of peptide (0.4 µM) did
not
result in a significant drop in neutralization (data not shown),
and at the highest peptide concentration tested (50 µM), losses
of
protection of 87, 94, and 88% were measured for sera Bx08
(3
years),
Bx16
(1.5 years), and Bx26
(1.5
years), respectively. An inhibition
of HIV-1
MN/MT-4
neutralization was also observed in the presence
of 2 µM peptide MN,
resulting in a similar loss of protection
(data not shown). However, it
was only at the highest concentration
(50 µM) of peptides Bx08-1 and
MN that neutralization of HIV-1
MN/MT-4
by serum
Bx17
(1.5 years) was significantly inhibited (Fig.
3B
and
data not
shown).
The same competition experiments have been carried out with the peptide
R21, which is quite different from peptides Bx08-1
and MN and has a
sequence close to that of the V3 loop of the
Bx17 isolate. The
neutralization of HIV-1
MN/MT-4 by serum Bx17
(1.5
years) was inhibited by a peptide concentration of 50 to 2 µM
(~80% inhibition).
Preincubation of this peptide with the
Bx08
(3 years) and Bx16
(1.5 years) sera had no
effect on the neutralization of HIV-1
MN/MT-4. However,
this
heterologous peptide competitively inhibited the neutralizing
activity
of serum Bx26
(1.5 years) on this TCLA strain. It is
noteworthy
that the serum from patient Bx26 already shows a binding
activity
to both homologous and heterologous
peptides.
According to these results, V3 peptides able to fix and capture
antibodies present in immune sera inhibit the neutralization
of the
TCLA strain HIV-1
MN/MT-4, and this confirms the role of
V3-specific antibodies in the neutralization of TCLA strains.
In
contrast, whether recognized or not by antibodies present in
the sera,
none of the peptides had an effect on the autologous
neutralization of
the four primary isolates tested. The involvement
of antibodies
specific for V3 linear epitopes in the neutralization
of primary
isolates could thus not be
demonstrated.
Evaluation of the effect of experimental conditions on competition
results.
To make sure that the differential effect produced by the
addition of V3 peptides in the neutralization of TCLA strains versus primary isolates did not result from experimental conditions, several
experimental parameters were modified. In particular, for the TCLA
virus, peptides and sera were always present in the test with the MT-4
cell line whereas they were removed by washing in the test involving
primary isolates and PBMC. By including washing after adsorption of the
virus in the former test, similar results were obtained (data not
shown), demonstrating that the observed competitive effects on the
neutralization of HIV-1MN/MT-4 were not due to the
continual presence of peptide.
On the other hand, besides the virus (TCLA strain versus primary
isolate), the type of cell used either to constitute the
viral stock or
as target in the neutralization assay represents
an important parameter
that may strongly influence the results
of neutralization and
competition (
17). We could not grow these
primary isolates
on T-cell lines, but multiplication of the HIV-1
MN strain
on PBMC was obtained, and after a single passage on these
primary
cells, a new virus stock, HIV-1
MN/PBMC, was constituted.
Neutralization and competition experiments were then carried out
with
this virus, using exactly the same protocol as for primary
isolates.
Under these experimental conditions, only sera Bx16
(1.5
years) and Bx26
(1.5 years) neutralized the
HIV-1
MN/PBMC strain, though
less efficiently, as
neutralization titers were 10 and 40, respectively.
The addition of 50 µM peptide MN and peptide Bx08-1 led to 60
and 50% inhibition in
neutralization by serum Bx16
(1.5 years),
respectively,
while peptide R21 did not diminish the neutralizing
activity (Fig.
4). Although the percentage of inhibition
was lower
than that for HIV-1
MN/MT-4, the neutralization of
the HIV-1
MN/PBMC
strain was still, at least partially,
inhibited by V3 loop peptides.

View larger version (28K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 4.
Competition experiments with the TCLA strain
HIVMN/PBMC. HIVMN/MT-4 was passaged
on PBMC and amplified on these primary cells before neutralization and
competition experiments with exactly the same experimental conditions
as for primary isolates. Results with the addition of 50 µM peptide
are indicated. Values are representative of those from two separate
experiments.
|
|
Overall, these data reveal a difference in the functional activity of
the V3-specific antibodies according to the virus involved
in the
neutralization assay, i.e., whether it is a TCLA strain
or a primary
isolate.
Depletion experiments.
In order to further evaluate the role
of V3-specific antibodies in neutralization, a depletion assay which
allowed antibodies that bound to the V3 peptides to be removed from the
sera was set up. This depletion method, based on successive passages of the sera on V3 peptide-coated plates, permitted over a 94% depletion in the V3-specific antibodies, which reach levels undetectable by ELISA
(Table 2). Depleted sera were then tested
in both neutralization assays for a residual neutralizing activity.
Like for the competition experiments, results obtained with the serum
dilution whose reciprocal corresponds to twice the neutralization titer
of the undepleted sera are presented (Fig.
5B); similar effects were obtained for the other dilutions tested (data not shown). We observed that the
removal of V3-specific antibodies from serum Bx08(3 years) with the homologous peptide Bx08-1 led to a drop in
HIV-1MN/MT-4 neutralization. However, depletion experiments
using the heterologous peptide R21 or no peptide did not show a notable
reduction in the neutralizing activity. The depletion procedure was
thus specific and did not adversely affect the antibody-neutralizing
capacity. For serum Bx26(1.5 years), which had antibodies
to both peptides, only the removal of antibodies directed towards the
homologous peptide Bx08-1 resulted in an inhibition in
HIV-1MN/MT-4 neutralization. A significant decrease in the
neutralizing activity against HIV-1MN/MT-4 was detected in
serum Bx17(1.5 years) depleted with the related peptide
R21, with a slight decrease being also measured for this serum when it
was depleted with the heterologous peptide Bx08-1, which corroborates
the competitive effect of this peptide at 50 µM. In contrast,
whatever the peptide used in the depletion protocol, the depleted sera
retained their neutralizing activities against the autologous primary
isolate (Fig. 5A).

View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 5.
