Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Journal of Virology, December 1998, p. 10270-10274, Vol. 72, No. 12
Departments of Immunology and Molecular
Biology, The Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, California
920371;
Aaron Diamond AIDS Research
Center, The Rockefeller University, New York, New York
100162; and
Institute of Applied
Microbiology, Vienna, Austria3
Received 3 February 1998/Accepted 12 August 1998
Although typical primary isolates of human immunodeficiency virus
type 1 (HIV-1) are relatively neutralization resistant, three human
monoclonal antibodies and a small number of HIV-1+ human
sera that neutralize the majority of isolates have been described. The
monoclonal antibodies (2G12, 2F5, and b12) represent specificities that
a putative vaccine should aim to elicit, since in vitro neutralization
has been correlated with protection against primary viruses in animal
models. Furthermore, a neutralization escape mutant to one of the
antibodies (b12) selected in vitro remains sensitive to neutralization
by the other two (2G12 and 2F5) (H. Mo, L. Stamatatos, J. E. Ip,
C. F. Barbas, P. W. H. I. Parren, D. R. Burton, J. P. Moore, and D. D. Ho, J. Virol.
71:6869-6874, 1997), supporting the notion that eliciting a
combination of such specificities would be particularly advantageous.
Here, however, we describe a small subset of viruses, mostly pediatric,
which show a high level of neutralization resistance to all three human monoclonal antibodies and to two broadly neutralizing sera. Such viruses threaten antibody-based antiviral strategies, and the basis for
their resistance should be explored.
There is evidence to indicate that
antibody can protect or offer benefit against challenge with primary
isolates of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) (3).
In passive-transfer experiments, the recombinant human antibody b12
completely protected against challenge with two primary isolates in the
hu-PBL-SCID mouse model when it was administered pre- or shortly
postexposure (11). The anti-gp41 antibody 2F5 did not
protect chimpanzees against challenge with a primary virus, but
seroconversion was delayed and the peak of measurable virus-specific
RNA in serum was either delayed or did not reach levels comparable to
those in the sera of control animals (7).
Protection in vivo appears to be directly related to neutralization in
vitro. For instance, it is considerably easier to protect against
challenge with readily neutralized T-cell-line-adapted (TCLA) strains
of HIV-1 than with the more refractory primary isolates (11,
20). Complete protection requires serum antibody concentrations
in vivo considerably in excess of the 90% neutralization titers
measured in typical in vitro assays. As a rough guide, in the
hu-PBL-SCID mouse model, antibody concentrations 1 to 2 orders of
magnitude higher than the 90% neutralization titers are needed. For
example, antibody b12 provided complete protection in the mouse model
at 50 mg/kg of body weight, which corresponds to a concentration in
serum of about 500 µg/ml, against two primary viruses for which the
90% neutralization titers were 15 and 5 µg/ml. A dose of 10 mg of
b12 per kg offered only partial protection.
Extrapolation from the mouse model to humans is uncertain, but it seems
likely that potent antibodies will be required to achieve protection.
In a recent comparative study, only three human monoclonal antibodies
(MAbs) were found to neutralize (90%) a range of clade B primary
isolates at concentrations equal to or less than 25 µg/ml
(9). These are MAb b12, which recognizes an epitope
overlapping the CD4 binding site of gp120 (4, 5); MAb 2G12,
which recognizes an epitope involving the base of the V3 loop and the
base of the V4 loop of gp120 (2, 27); and MAb 2F5, which
recognizes a linear sequence close to the transmembrane segment of gp41
(2, 8). Similar results were reported by Trkola et al.
(26). In that study, a tetrameric CD4 immunoglobulin G2
(IgG2) molecule was also found to be approximately as potent as the
three human MAbs. Furthermore, the antibodies and CD4 IgG2 were also
highly effective against viruses from clades other than B.
