Previous Article | Next Article 
Journal of Virology, November 1998, p. 8772-8781, Vol. 72, No. 11
0022-538X/98/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1998, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
In Vitro Processing of Herpes Simplex Virus Type 1 DNA Replication Intermediates by the Viral Alkaline Nuclease,
UL12
Joshua N.
Goldstein and
Sandra K.
Weller*
Department of Microbiology, University of
Connecticut Health Center, Farmington, Connecticut 06030
Received 26 May 1998/Accepted 11 August 1998
 |
ABSTRACT |
Herpes simplex virus type 1 (HSV-1) DNA replication intermediates
exist in a complex nonlinear structure that does not migrate into a
pulsed-field gel. Genetic evidence suggests that the product of the
UL12 gene, termed alkaline nuclease, plays a role in processing replication intermediates (R. Martinez, R. T. Sarisky, P. C. Weber, and S. K. Weller, J. Virol. 70:2075-2085, 1996). In
this study we have tested the hypothesis that alkaline nuclease acts as
a structure-specific resolvase. Cruciform structures generated with oligonucleotides were treated with purified alkaline nuclease; however,
instead of being resolved into linear duplexes as would be expected of
a resolvase activity, the artificial cruciforms were degraded. DNA
replication intermediates were isolated from the well of a pulsed-field
gel ("well DNA") and treated with purified HSV-1 alkaline nuclease.
Although alkaline nuclease can degrade virion DNA to completion,
digestion of well DNA results in a smaller-than-unit-length product
that migrates as a heterogeneous smear; this product is resistant to
further digestion by alkaline nuclease. The smaller-than-unit-length products are representative of the entire HSV genome, indicating that alkaline nuclease is not inhibited at specific sequences. To
further probe the structure of replicating DNA, well DNA was treated with various known nucleases; our results indicate that replicating DNA apparently contains no accessible double-stranded ends
but does contain nicks and gaps. Our data suggest that UL12 functions
at nicks and gaps in replicating DNA to correctly repair or process the
replicating genome into a form suitable for encapsidation.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Herpes simplex virus type 1 (HSV-1)
is an enveloped double-stranded DNA virus (59). The linear
genome becomes circular upon infection (20), and the
circular template is replicated into longer-than-unit-length
head-to-tail concatemers (32). The packaging machinery then
cleaves concatemeric DNA to monomeric units, which are packaged into
preassembled capsids (74). DNA-containing capsids bud from
the nucleus to the cytoplasm, where they acquire an envelope and mature
glycoproteins (59).
Although the viral proteins required for DNA replication have
been identified, the exact mechanism of replication remains unclear (reviewed in references 5 and
77). Despite suggestions that HSV-1 DNA replication
proceeds by a rolling-circle mechanism (58, 67, 68), there
is no direct evidence that larger-than-unit-length replication
intermediates result solely from rolling-circle replication. HSV-1 DNA
replication and recombination appear to be linked (2, 12, 13,
76), and the earliest replication products that can be observed
have undergone genomic inversion (1, 45, 83). By analogy
with bacteriophage T4, recombination may play a role in the generation
of DNA replication intermediates. When cesium chloride-banded viral DNA
is viewed under the electron microscope, a number of unusual structures
are observed. Such structures include large tangled masses similar to
those in replicating DNA from bacteriophage T4 (29), as well
as Y-shaped structures and replication bubbles (33, 34, 66).
Taken together, these results may indicate that recombination plays a
role in the generation of viral replication
intermediates.
Recent analysis by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) also
suggests that simple rolling-circle replication cannot account for the
complex structure of DNA replication intermediates. PFGE can resolve
high-molecular-weight linear DNA up to 2,000 kb (75). DNA
replication intermediates from cells infected with HSV-1, however, do
not even migrate into the pulsed-field gel (1, 10, 45, 48, 61,
83). Although restriction enzymes that cut once per genome
length can release linear molecules into the gel, the majority of
replicating DNA remains in the well (at the gel origin). These results
suggest that replicating DNA is not composed merely of linear
concatemers or of large circular forms. Y- and X-shaped branches are
found within this structure (62), and these
branches may account for its inability to migrate in a pulsed-field
gel. DNA replication intermediates may be topologically constrained as
well (22, 54). In summary, replicating DNA exists in a
complex nonlinear structure whose precise conformation remains unclear.
Since DNA packaged into capsids is linear, replication intermediates
must presumably be processed from a complex to a linear form prior to
or during cleavage and encapsidation. Viral mutants bearing mutations
in the UL12 gene appear deficient in this processing step. The
UL12 null mutant (AN-1) is severely compromised for overall growth,
with production of progeny at 0.1 to 1% of the levels of the wild type
(79). During AN-1 infection, DNA replication produces
wild-type quantities of DNA, and full-length genomes are cleaved and
packaged into capsids (63). A large number of abortive A
capsids are produced, however, and few DNA-containing capsids
are detectable in the cytoplasm (63). Alkaline nuclease is
therefore required for efficient egress of DNA-containing capsids from
the nucleus. The observation that subtle mutations that eliminate exonucleolytic activity in vitro also eliminate function in vivo suggests that the role of alkaline nuclease in vivo is probably a
exonucleolytic one (21). Henderson et al. (23)
recently reported that the endonucleolytic activity of UL12 is required in vivo; however, the assay system used in that study did not clearly
differentiate between endo- and exonucleolytic activities. In any case,
UL12 enzymatic activity is required for viral growth.
Cleavage of well DNA (DNA replication intermediates from the well
of a pulsed-field gel) isolated from AN-1-infected cells with a
restriction enzyme that cuts once per genome length releases no
discrete bands into a pulsed-field gel (45).
Replicating DNA from AN-1-infected cells is therefore more complex than
that from cells infected with wild-type virus. We have proposed that alkaline nuclease is required for a genome maturation step,
"processing" complex replication intermediates into a form
suitable for encapsidation. Genomes which are cleaved and packaged in
the absence of functional alkaline nuclease may retain some level of
complexity, such as small branches or other modifications. We suggest
that capsids that contain these complex unit-length molecules are
unstable and unable to egress from the nucleus (45, 77).
Bacteriophage T4 gene 49 encodes an enzyme termed endonuclease VII,
which resolves cruciform structures in replicating DNA into a linear
form in order to ensure proper packaging (50). A gene 49 mutant accumulates highly branched, complex DNA (15, 35). In
order to determine whether alkaline nuclease performs the analogous
function of converting complex DNA into a linear form, we examined its
activity in vitro. In addition, we digested well DNA with UL12 and
other nucleases with defined specificities to probe the function of
UL12 and the structure of well DNA itself. Various models for UL12
function are considered.
 |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
Cells and viruses.
African green monkey kidney cells (Vero;
American Type Culture Collection, Manassas, Va.) were propagated as
described previously (78). The 6-5 and S22 cell lines, which
are permissive for UL12 mutants, have previously been described
(8, 63). The KOS strain of HSV-1 was used as the wild-type
virus. The UL12-null mutant virus AN-1 has previously been described
(79). The AD169 strain of human cytomegalovirus (HCMV) was
used for the HCMV studies; this strain was used to infect human
foreskin fibroblast (HFF) cells. Both virus and cells were kindly
provided by John Shanley, University of Connecticut Health Center.
Proteins.
Recombinant UL12 protein and two UL12 mutant
proteins, D340E and G336A/S338A, were purified to >95% homogeneity
from Sf9 insect cells infected with recombinant baculoviruses as
described previously (21). Purified wild-type UL12 exhibits
a specific activity of 2 U/µg; a unit is defined as the amount of
enzyme required to render 1 µg of DNA soluble in 1 min. Exonuclease V
(ATP-dependent exonuclease) from Micrococcus luteus was
obtained from U.S. Biochemicals (Cleveland, Ohio). S1 nuclease was
obtained from GIBCO (Gaithersburg, Md.). Staphylococcal nuclease and
DNase I were obtained from Pharmacia (Piscataway, N.J.). T4
endonuclease VII (T4 Endo VII) (39) was kindly provided by
Börries Kemper (Institut fur Genetik der Universitat zu Koln,
Cologne, Germany).
Resolvase assay.