Consequences of the removal of V3-specific antibodies
from immune sera. Neutralization was measured in sera not depleted,
mock depleted, and depleted with the autologous and heterologous V3
peptides (peptide Bx08-1 and peptide R21). The capacities of the sera
to neutralize the autologous primary isolate (A) and the TCLA strain
HIV-1MN/MT-4 (B) were determined. Values are representative
of those from two separate experiments.
|
|
Overall, these results confirm the previous observations made with
competition experiments and strengthen the differential
role of
V3-specific antibodies in the neutralization of TCLA strains
versus
primary
isolates.
 |
DISCUSSION |
The identification of epitopes implicated in the neutralization of
HIV-1 primary isolates remains one of the fundamental goals of HIV
vaccine development. Until a few years ago, the V3 loop of gp120 was
considered the major target for NAb and was defined as the PND for
laboratory TCLA strains. Since then, through analysis of the
neutralization of viruses isolated directly from infected individuals,
the role of the V3 loop as the PND has become controversial. On one
hand, reports describing the neutralization of primary isolates by V3
monoclonal antibodies furthered the idea that the V3 region is the
target for NAb (11, 46). On the other hand, large amounts of
V3-specific antibodies detectable in human sera are not predictive of
neutralization (41). Moreover, a conflicting argument is
provided by results of cross-clade neutralization studies that indicate
a lack of correlation between genetic subtypes and neutralization
serotypes (28, 42, 71). Another source of controversy over
the role of V3 antibodies in controlling HIV-1 is the fact that such
antibodies can display neutralizing but also nonneutralizing and even
enhancing activities (27).
In this paper, we have shown that antibodies present in immune sera of
infected individuals bind to V3 loop peptides, and we have thereby
confirmed the immunogenicity of the V3 region. The antibodies detected
were highly specific to the V3 loop representative of the autologous
primary isolates, except for the serum from patient Bx26. In this case,
antibodies bound to a related peptide (Bx08-1) as well as to a much
more divergent peptide (R21). It should be noted that the serum from
this patient was also the one that displayed cross-neutralizing
activity. However, V3-specific antibodies were detected very
early after seroconversion, i.e., before the detection of autologous
and heterologous neutralizing activities (Table 1) (38).
There is thus a lack of correlation between the presence of V3
antibodies and NAb at early stages of infection. This was also
described previously (41) and raises the question as to
whether V3-specific antibodies are involved in the neutralization of
primary isolates.
In competition experiments, the addition of a related peptide (able to
bind V3-specific antibodies) resulted in a loss of the capacity of the
sera to neutralize the TCLA strain HIV-1MN/MT-4. Conversely, although they bound antibodies, the same peptides did not
competitively inhibit the neutralization of the autologous primary
isolate. This dual effect of the V3 peptides suggested that the
V3-specific antibodies play different roles in the neutralization of
TCLA strains versus primary isolates. To confirm this, we removed antibodies that bind to V3 linear epitopes from the sera and measured the residual neutralizing activities after depletion. Similar conclusions could be drawn. Indeed, depletion with a homologous peptide led to a loss in neutralizing activity against the TCLA strain
HIV-1MN/MT-4, while depleted sera neutralized their
autologous primary isolate with exactly the same efficiency as
undepleted sera. It is noteworthy that for serum
Bx26(1.5 years), depletion with the heterologous peptide
R21 did not modify neutralization of the TCLA strain
HIV-1MN/MT-4, while a 50% drop in neutralizing activity
was measured when 50 µM peptide was added in competition experiments.
Thus, slight differences were observed in competition and depletion
experiments, but the conclusions remained similar.
As neutralization results are highly dependent on the assays used
(13, 17), we verified that the different capacities of
V3-specific antibodies for neutralizing TCLA strains versus primary
isolates were not the consequences of experimental parameters. Using
exactly the same experimental conditions as for primary isolates, we
studied the neutralization of the HIV-1MN strain grown on
PBMC. This neutralization was inhibited by the addition of a V3 peptide
recognized by the immune serum. However, the percentage of inhibition
was lower than that of HIV-1MN/MT-4, suggesting that after
the passage on PBMC, HIV-1MN had acquired certain
characteristics of field isolates.
Overall, these data confirm previous results implicating V3-specific
antibodies in the neutralization of TCLA strains such as
HIV-1MN. However, this does not apply for primary isolates, as antibodies that bind to linear epitopes of the V3 loop do not appear
to be involved in the neutralization of primary isolates. We therefore
corroborate and extend two studies (3, 70) in which a
similar differential role of V3-specific antibodies has been pointed
out. In the first study, by depleting V3-specific antibodies, Vancott
et al. (70) showed that the contribution of these antibodies
in the neutralization of primary isolates is less pronounced than that
in the neutralization of a TCLA strain. However, the 20% loss of total
antibodies caused by their depletion procedure could account for part
of the inhibitory effect observed. Moreover, whereas they studied only
heterologous neutralization, we took into account the autologous
neutralization of primary viruses. In the second study, Beddows et al.
(3) carried out competition experiments and obtained similar
results, i.e., that a V3 peptide was able to inhibit the neutralization
of a TCLA strain but not that of field isolates. However, the
35-amino-acid MN V3 peptide used contained as many as nine
substitutions compared to the V3 loop of the primary isolates studied,
and this may limit interpretation of the inhibition data, as pointed
out by the authors. By using several 21-amino-acid V3 peptides, we have
shown that a sequence-specific competition can indeed be observed in
three of four sera tested. Taken together, these complementary studies lead to the same conclusions and suggest a predominant role of antibodies with specificities outside the V3 loop and/or a contribution of antibodies directed towards complex epitopes, including
conformational V3 determinants not mimicked by V3 peptides.
