Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Journal of Virology, November 1998, p. 8921-8932, Vol. 72, No. 11
Department of Genetics,
Received 13 May 1998/Accepted 12 August 1998
The bovine papillomavirus E5 protein is a small, homodimeric
transmembrane protein that forms a stable complex with the cellular platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF) Bovine papillomavirus type 1 (BPV)
is a double-stranded DNA tumor virus that causes benign fibropapillomas
in infected cattle and transforms cultured fibroblasts. The
transforming activity of BPV resides primarily in the E5 gene, which
encodes a small homodimeric protein largely localized to membranes of
the endoplasmic reticulum and Golgi apparatus (see reference
7 for a review). The BPV E5 protein forms a stable
complex with the endogenous cellular platelet-derived growth factor
(PDGF) The 44-residue E5 protein consists of a hydrophobic 30-residue segment
at the N terminus that spans membranes as an Complex formation between the E5 protein and the PDGF The E5 protein is thought to be a type II membrane protein and
consequently would be inserted into membranes in an orientation opposite that of the PDGF There are few structural data about the E5-PDGF Construction of mutant E5 genes.
Position 17 mutations were
constructed by using codon-cassette mutagenesis, a method we previously
described in detail (14). Standard subcloning procedures
were used to subclone the mutant E5 genes into the retroviral vector
pRVY-BPV-E5 (26). The DNA sequence of the entire E5 coding
region was confirmed for each mutant. Retroviral DNA containing each
mutant was introduced into packaging cell lines, and stable cell lines
producing high-titer retrovirus stocks were obtained after selection
for hygromycin resistance as described previously (26).
Mutant E5 genes encoding glutamic acid, serine, leucine, and glycine at
position 17 were subcloned into the vector pPava2, and recombinant
BPV/simian virus 40 (SV40) stocks were generated from the resulting
plasmids as previously described (22). Details of the
mutagenesis and subcloning procedures are available from the authors on
request.
Cell lines and tissue culture.
C127 and COS7 cells were
maintained in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium supplemented with
10% fetal bovine serum and antibiotics (DME-10). To assay the mutants
for focus-forming activity, 60-mm-diameter dishes of C127 cells were
infected with retroviruses (approximately 104 CFU) encoding
the mutant or wild-type E5 genes and foci were counted 2 to 3 weeks
after infection, as described previously (26). Additional
cells were selected in medium containing 300 U of hygromycin B per ml.
Cell lines were established from pools of >100 resistant colonies and
grown in medium containing 300 U of hygromycin per ml. To calculate
focus-forming efficiencies, the number of foci that formed were
normalized for the number of hygromycin-resistant colonies that arose
in parallel in the same infection. The results shown in Table
1 represent the averages of between two
and four independent infections for each mutant. We also transformed
C127 cells with retroviruses expressing neu*, an activated version of
the ErbB2 protein (1).
0022-538X/98/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1998, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Role of Glutamine 17 of the Bovine Papillomavirus
E5 Protein in Platelet-Derived Growth Factor
Receptor Activation
and Cell Transformation

and
![]()
ABSTRACT
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials & Methods
Results
Discussion
References
receptor through
transmembrane and juxtamembrane interactions, resulting in receptor
activation and cell transformation. Glutamine 17 in the transmembrane
domain of the 44-amino-acid E5 protein is critical for complex
formation and receptor activation, and we previously proposed that
glutamine 17 forms a hydrogen bond with threonine 513 of the PDGF
receptor. We have constructed and analyzed mutant E5 proteins
containing all possible amino acids at position 17 and examined the
ability of these proteins to transform C127 fibroblasts, which express endogenous PDGF
receptor. Although several position 17 mutants were
able to transform cells, mutants containing amino acids with side
groups that were unable to participate in hydrogen bonding interactions
did not form a stable complex with the PDGF
receptor or transform
cells, in agreement with the proposed interaction between position 17 of the E5 protein and threonine 513 of the receptor. The nature of the
residue at position 17 also affected the ability of the E5 proteins to
dimerize. Overall, there was an excellent correlation between the
ability of the various E5 mutant proteins to bind the PDGF
receptor, lead to receptor tyrosine phosphorylation, and transform
cells. Similar results were obtained in Ba/F3 hematopoietic cells
expressing exogenous PDGF
receptor. In addition, treatment of
E5-transformed cells with a specific inhibitor of the PDGF receptor
tyrosine kinase reversed the transformed phenotype. These results
confirm the central importance of the PDGF
receptor in mediating E5
transformation and highlight the critical role of the residue at
position 17 of the E5 protein in the productive interaction with the
PDGF
receptor. On the basis of molecular modeling analysis and the known chemical properties of the amino acids, we suggest a structural basis for the role of the residue at position 17 in E5 dimerization and
in complex formation between the E5 protein and the PDGF
receptor.
![]()
INTRODUCTION
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials & Methods
Results
Discussion
References
receptor in fibroblasts and induces ligand-independent
receptor oligomerization, tyrosine phosphorylation, and activation,
leading to cell transformation (6, 7, 10, 17, 21, 23-25).
-helix and a
hydrophilic 14-residue segment at the C terminus (7, 30).
Extensive mutational analysis has demonstrated that four absolutely
conserved residues in the E5 protein are critical for binding and
activation of the PDGF
receptor and for cell transformation (13, 20, 22, 27, 28). These residues are glutamine 17, the
only hydrophilic residue in the transmembrane region, aspartic acid 33 in the juxtamembrane region, and the two carboxy-terminal cysteines at
positions 37 and 39 that are involved in homodimerization of the E5
protein. In addition, the overall hydrophobicity of the central core of
the E5 protein, but not the specific amino acid sequence, is required
for cell transformation (7).
receptor is
mediated by interactions between the transmembrane and juxtamembrane
regions of the two proteins, and removal of the ligand-binding domain
of the receptor does not disrupt interaction with the E5 protein
(5, 6, 9, 10, 26, 29). A positive charge in the
extracellular juxtamembrane region of the receptor and threonine 513 in
the transmembrane domain is required for interaction with the E5
protein and for E5-induced receptor activation but not for activation
by PDGF. The E5 protein does not interact with the related PDGF
receptor, a difference that maps to the transmembrane/juxtamembrane
region of the receptor (10, 25, 29). Strikingly, both a
positively charged juxtamembrane residue and the transmembrane
threonine are absent from the PDGF
receptor.
receptor (4). This places
aspartate 33 of the E5 protein and lysine 499 of the receptor on the
extracytoplasmic side of the membrane at the membrane surface, with
glutamine 17 and threonine 513 buried in the membrane at roughly the
same distance relative to the membrane surface. These considerations
have led to the proposal that two pairs of interacting residues,
aspartate 33-lysine 499 and glutamine 17-threonine 513, are essential
for complex formation between the E5 protein and the PDGF
receptor (20, 22, 26, 30).
receptor complex.