Artificial branched structures were
prepared as described previously (4). Briefly, five 60-mer
partially complementary oligonucleotides were provided by National
Biosciences, Plymouth, Minn., and were termed 4X12-1
(5'-GACGCTGCCGAA TTCTACCAGTGC CTTGCTAGGACA TCTTTGCCCACC
TGCAGGTTCACC C-3'), 4X12-2 (5'-TGGGTGAACCTG CAGGTGGGCAAA GATGTCCTAGCA ATGTAATCGTCA AGCTTTATGCCG TT-3'), 4X12-3
(5'-CAACGGCATAAA GCTTGACGATTA CATTGCTAGGAC ATGCTGTCTAGA
GGATCCGACTAT CGA-3'), 4X12-4 (5'-ATCGATAGTCGG ATCCTCTAGACA
GCATGTCCTAGC AAGGCACTGGTA GAATTCGGCAGC GT-3'), and 4X12-5
(5'-AACGGCATAAAG CTTGACGATTAC ATTGCTAGGACA TCTTTGCCCACC
TGCAGGTTCACC CA-3'). Oligonucleotide 4X12-2 was
5'-32P-end labeled by using T4 polynucleotide kinase and
-32P. The labeled oligonucleotide was mixed with an
excess of various combinations of partially complementary
oligonucleotides as follows: no oligonucleotide for single-stranded
DNA; 4X12-1 for a pseudo-Y-forked substrate; 4X12-1 plus 4X12-3 for a
three-way junction; 4X12-1 plus 4X12-3 plus 4X12-4 for a four-way
cruciform structure; and 4X12-5 for a double-stranded linear structure.
Reaction mixtures containing branched structures and 20 U of T4 Endo
VII were incubated at 37°C in 50 mM Tris (pH 8)-10 mM
MgCl2-10 mM 2-mercaptoethanol (BME)-100 µg of bovine
serum albumin per ml for 20 min. Reaction mixtures containing branched
structures and 20 ng (0.04 U) of either UL12, mutant D340E, or mutant
G336A/S338A were incubated at 37°C in 50 mM Tris (pH 9)-2
mM MgCl2-5 mM BME for 15 min. Reactions were stopped by
the addition of 50 mM EDTA, 10% glycerol, 0.1% bromphenol blue,
and 0.1% xylene cyanol, and the products were subjected to
electrophoresis through a nondenaturing 8% polyacrylamide gel. Following electrophoresis, gels were dried and exposed to film.
Isolation of DNA.
Well DNA was isolated as described in
reference 45 with some modifications. Vero cells in
60-mm-diameter plates were infected at a multiplicity of infection
of 5 PFU/cell and harvested 18 h postinfection. Infected cells
were suspended in 1% low-melting point (LMP) agarose in
phosphate-buffered saline. Agarose plugs were incubated overnight at
37°C in 0.4 M EDTA (pH 9.5)-1% sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS)-1 mg
of proteinase K per ml, followed by five washes with TE (10 mM
Tris [pH 8], 1 mM EDTA) at 50°C. Following PFGE, plugs were
recovered, incubated in PacI digestion buffer, and treated
with PacI to digest cellular DNA (the KOS genome contains no
PacI sites). Plugs were then subjected to another round of PFGE, recovered, and stored in TE at 4°C. To isolate well DNA from
HCMV-infected cells, confluent monolayers of 106 HFF cells
were infected with HCMV at a multiplicity of infection of >5
PFU/cell and harvested 72 h postinfection. Infected cells were
treated as described above except that no PacI digestion was
performed before the second round of PFGE.
DNA released from the well of a pulsed-field gel by alkaline nuclease
was isolated as follows. Well DNA was incubated with buffer or treated
with UL12, subjected to PFGE as described above except that LMP agarose
was used, and stained with ethidium bromide. Untreated well DNA and
released DNA in the treated lane were excised from the LMP agarose. For
BamHI digestion, agarose plugs were treated with
BamHI and then with GELase (Epicenter Technologies, Madison,
Wis.). DNA was precipitated in ethanol, resuspended in 20 µl of TE,
and subjected to electrophoresis in a 0.8% agarose gel. The gel was
Southern blotted and probed with 32P-labeled KOS genomic
DNA labeled with random hexamers as recommended by the manufacturer
(Boehringer GmbH, Mannheim, Germany).
Virion DNA was isolated from KOS virions, which were prepared as
described previously (
70). Virions were resuspended in
1%
LMP agarose and cast into plugs for PFGE. Plugs were lysed
as described
above for infected cells.
Enzymatic treatment of well DNA.
Digestion of well DNA with
various enzymes was typically performed as follows. Plugs were cut into
3- by 20-mm blocks, each containing the equivalent of 8 × 104 infected cells. Plugs were incubated overnight at 4°C
in the optimum buffer for each enzyme. The buffer was then replaced
with 300 µl of fresh buffer and enzyme, and the mixture was incubated on ice for 1 h to permit diffusion and then incubated at 37°C for 2 h. Plugs were washed once with 0.5 M EDTA and four times with TE and then were either incubated with buffer for the next reaction or subjected to PFGE as described previously (45). Southern blots were hybridized to 32P-labeled KOS genomic
DNA or a fragment of the HCMV genome. For the time course experiment,
reactions were stopped by adding 0.5 M EDTA to the plugs and placing
them on ice for 1 h and then the plugs were incubated in TE-1%
SDS-1 mg of proteinase K per ml at 37°C overnight. Following
SDS-proteinase K treatment, plugs were washed with TE.
UL12 reactions were typically performed with an agarose plug containing
well DNA isolated from 8 × 10
4 infected cells, with
1.2 µg (2.4 U) of UL12 in AN buffer (50
mM Tris-HCl [pH 9], 5 mM
MgCl
2, 5 mM BME, 100 µg of bovine serum
albumin per ml).
Staphylococcal nuclease digestion was performed
in the buffer described
in reference
65. DNase I digestion was
performed in
0.1 M sodium acetate (pH 5.0)-5 mM MgCl
2. Exonuclease
V
(exo V) reactions were performed in 67 mM glycine-NaOH (pH 9.4)-30
mM
MgCl
2-8.3 mM BME-0.5 mM ATP. S1 nuclease reactions were
performed
in 30 mM NaAc (pH 4.6)-1 mM ZnAc-5% glycerol. For the
S1 nuclease
control experiments, 1 µg of pUC119 was linearized with
BamHI,
embedded in plugs of LMP agarose, and treated as
described for
well DNA. After the reaction was stopped, DNA in the
agarose plugs
was subjected to electrophoresis on a 0.8% agarose gel,
stained
with ethidium bromide, and photographed.
 |
RESULTS |
UL12 is not a simple resolvase.
We have previously proposed
that UL12 may act as a cruciform resolvase, in a manner analogous to
the activities of T4 Endo VII or Escherichia coli RuvC
(45). This hypothesis was tested by constructing artificial
branched structures with oligonucleotides as described previously
(4). As a control, these substrates were first incubated
with purified T4 Endo VII, which exhibits a well-characterized
resolvase activity (49). Figure
1A shows that T4 Endo VII
specifically cleaves cruciform structures into a duplex linear form
(lanes 7 and 8). T4 Endo VII also exhibits resolving activity on other
branched substrates (Fig. 1A, lanes 3 to 6). The activity of alkaline
nuclease was then compared to that of T4 Endo VII by incubating the
same structures with alkaline nuclease purified from recombinant
baculovirus-infected insect cells as described previously
(21). In contrast to T4 Endo VII, UL12 simply degrades
branched structures (Fig. 1B, lanes 2, 6, 10, 14, and 18). This result
suggests either that UL12 is not a resolvase or that the exonuclease
activity of UL12 masks any cruciform-resolving activity. In order to
examine whether the endonuclease activity of UL12 could act as a
resolvase in the absence of exonuclease activity, we incubated
the branched structures with two previously described mutant UL12
proteins which exhibit no exonuclease activity (21). We have
previously shown that the mutant D340E protein preparation retains some
residual endonuclease activity, while the mutant G336A/S338A protein
preparation exhibits no endonuclease activity (21). When
these mutant proteins were incubated with the artificial structures, no
resolvase activity was observed (Fig. 1B, lanes 3, 4, 7, 8, 11, 12, 15, 16, 19, and 20). Furthermore, these results show that the
exonucleolytic degradation exhibited by the wild-type protein was not
due to a contaminating nuclease. Finally, in order to determine whether
wild-type UL12 could exhibit some resolvase activity under conditions
that minimize exonuclease activity, branched structures were incubated
with various amounts of UL12 (0.012 to 1.2 U) and at pH 8 with
Mn2+, which has previously been reported to enhance
endonuclease activity at the expense of exonuclease activity
(25). Figure 2 shows that no
evidence for an internal cleavage event was seen even under limiting
exonuclease conditions. Although some structure-specific endonucleases
exhibit exonuclease activity (42), the exonuclease activity
is typically less active and more difficult to detect than that of the
endonuclease. This is not the case for UL12. The simplest explanation
for the result described here is that alkaline nuclease does not act as
a simple resolvase.