A lower accessibility of the V3 epitopes on the oligomeric form of
gp120 at the surface of the primary virions could hinder the
recognition and the function of NAb (4, 26). Quantitative and qualitative differences have indeed been proposed to explain the
relative sensitivity to neutralization of TCLA strains, compared to the
apparent resistance of primary isolates. Along with others, we have
shown that a larger amount of gp120 could be detected at the surface of
primary isolates than at that of TCLA strains (39, 48). This
higher density of glycoproteins could hamper the interactions between
the antibody and the virus. However, Karlsson et al. reported that
neither the high envelope spike density nor its stability could explain
the relative neutralization resistance of primary viruses
(25). Recently, several authors ruled out the possibility
that this difference in neutralization sensitivity between TCLA and
primary viruses could be attributable to coreceptor use (30, 37,
67). Nevertheless, Trkola et al. (67) suggest that
antibodies to the V3 loop could interfere more effectively with CXCR4
interaction of HIV-1 than with CCR5 interaction. V3-specific antibodies
may therefore be better able to neutralize TCLA strains that use CXCR4,
which could account for the neutralizing activity associated with
V3-specific antibodies in our study.
In addition, the affinity of the antibody for its epitope may be an
important parameter that could affect the capacity of the antibody to
neutralize the virus. Nevertheless, V3-specific antibodies of high
affinity had more chance of being removed during the depletion
procedure than low-affinity antibodies, and this depletion had no
influence on the autologous neutralizing activity. This would therefore
tend to exclude the implication of V3 linear epitopes in the
neutralization of primary isolates. An alternative explanation of the
absence of neutralizing capacity associated with V3-specific antibodies
was provided by Schreiber et al., who showed that these antibodies were
directed towards noninfectious virions but not towards cell-free
infectious viruses (59, 60). On the other hand, those
authors recently suggested that conformational rather than linear V3
epitopes could be preferentially involved in the neutralization of
primary isolates (61). They described conserved V3
discontinuous epitopes formed by the GPGRAF motif and its adjacent
amino and carboxy sides as targets for highly specific antibodies
detectable in infected individuals. In contrast, as suggested by
Garrity et al. (16), the V3 region may have hypervariable,
immunodominant epitopes that serve to misdirect or dysregulate the
ability of the immune system to focus on more protective targets. By
masking the V3 region on a recombinant gp120 used to immunized guinea
pigs, they shifted the dominant antibody response away from V3 to
neutralizing epitopes in the V1 variable domain of gp120. However,
these experiments suffer from the facts that the recombinant gp120 was
derived from the TCLA strain HXB2 and that NAb have been characterized
against TCLA viruses only. They should accordingly be performed with
primary isolates.
Various other epitopes with different specificities could also be
implicated in the neutralization of primary isolates. Among them
are linear epitopes, such as the conserved domain ELDKWA of
gp41 recognized by the neutralizing monoclonal antibody 2F5 (47,
68). Additional epitopes in the V1 and V2 regions of gp120 have
also been identified as targets of antibodies that neutralize either
TCLA strains or primary isolates (72). In particular, a
surprising V2-specific antibody that neutralizes primary isolates
but not TCLA strains has been described (18). Conformational
epitopes encompassing the CD4 binding site and other sites
created by amino acids spaced over several regions of gp120 have also
been proposed and appear to be crucial (43, 65). Indeed, one
of the most efficient monoclonal antibodies described up to now,
IgG1b12, recognizes the conformational CD4 binding site and shows a
strong cross-clade neutralizing activity (5, 68).
Furthermore, antibodies directed towards discontinuous sites appear to
be prevalent in the immune sera of naturally infected individuals
(43), while such antibodies are lacking in sera of immunized
individuals and animals (33, 69). This may explain the
inability of sera from vaccinated individuals to neutralize primary
isolates even though they neutralize TCLA strains efficiently (9). A qualitative rather than a quantitative defect in the antibodies seems therefore to be implicated, as high quantities of
antibodies of different specificities are present, but these are not NAb.
Identifying the antibodies found in infected patients, and especially
in long-term nonprogressors, would help to elaborate vaccinal antigens
with neutralization epitopes able to induce efficient NAb. Such
antigens should display the specificities of a wide range of primary
isolates in order to generate a strong cross-reactive antibody response.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
We are indebted to Sandrine Haessig and Virginie Roques for
technical assistance.
This work is supported by a grant from Synthélabo and has been
carried out under the project Action coordonnée 1 of l'Agence Nationale de Recherches sur le SIDA.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
Corresponding author. Mailing address: Institut
de Virologie, INSERM U74, 3 rue Koeberlé, 67000 Strasbourg,
France. Phone: 0388566300. Fax: 0388566303. E-mail:
c.moog{at}viro-ulp.u-strasbg.fr.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Baier, M.,
A. Werner,
N. Bannert,
K. Metzner, and R. Kurth.
1995.
HIV suppression by interleukin-16.
Nature
378:563[Medline].
|
| 2.
|
Bates, P.
1996.
Chemokine receptors and HIV-1: an attractive pair?
Cell
86:1-3[Medline].
|
| 3.
|
Beddows, S.,
S. Louisirirotchanakul,
R. Cheingsong-Popov,
P. J. Easterbrook,
P. Simmonds, and J. Weber.
1998.
Neutralization of primary and T-cell line adapted isolates of human immunodeficiency virus type 1: role of V3-specific antibodies.
J. Gen. Virol.
79:77-82[Abstract].
|
| 4.
|
Bou-Habib, D. C.,
G. Roderiquez,
T. Oravecz,
P. W. Berman,
P. Lusso, and M. A. Norcross.
1994.
Cryptic nature of envelope V3 region epitopes protects primary monocytotropic human immunodeficiency virus type 1 from neutralization.
J. Virol.
68:6006-6013[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 5.
|
Burton, D. R.,
J. Pyati,
R. Koduri,
S. J. Sharp,
G. B. Thornton,
P. W. H. I. Parren,
L. S. W. Sawyer,
R. M. Hendry,
N. Dunlop,
P. L. Nara,
M. Lamacchia,
E. Garratty,
E. R. Stiehm,
Y. J. Bryson,
Y. Cao,
J. P. Moore,
D. D. Ho, and C. F. Barbas, III.
1994.
Efficient neutralization of primary isolates of HIV-1 by a recombinant human monoclonal antibody.
Science
266:1024-1027[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 6.
|
Cao, Y.,
L. Qin,
L. Zhang,
J. Safrit, and D. D. Ho.
1995.