Recently, polarized infrared spectroscopy has shown that the dimeric E5
protein in lipid bilayers is largely
-helical and has a
transmembrane orientation (30). Computational searches generated two related structural models for the E5 dimer that account
for the role of glutamine 17 and aspartate 33 in complex formation and
are consistent with the position of conserved and transformation-sensitive residues (30). In this report, we
have constructed and analyzed mutant E5 proteins containing all
possible amino acids in place of the required glutamine to establish
the role of glutamine 17 in mediating the activities of the E5 protein. Based on the molecular models we previously developed for the E5 dimer
and on the chemical properties of the amino acid at position 17, we
propose structural explanations for the transforming activity and
biochemical properties of the mutants.
![]()
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials & Methods
Results
Discussion
References
TABLE 1.
Summary of position 17 mutants in C127 cells
receptor kinase inhibitor AG1295 (16) was
obtained from Calbiochem, Inc. Subconfluent monolayers of C127 cells were incubated in 50 µM AG1295 in DME-10 for 8 to 10 h, after which the cells were processed for phosphotyrosine blotting as detailed
below. Alternatively, cells were maintained in the presence or absence
of 50 µM AG1295 for 3 to 5 days and photographed.
-mercaptoethanol, and
antibiotics (RPMI/IL-3). Stable Ba/F3 cell lines expressing the various
E5 mutant or wild-type constructs in the absence or presence of the
murine PDGF
receptor were established by using recombinant
retroviruses to infect Ba/F3-neo or Ba/F3-mPR, respectively, as
previously described (6, 26), with minor modifications.
Approximately 1.5 × 105 CFU of retrovirus was added
to 5 × 106 cells in 10 ml of RPMI/IL-3 containing 4 µg of Polybrene per ml. After 2 days, 1 ml of infected cells was
transferred into 10 ml of RPMI/IL-3 containing G418 (1 mg/ml) and
hygromycin B (1,000 U/ml). Cells were passaged during drug selection
when they reached a density of approximately 106 cells per
ml, and after three to five passages, stable cell lines were
established.
Assay for IL-3-independent growth. The ability of Ba/F3 cells to proliferate in the absence of IL-3 was assessed as described previously (6, 26), with some modifications. Drug-resistant cells were grown to a density of approximately 106 cells per ml in complete medium, pelleted, washed with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS; 140 mM NaCl, 27 mM KCl, 1.5 mM KH2PO4, 8.1 mM Na2HPO4), and repelleted. Cells were resuspended in RPMI formulated as described above except that WEHI-conditioned medium was omitted and the serum concentration was reduced to 1% (RPMI/no IL-3). Either 2 × 106 or 5 × 106 cells were seeded into 10 ml of RPMI/no IL-3 and incubated at 37°C, and viable cells were counted in a hemocytometer by trypan blue exclusion each day thereafter.
Metabolic labeling.
C127 cells at 70 to 80% confluence in
10-cm-diameter dishes were rinsed twice in PBS and then incubated for
1 h in leucine-free medium (MEM Select-Amine kit; Gibco). Cells
were then incubated for 5 h in 3 ml of leucine-free minimal
essential medium containing 16 µCi of [14C]leucine
(Amersham) per ml. For harvest, cells were rinsed twice with cold PBS
supplemented with 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride (PMSF) and 10 mM
iodoacetamide (to prevent postextraction dimer formation). Cells were
lysed in 1 ml of cold radioimmunoprecipitation assay (RIPA) buffer (20 mM morpholinepropanesulfonic acid [MOPS; pH 7.0], 150 mM NaCl, 1 mM
EDTA, 1% Nonidet P-40, 1% deoxycholate, 0.1% sodium dodecyl sulfate
[SDS]) containing 1 mM PMSF, 10 mM iodoacetamide, 10 µg of
aprotinin/ml, and 10 µg of leupeptin/ml and then incubated for 20 min
on ice. Lysates were cleared by centrifugation at 14,000 × g for 30 min at 4°C and stored at
70°C. To detect
14C-labelled E5 protein, after immunoprecipitation and
electrophoresis (see below), the gel was dried and visualized by using
a PhosphorImager (Molecular Dynamics).
Immunofluorescence. COS7 cells grown to 50% confluence on glass coverslips were infected at a multiplicity of ~1 with BPV/SV40 recombinant viruses containing the wild-type or various mutant E5 genes. Three days after infection, the cells were washed with PBS, fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde in PBS for 20 min and incubated for 20 min in PBS containing 0.01% saponin-0.1% bovine serum albumin (PBS/sB). The cells were then incubated for 1 h with anti-E5 antiserum diluted 1:500 in PBS/sB, washed three times with PBS/sB, and incubated for 45 min with Alexa 488-conjugated goat anti-rabbit antibody (Molecular Probes). The cells were counterstained with a 1:1,000 dilution of 4',6-diamidino-2-phenylindole hydrochloride (DAPI) in PBS/sB and washed three times with PBS/sB. The coverslips were mounted on slides with Gel/Mount (Biomeda), and fluorescence photomicrographs were obtained.