View larger version (54K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 1.
Alkaline nuclease activity on preformed branched
substrates. Branched structures were constructed from oligonucleotides
as described under Materials and Methods. (A) Branched structures were
treated with T4 Endo VII. Lane assignments for the structures used are
as follows: lanes 1 and 2, single-stranded linear DNA; lanes 3 and 4, forked DNA (pseudo-Y shaped) in which the upper single-stranded end is
3'; lanes 5 and 6, three-way junction DNA in which the rightmost
single-stranded end is 3' and the lower single-stranded end is 5';
lanes 7 and 8, cruciform DNA (X-shaped form); lanes 9 and 10, double-stranded linear DNA. (B) Branched structures were treated with
either wild-type alkaline nuclease (lanes 2, 6, 10, 14, and 18), mutant
D340E (lanes 3, 7, 11, 15, and 19), or mutant G336A/S338A (lanes 4, 8, 12, 16, and 20). For lanes labeled with a minus sign, structures were
not treated.
|
|

View larger version (45K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 2.
Alkaline nuclease activity on cruciform substrates in
the presence of MnCl2. Cruciform (X-shaped) structures were
treated with alkaline nuclease in a pH 8 reaction buffer containing 5 mM MnCl2. Lane 1, no enzyme; lane 2, 1.2 U of UL12; lane 3, 0.12 U of UL12; lane 4, 0.012 U of UL12; lane 5, 0.0012 U of UL12; lane
6, 0.00012 U of UL12. Reaction products were subjected to nondenaturing
8% polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis.
|
|
Well DNA can be released into a pulsed-field gel by UL12.
Genetic evidence has suggested that alkaline nuclease plays a role in
the correct processing of DNA replication intermediates. Replication
intermediates were isolated as well DNA as described previously
(45) and treated with UL12 (Fig.
3A, lane 2). After UL12 digestion for
2 h under optimal conditions (pH 9 with Mg2+ as the
cation), a significant amount of well DNA was released as a
heterogeneous smear ranging in size from 10 to 50 kb. In contrast,
lanes 3 and 4 show that both staphylococcal nuclease and DNase I can
degrade well DNA to completion. Alkaline nuclease is known to degrade
both single- and double-stranded DNA and even closed circular
supercoiled plasmids (due to endonuclease activity that nicks
this substrate) (7, 21, 25, 27, 37, 69). At pH 9 in
the presence of magnesium, alkaline nuclease degrades equivalent
amounts of agarose-embedded salmon sperm DNA (data not shown) and
virion DNA (Fig. 3A, lane 6) to completion. Well DNA
therefore appears unique in its partial resistance to UL12 activity. The ability of UL12 to release well DNA was not dependent on
the concentration of UL12, the concentration of DNA in agarose, or the
time postinfection at which well DNA was harvested from infected cells
(data not shown). Lanes 2 to 6 of Fig. 3B show that in the presence of
magnesium, UL12 releases well DNA into the same heterogeneous smear
over a pH range of 6 to 10, despite the fact that alkaline nuclease is
more than 100-fold more active at high pH than at low pH (7, 26,
69). The released product in Fig. 3B migrates at a slightly
different molecular weight than that in Fig. 3A; despite this variation
between experiments, no differences in migration were observed within
any experiment, and the observed differences may be due to temperature
variation during electrophoresis. Manganese has previously been
reported to enhance UL12 endonucleolytic activity and to repress
exonucleolytic activity (25). When manganese is substituted
for magnesium at pH 9, no releasing activity is detected (Fig. 3B, lane
7). In addition, neither calcium nor zinc can substitute for magnesium (lanes 8 and 9). These results suggest that the exonucleolytic activity
of UL12, rather than the endonucleolytic activity, is responsible for
the release of well DNA into a pulsed-field gel.

View larger version (41K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 3.
Alkaline nuclease activity on well DNA. Well DNA was
prepared from KOS-infected cells as described under Materials and
Methods. (A) Well DNA was either untreated (lane 1) or treated with
UL12 (lane 2), staphylococcal nuclease (lane 3), or DNase I (lane 4) as
described under Materials and Methods. Virion DNA was untreated (lane
5) or treated with UL12 (lane 6). (B) Well DNA was treated with UL12 in
AN buffer, either unmodified (lane 5) or with the following
modifications in pH and/or components: 50 mM
N,N-methylenebisacrylamide (BIS)-Tris, pH 6 (lane 2); 50 mM BIS-Tris, pH 7 (lane 3); 50 mM Tris, pH 8 (lane 4); 50 mM 3-(cyclohexylamino)-1-propanesulfonic acid (CAPS), pH 10 (lane 6); 5 mM MnCl2 (lane 7); 5 mM CaCl2 (lane 8); 5 mM
ZnCl2 (lane 9). Samples were subjected to PFGE in 1.3%
agarose gels. Southern blots of the gels were probed with
32P-labeled KOS genomic DNA. The molecular weight ladder
was the Bio-Rad lambda ladder pulsed-field gel marker (1 Mb to 50 kb).
Lane 1, no treatment.
|
|
The releasing activity was further analyzed with the two mutant UL12
proteins described above, which exhibit no exonuclease
activity.
Well DNA was incubated with wild-type UL12, mutant D340E,
or
mutant G336A/S338A. For this experiment, electrophoresis conditions
which would be expected to broaden the released smear were chosen
and
the blot was overexposed in order to reveal any specific bands
that may
be present. Figure
4 shows that neither
mutant protein
can release well DNA into a pulsed-field gel. The
releasing reaction
therefore requires the exonuclease activity of UL12.

View larger version (39K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 4.
Activities of mutant forms of alkaline nuclease on well
DNA. Well DNA was prepared from KOS-infected cells. Plugs were
incubated at 4°C overnight in AN buffer. The buffer was replaced with
fresh buffer, and then the plugs were treated with UL12, mutant D340E,
or mutant G336A/S338A. Plugs were subjected to PFGE in a
1% agarose gel. A Southern blot of the gel was probed with KOS genomic
DNA. The blot was overexposed to show any faint bands or activity.
|
|
A time course experiment was performed to look for intermediates that
might form during the UL12 releasing reaction. Lane
2 of Fig.
5 shows that in plugs incubated at 4°C,
no well DNA
was released despite the presence of UL12. After 5 min at
37°C,
the heterogeneous smear is released into the well (lane 3). No
intermediates between well DNA and the final smear were observed
even
at the 5-min time point. The product after 2 h of digestion
(lane
6) migrates in the same molecular weight range as that produced
after 5 min (lane 3). One explanation for this result is that
UL12 is highly
processive and acts upon one molecule to completion
before diffusing
through the agarose to another. Under this scenario,
any molecule
released into the well will have been processed to
completion; this may
explain the absence of reaction intermediates
seen in Fig.
5. In
support of this hypothesis, the Epstein-Barr
virus DNase has been
reported to act processively on double-stranded
DNA
(
43).

View larger version (80K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 5.
Time course of alkaline nuclease activity on well DNA.
Agarose plugs containing well DNA were incubated overnight at 4°C in
AN buffer. The buffer was replaced with fresh buffer, and UL12 was
added to samples 2 to 6. Following 1 h on ice, samples were
subjected to 37°C (time zero). At various times, reactions were
stopped as described under Materials and Methods. Plugs were subjected
to PFGE in a 1% agarose gel. A Southern blot of the gel was probed
with KOS genomic DNA. Reaction times: 2 h (lane 1), 0 min (lane
2), 5 min (lane 3), 10 min (lane 4), 15 min (lane 5), and 2 h
(lane 6).
|
|
Released DNA is not sequence specific.