Virologic and immunologic characterization of long-term survivors of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 infection.
N. Engl. J. Med.
332:201-208[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 7.
|
Chaix, M.-L.,
C. Chappey,
I. Couillin,
W. Rozenbaum,
J.-P. Levy, and S. Saragosti.
1993.
Diversity of the V3 region of HIV in Paris, France.
AIDS
7:1199-1204[Medline].
|
| 8.
|
Cocchi, F.,
A. L. DeVico,
A. Garzino-Demo,
S. K. Arya,
R. C. Gallo, and P. Lusso.
1995.
Identification of RANTES, MIP-1 , and MIP-1 as the major HIV-suppressive factors produced by CD8+ T cells.
Science
270:1811-1815[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 9.
|
Cohen, J.
1993.
Jitters jeopardize AIDS vaccine trials.
Science
262:6574-6578.
|
| 10.
|
Cohen, J.
1996.
Likely HIV cofactor found.
Science
272:809-810[Medline].
|
| 11.
|
Conley, A. J.,
M. K. Gorny,
J. A. Kessler,
L. J. Boots,
M. Ossorio-Castro,
S. Koenig,
D. W. Lineberg,
E. A. Emini,
C. Williams, and S. Zolla-Pazner.
1994.
Neutralization of primary human immunodeficiency virus type 1 isolates by the broadly reactive anti-V3 monoclonal antibody, 447-52D.
J. Virol.
68:6994-7000[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 12.
|
Doms, R., and S. Peipert.
1997.
Unwelcomed guests with master keys: how HIV uses chemokine receptors for cellular entry.
Virology
235:179-190[Medline].
|
| 13.
|
D'Souza, M. P., and B. J. Mathieson.
1996.
Early phases of HIV type 1 infection.
AIDS Res. Hum. Retroviruses
12:1-9[Medline].
|
| 14.
|
D'Souza, M. P.,
G. Milman,
J. A. Bradac,
D. McPhee,
C. V. Hanson,
R. M. Hendry, and collaborating investigators.
1995.
Neutralization of primary HIV-1 isolates by anti-envelope monoclonal antibodies.
AIDS
9:867-874[Medline].
|
| 15.
|
Emini, E. A.,
W. A. Scleif,
J. H. Numberg,
A. J. Conley,
Y. Eda,
S. Tokiyoshi,
S. D. Putney,
S. Matsushita,
K. E. Cobb,
C. M. Jett,
J. W. Eichberg, and K. K. Murthy.
1992.
Prevention of HIV-1 infection in chimpanzees by gp120 V3 monoclonal antibody.
Nature
355:728-730[Medline].
|
| 16.
|
Garrity, R. R.,
G. Rimmelzwaan,
A. Minassian,
W.-P. Tsai,
G. Lin,
J. J. De Jong,
J. Goudsmit, and P. L. Nara.
1997.
Refocussing neutralizing antibody response by targeted dampening of an immunodominant epitope.
J. Immunol.
159:279-289[Abstract].
|
| 17.
|
Golding, H.,
P. D'Souza,
J. Bradac,
B. Mathieson, and P. Fast.
1994.
Neutralization of HIV-1.
AIDS Res. Hum. Retroviruses
10:633-643[Medline].
|
| 18.
|
Gorny, M. K.,
J. P. Moore,
A. J. Conley,
S. Karwowska,
J. Sodroski,
C. Williams,
S. Burda,
L. J. Boots, and S. Zolla-Pazner.
1994.
Human anti-V2 monoclonal antibody that neutralizes primary but not laboratory isolates of human immunodeficiency virus type 1.
J. Virol.
68:8312-8320[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 19.
|
Harrer, T.,
E. Harrer,
S. A. Kalams,
T. Elbeik,
S. I. Staprans,
M. B. Feinberg,
Y. Cao,
D. D. Ho,
T. Yilma,
A. M. Caliendo,
R. P. Johnson,
S. P. Buchbinder, and B. D. Walker.
1996.
Strong cytotoxic T cell and weak neutralizing antibody responses in a subset of persons with stable non progressing HIV type 1 infection.
AIDS Res. Hum. Retroviruses
12:585-592[Medline].
|
| 20.
|
Haynes, B. F.,
G. Pantaleo, and A. S. Fauci.
1996.
Toward an understanding of the correlates of protective immunity to HIV infection.
Science
271:324-328[Abstract].
|
| 21.
|
Hwang, S. S.,
T. J. Boyle,
H. K. Lyverly, and B. R. Cullen.
1991.
Identification of the envelope V3 loop as the primary determinant of cell tropism in HIV-1.
Science
253:71-74[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 22.
|
Ivanoff, L. A.,
J. W. Dubay,
J. F. Morris,
S. J. Roberts,
L. Gutshall,
E. J. Sternberg,
E. Hunter,
T. J. Matthews, and S. R. Petteway.
1992.
V3 loop region of the HIV-1 gp120 envelope protein is essential for virus infectivity.
Virology
187:423-432[Medline].
|
| 23.
|
Jahaverian, K.,
A. J. Langlois,
G. J. La Rossa,
A. T. Profy,
D. P. Bolognesi,
W. C. Herlihy,
S. D. Putney, and T. J. Matthews.
1990.
Broadly neutralizing antibodies elicited by the hypervariable neutralizing determinant of HIV-1.
Science
250:1590-1593[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 24.
|
Jahaverian, K.,
A. J. Langlois,
C. McDanal,
K. L. Ross,
L. I. Eckler,
C. L. Jellis,
A. T. Profy,
J. R. Rusche,
D. P. Bolognesi,
S. D. Putney, and T. J. Matthews.
1989.
Principal neutralizing domain of the human immunodeficiency virus type 1 envelope protein.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
86:6768-6772[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 25.
|
Karlsson, G. B.,
F. Gao,
J. Robinson,
B. Hahn, and J. Sodroski.
1996.
Increased envelope spike density and stability are not required for the neutralization resistance of primary human immunodeficiency viruses.
J. Virol.
70:6136-6142[Abstract].
|
| 26.
|
Klasse, P. J., and J. P. Moore.