Protein extracts and immunoprecipitation. C127 extracts were prepared as described previously (6, 25, 26) in RIPA buffer or CHAPS buffer {15 mM 3-[(3-cholamidopropyl)dimethylammonio]-1-propanesulfonate [CHAPS], 30 mM NaCl, 1 mM EDTA, 50 mM Tris-HCl, [pH 7.4]}, both containing protease inhibitors and 2 mM Na3VO4. Extracts of Ba/F3 cells were prepared as described previously (6) in cold RIPA or CHAPS buffer containing vanadate and protease inhibitors.
The PDGF
receptor was immunoprecipitated as previously described
(25) by adding 1 µl of anti-PR-C3a antibody (which
recognizes the C-terminal 13 amino acids of the receptor) per 100 µg
of protein extract. Immunoprecipitation of the E5 protein and
associated PDGF
receptor was performed as described previously
(25, 26) by adding 1 µl of anti-E5 (which recognizes the
16 C-terminal amino acids of the E5 protein) per 100 µg of RIPA (for
E5 immunoblotting) or CHAPS (for coimmunoprecipitation assays) protein
extract.
Immunoprecipitates were collected with 60 µl of a 1:1 suspension of
protein A-Sepharose beads in Tris-buffered saline (10 mM Tris-HCl [pH
7.4], 165 mM NaCl) containing 10% (wt/vol) bovine serum albumin and
washed three to five times with NET-N (20 mM Tris-HCl [pH 8.0], 100 mM NaCl, 1 mM EDTA, 0.5% Nonidet P-40) buffer.
Electrophoresis and immunoblotting.
Samples were boiled in
2× Laemmli sample buffer with
-mercaptoethanol, except for the
metabolically labelled samples, which were boiled in sample buffer
without any reducing agents. Samples were then electrophoresed in 7.5 or 15% polyacrylamide gels containing SDS, for PDGF
receptor or E5
protein, respectively. Phosphotyrosine, PDGF
receptor, and E5
immunoblotting was performed as described previously (26) by
using a 1:500 dilution of antiphosphotyrosine monoclonal antibody 4G10
(Upstate Biotechnology, Inc.), a 1:500 dilution of anti-PR-C3a, or a
1:500 dilution of anti-E5 antiserum, respectively. Proteins were
detected with 125I-protein A (ICN) and visualized by using
a PhosphorImager. The band corresponding to the mature,
tyrosine-phosphorylated PDGF
receptor was quantitated by using
ImageQuant software and compared to those of cells transformed by the
wild-type E5 protein and analyzed in parallel. The average levels of
receptor tyrosine phosphorylation in multiple independent cell lines
for each mutant (including Q17Q, a reconstructed wild-type E5 protein)
are shown in Table 1.
Molecular modeling. Conformational searches of the transmembrane region of all 19 mutant E5 dimers were performed to identify likely structures of the mutant E5 proteins. The algorithm and parameters used were the same as those described previously (30), including the sequence length, the helix-helix separation (11.5 Å), and the clustering cutoffs.
The PDGF
receptor transmembrane domain was modeled as a canonical
-helix and manually docked in an antiparallel orientation to the E5
dimer with wild-type glutamine, glutamic acid, or serine at position
17. Docking was carried out using the program MidasPlus. The E5-PDGF
receptor transmembrane helix complex was subjected to 300 rounds of
minimization, using the program XPLOR (3). The parameter and
topology sets used were modified versions of PARAM19 and TOPH19
(2, 8). The first 100 cycles of Powell minimization were
implemented to remove steric clashes. To find the optimal alignment of
the two proteins, rigid body minimization was executed for the second
100 cycles of minimization. Another 100 rounds of Powell minimization
were added to converge on a low energy structure. Intrahelical
restraints were applied during the minimization to maintain helical
secondary structure. Restraints were added between residues at position
17 of each E5 monomer to model interhelical hydrogen bonding at
position 17, which was predicted by previous computational searches on
the E5 dimer (30). Finally, interhelical E5-PDGF
receptor restraints were applied between position 17 and threonine 513 and between aspartate 33 and lysine 499 to establish the proposed
E5-receptor contacts.
| |
RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Construction of the mutants. Saturation mutagenesis of position 17 in the E5 gene was performed by using codon cassette mutagenesis (14). This method utilized a set of 11 universal mutagenic oligodeoxyribonucleotide cassettes which were temporarily inserted at position 17 of the E5 gene. Subsequently, most of the cassette was removed, leaving three-base cohesive overhangs that were ligated to yield the desired codon substitution. The mutants were subcloned into a retroviral vector and into a BPV/SV40 recombinant virus vector, and virus stocks were produced. Mutant genes encoding all possible substitutions at position 17 were obtained and analyzed.
Studies with C127 cells.
To gain a comprehensive picture of
the role of the amino acid at position 17 in productive interaction
between the E5 protein and the PDGF
receptor and in cell
transformation, we examined the biological activities and biochemical
properties of all possible position 17 mutants in C127 mouse
fibroblasts. To assess the transforming activity of the mutants,
focus-formation assays were performed by infecting cells with
retroviruses expressing the mutant or wild-type E5 protein. The number
of foci obtained with each viral stock was normalized to the number of
drug-resistant colonies that developed from a portion of the infected
cells, in order to correct for differences in titers of the viral
stocks. In addition, stable cell lines for biochemical analysis were
established by pooling drug-resistant colonies.
