Journal of Virology, November 1998, p. 8620-8626, Vol. 72, No. 11
0022-538X/98/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1998, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
134.5 Gene if Present before
Activation of Protein Kinase R by Precluding Its Phosphorylation
and That of the
Subunit of Eukaryotic Translation
Initiation Factor 2
The Marjorie B. Kovler Viral Oncology Laboratories1 and Department of Pathology,2 The University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois 60637
Received 29 May 1998/Accepted 24 July 1998
| |
ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In herpes simplex virus-infected cells, viral
134.5
protein blocks the shutoff of protein synthesis by activated protein kinase R (PKR) by directing the protein phosphatase 1
to
dephosphorylate the
subunit of eukaryotic translation
initiation factor 2 (eIF-2
). The amino acid sequence of the
134.5 protein which interacts with the phosphatase has
high homology to a domain of the eukaryotic protein GADD34. A class of
compensatory mutants characterized by a deletion which results in the
juxtaposition of the
47 promoter next to US11, a
2 (late) gene in wild-type virus-infected cells, has
been described. In cells infected with these mutants, protein synthesis
continues even in the absence of the
134.5 gene. In these cells, PKR is activated but eIF-2
is not phosphorylated, and
the phosphatase is not redirected to dephosphorylate eIF-2
. We
report the following: (i) in cells infected with these mutants, US11 protein was made early in infection; (ii)
US11 protein bound PKR and was phosphorylated; (iii) in in
vitro assays, US11 blocked the phosphorylation of eIF-2
by PKR activated by poly(I-C); and (iv) US11 was more
effective if present in the reaction mixture during the activation of
PKR than if added after PKR had been activated by poly(I-C). We
conclude the following: (i) in cells infected with the compensatory
mutants, US11 made early in infection binds to PKR and
precludes the phosphorylation of eIF-2
, whereas US11
driven by its natural promoter and expressed late in infection is
ineffective; and (ii) activation of PKR by double-stranded RNA is a
common impediment countered by most viruses by different mechanisms.
The
134.5 gene is not highly conserved among
herpesviruses. A likely scenario is that acquisition by a progenitor of
herpes simplex virus of a portion of the cellular GADD34 gene resulted in a more potent and reliable means of curbing the effects of activated
PKR. US11 was retained as a
2 gene because,
like many viral proteins, it has multiple functions.
| |
INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The herpes simplex virus 1 (HSV-1) genome encodes two sets of functions. The first and paramount are functions related to viral gene expression, replication of viral DNA, synthesis of virion proteins, assembly, packaging, and egress of the virus from the infected cell. The second set of functions, no less important in the survival of the virus in the human population, is creation of the environment necessary to maximize the yield and spread of virus from cell to cell and from infected to uninfected individuals (reviewed in reference 38). Of these known genes, several play a significant role in abating or delaying a host response to infection. The earliest to be expressed is the UL41 gene which encodes a protein that is introduced into the cell in virions during infection (26, 27). This protein reduces the synthesis of host proteins by causing the destruction of mRNA in a rather nonspecific manner and therefore could be expected to reduce the synthesis of cellular proteins deleterious to viral replication (26, 27, 44).
A second and very different approach to blocking host defense
mechanisms is exemplified by infected cell protein 47 (ICP47). Proteosomal degradation of viral proteins could be expected to produce
antigenic peptides which, if presented on the cell surface, could provoke a cytotoxic cell response early in infection and thus
reduce viral yield. ICP47, an
protein made immediately after
infection, blocks the presentation of antigenic peptides on the surface
of the infected cells (20).
The focus of this laboratory has been on a third viral pathway designed
to block cellular response to infection. In cells infected
with most viruses, the synthesis of complementary mRNA leads to
activation of double-stranded RNA-dependent protein kinase R (PKR).