Generally, comparative neutralization studies have shown that viruses
resistant to one of the three antibodies described above could still be
neutralized by other members of the panel. This finding is consistent
with observations that neutralization escape mutants selected by growth
of the primary isolate molecular clone HIV-1JR-CSF in the
presence of antibody b12 were still sensitive to neutralization by 2F5
and 2G12 (13). The escape mutants were shown to arise by
point mutations which reduced b12 binding to mature oligomeric envelope
on the virus (and gp120 monomer) but did not affect binding of the
other antibodies. However, we noted previously that certain isolates
with which we have worked appeared to be difficult to neutralize with
several antibodies. Such isolates may be important in considering
antiviral strategies, including vaccination, involving antibody. We
therefore determined to investigate the neutralization properties of a
number of isolates using the panel of MAbs described above and sera for
which we had preliminary evidence of unusually high neutralizing
titers. The viruses chosen included a panel of pediatric isolates
arising from mother-child transmission. This was because interruption
of mother-child transmission is a clear potential application of
prophylactic antibody (24) and because we had some evidence
of more neutralization-resistant viruses in this group.
Identification of two sera showing broad neutralization of primary
isolates.
A panel of sera was examined at The Scripps Research
Institute for neutralization of a diverse panel of isolates of
different clades (Table 1). To analyze
antibodies for neutralization activity against TCLA virus
HIV-1MN, we used an assay based on infection of HeLa cells
expressing human CD4 and the HIV-1 long terminal repeat fused to
lacZ as described previously (6, 21).
Neutralization of primary isolates was performed essentially as
described by Trkola et al. (26) except that we used a virus
inoculum of 100 rather than 10 50% tissue culture infective doses
(TCID50). Sera from 10 individuals, designated RW1 to RW10,
who had been infected for various periods from 3 to 10 years, and sera
from two donors, designated P and M, from whom antibody phage libraries
have been prepared (19), were used. We further included a
serum from a donor, designated FDA-2, which had been shown previously
to be relatively potent against a number of isolates (10, 15,
28). FDA-2 sera drawn at two different time points were tested.
One sample was a pool of four blood donations drawn between April 1990 and February 1991 and was obtained from the AIDS Research and
Reference Reagent Program (ARRRP), and the second sample was obtained in August of 1996. Table 1 shows that all of the sera effectively neutralized the TCLA strain HIV-1MN but that
neutralization of the primary isolates was much more restricted. The
best sera, RW-1, RW-3, and FDA-2, neutralized all the isolates. All the
other sera neutralized only some of the isolates. The two FDA-2 sera taken at different time points indicate an evolution of neutralizing antibody titers; both sera, however, are broadly neutralizing. Although
FDA-2 was one of the best-neutralizing sera observed in a previous
comparison of 15 different sera (15), Table 1 shows that at
least two RW sera had comparable or greater potency; both these sera
were from individuals who had been infected for 9 years or more. A
broadening of neutralizing antibody titers in long-term-infected
persons has been observed previously (14, 32). The sera RW-1
and FDA2 were chosen for detailed examination of neutralization of
pediatric isolates together with RW-7, a serum that is relatively
inefficient (Table 1).
0022-538X/98/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1998, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Antibody Neutralization-Resistant Primary Isolates
of Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1
![]()
ABSTRACT
Top
Abstract
Text
References
![]()
TEXT
Top
Abstract
Text
References
TABLE 1.
Neutralization titers of sera and MAb IgG1 b12 against
viruses of different clades
Pediatric isolates resistant to neutralization by sera and MAbs. Table 2 shows a comparison of neutralization titers of the above-described sera and three potent human MAbs against 14 pediatric isolates. The panel of isolates was obtained from the ARRRP and included isolates transmitted in utero as well as isolates transmitted intra- and postpartum. The majority of isolates were neutralized by the sera RW-1 and FDA2 but not by the serum RW-7. About half of the isolates were neutralized by each of the MAbs. This is a lower figure than has been generally observed for clade B isolates (see, e.g., reference 26) and may suggest that the pediatric panel is more resistant to antibody neutralization than a more general selection of viruses (i.e., adult based). Three viruses in particular, i.e., 92US076, 92US077, and 93US143, were not neutralized by any of the sera at a 1:32 dilution or any of the three MAbs at concentrations up to 50 µg/ml. These three isolates were also resistant to a cocktail of the three MAbs, each at 17 µg/ml. It appears that they have a general enhanced resistance to antibody neutralization. Of note is that all three are syncytium-inducing viruses.