1996.
Quantitative model of antibody- and soluble CD4-mediated neutralization of primary isolates and T-cell line-adapted strains of human immunodeficiency virus type 1.
J. Virol.
70:3668-3677[Abstract].
|
| 27.
|
Kliks, S. C.,
T. Shioda,
N. L. Haigwood, and J. A. Levy.
1993.
V3 variability can influence the ability of an antibody to neutralize or enhance infection by diverse strains of human immunodeficiency virus type 1.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
90:11518-11522[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 28.
|
Korstrikis, L. G.,
Y. Cao,
H. Ngai,
J. P. Moore, and D. D. Ho.
1996.
Quantitative analysis of serum neutralization of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 from subtypes A, B, C, D, E, F, and I: lack of direct correlation between neutralization serotypes and genetic subtypes and evidence for prevalent serum-dependent infectivity enhancement.
J. Virol.
70:445-458[Abstract].
|
| 29.
|
Koup, R. A.,
J. T. Safrit,
Y. Cao,
C. A. Andrews,
G. McLeod,
W. Borowsky,
C. Farthing, and D. D. Ho.
1994.
Temporal association of cellular immune responses with the initial control of viremia in primary human immunodeficiency virus type 1 syndrome.
J. Virol.
68:4650-4655[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 30.
|
LaCasse, R. A.,
K. E. Follis,
T. Moudgil,
M. Trahey,
J. M. Binley,
V. Planelles,
S. Zolla-Pazner, and J. H. Numberg.
1998.
Coreceptor utilization by human immunodeficiency virus type 1 is not a primary determinant of neutralization sensitivity.
J. Virol.
72:2491-2495[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 31.
|
Langedijk, J. P. M.,
G. Zwart,
J. Goudsmitt, and R. H. Meloen.
1995.
Fine specificity of antibody recognition may predict substitution in the third variable region of gp120 during HIV type 1 infection.
AIDS Res. Hum. Retroviruses
10:1153-1162.
|
| 32.
|
Mackewicz, C., and J. A. Levy.
1992.
CD8+ cell anti-HIV activity: noncytolytic suppression of virus replication.
AIDS Res. Hum. Retroviruses
6:1039-1050.
|
| 33.
|
Mascola, J. R.,
S. W. Snyder,
O. S. Weislow,
S. M. Belay,
R. B. Belshe,
D. H. Schwartz,
M. L. Clements,
R. Dolin,
B. S. Graham,
G. J. Gorse,
M. C. Keefer,
M. J. McElrath,
M. C. Walker,
K. F. Wagner,
J. G. McNeil,
F. E. McCuthan, and D. S. Burke for the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases AIDS Evaluation Group.
1996.
Immunization with envelope subunit vaccine products elicits neutralizing antibodies against laboratory-adapted but not primary isolates of human immunodeficiency virus type 1.
J. Infect. Dis.
173:340-348[Medline].
|
| 34.
|
Matthews, T. J.
1994.
Dilemma of neutralization resistance of HIV-1 field isolates and vaccine development.
AIDS Res. Hum. Retroviruses
6:631-632.
|
| 35.
|
Mazzoli, S.,
D. Trabattoni,
S. Lo Caputo,
S. Piconi,
C. Ble,
F. Meacci,
S. Ruzzante,
A. Salvi,
F. Semplici,
R. Longhi,
M. L. Fusi,
N. Tofani,
M. Biasin,
M. L. Villa,
F. Mazzotta, and M. Clerici.
1997.
HIV-specific mucosal and cellular immunity in HIV-seronegative partners of HIV-seropositive individuals.
Nat. Med.
3:1250-1257[Medline].
|
| 36.
|
Merrifield, R. B.
1963.
Solid phase peptide synthesis. I. The synthesis of a tetrapeptide.
J. Am. Chem. Soc.
  :2149.
|
| 37.
|
Montefiori, D. C.,
R. G. Collman,
T. R. Fouts,
J. Ying Zhou,
M. Bilska,
J. A. Hoxie,
J. P. Moore, and D. P. Bolognesi.
1998.
Evidence that antibody-mediated neutralization of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 by sera from infected individuals is independent of coreceptor usage.
J. Virol.
72:1886-1893[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 38.
|
Moog, C.,
H. J. A. Fleury,
I. Pellegrin,
A. Kirn, and A.-M. Aubertin.
1997.
Autologous and heterologous neutralizing antibody responses following initial seroconversion in human immunodeficiency virus type 1-infected individuals.
J. Virol.
71:3734-3741[Abstract].
|
| 39.
|
Moog, C.,
C. Spenlehauer,
H. J. A. Fleury,
F. Heshmati,
S. Saragosti,
F. Letourneur,
A. Kirn, and A.-M. Aubertin.
1997.
Neutralization of primary human immunodeficiency virus type 1 isolates: a study of parameters implicated in neutralization in vitro.
AIDS Res. Hum. Retroviruses
13:19-27[Medline].
|
| 40.
|
Moore, J. P.,
Y. Cao,
D. D. Ho, and R. A. Koup.
1994.
Development of the anti-gp120 antibody response during seroconversion to human immunodeficiency virus type 1.
J. Virol.
68:5142-5155[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 41.
|
Moore, J. P.,
Y. Cao,
L. Qing,
Q. J. Sattentau,
J. Pyati,
R. Koduri,
J. Robinson,
C. F. Barbas III,
D. Burton, and D. D. Ho.
1995.
Primary isolates of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 are relatively resistant to neutralization by monoclonal antibodies and their neutralization is not predicted by studies with monomeric gp120.
J. Virol.
69:101-109[Abstract].
|
| 42.
|
Moore, J. P.,
Y. Cao,
J. Leu,
L. Quin,
B. Korber, and D. D. Ho.
1996.
Inter- and intraclade neutralization of human immunodeficiency virus type 1: genetic clades do not correspond to neutralization serotypes but partially correspond to gp120 antigenic serotypes.
J. Virol.
68:1342-1349[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 43.
|
Moore, J. P., and D. D. Ho.
1993.