(i) Transforming activity of the position 17 mutants in C127 cells. A wide range of transformation activities was seen in focus-formation assays with the position 17 mutants (Table 1). Most E5 mutants with nonpolar hydrophobic substitutions, namely, alanine, glycine, leucine, valine, isoleucine, and phenylalanine, lacked significant transforming ability. In the three infections averaged for the phenylalanine mutant, it induced foci at a moderate level in one experiment, but averaged less than 5% wild-type activity in two additional experiments. In addition, in two transfection experiments with the mutant cloned in a different vector (not included in the average shown in the table), it failed to induce foci. Moreover, a stable cell line expressing this mutant was morphologically flat. Thus, we conclude that the phenylalanine mutant has very little transforming activity and that the 17% level shown in the table is misleadingly high. The transforming activity of the rest of the mutants ranged from completely defective to hypertransforming compared to that of the wild type. The cysteine, tyrosine, proline, and arginine mutants displayed little, if any, focus-forming activity, whereas the lysine, aspartic acid, methionine, and threonine mutants possessed significant activity that was clearly reduced compared to that of the wild type. The tryptophan, asparagine, and histidine mutants transformed cells efficiently, and the serine and glutamic acid mutants reproducibly displayed approximately two to three times the focus-forming activity of the wild-type E5 protein. There was an excellent correlation between the transforming activities of the various mutants as measured by focus formation and by the morphology of stable cell lines expressing these mutants (data not shown; see also Fig. 8). These results confirmed that the identity of the residue at position 17 of the E5 protein is important in C127 cell transformation and highlighted the ability of several amino acids to substitute for the glutamine at position 17 and allow efficient C127 cell transformation. As discussed later, one feature common to all the amino acids that allowed transformation is their potential to form hydrogen bonds.
(ii) Expression, localization, and dimerization of the position 17 mutants. Stable C127 cell lines generated with each of the mutant viruses were analyzed biochemically. The E5 protein was immunoprecipitated from each of the cell lines by using an anti-E5 antiserum which recognizes the hydrophilic carboxy terminus of the protein distal to position 17. After electrophoresis under reducing conditions to disrupt disulfide bonds, the E5 protein was detected by immunoblotting with the same antiserum. As shown in Fig. 1, the great majority of the mutant E5 proteins accumulated to levels similar to those of the wild-type protein or to higher levels. The one exception was the mutant containing arginine, which was present at markedly reduced levels. Thus, with the exception of the arginine mutant, the differences noted above in transforming activities were not due to differences in the level of E5 protein expressed in the cells. It is striking that the mobility of the various E5 mutants differed markedly upon SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis, even though they all contained the same number of amino acids as the wild-type protein and differed from one another only in the identity of the amino acid at position 17.
|
|
|
(iii) PDGF
receptor activation and binding.
To examine the
ability of the various mutants to activate the PDGF
receptor, the
receptor was immunoprecipitated from extracts of the stable cell lines
by using a PDGF
receptor-specific antiserum and tyrosine
phosphorylation of the receptor was determined by immunoblotting with a
monoclonal antibody that recognizes phosphotyrosine. Results of a
typical experiment are shown in Fig. 4.
As described previously, the wild-type E5 protein induced tyrosine
phosphorylation of both the slowly migrating form of the PDGF
receptor with mature carbohydrates and a more rapidly migrating
intracellular precursor form of the receptor containing incompletely
processed carbohydrates (23). In contrast, the
transformation-competent mutants preferentially induced tyrosine
phosphorylation of the mature form of the receptor and had little
effect on the tyrosine phosphorylation of the precursor. The average
results from the examination and quantitation of multiple independently
derived cell lines expressing each mutant are tabulated in Table 1.
Although the results of this assay were somewhat variable and the PDGF
receptor in untransformed cells showed background levels of tyrosine phosphorylation, several trends emerged. All of the E5 mutant
proteins which efficiently transformed C127 cells, including the serine
mutant, induced abundant receptor tyrosine phosphorylation. In
contrast, the transformation-defective mutants induced little or no
receptor tyrosine phosphorylation. (Additional, independently derived
C127 cell lines expressing the valine mutant, as well as Ba/F3 cells
expressing this mutant [see Fig. 10, top], displayed less tyrosine
phosphorylation than in the example shown in Fig. 4.) All four of the
mutants with intermediate transforming activity induced more receptor
phosphorylation than did the most defective hydrophobic mutants. In the
analysis of the aspartic acid mutant, one of three cell lines tested
(shown in Fig. 4) displayed high receptor tyrosine phosphorylation, but
tyrosine phosphorylation in the other cell lines expressing this mutant
was approximately one-half of the wild-type levels. In summary, for the
mutants with clearcut transformation phenotypes, i.e., displaying
either marked transformation defects or robust transforming activity, there was an excellent correlation between transforming activity and
the extent of receptor tyrosine phosphorylation.
|
receptor, coimmunoprecipitation analysis was
carried out. Extracts prepared in RIPA buffer were immunoprecipitated with the E5 antiserum, and PDGF
receptor in the immunoprecipitate was detected by immunoblotting with antiserum that recognized the
receptor (Fig. 5). No PDGF
receptor
was immunoprecipitated with the E5 antiserum from cells infected with
the empty vector (data not shown), and both mature and precursor forms
of the receptor were coimmunoprecipitated from cells expressing the
wild-type E5 protein. The mature form and a relatively small amount of
the precursor form of the PDGF
receptor were coimmunoprecipitated from cells expressing the glutamic acid mutant, the mutant that consistently displayed very high transforming activity. However, little
PDGF
receptor was coimmunoprecipitated from cells expressing the
other mutants, including those, such as the histidine and serine
mutants, that efficiently transformed cells and induced receptor
tyrosine phosphorylation (Fig. 5 and data not shown). To test the
possibility that the stability of receptor-E5 complexes containing
these mutants was reduced compared to the stability of complexes
containing the wild-type E5 protein or the glutamic acid mutant,
extracts were also prepared using the gentler detergent, CHAPS. In
contrast to the results obtained with RIPA buffer, the E5 antiserum
coimmunoprecipitated the PDGF
receptor from CHAPS extracts prepared
from cells expressing several mutants (Fig. 6). Under these conditions, all of the
transformation-competent mutants were present in a stable complex with
the mature form of the PDGF
receptor, whereas none of the
nontransforming mutants was able to bind significant amounts of the
PDGF
receptor. The aspartic acid mutant bound more receptor than
the other mutants with intermediate transforming activity. Relatively
low amounts of the precursor form of the receptor were present in
complexes containing the transformation-competent mutant E5 proteins
compared to complexes containing the wild-type E5 protein.
|
|
(iv) Kinase inhibitor studies.