One explanation for the
"resistance" of released DNA to further UL12 digestion is that
specific regions of replicating HSV-1 DNA may block UL12 activity. For
example, the nuclease activity of the E. coli RecBCD enzyme
is attenuated at specific chi sequences (40). If such
sequences exist for HSV-1, then released DNA may represent only a
subset of HSV-1 genomic sequences. To test this hypothesis, released
DNA was excised from a LMP agarose gel following PFGE and digested with
BamHI (42 recognition sites per genome). BamHI
treatment produces a well-characterized pattern of restriction fragments (44, 56). Figure 6
shows the restriction pattern following BamHI digestion of
virion DNA, well DNA, and UL12-released DNA. No major differences
between well DNA and released DNA were observed in the pattern of
bands. An enhanced band migrating below the 4-kb marker in
BamHI-digested virion DNA (lane 1) probably represents the
unique short terminus. Released DNA does not appear to represent a
specific subset of sequences from the viral genome, which suggests that
no specific sequences are protected from UL12 activity. This result is
consistent with the previous finding that virion DNA is completely
degraded by UL12 (Fig. 3A, lane 6).

View larger version (35K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 6.
BamHI digestion of released DNA. Well
DNA was treated with UL12 or was left untreated and subjected to
PFGE in a 1.3% LMP agarose gel. Released DNA and untreated well DNA
were excised from the gel, digested with BamHI, treated with
GELase, and ethanol precipitated. DNA was resuspended in TE and
subjected to electrophoresis on a 0.8% agarose gel. Virion DNA was
digested with BamHI as a control. A Southern blot of the gel
was probed with KOS genomic DNA. The molecular weight ladder was a
GIBCO 1-kb DNA ladder.
|
|
We additionally examined the specificity of UL12 activity by incubating
it with well DNA from cells infected with the distantly
related
herpesvirus HCMV. The HCMV genome is 230 kb, in contrast
to the 152-kb
genome of HSV-1, and limited homology exists between
the two virus
genomes (
28,
47). The replication fork machinery,
however,
is conserved, and replicating DNA from cells infected
with HCMV
exhibits properties similar to those of DNA from cells
infected with
HSV-1 (
48,
52,
60). Well DNA was harvested
from
HCMV-infected cells and treated with UL12. Lane 4 of Fig.
7 shows that UL12 releases HCMV well DNA
into the pulsed-field
gel, although the released DNA migrates at a
higher molecular
weight than released DNA from HSV-1 well DNA (compare
lanes 2
and 4). These data imply that the ability of UL12 to release
well
DNA into molecules which are resistant to further UL12 digestion
is dependent upon the structure of replicating DNA, rather than
upon
the DNA sequence.

View larger version (61K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 7.
Alkaline nuclease activity on HCMV well DNA. Well DNA
from HSV-1-infected cells or HCMV-infected cells was subjected to
treatment with UL12. Following treatment, plugs were subjected to PFGE
in a 1.3% agarose gel. A Southern blot of the gel was probed first
with KOS genomic DNA (left panel) and then was stripped and reprobed
with an HCMV-specific probe (right panel).
|
|
Well DNA exists in a structure which is resistant to exonuclease
activity.
Well DNA appears to contain a structural
modification that prevents its complete digestion by UL12. To
probe the structure of replicating DNA, we tested its
susceptibility to M. luteus exo V, a double-stranded
end-specific exonuclease which digests linear but not circular
molecules (51, 71). Umene and Nishimoto have previously used
this enzyme to examine early circularization of the HSV-1 genome
(73). Lane 3 of Fig. 8A shows
that well DNA appears to be resistant to exo V digestion. In
contrast, virion DNA was completely degraded under the same conditions
(Fig. 8B). This result suggests that well DNA may not contain
accessible double-stranded ends. Although well DNA exhibits unique long
termini, these may be relatively infrequent (41, 45, 61,
83); the bulk of the DNA in replication intermediates may exhibit
no termini or other free ends. Alternatively, it is possible that well
DNA contains double-stranded ends but that an altered secondary
structure at or near these ends confers resistance to exo V digestion.

View larger version (72K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 8.
Exo V activity on well and virion DNA. (A) Well DNA from
KOS-infected cells was subjected to treatment with either UL12 or exo
V, a double-stranded end-specific exonuclease. (B) KOS virion DNA
suspended in a plug of agarose was subjected to treatment with either
UL12 or exo V. Following treatment, plugs were subjected to PFGE in
1.3% agarose gels. Southern blots of the gels were probed with KOS
genomic DNA.
|
|
We hypothesized that a lack of double-stranded ends in well DNA may be
responsible for the resistance of this DNA to complete
UL12 digestion.
To test this model, we pretreated well DNA with
the restriction enzyme
SpeI and then digested it with UL12 (Fig.
9). Control lane 2 shows that
SpeI releases three bands (due to
HSV-1 genomic inversion
[
45]), and control lane 5 shows that
SpeI
treatment following UL12 digestion has little effect. Lane
4 of Fig.
9
shows that following
SpeI treatment, well DNA is much
more
susceptible to digestion by UL12. Therefore, UL12 is capable
of
digesting well DNA provided that double-strand breaks are
available.
This experiment further supports the notion that resistance
to
UL12 digestion is not sequence specific.

View larger version (47K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 9.
Alkaline nuclease activity on well DNA following the
introduction of double-strand breaks. Well DNA was incubated with
SpeI, UL12, or both enzymes in succession (arrows) as shown.
All samples were subjected to a series of three incubations:
SpeI buffer, AN buffer, and SpeI buffer. Samples
were washed with TE between treatments. DNA was subjected to PFGE in a
1.3% agarose gel. A Southern blot of the gel was probed with KOS
genomic DNA.
|
|
Well DNA contains regions of single-strandedness.
DNA containing single-stranded regions, such as nicks or
gaps, would be expected to act as a substrate for UL12 but not exo V. A
number of reports have suggested that nicks and gaps are present in
both virion and replicating DNA (3, 17, 24, 31, 36, 57, 66, 80,
81). We examined whether well DNA contains single-stranded
regions by treating it with S1 nuclease, a single-strand-specific
endonuclease which cuts opposite nicks and gaps and at other regions of
single-strandedness. Figure 10A shows
that well DNA is, in fact, susceptible to S1 nuclease digestion. Under
optimal S1 nuclease conditions (pH 4.6), as little as 0.032 U was
sufficient to release the bulk of well DNA into a pulsed-field gel
(Fig. 10A, lane 4). Increasing concentrations produced
progressively smaller fragments (Fig. 10A, lanes 2 and 3).
Unexpectedly, incubation of well DNA in S1 nuclease buffer alone
resulted in some DNA breakage (Fig. 10A, lane 1). We therefore
determined conditions under which well DNA would remain at the
gel origin but S1 nuclease would retain activity. At pH 6, well DNA
appears to remain intact in the absence of enzyme (Fig. 10B, lane 1).
S1 nuclease does remain active under these conditions, although 100- to
1,000-fold-larger amounts of enzyme are necessary (Fig. 10B, lanes
2 and 3). S1 nuclease releases a heterogeneous smear of DNA into a
pulsed-field gel. Next, we asked whether S1 nuclease behaves in a
single-strand-specific manner under the reaction conditions used in
this experiment. S1 nuclease activity on a linearized double-stranded
plasmid was examined. Linear pUC119 was embedded in agarose, incubated
in S1 nuclease buffer at either pH 4.6 or pH 6, treated with S1 nuclease, and subjected to gel electrophoresis. Figure
10C shows that at pH 4.6, high concentrations of S1 nuclease
do in fact degrade double-stranded DNA (Fig. 10C, lane 2) but that
lower concentrations have little effect (Fig. 10C, lanes 3 and 4).
Similarly, at pH 6, 10 U of S1 nuclease does not digest the plasmid
(Fig. 10D, lane 2), while this amount is sufficient to release well DNA
into the pulsed-field gel (Fig. 10B, lane 2). Thus, the releasing
activity observed in Fig. 10A, lanes 3 and 4, and Fig. 10B,
lane 2, is probably due to digestion of single-stranded, not
double-stranded, DNA. Furthermore, the absence of specific bands
suggests that single-stranded regions are located randomly throughout
the genome, consistent with the findings of Wilkie et al.
(81).

View larger version (46K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 10.