Antibodies to discontinuous or conformational sensitive epitopes on the gp120 glycoprotein of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 are highly prevalent in sera of infected humans.
J. Virol.
67:863-875[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 44.
|
Moore, J. P., and D. D. Ho.
1995.
HIV-1 neutralization: the consequences of viral adaptation to growth on transformed T-cells.
AIDS
9:S117-S136.
|
| 45.
|
Moore, J. P.,
Q. J. Sattentau,
R. Wyatt, and J. Sodroski.
1994.
Probing the structure of the human immunodeficiency virus surface glycoprotein gp120 with a panel of monoclonal antibodies.
J. Virol.
68:469-484[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 46.
|
Moore, J. P.,
A. Trkola,
B. Korber,
L. J. Boots,
J. A. Kessler,
F. E. McCutchan,
J. Mascola,
D. D. Ho,
J. Robinson, and A. J. Conley.
1995.
A human monoclonal antibody to a complex epitope in the V3 region of gp120 of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 has broad reactivity within and outside clade B.
J. Virol.
69:122-130[Abstract].
|
| 47.
|
Muster, T.,
F. Steindl,
M. Purtscher,
A. Trkola,
A. Klima,
G. Himmler,
F. Rüker, and H. Katinger.
1993.
A conserved neutralizing epitope on gp41 of human immunodeficiency virus type 1.
J. Virol.
67:6642-6647[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 48.
|
O'Brien, W. A.,
S.-H. Mao,
Y. Cao, and J. P. Moore.
1994.
Macrophage-tropic and T-cell line-adapted chimeric strains of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 differ in their susceptibilities to neutralization by soluble CD4 at different temperatures.
J. Virol.
68:5264-5269[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 49.
|
Pal, R.,
A. Garzino-Demo,
P. D. Markham,
J. Burns,
M. Brown,
R. C. Gallo, and A. L. DeVico.
1997.
Inhibition of HIV-1 infection by the -chemokine MDC.
Science
278:695-698[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 50.
|
Pauwels, R.,
J. Balzarini,
M. Baba,
R. Snoeck,
D. Schols,
P. Herderwijn,
J. Desmyter, and E. De Clerck.
1988.
Rapid and automated tetrazolium-based colorometric assay for the detection of anti-HIV compounds.
J. Virol. Methods
20:309-321[Medline].
|
| 51.
|
Pellegrin, I.,
E. Legrand,
D. Neau,
P. Bonot,
B. Masquelier,
J.-L. Pellegrin,
J.-M. Ragnaud,
N. Bernard, and H. J. A. Fleury.
1996.
Kinetics of appearance of neutralizing antibodies in 12 patients with primary or recent HIV-1 infection and relationship with plasma and cellular viral loads.
J. Acquired Immune Defic. Syndr.
11:438-447.
|
| 52.
|
Pilgrim, A. K.,
G. Pantaleo,
O. J. Cohen,
L. M. Fink,
J. Y. Zhou,
J. T. Zhou,
D. P. Bolognesi,
A. S. Fauci, and D. C. Montefiori.
1997.
Neutralizing antibody responses to human immunodeficiency virus type 1 in primary infection and long term non progressive infection.
J. Infect. Dis.
176:924-932[Medline].
|
| 53.
|
Rinaldo, C.,
X.-L. Huang,
Z. Fan,
M. Ding,
L. Beltz,
A. Logar,
D. Panicali,
G. Mazzara,
J. Liebmann,
M. Cottrill, and P. Gupta.
1995.
High levels of anti-human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) memory T-lymphocyte activity and low viral load are associated with lack of disease in HIV-1 long-term nonprogressors.
J. Virol.
69:5838-5842[Abstract].
|
| 54.
|
Rowland-Jones, S.,
J. Sutton,
K. Ariyoshi,
F. Gotch,
D. Whitby,
A. Sabally,
A. Gallimore,
T. Corrah,
M. Takiguchi,
T. Schultz,
A. McMichael, and H. Whittle.
1995.
HIV-specific cytotoxic T-cells in HIV-exposed but uninfected Gambian women.
Nat. Med.
1:59-64[Medline].
|
| 55.
|
Rusche, J. R.,
K. Jahaverian,
C. McDanal,
J. Petro,
D. L. Lynn,
R. Grimaila,
A. Langlois,
R. C. Gallo,
L. O. Arthur,
P. J. Fischinger,
D. P. Bolognesi,
S. D. Putney, and T. J. Matthews.
1988.
Antibodies that inhibit fusion of human immunodeficiency virus-infected cells bind a 24-amino acid sequence of the viral envelope, gp120.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
85:3198-3202[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 56.
|
Scarlatti, G.,
J. Albert,
P. Rossi,
V. Hodara,
P. Biraghi,
L. Muggiasca, and E. M. Fenyö.
1993.
Mother-to-child transmission of human immunodeficiency virus type 1: correlation with neutralizing antibodies against primary isolates.
J. Infect. Dis.
168:207-210[Medline].
|
| 57.
|
Scarlatti, G.,
T. Leitner,
V. Hodara,
M. Jansson,
A. Karlsson,
J. Wahlberg,
P. Rossi,
M. Uhlén,
E. M. Fenyö, and J. Albert.
1996.
Interplay of HIV-1 phenotype and neutralizing antibody response in pathogenesis of AIDS.
Immunol. Lett.
51:23-28[Medline].
|
| 58.
|
Schonning, K.,
C. Nielsen,
J. Iversen,
J. O. Nielsen, and J.-E. S. Hansen.
1995.
Neutralizing antibodies in slowly progressing HIV-1 infection.
J. Acquired Immune Defic. Syndr.
10:400-407.
|
| 59.
|
Schreiber, M.,
H. Petersen,
C. Wachsmuth,
H. Müller,
F. Hufert, and H. Schmitz.
1994.
Antibodies of symptomatic human immunodeficiency virus type 1-infected individuals are directed to the V3 domain of noninfectious and not of infectious virions present in autologous serum.
J. Virol.
68:3908-3916[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 60.
|
Schreiber, M.,
C. Wachsmuth,
H. Müller,
C. Hagen,
H. Schmitz, and J. Van Lunzen.
1996.