This enzyme phosphorylates the
subunit of eukaryotic translation
initiation factor 2 (eIF-2
) (23). A consequence of this
phosphorylation is total shutoff of protein synthesis. This would be an
example of a noble sacrifice of the infected cell for the sake of
survival of the organism were it not for the fact that viruses, while
activating the PKR kinase pathway by making double-stranded RNA, also
express functions which block this host defense system (2-4, 6,
7, 10, 28, 30, 34). In the case of HSV-1, more than 50% of the
viral DNA is represented late in infection in the form of cRNA
(21, 25), and the gene whose product blocks the consequences
of activation of PKR is
134.5 (7). In
the absence of the gene, eIF-2
is phosphorylated and protein
synthesis is impaired beginning approximately 5 h after infection
(7, 9). In its presence, protein synthesis continues
unabated even though PKR is activated (9). Recent studies
have shown that the carboxyl terminus of the
134.5 gene binds to the protein phosphatase 1
(PP1) and redirects it to dephosphorylate eIF-2
(19). The effectiveness of the
134.5-PP1 complex is apparent from the observation that
the rate of dephosphorylation of eIF-2
in cells infected with
wild-type virus is more than 1000 times that of uninfected cells or
cells infected with the
134.5
virus
(5, 19).
The studies described in this report concern another aspect of
virus-induced block of the consequence of activation of PKR. Briefly,
Mohr and Gluzman reported that serial passage of a
134.5
mutant resulted in the selection of
a compensatory mutation capable of sustained protein synthesis
(35). A characteristic of the compensatory mutants isolated
by Mohr and Gluzman is a deletion in the
47 gene resulting in the
juxtaposition of the promoter of the
47 gene next to the 5' end of
US11, a late (
2) viral gene. Preliminary
studies of those mutants revealed that PKR was activated in cells
infected with either the wild-type parent or the
134.5
virus, but protein synthesis was
unaffected in cells infected with wild-type virus or the mutant
carrying the compensatory mutations (5, 18).
In an attempt to define the phenotype of the virus carrying the
compensatory mutation, we constructed a mutant lacking the
134.5 and the US8 to -12 genes. This mutant,
designated R5103, activated PKR and caused a shutoff of protein
synthesis (5). We then inserted into the R5103 genome a DNA
fragment consisting of the intact US10 gene and the
US11 open reading frame fused to the
47 promoter.
This virus, designated R5104, activated PKR but did not induce
the shutoff of protein synthesis. Consistent with the conclusion of
Mohr and Gluzman (35), the mutation maps in the domain
inserted into the R5104 virus (5). Further studies yielded
two significant observations. First, in stark contrast to lysates of
cells infected with R5103 and other
134.5
mutants, the lysates of R5104 virus failed to phosphorylate the
subunit of eIF-2 (5). Second, in striking contrast to
lysates of wild-type virus-infected cells, the phosphatase activity of lysates of R5104 virus-infected cells specific for eIF-2
could not
be differentiated from that of mock-infected cells or those of
cells infected with other
134.5
mutants
(5). These results indicated that the compensatory mutation
blocks PKR from phosphorylating eIF-2
.
The studies summarized in this report focused on US11
protein. We report that in cells infected with the R5104 recombinant the US11 protein is made early in infection, that
US11 protein interacts with PKR and blocks the
phosphorylation of eIF-2
by activated PKR in in vitro assays, and
that the effectiveness of the US11 protein is greater if
the protein is present in the reaction before activation of PKR than if
it is after PKR has been activated by the addition of poly(I-C). We
also found that US11 is phosphorylated in the presence of
activated PKR but not in its absence. We conclude that US11
may have been an ancient mechanism for blocking the effects of
activated PKR and that it has been supplanted by acquisition of the
carboxyl-terminal domain of the
134.5 protein from a
cellular gene. We also note that US11 protein made late in
infection, after PKR has been activated, is ineffective.
Relevant to this report are some of the properties of the US11 protein. US11 is one of the most abundant viral proteins expressed at late times in viral infection (22, 31). It binds mRNA in a sequence- and conformation-specific fashion (39-41). In HSV-1-infected cells, US11 suppresses the synthesis of a truncated RNA colinear with the 5' domain of the UL34 mRNA (40). The protein accumulates in nucleoli, in the cytoplasm in association with the 60S ribosomal subunit, and it is also packaged in virions (31, 37, 41). In newly infected cells, the US11 protein has been found associated with ribosomes (41).
Recently a plethora of reports suggested that US11 may have
novel functions not readily apparent from its localization in the
infected cell. Thus, US11 protein has been reported to have functions similar to those of human immunodeficiency Tat and Rev proteins and has also been reported to complement Rev function in a
Rev
human immunodeficiency virus mutant (11).