|
|
|
Reactivities of soluble gp120 and gp41 from resistant viruses with MAbs. Neutralization resistance seems to be possible through at least two mechanisms. First, local changes through point mutations which reduce the affinity of the neutralizing antibody to the virion may occur, as has been described for the V2 (31) or V3 (18) loop and in vitro escape mutants of MAb b12 (13). Second, more-global conformational changes which make viruses more refractory to neutralization by subtle alterations of the envelope antigenic makeup may occur through mutations in distal sites. One such mutation in the gp41 subunit (A-T at position 582) which made the mutant virus (a variant of TCLA virus IIIB) less sensitive to neutralization by several antisera and anti-CD4 binding site antibodies has been described (22, 23, 25, 30). By the second mechanism, certain difficult-to-neutralize viruses may acquire resistance to neutralizing antibodies to multiple antigenic sites. Resistance by the first mechanism is therefore due to a loss of the relevant epitope through primary structural variation, whereas resistance by the second mechanism is mediated through changes in tertiary and quaternary structures, such as sequestering of the epitope from the antibody-accessible surface area.
Although there is a poor correlation between the presence of an epitope on monomeric gp120 and its accessibility to antibody on oligomeric gp120 (16), the absence of an epitope on monomeric gp120, at least for the epitopes studied here, does predict its absence from the oligomer. To investigate this possibility for the resistant isolates identified, we studied the binding of MAbs IgG1 b12 and 2G12 with detergent-solubilized primary isolate gp120 captured with a sheep antibody against the gp120 C terminus immobilized on an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) plate as described previously (17). The results showed that loss of binding to gp120 is not a general explanation for the resistant phenotype of these isolates. Captured solubilized gp120 from all four resistant isolates (92US076, 92US077, 93US143, and 93US714) bound MAb 2G12, whereas IgG1 b12 bound well to gp120 from 92US077 and 93US714 but not from 92US076 and 92US143 (Fig. 1). The resistant isolate 92US077 even retains the binding sites on gp120 of both MAb b12 and MAb 2G12. Similarly, there was no correlation between binding of MAb 2F5 to captured gp41 and neutralization resistance, since ELISA signals two to five times greater than background signals and comparable to those of controls were found for all viruses, except 93US143, for which binding was unclear (data not shown). From these results, it therefore seems that in some cases resistance may simply be due to the absence of epitope expression on subunits constituting the oligomeric envelope spikes but that in other cases resistance is a more complicated phenomenon, possibly reflecting a more global perturbation of the oligomeric envelope on the virion surface.
|
| |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
We are grateful to Robert Walker for providing a panel of sera from HIV-1+ donors. We thank John Sullivan and Merlin Robb for providing sera from pediatric donors, James Robinson for providing the control MAb PA-53, and Gerald Quinnan and Harvey Alter for FDA-2 serum. HIVIG was obtained from Albert Prince via the ARRRP. Virus isolates were collected from various geographical regions of the world by the World Health Organization and the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases. All viruses were obtained via the ARRRP. Pediatric isolates were deposited by Merlin Robb, David Ho, John Sullivan, and Cecelia Hutto. Isolate 92US714 was from Kenrad Nelson.
This study was supported by NIH grants AI33292 (D.R.B.), AI40377 and AI42653 (P.W.H.I.P.), and AI36082 and HL59735 (J.P.M.) and by the Elisabeth Glaser Pediatric AIDS Foundation, of which J.P.M. is an Elisabeth Glaser Scientist and of which P.W.H.I.P. is a scholar (PFR-77348). A.T. acknowledges a fellowship from the Fonds zur Förderung der wissenschaftlicher Forschung (J01165-MED) and the Austrian Program for Advanced Research and Technology.