Loss of antibody reactivity directed against the V3 domain of certain human immunodeficiency virus type 1 variants during disease progression.
J. Gen. Virol.
77:2403-2414[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 61.
|
Schreiber, M.,
C. Wachsmuth,
H. Müller,
S. Odemuyiwa,
H. Schmitz,
S. Meyer,
B. Meyer, and J. Schneider-Mergener.
1997.
The V3-directed immune response in natural human immunodeficiency virus type 1 infection is predominantly directed against a variable, discontinuous epitope presented by the gp120 V3 domain.
J. Virol.
71:9198-9205[Abstract].
|
| 62.
|
Shan-Lu, L.,
T. Schacker,
L. Musey,
D. Shriner,
J. M. McElrath,
L. Corey, and J. I. Mullins.
1997.
Divergent patterns of progression to AIDS after infection from the same source: human immunodeficiency virus type 1 evolution and antiviral responses.
J. Virol.
71:4284-4295[Abstract].
|
| 63.
|
Shioda, T.,
J. A. Levy, and C. Cheng-Meyer.
1992.
Small amino acid changes in the V3 hypervariable region of gp120 can affect the T-cell line and macrophage tropism of human immunodeficiency virus type 1.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
89:9434-9438[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 64.
|
Spear, G. T.,
D. M. Takefman,
S. Sharpe,
M. Ghassemi, and S. Zolla-Pazner.
1994.
Antibodies to the HIV-1 V3 loop in serum from infected persons contribute a major proportion of immune effector functions including complement activation, antibody binding, and neutralization.
Virology
204:609-615[Medline].
|
| 65.
|
Steimer, K. S.,
C. J. Scandella,
P. V. Skiles, and N. L. Haigwood.
1991.
Neutralization of divergent HIV-1 isolates by conformation-dependent human antibodies to gp120.
Science
254:105-108[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 66.
|
Trkola, A.,
T. Dragic,
J. Arthos,
J. M. Binley,
W. C. Olson,
G. P. Allaway,
C. Cheng-Meyer,
J. Robinson,
P. J. Maddon, and J. P. Moore.
1996.
CD4-dependent, antibody-sensitive interactions between HIV-1 and its coreceptor CCR-5.
Nature
384:184-187[Medline].
|
| 67.
|
Trkola, A.,
T. Ketas,
V. N. Kewalramani,
F. Endorf,
J. M. Binley,
H. Katinger,
J. Robinson,
D. R. Littman, and J. P. Moore.
1998.
Neutralization sensitivity of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 primary isolates to antibodies and CD4-based reagents is independent of coreceptor usage.
J. Virol.
72:1876-1885[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 68.
|
Trkola, A.,
A. B. Pomales,
H. Yuan,
B. Korber,
P. J. Maddon,
G. P. Allaway,
H. Katinger,
C. F. Barbas III,
D. R. Burton,
D. D. Ho, and J. P. Moore.
1995.
Cross-clade neutralization of primary isolates of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 by human monoclonal antibodies and tetrameric CD4-immunoglobulin G.
J. Virol.
69:6609-6617[Abstract].
|
| 69.
|
Vancott, T. C.,
F. R. Bethke,
D. S. Burke,
R. R. Redfield, and D. L. Birx.
1995.
Lack of induction of antibodies specific for conserved, discontinuous epitopes of HIV-1 envelope glycoproteins by candidate AIDS vaccines.
J. Immunol.
155:4100-4110[Abstract].
|
| 70.
|
Vancott, T. C.,
V. R. Polonis,
L. D. Loomis,
N. L. Michael,
P. L. Nara, and D. L. Birx.
1995.
Differential role of V3-specific antibodies in neutralization assays involving primary and laboratory-adapted isolates of HIV type 1.
AIDS Res. Hum. Retroviruses
11:1379-1391[Medline].
|
| 71.
|
Weber, J.,
E.-M. Fenyö,
S. Beddows,
P. Kaleebu,
A. Björndal, and the WHO Network for HIV Isolation and Characterization.
1996.
Neutralization serotypes of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 field isolates are not predicted by genetic subtype.
J. Virol.
70:7827-7832[Abstract].
|
| 72.
|
Wyatt, R.,
J. P. Moore,
M. Accola,
E. Desjardin,
J. Robinson, and J. Sodroski.
1995.
Involvement of the V1/V2 variable loop structure in the exposure of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 gp120 epitopes induced by receptor binding.
J. Virol.
69:5723-5733[Abstract].
|
| 73.
|
Zwart, G.,
N. K. T. Back,
C. Ramautarsing,
M. Valk,
L. Van der Hoek, and J. Goudsmit.
1994.
Frequent and early HIV-1MN neutralizing capacity in sera from Dutch HIV-1 seroconverters is related to antibody reactivity to peptides from the gp120 V3 domain.
AIDS Res. Hum. Retroviruses
3:245-251.
|
| 74.
|
Zwart, G.,
H. Langedijk,
L. Van der Hoek,
J.-J. De Jong,
T. F. W. Wolfs,
C. Ramautarsing,
M. Bakker,
A. De Ronde, and J. Goudsmit.
1991.
Immunodominance and antigenic variation of the principal neutralizing domain of HIV-1.
Virology
181:481-489[Medline].
|
Journal of Virology, December 1998, p. 9855-9864, Vol. 72, No. 12
0022-538X/98/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1998, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Holl, V., Peressin, M., Schmidt, S., Decoville, T., Zolla-Pazner, S., Aubertin, A.-M., Moog, C.
(2006). Efficient inhibition of HIV-1 replication in human immature monocyte-derived dendritic cells by purified anti-HIV-1 IgG without induction of maturation. Blood
107: 4466-4474
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Lusso, P., Earl, P. L., Sironi, F., Santoro, F., Ripamonti, C., Scarlatti, G., Longhi, R., Berger, E. A., Burastero, S. E.
(2005). Cryptic Nature of a Conserved, CD4-Inducible V3 Loop Neutralization Epitope in the Native Envelope Glycoprotein Oligomer of CCR5-Restricted, but Not CXCR4-Using, Primary Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Strains. J. Virol.