S1 nuclease activity on well DNA. Well DNA isolated
from KOS-infected cells was subjected to treatment with S1 nuclease as
follows. (A) Well DNA was incubated in S1 nuclease buffer containing 30 mM NaAc, pH 4.6, and then subjected to S1 nuclease treatment as
indicated above the lanes. (B) Well DNA was incubated with S1 nuclease
buffer containing 50 mM BIS-Tris, pH 6, and then subjected to S1
nuclease treatment as indicated above the lanes. Following treatment,
plugs were subjected to PFGE in 1.3% agarose gels. Southern blots of
the gels were probed with KOS genomic DNA. The molecular weight ladder
was a Bio-Rad lambda ladder. Plasmid pUC119 was linearized with
BamHI, embedded in plugs of 1% LMP agarose, and treated
with S1 nuclease as for panel A (C) or as for panel B (D). Following
treatment, plugs were subjected to electrophoresis in a 0.8% agarose
gel. The gel was stained with ethidium bromide and photographed.
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
Several observations regarding alkaline nuclease activity and the
structure of replicating DNA are made in this report. (i) Purified
HSV-1 UL12 exhibits exonucleolytic activity on preformed cruciforms and
no detectable resolvase activity. (ii) Alkaline nuclease can release
replicating HSV-1 DNA into a pulsed-field gel in an exonucleolytic
reaction which does not appear to exhibit any sequence specificity.
(iii) The DNA released by UL12 digestion migrates as a smear of
smaller-than-unit-length DNA which is resistant to further digestion
with UL12. (iv) Well DNA is resistant to digestion with exo V,
which acts at double-stranded termini, suggesting that replicating DNA
does not contain accessible double-stranded ends. (v) Well DNA is
susceptible to digestion with S1 nuclease, confirming previous
reports that replicating DNA contains nicks and gaps.
Previous studies with a UL12-null mutant virus led to the proposal that
alkaline nuclease acts to resolve recombination intermediates generated
as a result of DNA replication (45). An artificial cruciform
was treated with purified UL12, and rather than being resolved into
linear forms as would be expected from a resolvase, the substrate was
degraded exonucleolytically. Although it is possible that in vivo other
viral or cellular proteins may modulate the exonucleolytic activity of
UL12 resulting in an alteration of its activity, the simplest
explanation for these results is that alkaline nuclease does not
function as a simple cruciform resolvase. This explanation is
consistent with our recent finding that the exonucleolytic activity of
UL12 is required in vivo (21). Both biochemical and genetic
evidence indicates, therefore, that exonuclease activity is important
for UL12 function.
Although UL12 digested virion DNA and salmon sperm DNA to completion,
it did not completely degrade well DNA. UL12 instead released well DNA
into the gel, generating a wide band migrating as
smaller-than-unit-length molecules which were resistant to further
digestion. This unexpected result has two significant implications: (i)
UL12 removes the structural features that prevent well DNA from
migrating into a pulsed-field gel, and (ii) well DNA contains
structures that prevent UL12 from completely degrading it. UL12
releases a similar heterogeneous smear from well DNA isolated from
UL12
and UL6
mutant infected cells (data
not shown), suggesting that neither the cleavage and packaging
machinery nor UL12 is responsible for the generation of these
structural features. The structures that confer UL12 resistance are
probably a result of the process of DNA replication itself.
The releasing activity was studied further in an attempt to understand
how the exonucleolytic activity of UL12 may function in vivo in the
maturation of viral genomes prior to packaging. No intermediates
between well DNA and the released product were observed at early times
in the reaction, consistent with findings that UL12 acts processively
(43, 69). In addition, UL12 does not appear to act in a
sequence-specific manner. Released DNA migrates as a heterogeneous
smear; no specific region of the genome is preferentially degraded or
protected; and UL12 activity on well DNA from HCMV-infected cells is
similar to that on well DNA from HSV-1-infected cells despite the large
disparity in genome sequence. This finding is consistent with recent
work demonstrating that the HCMV UL12 homolog can functionally
substitute for UL12 in vivo (19). UL12 probably acts on a
particular structure or conformation of replicating DNA which exists in
both HSV-1- and HCMV-infected cells rather than on any particular
sequence. Finally, the finding that released DNA is smaller than unit
length may indicate that the releasing reaction observed in vitro does
not completely mimic UL12 activity in vivo, where the activity of UL12
can be modulated or attenuated by interactions with other proteins
(43, 72).
This report also demonstrates that alkaline nuclease does not
completely degrade well DNA. To our knowledge, well DNA is the first
published DNA substrate that is not digested to completion by this
enzyme. As UL12 exhibits no sequence specificity, well DNA must contain
a structural modification that prevents UL12 progression. It is
possible that some stretches of well DNA contain unusual bases,
such as covalent DNA modifications, which block UL12 progression.
This model is not consistent, however, with the observation
that the introduction of double-stranded breaks renders the bulk of
well DNA sensitive to UL12 digestion (Fig. 8). No stretches of DNA are
inherently resistant to UL12 activity. Another possibility is that one
or more proteins are covalently attached to well DNA and amino acid
residues that survive proteinase K treatment prevent exonucleolytic
progression. It has previously been reported that up to four proteins
may be tightly (although not covalently) bound near the ends of virion
DNA (30, 82), and it is possible that replicating DNA may
also exist in a protein-bound form. Alternatively, unusual
secondary structures may form during DNA replication at random
positions throughout the genome and these structures may
prevent UL12 progression. Whether well DNA is protected by
covalently attached amino acid residues or by specific secondary
structures, the introduction of double-strand breaks may provide UL12
with loading sites from which it can digest most of the DNA.
We probed the structure of replicating DNA by using a series of
endo- and exonucleases with defined biochemical activities. The
apparent resistance of well DNA to exo V activity suggests that
replicating DNA contains few if any accessible double-stranded ends. It
has been known for some time that HSV-1 DNA becomes circular soon after
infection (20, 32, 55), and Zhang et al. (83) have proposed that DNA replication may proceed by a
double-rolling-circle mechanism similar to that used by the 2µm
plasmid of Saccharomyces cerevisiae (6). If the
genome is maintained in a circular form during replication, no
double-stranded ends would be present in replicating DNA.
Alternatively, as mentioned above, the replicating genome may contain
ends that are structurally modified in some way which prevents
exonucleolytic progression. In contrast, replicating DNA is susceptible
to a releasing reaction by UL12 and S1 nuclease, suggesting that
replicating DNA contains nicks, gaps, or other internal structures that
are inaccessible to exo V.
Although no sequence homology between UL12 and other known exo- or
endonucleases can be detected, alkaline nuclease is well conserved
throughout the herpesvirus family, suggesting that it plays an
important role in the life cycle of herpesviruses. The growth
properties of null and other mutants of alkaline nuclease confirm that
it is essential for efficient production of progeny virus (11, 19,
46, 53, 79). The major defect in UL12-null mutant infections is
manifested at the point of capsid egress from the nucleus; in the
absence of UL12, few if any DNA-containing capsids appear in the
cytoplasm (63). We believe that the defect in egress is due
to a defect in genome maturation, which in turn affects the stability
of DNA-containing capsids. Specifically, the DNA which accumulates in
cells infected with UL12-null mutants is even more complex than that in
cells infected with wild-type viruses (45). Furthermore,
when well DNA is isolated from cells infected with wild-type and AN-1
mutant viruses and the agarose is digested, AN-1 well DNA, as observed
by electron microscopy, appears to be much shorter (approximately 6 kb)
than that isolated from wild-type virus-infected cells (approximately
66 kb) (21a). This result suggests that while wild-type well
DNA is fragile and shears upon isolation from agarose, AN-1 well DNA is
up to 10-fold more fragile. We propose that in both wild-type and AN-1 virus infections, the complexity and fragility of viral
replicating DNA may be caused by the existence of aberrant
structures which both prevent pulsed-field gel migration and are
fragile to manipulation. These structural features are apparently
present with an increased frequency in the absence of UL12.
Although the nature of these putative aberrant structures remains
unclear, they may be remnants of recombination or replication. Two
mechanisms could explain their enhanced frequency in replicating DNA from cells infected with the AN-1 mutant. First, UL12 may normally act to resolve or process aberrant structures following replication. Although UL12 may not act as a cruciform resolvase, its
exonucleolytic activity may function to remove such structures as a
form of DNA repair. A role for exonucleases in secondary structure
repair has been proposed for other systems (16). On the
other hand, UL12 may act during replication to prevent the formation of
aberrant structures. By analogy with bacteriophage T4, late replication
may be initiated by strand invasion of 3' ends, which can then be
extended to form productive replication forks. Sheaffer et al. have
proposed that alkaline nuclease may act at the 5' ends of lagging
strands to prevent 5'-end strand invasion, which might lead to
junctions that cannot promote further replication (64).