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
* Corresponding author. Mailing address for Paul W. H. I. Parren: The Scripps Research Institute, Department of Immunology, IMM2, 10550 N. Torrey Pines Rd., La Jolla, CA 92037. Phone: (619) 784-9298. Fax: (619) 784-8360. E-mail: parren{at}scripps.edu. Mailing address for Dennis R. Burton: The Scripps Research Institute, Department of Immunology, IMM2, 10550 N. Torrey Pines Rd., La Jolla, CA 92037. Phone: (619) 784-9298. Fax: (619) 784-8360. E-mail: burton{at}scripps.edu.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| 1. | Allaway, G. P., K. L. Davis-Bruno, G. A. Beaudry, E. B. Garcia, E. L. Wong, A. M. Ryder, K. W. Hasel, M.-C. Gauduin, R. A. Koup, J. S. McDougal, and P. J. Maddon. 1995. Expression and characterization of CD4-IgG2, a novel heterotetramer that neutralizes primary HIV type 1 isolates. AIDS Res. Hum. Retroviruses 11:533-539[Medline]. |
| 2. | Buchacher, A., R. Predl, K. Strutzenberger, W. Steinfellner, A. Trkola, M. Purtscher, G. Gruber, C. Tauer, F. Steidl, A. Jungbauder, and H. Katinger. 1994. Generation of human monoclonal antibodies against HIV-1 proteins; electrofusion and Epstein-Barr virus transformation for peripheral blood lymphocyte immortalization. AIDS Res. Hum. Retroviruses 10:359-369[Medline]. |
| 3. |
Burton, D. R.
1997.
A vaccine for HIV type 1: the antibody perspective.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
94:10018-10023 |
| 4. |
Burton, D. R.,
C. F. Barbas,
M. A. Persson,
S. Koenig,
R. M. Chanock, and R. A. Lerner.
1991.
A large array of human monoclonal antibodies to type 1 human immunodeficiency virus from combinatorial libraries of asymptomatic seropositive individuals.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
88:10134-10137 |
| 5. |
Burton, D. R.,
J. Pyati,
R. Koduri,
S. J. Sharp,
G. B. Thornton,
P. W. H. I. Parren,
L. S. W. Sawyer,
R. M. Hendry,
N. Dunlop,
P. L. Nara,
M. Lamacchia,
E. Garratty,
E. R. Stiehm,
Y. J. Bryson,
Y. Cao,
J. P. Moore,
D. D. Ho, and C. F. Barbas.
1994.
Efficient neutralization of primary isolates of HIV-1 by a recombinant human monoclonal antibody.
Science
266:1024-1027 |
| 6. |
Clavel, F., and P. Charneau.
1994.
Fusion from without directed by human immunodeficiency virus particles.
J. Virol.
68:1179-1185 |
| 7. |
Conley, A. J.,
J. A. Kessler II,
L. J. Boots,
P. M. McKenna,
W. A. Schleif,
E. A. Emini,
G. E. Mark III,
H. Katinger,
E. K. Cobb,
S. M. Lunceford,
S. R. Rouse, and K. K. Murthy.
1996.
The consequence of passive administration of an anti-human immunodeficiency virus type 1 neutralizing monoclonal antibody before challenge of chimpanzees with a primary virus isolate.
J. Virol.
70:6751-6758 |
| 8. |
Conley, A. J.,
J. A. Kessler II,
L. J. Boots,
J.-S. Tung,
B. A. Arnold,
P. M. Keller,
A. R. Shaw, and E. A. Emini.
1994.