79: 6957-6968
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Krachmarov, C., Pinter, A., Honnen, W. J., Gorny, M. K., Nyambi, P. N., Zolla-Pazner, S., Kayman, S. C.
(2005). Antibodies That Are Cross-Reactive for Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Clade A and Clade B V3 Domains Are Common in Patient Sera from Cameroon, but Their Neutralization Activity Is Usually Restricted by Epitope Masking. J. Virol.
79: 780-790
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Holl, V., Hemmerter, S., Burrer, R., Schmidt, S., Bohbot, A., Aubertin, A.-M., Moog, C.
(2004). Involvement of Fc{gamma}R I (CD64) in the Mechanism of HIV-1 Inhibition by Polyclonal IgG Purified from Infected Patients in Cultured Monocyte-Derived Macrophages. J. Immunol.
173: 6274-6283
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Burrer, R., Haessig-Einius, S., Aubertin, A.-M., Moog, C.
(2003). Polyclonal Immunoglobulin G from Patients Neutralizes Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Primary Isolates by Binding Free Virions, but without Interfering with an Initial CD4-Independent Attachment of the Virus to Primary Blood Mononuclear Cells. J. Virol.
77: 11385-11397
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Montefiori, D. C., Altfeld, M., Lee, P. K., Bilska, M., Zhou, J., Johnston, M. N., Gao, F., Walker, B. D., Rosenberg, E. S.
(2003). Viremia Control Despite Escape from a Rapid and Potent Autologous Neutralizing Antibody Response After Therapy Cessation in an HIV-1-Infected Individual. J. Immunol.
170: 3906-3914
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Gorny, M. K., Williams, C., Volsky, B., Revesz, K., Cohen, S., Polonis, V. R., Honnen, W. J., Kayman, S. C., Krachmarov, C., Pinter, A., Zolla-Pazner, S.
(2002). Human Monoclonal Antibodies Specific for Conformation-Sensitive Epitopes of V3 Neutralize Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Primary Isolates from Various Clades. J. Virol.
76: 9035-9045
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Chen, C.-H., Jin, L., Zhu, C., Holz-Smith, S., Matthews, T. J.
(2001). Induction and Characterization of Neutralizing Antibodies against a Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Primary Isolate. J. Virol.
75: 6700-6704
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Montefiori, D. C., Safrit, J. T., Lydy, S. L., Barry, A. P., Bilska, M., Vo, H. T. T., Klein, M., Tartaglia, J., Robinson, H. L., Rovinski, B.
(2001). Induction of Neutralizing Antibodies and Gag-Specific Cellular Immune Responses to an R5 Primary Isolate of Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 in Rhesus Macaques. J. Virol.
75: 5879-5890
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Burrer, R., Salmon-Ceron, D., Richert, S., Pancino, G., Spiridon, G., Haessig, S., Roques, V., Barre-Sinoussi, F., Aubertin, A.-M., Moog, C.
(2001). Immunoglobulin G (IgG) and IgA, but also Nonantibody Factors, Account for In Vitro Neutralization of Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) Type 1 Primary Isolates by Serum and Plasma of HIV-Infected Patients. J. Virol.
75: 5421-5424
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Letvin, N. L., Robinson, S., Rohne, D., Axthelm, M. K., Fanton, J. W., Bilska, M., Palker, T. J., Liao, H.-X., Haynes, B. F., Montefiori, D. C.
(2001). Vaccine-Elicited V3 Loop-Specific Antibodies in Rhesus Monkeys and Control of a Simian-Human Immunodeficiency Virus Expressing a Primary Patient Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Isolate Envelope. J. Virol.
75: 4165-4175
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Means, R. E., Matthews, T., Hoxie, J. A., Malim, M. H., Kodama, T., Desrosiers, R. C.
(2001). Ability of the V3 Loop of Simian Immunodeficiency Virus To Serve as a Target for Antibody-Mediated Neutralization: Correlation of Neutralization Sensitivity, Growth in Macrophages, and Decreased Dependence on CD4. J. Virol.
75: 3903-3915
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Spenlehauer, C., Kirn, A., Aubertin, A.-M., Moog, C.
(2001). Antibody-Mediated Neutralization of Primary Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Isolates: Investigation of the Mechanism of Inhibition. J. Virol.
75: 2235-2245
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Hötzel, I., Cheevers, W. P.
(2001). Conservation of Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 gp120 Inner-Domain Sequences in Lentivirus and Type A and B Retrovirus Envelope Surface Glycoproteins. J. Virol.
75: 2014-2018
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Cho, M. W., Lee, M. K., Chen, C. H., Matthews, T., Martin, M. A.
(2000). Identification of gp120 Regions Targeted by a Highly Potent Neutralizing Antiserum Elicited in a Chimpanzee Inoculated with a Primary Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Isolate. J. Virol.
74: 9749-9754
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Liao, H.-X., Etemad-Moghadam, B., Montefiori, D. C., Sun, Y., Sodroski, J., Scearce, R. M., Doms, R. W., Thomasch, J. R., Robinson, S., Letvin, N. L., Haynes, B. F.
(2000). Induction of Antibodies in Guinea Pigs and Rhesus Monkeys against the Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Envelope: Neutralization of Nonpathogenic and Pathogenic Primary Isolate Simian/Human Immunodeficiency Virus Strains. J. Virol.
74: 254-263
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Crawford, J. M., Earl, P. L., Moss, B., Reimann, K. A., Wyand, M. S., Manson, K. H., Bilska, M., Zhou, J. T., Pauza, C. D., Parren, P. W. H. I., Burton, D. R., Sodroski, J. G., Letvin, N. L., Montefiori, D. C.
(1999). Characterization of Primary Isolate-Like Variants of Simian-Human Immunodeficiency Virus. J. Virol.
73: 10199-10207
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Trkola, A., Matthews, J., Gordon, C., Ketas, T., Moore, J. P.
(1999). A Cell Line-Based Neutralization Assay for Primary Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Isolates That Use either the CCR5 or the CXCR4 Coreceptor. J. Virol.
73: 8966-8974
[Abstract]
[Full Text]