Our results with the serine
mutant are particularly interesting since Sparkowski et al. reported
that this mutant transformed mouse fibroblasts in the absence of PDGF
receptor activation (28). To explore explicitly the
requirement for PDGF
receptor signaling in C127 cell
transformation, we treated transformed cells with AG1295, a specific
inhibitor of PDGF receptor tyrosine kinase activity (16). As
a control, we also examined C127 cells transformed by neu*, an
unrelated activated receptor tyrosine kinase. AG1295 treatment of C127
cells transformed by the wild-type E5 protein caused rapid
dephosphorylation of the endogenous PDGF
receptor but did not
decrease tyrosine phosphorylation of neu* (Fig.
7). Moreover, AG1295 treatment caused
morphologic reversion of E5-transformed cells so that they resembled
parental C127 cells, but had no effect on neu*-transformed cells (Fig.
8). Treatment of C127 cells transformed
with the glutamic acid or serine mutant also caused receptor
dephosphorylation and reversion of the transformed phenotype.
Therefore, not only do these mutants bind and activate the
endogenous PDGF
receptor in C127 fibroblasts, but sustained receptor kinase activity is required to maintain the transformed phenotype.
|
|
Studies with Ba/F3 cells.
Ba/F3 cells are murine hematopoietic
cells that do not express the endogenous PDGF
receptor or other
receptor tyrosine kinases proposed to interact with the E5 protein.
These cells are normally dependent on IL-3 for survival and
proliferation, but coexpression of the wild-type BPV E5 protein
and the PDGF
receptor resulted in complex formation between the two
proteins, constitutive tyrosine phosphorylation of the
receptor, and IL-3-independent proliferation (6). To examine
the role of the amino acid at position 17 in Ba/F3 cells, cell lines
expressing no PDGF
receptor or exogenous murine PDGF
receptor
were infected with retroviruses carrying the wild-type E5 gene or a
mutant gene encoding glutamic acid, serine, valine, or tyrosine at
position 17. Following selection for a cotransduced hygromycin
resistance gene, pooled drug-resistant cell lines were established.
Expression of the E5 proteins in these stable cell lines was confirmed
by immunoblotting, as was expression of similar levels of PDGF
receptor in the appropriate cell lines (data not shown).
(i) Transformation of Ba/F3 cells by the position 17 mutants.
Neither the wild-type E5 protein nor any of the mutants supported
IL-3-independent proliferation in Ba/F3 cells not expressing the PDGF
receptor, whereas IL-3-independent proliferation occurred in cells
coexpressing the PDGF
receptor and the wild-type E5 protein (Fig.
9, bottom panel). When exogenous PDGF
receptor was expressed in these cells, the glutamic acid and the serine substitution mutants, which efficiently transformed C127 cells, supported IL-3 independence, whereas two transformation-defective mutants, the valine and the tyrosine substitutions, did not (Fig. 9,
top panel). Thus, expression of the PDGF
receptor was required for
transformation of Ba/F3 cells by the serine mutant, as well as by the
wild-type E5 protein and the glutamic acid mutant. Treatment with
AG1295, the PDGF receptor kinase inhibitor, prevented IL-3-independent proliferation of cells coexpressing the PDGF
receptor and either the wild-type E5 protein or the serine mutant but had no effect on the
growth of these cells in the presence of IL-3 (data not shown).
|
(ii) Biochemical analysis of Ba/F3 cells.
To further
characterize the interaction of the E5 protein and the PDGF
receptor in Ba/F3 cells, extracts were prepared from cells grown in the
presence of IL-3. As shown in Fig. 10,
the glutamic acid and serine mutants, which supported IL-3-independent
growth when coexpressed with the PDGF
receptor, led to tyrosine
phosphorylation of the mature form of the PDGF
receptor (top panel)
and formed a stable complex with the receptor (bottom panel). In
contrast, the two defective mutants, valine and tyrosine, did not bind
the PDGF
receptor or lead to its tyrosine phosphorylation. Thus, there was an excellent correlation between the ability of mutants to
transform Ba/F3 cells and to bind to and activate the mature form of
the PDGF
receptor in these cells.
|
Molecular modeling.
To explore the structural basis for the
activities of the various position 17 mutants, computational searches
were performed of the E5 dimer with different substitutions at position
17. For the wild-type E5 protein, two low-energy dimer structures
are found through computational searches (30). In both
conformations, the E5 dimer is formed by two long transmembrane
-helices that pack together in a left-handed coiled-coil geometry.
The dimer is stabilized largely by van der Waals interactions along
the interface. In one conformation, the side chain of glutamine 17 is
directed away from the helix interface, while in the second conformation glutamine 17 is packed in the interface, forming interhelical hydrogen bonds. When other residues were substituted at
position 17, these two conformations were frequently found in the
computational searches (data not shown), indicating that the residue at
position 17 did not make the dominant contribution to dimer stability.
These results agree with the observation that E5 dimerization was not
completely disrupted in the glutamine 17 mutants.
receptor, we docked the PDGF
receptor transmembrane domain to both
of the structural models of the E5 dimer found previously. The
transmembrane portion of the PDGF
receptor was modeled as a
canonical
-helix, oriented to form favorable interactions with
residues on the E5 dimer, and energy was minimized. It was possible to
obtain simultaneous aspartate 33-lysine 499 and glutamine 17-threonine
513 interactions with the glutamine oriented either away from or in the
dimer interface (Fig. 11A and data not
shown). Figure 11A presents a model of the E5 dimer in which glutamine 17 is packed in the interface and interacts with the PDGF
receptor transmembrane domain. The side chain of each glutamine can form three
distinct hydrogen bonds and thus has the potential to hydrogen bond
across the E5 dimer interface and to threonine 513 of the PDGF
receptor. In the model shown in Fig. 11A, each glutamine forms two
hydrogen bonds across the E5 dimer interface, one to the other
glutamine and the other to a backbone carbonyl oxygen on the opposite
E5 monomer, for a total of three hydrogen bonds stabilizing the E5
dimer. The remaining functional group on each glutamine forms a
hydrogen bond with the threonine side chain hydroxyl group of a
different PDGF
receptor molecule. The side chain of glutamic acid
also has a hydrogen bond donor (C---OH) and an acceptor (C==O) and can
also interact with the other E5 monomer across the E5 interface as well
as with threonine 513. In Fig. 11B, interhelical hydrogen bonding
restraints were placed between the glutamic acid side chain and the
threonine
-hydroxyl proton. The two glutamic acid side chains are
hydrogen bonded to one another, leaving a free functional group on each
glutamic acid to hydrogen bond to threonine 513 on a different PDGF
receptor molecule. In the case of serine, which has a smaller side
chain than glutamine and glutamic acid, it is also possible to dock the
transmembrane domain of the PDGF
receptor and form interhelical
hydrogen bonds with threonine 513 (Fig. 11C). In the calculations for
the mutant E5 dimer alone, the serine side chain is hydrogen bonded
back to the i-4 carbonyl of the same helix (data not shown), whereas it
rotates outward in the PDGF
receptor-E5 complex to hydrogen bond
with the receptor threonine. Thus, in the docked models, each of the
three residues that support PDGF receptor complex formation and
transformation can form hydrogen bonds with threonine 513 of the PDGF
receptor.