Neutralization of divergent human immunodeficiency virus type 1 variants and primary isolates by IAM-41-2F5, an anti-gp41 human monoclonal antibody.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
91:3348-3352 |
| 9. | D'Souza, M. P., D. Livnat, J. A. Bradac, S. Bridges, The AIDS Clinical Trials Group Antibody Selection Working Group, and Collaborating Investigators. 1997. Evaluation of monoclonal antibodies to HIV-1 primary isolates by neutralization assays: performance criteria for selecting candidate antibodies for clinical trials. J. Infect. Dis. 175:1056-1062[Medline]. |
| 10. | Fenyö, E.-M., J. Albert, and J. McKeating. 1996. The role of the humoral immune response in HIV infection. AIDS 10(Suppl. A):S97-S106. |
| 11. | Gauduin, M.-C., P. W. H. I. Parren, R. Weir, C. F. Barbas, D. R. Burton, and R. A. Koup. 1997. Passive immunization with a human monoclonal antibody protects hu-PBL-SCID mice against challenge by primary isolates of HIV-1. Nat. Med. 3:1389-1393[Medline]. |
| 12. | Mascola, J. R., M. K. Louder, T. C. VanCott, C. V. Sapan, J. S. Lambert, L. R. Muenz, B. Bunow, D. L. Birx, and M. L. Robb. 1997. Potent and synergistic neutralization of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) type 1 primary isolates by hyperimmune anti-HIV immunoglobulin combined with monoclonal antibodies 2F5 and 2G12. J. Virol. 71:7198-7206[Abstract]. |
| 13. | Mo, H., L. Stamatatos, J. E. Ip, C. F. Barbas, P. W. H. I. Parren, D. R. Burton, J. P. Moore, and D. D. Ho. 1997. Human immunodeficiency virus type 1 mutants that escape neutralization by human monoclonal antibody IgG1 b12. J. Virol. 71:6869-6874[Abstract]. |
| 14. | Montefiori, D. C., G. Pantaleo, L. M. Fink, J. T. Zhou, J. Y. Zhou, M. Bilska, G. D. Miralles, and A. S. Fauci. 1996. Neutralizing and infection-enhancing antibody responses to human immunodeficiency virus type 1 in long term non-progressors. J. Infect. Dis. 173:60-67[Medline]. |
| 15. | Moore, J. P., Y. Cao, J. Leu, L. Qin, B. Korber, and D. D. Ho. 1996. Inter- and intraclade neutralization of human immunodeficiency virus type 1: genetic clades do not correspond to neutralization serotypes but partially correspond to gp120 antigenic serotypes. J. Virol. 70:427-444[Abstract]. |
| 16. | Moore, J. P., Y. Cao, L. Qing, Q. J. Sattentau, J. Pyati, R. Koduri, J. Robinson, C. F. Barbas, D. R. Burton, and D. D. Ho. 1995. Primary isolates of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 are relatively resistant to neutralization by monoclonal antibodies to gp120, and their neutralization is not predicted by studies with monomeric gp120. J. Virol. 69:101-109[Abstract]. |
| 17. |
Moore, J. P.,
F. E. McCutchan,
S.-W. Poon,
J. Mascola,
J. Liu,
Y. Cao, and D. D. Ho.
1994.
Exploration of antigenic variation in gp120 from clades A through F of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 by using monoclonal antibodies.
J. Virol.
68:8350-8364 |
| 18. | Msuda, T., S. Matsushita, M. J. Kuroda, M. Kannagi, K. Takatsuki, and S. Harada. 1990. Generation of neutralization-resistant HIV-1 in vitro due to amino acid interchanges of third hypervariable env region. J. Immunol. 145:3240-3246[Abstract]. |
| 19. | Parren, P. W. H. I., and D. R. Burton. 1997. Antibodies against HIV-1 from phage display libraries: mapping of an immune response and progress towards anti-viral immunotherapy. Chem. Immunol. 65:18-56[Medline]. |
| 20. | Parren, P. W. H. I., M.-C. Gauduin, R. A. Koup, P. Poignard, Q. J. Sattentau, P. Fisicaro, and D. R. Burton. 1997. Relevance of the antibody response against human immunodeficiency virus type 1 envelope to vaccine design. Immunol. Lett. 58:125-132[Medline]. |
| 21. |
Parren, P. W. H. I.,
D. Naniche,
I. Mondor,
H. J. Ditzel,
P. J. Klasse,
D. R. Burton, and Q. J. Sattentau.
1998.