Precedent for such a mechanism appears in the E. coli
system: only 3' invading strands are productive for RecA/single-stranded binding protein-mediated joint formation (14,
18, 38), and the 5' single-strand exonuclease RecJ appears to
enhance strand transfer (9) by removing 5' invading strands
(18). Although DNA replication and recombination appear to
proceed at wild-type levels in the absence of alkaline nuclease activity, it is possible that redundant mechanisms exist to initiate these processes. In the absence of alkaline nuclease, the presence of
unresolvable 5' junctions may result in structures which cannot be
stably packaged into capsids. Regardless of the mechanism, our results
are consistent with a model in which UL12 acts to remove potentially
harmful structures from HSV-1 replicating DNA. Further
characterization of these structures will clearly be important to
further understand not only the mechanism of UL12 activity but also the
role of recombination in herpesvirus DNA replication.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
We thank Börries Kemper for providing T4 Endo VII. We thank
Elizabeth Mostello, Richard Zeff, and John Shanley for providing HCMV-infected HFF cells. We thank members of our laboratory for helpful
discussions of the work and the manuscript.
This investigation was supported by Public Health Service grants
AI21747 and AI37549 and by a Faculty Research Grant from the University
of Connecticut Health Center Research Advisory Committee.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
Corresponding author. Mailing address: MC-3205,
Department of Microbiology, University of Connecticut Health Center,
Farmington, CT 06030-3205. Phone: (860) 679-2310. Fax: (860) 679-1239. E-mail: weller{at}nso2.uchc.edu.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Bataille, D., and A. Epstein.
1994.
Herpes simplex virus replicative concatemers contain L components in inverted orientation.
Virology
203:384-388[Medline].
|
| 2.
|
Bataille, D., and A. L. Epstein.
1995.
Herpes simplex virus type 1 replication and recombination.
Biochimie
77:787-795[Medline].
|
| 3.
|
Ben-Porat, T.,
B. Stehn, and A. S. Kaplan.
1976.
Fate of parental herpesvirus DNA.
Virology
71:412-422[Medline].
|
| 4.
|
Benson, F. E., and S. C. West.
1994.
Substrate specificity of the Escherichia coli RuvC protein.
J. Biol. Chem.
269:5195-5201[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 5.
|
Boehmer, P. E., and I. R. Lehman.
1997.
Herpes simplex virus DNA replication.
Annu. Rev. Biochem.
66:347-384[Medline].
|
| 6.
|
Broach, J. R., and F. C. Volkert.
1991.
Circular DNA plasmids of yeasts, p. 297-331.
In
J. R. Broach, J. R. Pringle, and E. W. Jones (ed.), The molecular and cellular biology of the yeast saccharomyces: genome dynamics, protein synthesis, and energetics. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.
|
| 7.
|
Bronstein, J. C., and P. C. Weber.
1996.
Purification and characterization of herpes simplex virus type 1 alkaline exonuclease expressed in Escherichia coli.
J. Virol.
70:2008-2013[Abstract].
|
| 8.
|
Carmichael, E. P.,
M. J. Kosovsky, and S. K. Weller.
1988.
Isolation and characterization of herpes simplex virus type 1 host range mutants defective in viral DNA synthesis.
J. Virol.
62:91-99[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 9.
|
Corrette-Bennett, S. E., and S. T. Lovett.
1995.
Enhancement of RecA strand-transfer activity by the RecJ exonuclease of Escherichia coli.
J. Biol. Chem.
270:6881-6885[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 10.
|
Deshmane, S. L.,
B. Raengsakulrach,
J. F. Berson, and N. W. Fraser.
1995.
The replicating intermediates of herpes simplex virus type 1 DNA are relatively short.
J. Neurovirol.
1:165-176[Medline].
|
| 11.
|
deWind, N.,
B. P. H. Peeters,
A. Zijderveld,
A. L. J. Gielkens,
A. J. M. Berns, and T. G. Kimman.
1994.
Mutagenesis and characterization of a 41-kilobase-pair region of the pseudorabies virus genome: transcription map, search for virulence genes, and comparison with homologs of herpes simplex virus type 1.
Virology
200:784-790[Medline].
|
| 12.
|
Dutch, R. E.,
V. Bianchi, and I. R. Lehman.
1995.
Herpes simplex virus type 1 DNA replication is specifically required for high-frequency homologous recombination between repeated sequences.
J. Virol.
69:3084-3089[Abstract].
|
| 13.
|
Dutch, R. E.,
R. C. Bruckner,
E. S. Mocarski, and I. R. Lehman.
1992.
Herpes simplex virus type 1 recombination: role of DNA replication and viral a sequences.
J. Virol.
66:277-285[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 14.
|
Dutreix, M.,
B. J. Rao, and C. M. Radding.
1991.
The effects on strand exchange of 5' versus 3' ends of single-stranded DNA in RecA nucleoprotein filaments.
J. Mol. Biol.
219:645-654[Medline].
|
| 15.
|
Flemming, M.,
B. Deumling, and B. Kemper.
1993.
Function of gene 49 of bacteriophage T4 III. Isolation of Holliday structures from very fast-sedimenting DNA.
Virology
196:910-913[Medline].
|
| 16.
|
Fraser, M. J.
1994.
Endo-exonucleases: enzymes involved in DNA repair and cell death?
Bioessays.
16:761-766[Medline].
|
| 17.
|
Frenkel, N., and B. Roizman.
1972.
Separation of the herpesvirus deoxyribonucleic acid duplex into unique fragments and intact strand on sedimentation in alkaline gradients.
J. Virol.
10:565-572[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 18.
|
Friedman-Ohana, R., and A. Cohen.
1998.
Heteroduplex joint formation in Escherichia coli recombination is initiated by pairing of a 3'-ending strand.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
95:6909-6914[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 19.
| Gao, M., B. J. Robertson, P. J. McCann III,
D. R. O'Boyle II, S. K. Weller, W. W. Newcomb, J. C. Brown, and S. P. Weinheimer. Functional conservation of
the alkaline nuclease of herpes simplex type-1 and human
cytomegalovirus. Virology, in press.
|
| 20.
|
Garber, D. A.,
S. M. Beverley, and D. M. Coen.
1993.
Demonstration of circularization of herpes simplex virus DNA following infection using pulsed field gel electrophoresis.
Virology
197:459-462[Medline].
|
| 21.
|
Goldstein, J. N., and S. K. Weller.
1998.
The exonuclease activity of HSV-1 UL12 is required for in vivo function.
Virology
244:442-457[Medline].
|
| 21a.
| Goldstein, J. N., and S. K. Weller.
Unpublished data.
|
| 22.
|
Hammarsten, O.,
X. Yao, and P. Elias.
1996.
Inhibition of topoisomerase II by ICRF-193 prevents efficient replication of herpes simplex virus type 1.
J. Virol.
70:4523-4529[Abstract].
|
| 23.
|
Henderson, J. O.,
L. J. Ball-Goodrich, and D. S. Parris.
1998.
Structure-function analysis of the herpes simplex virus type 1 UL12 gene: correlation of deoxyribonuclease activity in vitro with replication function.
Virology
243:247-259[Medline].
|
| 24.
|
Hirsch, I.,
J. Roubal, and V. Vonka.
1976.
Replicating DNA of herpes simplex virus type 1.
Intervirology
7:155-175[Medline].
|
| 25.
|
Hoffmann, P. J.
1981.
Mechanism of degradation of duplex DNA by the DNase induced by herpes simplex virus.
J. Virol.
38:1005-1014[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 26.
|
Hoffmann, P. J., and Y.-C. Cheng.
1978.
The deoxyribonuclease induced after infection of KB cells by herpes simplex virus type 1 or type 2.
J. Biol. Chem.
253:3557-3562[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 27.
|
Hoffmann, P. J., and Y.-C. Cheng.
1979.
DNase induced after infection of KB cells by herpes simplex virus type 1 or type 2.
J. Virol.
32:449-457[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 28.
|
Huang, E.-S., and J. S. Pagano.
1974.
Human cytomegalovirus. II. Lack of relatedness to DNA of herpes simplex I and II, Epstein-Barr virus, and nonhuman strains of cytomegalovirus.
J. Virol.
13:642-645[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 29.
|
Huberman, J. A.
1968.
Visualization of replicating mammalian and T4 bacteriophage DNA.
Cold Spring Harbor. Symp. Quant. Biol.
33:509-524[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 30.
|
Hyman, R. W.
1980.
Identification of proteins tightly bound to herpes simplex virus DNA.