|
| |
DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Our experiments determined the effect of all possible amino acids
at position 17 on the ability of the E5 protein to bind to and activate
the PDGF
receptor and to transform cells. In both C127 fibroblasts
and Ba/F3 cells, all of the E5 mutant proteins that transformed cells
formed complexes with the receptor and induced receptor
autophosphorylation, whereas the transformation-defective mutant
proteins did not efficiently bind or activate the receptor. The
wild-type and transformation-competent mutant E5 proteins induced
growth factor independence in Ba/F3 cells only when coexpressed with
exogenous PDGF
receptor. Furthermore, a PDGF receptor-specific kinase inhibitor reduced receptor tyrosine phosphorylation, led to
reversion of the transformed phenotype in C127 cells, and prevented IL-3-independent growth in Ba/F3 cells. Thus, the wild-type and transformation-competent mutant E5 proteins require the presence and
sustained activation of the PDGF
receptor to transform cells. These
results confirm the importance of position 17 of the E5 protein in PDGF
receptor binding and activation, imply that complex formation with
the E5 protein is required for receptor activation, and provide
compelling evidence that the PDGF
receptor is the primary target of
the E5 protein.
The E5 protein also binds to a 16-kDa transmembrane subunit of the H+-ATPase in some cell types (e.g., see reference 10). We and others have not been able to detect this interaction in C127 cells (28). Furthermore, in mouse NIH 3T3 cells, the ability of mutant E5 proteins to bind this protein shows no apparent correlation with transforming efficiency and appears to require only a positive charge at position 17 and a negative charge on the ATPase subunit (28).
These experiments extend the work of two other groups. Meyer et al.
(20) examined the focus-forming efficiencies of several position 17 mutants in NIH 3T3 cells. Since transformation appeared to
require a residue at position 17 capable of forming hydrogen bonds,
they speculated that the main function of glutamine 17 was to form
interhelical hydrogen bonds to stabilize the E5 dimer. However, E5
expression and dimerization by these mutants were not assessed, nor
were PDGF
receptor binding and activation examined. Sparkowski et
al. analyzed a panel of position 17 mutants in NIH 3T3 and C127 cells
and reported that most of the transformation-competent mutants induced
PDGF
receptor phosphorylation without binding the receptor and that
the serine mutant transformed cells without inducing PDGF receptor
activation (27, 28). In addition, they saw no effect of the
position 17 mutations on E5 dimerization. Several factors are likely to
account for the differences from our results. First, the basal level of
phosphorylation of the mature form of the receptor was high in the
experiments of Sparkowski and colleagues, precluding further
analysis of its phosphorylation and focusing their attention on
the immature form of the receptor (28). However, in
our experiments, the active position 17 mutant E5 proteins were
impaired in their ability to bind and induce autophosphorylation of the
immature form of the receptor, so conclusions about the activities of
various mutant E5 proteins cannot be based on study of this receptor
form alone. The basis for this impaired interaction of the
mutants with the precursor form of the receptor is not known.
Second, we found that the stringent buffer RIPA disrupts complexes
containing most transformation-competent mutants, whereas the gentle
lysis buffer CHAPS preserves these interactions. Thus, a possible
explanation for the findings of Sparkowski et al. (28) was
the use of extraction buffers that disrupted complexes containing these
mutants. Finally, they constructed their position 17 substitutions in a
mutant, epitope-tagged version of the E5 protein (27),
whereas we analyzed the authentic E5 protein, differing from the
wild-type protein only by the identity of the amino acid at position
17. It is possible that the presence of the epitope affected the
properties of the E5 mutants.
In the experiments reported here, we constructed and analyzed all
possible position 17 E5 mutants to gain a comprehensive picture of the
role of the residue at this position. The residue at position 17 affected the ability of the E5 protein to dimerize and form stable
complexes with the PDGF
receptor. Representative mutants localized
normally in cells, and almost all of the mutant E5 proteins accumulated
in cells, suggesting that the mutations did not affect appropriate
partitioning of the E5 protein into the hydrophobic membrane
environment. However, the transformation-defective arginine mutant was
present in low levels. It is possible that the arginine side chain was
unable to deprotonate to form the neutral species and partition
into the membrane, resulting in decreased stability of this mutant.
Previous analyses of mutants with substitutions at the cysteines, which
mediate E5 dimerization, imply that dimerization is required for
complex formation and transformation (13, 20, 22), and we
have proposed that dimer formation is required to generate the binding
site on the E5 protein for the PDGF
receptor (30). The
results reported here provide new insight into the role of dimerization
in transformation and the role of position 17 in dimer formation. In
general, the mutants with strongly polar residues at position 17 showed
high levels of dimer, similar to those of the wild-type protein,
whereas the residues with less-polar side chains, including serine and
threonine, resulted in higher levels of monomer (Table 1). However, all
the position 17 mutants formed some dimers and there was no strict
correlation between the extent of dimer formation and transforming
activity. For example, the serine mutant, which transformed cells very
efficiently, showed intermediate levels of dimer, similar to those of
most nontransforming mutants. This shows that relatively low levels of
dimer are sufficient for receptor binding and activation and suggests
that the transformation defects of various mutants are not due to the
inability of these mutants to dimerize efficiently. However, it is
possible that the position 17 mutations caused local perturbations in
the structure of the E5 dimer that affected receptor binding and
activation.