Neutralization of HIV-1 by antibody to gp120 is determined primarily by occupancy of sites on the virion irrespective of epitope specificity.
J. Virol.
72:3512-3519 |
| 22. | Reitz, M. S., Jr., C. Wilson, C. Naugle, R. C. Gallo, and M. Robert-Guroff. 1988. Generation of a neutralization-resistant variant of HIV-1 is due to selection for a point mutation in the envelope gene. Cell 54:57-63[Medline]. |
| 23. | Robert-Guroff, M., M. S. Reitz, Jr., W. G. Robey, and R. C. Gallo. 1985. In vitro generation of an HTLV-III variant by neutralizing antibody. J. Immunol. 137:3306-3309[Abstract]. |
| 24. | Stiehm, E. R., L. Mofenson, S. Zolla-Pazner, B. Jackson, N. L. Martin, A. J. Ammann, and The Passive Antibody Workshop Participants. 1995. Meeting report: summary of the workshop on passive immunotherapy in the prevention and treatment of HIV infection. Clin. Immunol. Immunopathol. 75:84-93[Medline]. |
| 25. |
Thali, M.,
M. Charles,
C. Furman,
L. Cavacini,
M. Posner,
J. Robinson, and J. Sodroski.
1994.
Resistance to neutralization by broadly reactive antibodies to human immunodeficiency virus type 1 gp120 glycoprotein conferred by a gp41 amino acid change.
J. Virol.
68:674-680 |
| 26. | Trkola, A., A. P. Pomales, H. Yuan, B. Korber, P. J. Maddon, G. Allaway, H. Katinger, C. F. Barbas, D. R. Burton, D. D. Ho, and J. P. Moore. 1995. Cross-clade neutralization of primary isolates of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 by human monoclonal antibodies and tetrameric CD4-IgG. J. Virol. 69:6609-6617[Abstract]. |
| 27. | Trkola, A., M. Purtscher, T. Muster, C. Ballaun, A. Buchacher, N. Sullivan, K. Srinivasan, J. Sodroski, J. P. Moore, and H. Katinger. 1996. Human monoclonal antibody 2G12 defines a distinctive neutralization epitope on the gp120 glycoprotein of human immunodeficiency virus type I. J. Virol. 70:1100-1108[Abstract]. |
| 28. | Vujcic, L. K., and G. V. Quinnan, Jr. 1995. Preparation and characterization of human HIV type 1 neutralizing reference sera. AIDS Res. Hum. Retroviruses 11:783-787[Medline]. |
| 29. | WHO Network for HIV Isolation and Characterization. 1994. HIV type 1 variation in World Health Organization-sponsored vaccine evaluation sites: genetic screening, sequence analysis, and preliminary biological characterization of selected viral strains. AIDS Res. Hum. Retroviruses 10:1327-1343[Medline]. |
| 30. |
Wilson, C.,
M. S. Reitz, Jr.,
K. Aldrich,
P. J. Klasse,
J. Blomberg,
R. C. Gallo, and M. Robert-Guroff.
1990.
The site of an immune-selected point mutation in the transmembrane protein of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 does not constitute the neutralization epitope.
J. Virol.
64:3240-3248 |
| 31. |
Yoshiyama, H.,
H. Mo,
J. P. Moore, and D. D. Ho.
1994.
Characterization of mutants of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 that have escaped neutralization by a monoclonal antibody to the gp120 V2 loop.
J. Virol.
68:974-978 |
| 32. | Zhang, Y.-J., C. Fracasso, J. R. Fiore, A. Bjorndal, G. Angarano, A. Gringeri, and E.-M. Fenyö. 1997. Augmented serum neutralizing activity against primary human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) isolates in two groups of HIV-1-infected long-term nonprogressors. J. Infect. Dis. 176:1180-1187[Medline]. |
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| J. Bacteriol. | Mol. Cell. Biol. | Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. |
|---|
| Clin. Vaccine Immunol. | ALL ASM JOURNALS |
|---|