Virology
105:254-255[Medline].
|
| 31.
|
Hyman, R. W.,
J. E. Oakes, and L. Kudler.
1977.
In vitro repair of the preexisting nicks and gaps in herpes simplex virus DNA.
Virology
76:286-294[Medline].
|
| 32.
|
Jacob, R. J.,
L. S. Morse, and B. Roizman.
1979.
Anatomy of herpes simplex virus DNA. XII. Accumulation of head-to-tail concatemers in nuclei of infected cells and their role in the generation of the four isomeric arrangements of viral DNA.
J. Virol.
29:448-457[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 33.
|
Jacob, R. J., and B. Roizman.
1977.
Anatomy of herpes simplex virus DNA. VIII. Properties of the replicating DNA.
J. Virol.
23:394-411[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 34.
|
Jean, J.-H.,
M. L. Blankenship, and T. Ben-Porat.
1977.
Replication of herpesvirus DNA. I. Electron microscopic analysis of replicative structures.
Virology
79:281-291[Medline].
|
| 35.
|
Kemper, B., and D. T. Brown.
1976.
Function of gene 49 of bacteriophage T4. II. Analysis of intracellular development and the structure of very fast sedimenting DNA.
J. Virol.
18:1000-1015[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 36.
|
Kieff, E. D.,
S. L. Bachenheimer, and B. Roizman.
1971.
Size, composition, and structure of the deoxyribonucleic acid of herpes simplex virus subtypes 1 and 2.
J. Virol.
8:125-132[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 37.
|
Knopf, C. W., and K. Weisshart.
1990.
Comparison of exonucleolytic activities of herpes simplex virus type-1 DNA polymerase and DNase.
Eur. J. Biochem.
191:263-273[Medline].
|
| 38.
|
Konforti, B. B., and R. W. Davis.
1987.
3' homologous free ends are required for stable joint molecule formation by the RecA and single-stranded binding proteins of Escherichia coli.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
84:690-694[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 39.
|
Kosak, H. G., and B. W. Kemper.
1990.
Large-scale preparation of T4 endonuclease VII from over-expressing bacteria.
Eur. J. Biochem.
194:779-784[Medline].
|
| 40.
|
Kowalczykowski, S. C.,
D. A. Dixon,
A. K. Eggleston,
S. D. Lauder, and W. M. Rehrauer.
1994.
Biochemistry of homologous recombination in Escherichia coli.
Microbiol. Rev.
58:401-465[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 41.
|
Lamberti, C., and S. K. Weller.
1996.
The herpes simplex virus type 1 UL6 protein is essential for cleavage and packaging but not for genomic inversion.
Virology
226:403-407[Medline].
|
| 42.
|
Lieber, M. R.
1997.
The FEN-1 family of structure-specific nucleases in eukaryotic DNA replication, recombination, and repair.
Bioessays.
19:233-240[Medline].
|
| 43.
|
Lin, S.-F.,
T.-Y. Hsu,
M.-Y. Liu,
L.-S. Lin,
H.-L. Yang,
J.-Y. Chen, and C.-S. Yang.
1995.
Characterization of Epstein-Barr virus DNase and its interaction with the major DNA binding protein.
Virology
208:712-722[Medline].
|
| 44.
|
Locker, H., and N. Frenkel.
1979.
BamI, KpnI, and SalI restriction enzyme maps of the DNAs of herpes simplex virus strains Justin and F: occurrence of heterogeneities in defined regions of the viral DNA.
J. Virol.
32:429-441[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 45.
|
Martinez, R.,
R. T. Sarisky,
P. C. Weber, and S. K. Weller.
1996.
Herpes simplex virus type 1 alkaline nuclease is required for efficient processing of viral DNA replication intermediates.
J. Virol.
70:2075-2085[Abstract].
|
| 46.
|
Martinez, R.,
L. Shao,
J. C. Bronstein,
P. C. Weber, and S. K. Weller.
1996.
The product of a 1.9-kb mRNA which overlaps the HSV-1 alkaline nuclease gene (UL12) cannot relieve the growth defects of a null mutant.
Virology
215:152-164[Medline].
|
| 47.
|
McGeoch, D. J.,
S. Cook,
A. Dolan,
F. E. Jamieson, and E. A. R. Telford.
1995.
Molecular phylogeny and evolutionary timescale for the family of mammalian herpesviruses.
J. Mol. Biol.
247:443-458[Medline].
|
| 48.
|
McVoy, M. A., and S. P. Adler.
1994.
Human cytomegalovirus DNA replicates after early circularization by concatemer formation, and inversion occurs within the concatemer.
J. Virol.
68:1040-1051[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 49.
|
Mizuuchi, K.,
B. Kemper,
J. Hays, and R. A. Weisberg.
1982.
T4 endonuclease VII cleaves Holliday structures.
Cell
29:357-365[Medline].
|
| 50.
|
Mosig, G.
1994.
Homologous recombination, p. 54-82.
In
J. D. Karam (ed.), Molecular biology of bacteriophage T4. ASM Press, Washington, D.C.
|
| 51.
|
Mukai, T.,
K. Matsubara, and Y. Takagi.
1973.
Isolation of circular DNA molecules from whole cellular DNA by use of ATP-dependent deoxyribonuclease.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
70:2884-2887[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 52.
|
Pari, G. S., and D. G. Anders.
1993.
Eleven loci encoding trans-acting factors are required for transient complementation of human cytomegalovirus oriLyt-dependent DNA replication.
J. Virol.
67:6979-6988[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 53.
|
Patel, A. H.,
J. H. Subak-Sharpe,
N. D. Stowe,
H. S. Marsden,
J. B. Maclean, and D. J. Dargan.
1996.
Suppression of amber nonsense mutations of herpes simplex virus type 1 in a tissue culture system.
J. Gen. Virol.
77:199-209[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 54.
|
Pfüller, R., and W. Hammerschmidt.
1996.
Plasmid-like replicative intermediates of the Epstein-Barr virus lytic origin of DNA replication.
J. Virol.
70:3423-3431[Abstract].
|
| 55.
|
Poffenberger, K. L., and B. Roizman.
1985.
A noninverting genome of a viable herpes simplex virus 1: presence of head-to-tail linkages in packaged genomes and requirements for circularization after infection.
J. Virol.
53:587-595[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 56.
|
Post, L. E.,
A. J. Conley,
E. S. Mocarski, and B. Roizman.
1980.
Cloning of reiterated and nonreiterated herpes simplex virus 1 sequences as Bam HI fragments.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
77:4201-4205[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 57.
|
Puvion-Dutilleul, F.,
E. Pichard,
M. Laithier, and E. Puvion.
1989.
Cytochemical study of the localization and organization of parental herpes simplex virus type 1 DNA during initial infection of the cell.
Eur. J. Cell Biol.
50:187-200[Medline].
|
| 58.
|
Roizman, B.
1979.
The structure and isomerization of herpes simplex virus genomes.
Cell
16:481-494[Medline].
|
| 59.
|
Roizman, B., and A. E. Sears.
1996.
Herpes simplex viruses and their replication, p. 1043-1107.
In
B. N. Fields, D. M. Knipe, and P. M. Howley (ed.), Fundamental virology, 3rd ed. Lippincott-Raven, Philadelphia, Pa.
|
| 60.
|
Sarisky, R. T., and G. S. Hayward.
1996.
Evidence that the UL84 gene product of human cytomegalovirus is essential for promoting oriLyt-dependent DNA replication and formation of replication compartments in cotransfection assays.
J. Virol.
70:7398-7413[Abstract].
|
| 61.
|
Severini, A.,
A. R. Morgan,
D. R. Tovell, and D. L. Tyrrell.
1994.
Study of the structure of replicative intermediates of HSV-1 DNA by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis.
Virology
200:428-435[Medline].
|
| 62.
|
Severini, A.,
D. G. Scraba, and D. L. J. Tyrrell.
1996.
Branched structures in the intracellular DNA of herpes simplex virus type 1.
J. Virol.
70:3169-3175[Abstract].
|
| 63.
|
Shao, L.,
L. M. Rapp, and S. K. Weller.
1993.
Herpes simplex virus 1 alkaline nuclease is required for efficient egress of capsids from the nucleus.
Virology
196:146-162[Medline].
|
| 64.
|
Sheaffer, A. K.,
S. P. Weinheimer, and D. J. Tenney.
1997.