The residue at position 17 may influence complex formation, and hence
transformation, by directly affecting interactions that stabilize the
E5-PDGF
receptor complex, as well as by affecting dimerization of
the E5 protein. All of the mutants containing hydrophobic residues with
side chains unable to form hydrogen bonds were defective for
transformation, a result consistent with the proposed hydrogen bond
between the residue at position 17 and threonine 513 in the
transmembrane domain of the PDGF
receptor. The tyrosine, proline,
and cysteine mutants, although capable of hydrogen bonding, were also
defective for complex formation and transformation. Proline and
tyrosine are largely excluded from the hydrophobic transmembrane region
of proteins having single-membrane-spanning helices, and tyrosine
occurs preferentially in the region of the polar headgroups in membrane
proteins (18). Proline disrupts the regular hydrogen bonding
pattern along the helix backbone, causing kinks in transmembrane
helices (31), and tyrosine substitutions in the
transmembrane domain of glycophorin A disrupted dimerization even when
located at positions not in the helix interface (19). Thus,
tyrosine and proline may interfere with proper E5 dimerization or
interaction with the PDGF
receptor.
Several polar amino acids at position 17 supported complex formation and transformation. Of these, glutamine and glutamic acid appeared to impart the most stability to the E5-receptor complex, based on its ability to withstand RIPA buffer extraction. This may be due to the length and strongly polar nature of these side chains which have great conformational flexibility and facilitate the formation of strong hydrogen bonds. Tryptophan and methionine, residues with substantial hydrophobic character, also allowed transformation. Tryptophan differs from the nontransforming hydrophobic residues in that it has an NH group on the side chain indole ring which is capable of hydrogen bonding. Similarly, methionine is able to hydrogen bond through its side chain sulfur atom (12). For example, there is a hydrogen bond between a hydroxyl group of a threonine residue and a methionine sulfur in the crystal structure of myohemerythrin (11). The aspartic acid mutant displayed intermediate transforming activity even though it bound the receptor well and, at least in some cell lines, induced a high level of receptor tyrosine phosphorylation. It is possible that this mutant induced the formation of aberrant complexes such as, for example, ones in which the sites of receptor phosphorylation differed from the sites in complexes containing the wild-type E5 protein.
Pairwise comparisons of mutants containing similar amino acid
substitutions also highlight the importance of hydrogen bonds involving
the side chain at position 17. For example, valine and threonine are
isosteric
-branched amino acids. The threonine hydroxyl group and
each valine side chain methyl group have roughly the same molecular
volume, but the hydroxyl-group, unlike the methyl group, is capable of
hydrogen bonding interactions. The valine mutant did not form complexes
with the PDGF
receptor or lead to transformation, whereas the
threonine mutant transformed cells far better than the valine mutant,
formed complexes with the receptor, and induced intermediate levels of
receptor tyrosine phosphorylation. The different activities of these
mutants did not reflect differences in dimerization. Rather, these
results strongly argue that hydrogen bonding by the amino acid at
position 17 is an essential element in stabilizing the E5-receptor
complex. Similarly, the serine mutant transformed at high efficiency,
while the cysteine mutant was transformation defective. These different phenotypes do not appear related to dimerization efficiency and are
likely to result from differences in the chemical properties of the
cysteine sulfhydryl group and the serine hydroxyl group, such as the
ability of the oxygen atom in the serine to form stronger hydrogen
bonds than the cysteine sulfur atom (15).
The effects of the mutations on dimerization suggest that the position 17 side chain forms contacts between E5 monomers, while the data on complex formation suggest that it forms contacts with the receptor. In both proposed conformations of the wild-type and representative transformation-competent E5 dimers, it was possible to dock aspartate 33 of the E5 protein with lysine 499 of the receptor and the residue at position 17 of the E5 protein with threonine 513 of the receptor. Therefore, these models can account for the ability of the residue at position 17 to influence both E5 dimer formation and complex formation with the PDGF receptor.
In summary, these studies provide a coherent view of the role of
glutamine 17 in cell transformation by the E5 protein. This analysis of
all possible substitutions at position 17 has revealed an excellent
correlation between the ability of these mutants to form a stable
complex with the PDGF
receptor, induce receptor activation, and
cause transformation. The activities of the individual mutants and
molecular modeling studies provide further evidence that the residue at
position 17 contributes to transformation by stabilizing the E5 dimer
and by interacting with threonine 513 in the PDGF
receptor
transmembrane domain.
| |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
We thank S. Courtneidge for an initial sample of AG1295; New England Biolabs, Inc., for oligonucleotides used for mutagenesis; P. Irusta, L. Petti, and E. Goodwin for helpful discussions; J. McMenamin-Balano and D. Stern for the neu* retrovirus and anti-neu antibodies; J. Su, E. Caler, and V. Reddy for technical assistance; and J. Zulkeski for assistance in preparing the manuscript.
O.K. was supported in part by an MSTP grant from the NIH. This work was supported by grant CA37157 from the NIH.
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Department of Genetics, Yale University School of Medicine, 333 Cedar St., New Haven, CT 06510. Phone: (203) 785-2684. Fax: (203) 785-7023. E-mail: daniel.dimaio{at}yale.edu.
Present address: Research Center for Science and Technology,
Department of Biological Sciences, Clark Atlanta University, Atlanta,
GA 30314.
Present address: SUNY Stony Brook, Stony Brook, NY 11794.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| 1. |
Bargmann, C. I., and R. A. Weinberg.
1988.