The US11 protein has been reported to confer
thermotolerance and help restore protein synthesis in HeLa cells
subjected to thermal injury (12).
| |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Cells and viruses. All cell lines were obtained from the American Type Culture Collection. The properties of HSV-1(F), the prototype HSV-1 strain used in these studies, and the recombinant viruses R3616, R5103, and R5104 derived from it have been described elsewhere (5, 6, 13) and are represented in Fig. 1. The stocks of HSV-1(F) were prepared in HEp-2 cells. All recombinant virus stocks and all virus titrations were done in Vero cells. SK-N-SH and HeLa cells were used for protein radiolabeling studies and for the preparation of virus-infected cell lysates. Cells were grown and maintained in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium supplemented with 5% newborn calf serum (Vero and HeLa) or with 5% fetal bovine serum (SK-N-SH).
|
Plasmids. Plasmid pRB4508, described previously (1), encodes the final 93 codons of the UL10 open reading frame fused to the glutathione S-transferase (GST) coding sequence in plasmid pGEX-3x (Pharmacia). The UL10 gene of HSV-1 encodes the viral glycoprotein gM, which is incorporated into the virion and cellular membranes of infected cells. Plasmid pRB4766 was prepared by inserting the US11 open reading frame contained within a Klenow-blunted EcoRI-XhoI fragment into blunted, HindIII- and XhoI-digested plasmid pGEX-KG such that the coding sequence of GST was fused in frame to the entire coding domain of the US11 gene (33, 41a). Plasmid pGEX-PKR(wt), kindly provided by Bryan R. G. Williams, encodes full-length PKR fused to GST and has been described previously (32). In addition, the control plasmid pGEX-3x (Pharmacia) was used to generate GST protein to serve as a control in appropriate experiments.
Labeling of proteins with [35S]methionine and electrophoretic separation in denaturing gels. Protein labeling experiments were done as previously described (7, 36). Two hours before harvest, infected SK-N-SH cells in 25-cm2 flasks were incubated in 1 ml of medium 199V (medium 199 supplemented with 1% calf serum) lacking methionine but supplemented with 50 µCi of [35S]methionine (1,000 Ci/mmol; Amersham). The cells were then rinsed twice with PBS-A (phosphate-buffered saline [PBS]), scraped in 1 ml of ice-cold PBS-A, pelleted, solubilized in disruption buffer, boiled, electrophoretically separated on a denaturing 12.5% (vol/vol) polyacrylamide gel cross-linked with N,N'-diallyltartardiamide, electrically transferred to a nitrocellulose sheet, and subjected to autoradiography on Kodak XAR5 film or immunoblotting.
Immunoblotting. The nitrocellulose sheet containing the electrophoretically separated proteins was blocked with 5% skim milk in PBS-A (blocking solution) for at least 1 h, reacted with different antibodies diluted in blocking solution for at least 4 h, and rinsed five times in PBS-A-1% Tween for 15 min. The nitrocellulose filter was then reacted with an appropriate alkaline phosphatase-conjugated antibody diluted in blocking solution for approximately 90 min. The filter was then washed once in large volumes of PBS-A-1% Tween, washed four times in PBS-A, and developed by using 1× 5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolylphosphate-nitroblue tetrazolium in AP buffer (100 mM Tris-HCl [pH 9.5], 5 mM MgCl2, 100 mM NaCl) (43).
The monoclonal antibodies against ICP0 (24) and US11 (41) have been described elsewhere.GST protein affinity assay and immunoblotting. HeLa cells were mock infected or infected with HSV-1(F) for 14 h. During the last 2 h of infection, the infected cell proteins were labeled by incubation in medium 199V containing [35S]methionine as described above. The cells were then rinsed twice with ice-cold PBS-A and resuspended in lysis solution (PBS-A containing 1% deoxycholate [DOC], 1% Nonidet P-40 [NP-40], and 5 mM sodium benzamidine) at a concentration of 4 × 106 cells/400 µl. The labeled infected cell lysates were then incubated with 20 µg of RNase A and 2 µg of RNase T1 for 90 min at 37°C. The labeled infected cell lysates were sonicated by using a 3-mm probe for 10 s, and the insoluble material was removed by centrifugation. The soluble infected cell proteins were transferred to a new tube and used in the experiments described below.