The human cytomegalovirus UL98 gene encodes the conserved herpesvirus alkaline nuclease.
J. Gen. Virol.
78:2953-2961[Abstract].
|
| 65.
|
Sherman, G., and S. L. Bachenheimer.
1988.
Characterization of intranuclear capsids made by ts morphogenic mutants of HSV-1.
Virology
163:471-480[Medline].
|
| 66.
|
Shlomai, J.,
A. Friedmann, and Y. Becker.
1976.
Replicative intermediates of herpes simplex virus DNA.
Virology
69:647-659[Medline].
|
| 67.
|
Skaliter, R., and I. R. Lehman.
1994.
Rolling circle DNA replication in vitro by a complex of herpes simplex virus type 1-encoded enzymes.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
91:10665-10669[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 68.
|
Skaliter, R.,
A. M. Makhov,
J. D. Griffith, and I. R. Lehman.
1996.
Rolling circle DNA replication by extracts of herpes simplex virus type 1-infected cells.
J. Virol.
70:1132-1136[Abstract].
|
| 69.
|
Strobel-Fidler, M., and B. Francke.
1980.
Alkaline deoxyribonuclease induced by herpes simplex virus type 1: composition and properties of the purified enzyme.
Virology
103:493-501[Medline].
|
| 70.
|
Szilagyi, J. F., and C. Cunningham.
1991.
Identification and characterization of a novel non-infectious herpes simplex virus-related particle.
J. Gen. Virol.
72:661-668[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 71.
|
Takagi, Y.,
K. Matsubara, and M. Anai.
1972.
A deoxyribonuclease which requires nucleoside triphosphate from micrococcus lysodeikticus. IV. The mode of DNA hydrolysis.
Biochim. Biophys. Acta
269:347-353[Medline].
|
| 72.
|
Thomas, M. S.,
M. Gao,
D. M. Knipe, and K. L. Powell.
1992.
Association between the herpes simplex virus major DNA-binding protein and alkaline nuclease.
J. Virol.
66:1152-1161[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 73.
|
Umene, K., and T. Nishimoto.
1996.
Replication of herpes simplex virus type 1 DNA is inhibited in a temperature-sensitive mutant of BHK-21 cells lacking RCC1 (regulator of chromosome condensation) and virus DNA remains linear.
J. Gen. Virol.
770:2261-2270.
|
| 74.
|
Vlazny, D.,
A. Kwong, and N. Frenkel.
1982.
Site-specific cleavage/packaging of herpes simplex virus DNA and the selective maturation of nucleocapsids containing full-length viral DNA.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
79:1423-1427[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 75.
|
Wagner, L., and E. Lai.
1994.
Separation of large DNA molecules with high voltage pulsed field gel electrophoresis.
Electrophoresis
15:1078-1083[Medline].
|
| 76.
|
Weber, P. C.,
M. D. Challberg,
N. J. Nelson,
J. Levine, and J. C. Glorioso.
1988.
Inversion events in the HSV-1 genome are directly mediated by the viral DNA replication machinery and lack sequence specificity.
Cell
54:369-381[Medline].
|
| 77.
|
Weller, S. K.
1995.
Herpes simplex virus DNA replication and genome maturation, p. 189-213.
In
G. M. Cooper, R. G. Temin, and B. Sugden (ed.), The DNA provirus: Howard Temin's scientific legacy. ASM Press, Washington, D.C.
|
| 78.
|
Weller, S. K.,
K. J. Lee,
D. J. Sabourin, and P. A. Schaffer.
1983.
Genetic analysis of temperature-sensitive mutants which define the gene for the major herpes simplex virus type 1 DNA-binding protein.
J. Virol.
45:354-366[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 79.
|
Weller, S. K.,
R. M. Seghatoleslami,
L. Shao,
D. Rowse, and E. P. Carmichael.
1990.
The herpes simplex virus type 1 alkaline nuclease is not essential for viral DNA synthesis: isolation and characterization of a lacZ insertion mutant.
J. Gen. Virol.
71:2941-2952[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 80.
|
Wilkie, N. M.
1973.
The synthesis and substructure of herpesvirus DNA: the distribution of alkali-labile single strand interruptions in HSV-1 DNA.
J. Gen. Virol.
21:453-467[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 81.
|
Wilkie, N. M.,
J. B. Clements,
J. C. M. Macnab, and J. H. Subak-Sharpe.
1974.
The structure and biological properties of herpes simplex virus DNA.
Cold Spring Harbor Symp. Quant. Biol.
39:657-666[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 82.
|
Wu, M.,
R. W. Hyman, and N. Davidson.
1979.
Electron microscopic mapping of proteins bound to herpes simplex virus DNA.
Nucleic Acids Res.
6:3427-3441[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 83.
|
Zhang, X.,
S. Efstathiou, and A. Simmons.
1994.
Identification of novel herpes simplex virus replicative intermediates by field inversion gel electrophoresis: implications for viral DNA amplification strategies.
Virology
202:530-539[Medline].
|
Journal of Virology, November 1998, p. 8772-8781, Vol. 72, No. 11
0022-538X/98/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1998, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Covarrubias, S., Richner, J. M., Clyde, K., Lee, Y. J., Glaunsinger, B. A.
(2009). Host Shutoff Is a Conserved Phenotype of Gammaherpesvirus Infection and Is Orchestrated Exclusively from the Cytoplasm. J. Virol.
83: 9554-9566
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Feederle, R., Bannert, H., Lips, H., Muller-Lantzsch, N., Delecluse, H.-J.
(2009). The Epstein-Barr Virus Alkaline Exonuclease BGLF5 Serves Pleiotropic Functions in Virus Replication. J. Virol.
83: 4952-4962
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Corcoran, J. A., Saffran, H. A., Duguay, B. A., Smiley, J. R.
(2009). Herpes Simplex Virus UL12.5 Targets Mitochondria through a Mitochondrial Localization Sequence Proximal to the N Terminus. J. Virol.
83: 2601-2610
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Burch, A. D., Weller, S. K.
(2005). Herpes Simplex Virus Type 1 DNA Polymerase Requires the Mammalian Chaperone Hsp90 for Proper Localization to the Nucleus. J. Virol.
79: 10740-10749
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Chen, Y., Carrington-Lawrence, S. D., Bai, P., Weller, S. K.
(2005). Mutations in the Putative Zinc-Binding Motif of UL52 Demonstrate a Complex Interdependence between the UL5 and UL52 Subunits of the Human Herpes Simplex Virus Type 1 Helicase/Primase Complex. J. Virol.
79: 9088-9096
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Glaunsinger, B., Chavez, L., Ganem, D.
(2005). The Exonuclease and Host Shutoff Functions of the SOX Protein of Kaposi's Sarcoma-Associated Herpesvirus Are Genetically Separable. J. Virol.
79: 7396-7401
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Porter, I. M., Stow, N. D.
(2004). Replication, recombination and packaging of amplicon DNA in cells infected with the herpes simplex virus type 1 alkaline nuclease null mutant ambUL12. J. Gen. Virol.
85: 3501-3510
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Okano, K., Vanarsdall, A. L., Rohrmann, G. F.
(2004). Characterization of a Baculovirus Lacking the Alkaline Nuclease Gene. J. Virol.
78: 10650-10656
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Mikhailov, V. S., Okano, K., Rohrmann, G. F.
(2004). Specificity of the Endonuclease Activity of the Baculovirus Alkaline Nuclease for Single-stranded DNA. J. Biol. Chem.
279: 14734-14745
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Mikhailov, V. S., Okano, K., Rohrmann, G. F.
(2003). Baculovirus Alkaline Nuclease Possesses a 5'->3' Exonuclease Activity and Associates with the DNA-Binding Protein LEF-3. J. Virol.
77: 2436-2444
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Umene, K.
(2001). Cleavage in and around the DR1 Element of the a Sequence of Herpes Simplex Virus Type 1 Relevant to the Excision of DNA Fragments with Length Corresponding to One and Two Units of the a Sequence. J. Virol.
75: 5870-5878
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Aravind, L., Makarova, K. S., Koonin, E. V.
(2000). SURVEY AND SUMMARY: Holliday junction resolvases and related nucleases: identification of new families, phyletic distribution and evolutionary trajectories. Nucleic Acids Res
28: 3417-3432
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Li, L., Rohrmann, G. F.
(2000). Characterization of a Baculovirus Alkaline Nuclease. J. Virol.
74: 6401-6407
[Abstract]
[Full Text]