Increased tyrosine kinase activity associated with the protein encoded by the activated neu oncogene.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
85:5394-5398 |
| 2. | Brooks, B. R., R. E. Bruccoleri, B. D. Olafson, D. J. States, S. Swaminathan, and M. Karplus. 1983. CHARMM: a program for macromolecular energy, minimization, and dynamics calculations. J. Comp. Chem. 4:187-217. |
| 3. | Brünger, A. T. 1992. X-PLOR, version 3.1. Yale University, New Haven, Conn. |
| 4. | Burkhardt, A., M. Willingham, C. Gay, K.-T. Jeang, and R. Schlegel. 1989. The E5 oncoprotein of bovine papillomavirus is oriented asymmetrically in Golgi and plasma membranes. Virology 170:334-339[Medline]. |
| 5. |
Cohen, B. D.,
D. J. Goldstein,
L. Rutledge,
W. C. Vass,
D. R. Lowy,
R. Schlegel, and J. Schiller.
1993.
Transformation-specific interaction of the bovine papillomavirus E5 oncoprotein with the platelet-derived growth factor receptor transmembrane domain and the epidermal growth factor receptor cytoplasmic domain.
J. Virol.
67:5303-5311 |
| 6. |
Drummond-Barbosa, D.,
R. R. Vaillancourt,
A. Kazlauskas, and D. DiMaio.
1995.
Ligand-independent activation of the platelet-derived growth factor receptor: requirements for bovine papillomavirus E5-induced mitogenic signaling.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
5:2570-2581.
|
| 7. | Drummond-Barbosa, D., and D. DiMaio. 1997. Virocrine transformation. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1332:M1-M17[Medline]. |
| 8. | Engh, R. A., and R. Huber. 1991. Accurate bond and angle parameters for X-ray protein-structure refinement. Acta Cryst. A47:392-400. |
| 9. | Goldstein, D. J., T. Andresson, J. J. Sparkowski, and R. Schlegel. 1992. The BPV-1 E5 protein, the 16 kDa membrane pore-forming protein and the PDGF receptor exist in a complex that is dependent on hydrophobic transmembrane interactions. EMBO J. 11:4851-4859[Medline]. |
| 10. |
Goldstein, D. J.,
W. Li,
L.-M. Wang,
M. A. Heidaran,
S. A. Aaronson,
R. Shinn,
R. Schlegel, and J. H. Pierce.
1994.
The bovine papillomavirus type 1 E5 transforming protein specifically binds and activates the -type receptor for platelet-derived growth factor but not other tyrosine kinase-containing receptors to induce cellular transformation.
J. Virol.
68:4432-4441 |
| 11. | Gregoret, L. M., S. D. Rader, R. J. Fletterick, and F. E. Cohen. 1991. Hydrogen bonds involving sulfur atoms in proteins. Proteins Struct. Funct. Genet. 9:99-107. [Medline] |
| 12. |
Honig, B. H., and W. L. Hubbell.
1984.
Stability of "salt bridges" in membrane proteins.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
81:5412-5416 |
| 13. |
Horwitz, B. H.,
A. L. Burkhardt,
R. Schlegel, and D. DiMaio.
1988.
44-amino-acid E5 transforming protein of bovine papillomavirus requires a hydrophobic core and specific carboxyl-terminal amino acids.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
8:4071-4078 |
| 14. |
Kegler-Ebo, D. M.,
C. M. Docktor, and D. DiMaio.
1994.
Codon cassette mutagenesis: a general method to insert or replace individual codons by using universal mutagenic cassettes.
Nucleic Acids Res.
22:1593-1599 |
| 15. |
Kollman, P.,
J. McKelvey,
A. Johansson, and S. Rothenberg.
1975.
Theoretical studies of hydrogen-bonded dimers. Complexes involving HF, H2O, NH3, HCl, H2S, PH3, HCN, HNC, HCP, CH2NH, H2CS, H2CO, CH4, CF3H, C2H2, C2H4, C6H6, F , and H3O+.
J. Am. Chem. Soc.
97:955-965.
|
| 16. |
Kovalenko, M.,
A. Gazit,
A. Böhmer,
C. Rorsman,
L. Rönnstrand,
C.-H. Heldin,
J. Waltenberger,
F.-D. Böhmer, and A. Levitzki.
1994.
Selective platelet-derived growth factor receptor kinase blockers reverse sis-transformation.
Cancer Res.
54:6106-6114 |
| 17. | Lai, C. C., C. Henningson, and D. DiMaio. Bovine papillomavirus E5 protein induces oligomerization and trans-phosphorylation of the platelet-derived growth factor receptor. Submitted for publication. |
| 18. | Landolt-Marticorena, C., K. A. Williams, C. M. Deber, and R. A. F. Reithmeier. 1993. Non-random distribution of amino acids in the transmembrane segments of human type I single span membrane proteins. J. Mol. Biol. 229:602-608[Medline]. |
| 19. |
Lemmon, M. A.,
J. M. Flanagan,
H. R. Treutlein,
J. Zhang, and D. M. Engelman.
1992.
Sequence specificity in the dimerization of transmembrane -helices.
Biochemistry
31:12719-12725[Medline].
|
| 20. |
Meyer, A. N.,
Y.-F. Xu,
M. K. Webster,
A. S. Smith, and D. J. Donoghue.
1994.
Cellular transformation by a transmembrane peptide: structural requirements for the bovine papillomavirus E5 oncoprotein.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
91:4634-4638 |
| 21. |
Nilson, L., and D. DiMaio.
1993.
Platelet-derived growth factor receptor can mediate tumorigenic transformation by the bovine papillomavirus E5 protein.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
13:4137-4145 |
| 22. |
Nilson, L. A.,
R. Gottlieb,
G. W. Polack, and D. DiMaio.
1995.
Mutational analysis of the interaction between the bovine papillomavirus E5 transforming protein and the endogenous receptor for platelet-derived growth factor in mouse C127 cells.
J. Virol.
69:5869-5874[Abstract].
|
| 23. | Petti, L., L. A. Nilson, and D. DiMaio. 1991. Activation of the platelet-derived growth factor receptor by the bovine papillomavirus E5 transforming protein. EMBO J. 10:845-855[Medline]. |