GST and GST-PKR fusion proteins were expressed in Escherichia coli BL21 cells and induced by addition of 0.1 mM isopropyl-
-D-thiogalactopyranoside. After a 90-min
incubation, the bacteria were harvested. A 25-µl sample was then
boiled, electrophoretically separated on a 10% (vol/vol)
polyacrylamide minigel, and stained with Coomassie blue to quantify the
relative amounts of GST and GST-PKR protein bound to
glutathione-agarose beads (G-beads). Equivalent amounts of bound GST
and GST-PKR protein were each reacted with 200 µl of the
RNase-treated, labeled infected cell protein mixture described above
for 12 h at 4°C. The beads were then harvested and washed seven
times with PBS containing 1% DOC and 1% NP-40. The proteins bound to
the G-beads were released by boiling in disruption buffer and
electrophoretically separated on a sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS)-denaturing 12.5% (vol/vol) polyacrylamide gel. The proteins were then electrically transferred to a nitrocellulose filter for
autoradiography and immunoblotting.
In vitro phosphorylation of eIF-2
by PKR kinase.
Phosphorylation reaction mixtures were incubated at 34°C in 10 mM
Tris-HCl (pH 7.5)-20 mM KCl-2 mM MgCl2 (TKM buffer) with the additions and for the times indicated in Results. The specific activity of the added [
-32P]ATP (purchased from ICN)
was 2 to 10 Ci/mmol. Reactions were stopped by adding an
SDS-containing, denaturing solution (16); the products were
analyzed by electrophoresis for 20 h at 44 V (3 V/cm) on
denaturing 7% polyacrylamide gels as described elsewhere (16), followed by silver staining, drying, and
autoradiography.
Preparation of protein components and source of materials. Rabbit reticulocyte eIF-2 was highly purified from the ribosomal fraction as previously described (14). The nonactive form of PKR was partially purified free of eIF-2 from the same ribosome fraction by chromatography on DEAE-cellulose, ammonium sulfate fractionation, and then chromatography on phosphocellulose as described elsewhere (15). This preparation was added to phosphorylation reactions at a final concentration of 0.4 mg/ml. Recombinant chimeric proteins consisting of GST fused to either HSV-1 US11 or UL10 (1) were prepared as described above. Partially purified nonactivated PKR from rabbit reticulocyte lysate was activated by incubation with 0.1 µg of poly(I-C) (P-L Biochemicals) per ml, 0.10 mM ATP, and 2.5 mM MgCl2 as described previously (15).
| |
RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
R5104-infected cells produce the US11 protein earlier
than HSV-1(F)-infected cells.
In the context of the wild-type
genome, US11 is expressed as a
2 gene. Since
in R5104 the open reading frame of US11 was juxtaposed to
the promoter of the
47 gene, it was necessary to verify that the
US11 protein was made early rather than late in infection.
Replicate 25-cm2 flask cultures of SK-N-SH cells were mock
infected or infected with 10 PFU of HSV-1(F), R3616, R5103, and R5104.
At 3, 6, 9, and 12 h postinfection, the cells were harvested,
rinsed twice with PBS-A, and resuspended and boiled in disruption
buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl [pH 7.0], 2% SDS, 700 mM
-mercaptoethanol,
2.75% sucrose); the infected cell proteins were subjected to
electrophoresis on a denaturing 12.5% polyacrylamide gel and
transferred to a nitrocellulose sheet as described in Materials and
Methods. Immunoblotting of nitrocellulose filters with the
US11 and
0 antibodies (Fig. 2) revealed that the US11
protein, labeled B, is easily detectable within 6 h in the
R5104-infected cells (Fig. 2, lane 18), whereas in the HSV-1(F)
infected cells, equivalent amounts of US11 are not produced
until at least 9 h postinfection (lane 7). In cells infected with
R3616, protein synthesis shutoff occurs at the onset of viral DNA
synthesis; consequently the US11 protein, a true late
2 protein, is not synthesized (lanes 9 to 12). The
US11 protein is also not produced in the R5103-infected
cells, as R5103 lacks the domain encoding this protein (lanes 13 to
16). In addition to being probed for the US11 protein, the
nitrocellulose filters were probed with antiserum directed against the
0 protein, labeled A (24), showing equivalent loading of
protein in each lane of the gel (Fig. 2).
|
PKR binds the US11 protein in vitro.
In an earlier
publication, we reported that a viral or virus-induced factor blocked
the phosphorylation of eIF-2
by activated PKR (5). The
purpose of this series of experiments was to determine whether the
US11 protein could be involved in this process by specifically interacting with PKR.
|
US11 protein precludes the phosphorylation of eIF-2
by activated PKR in vitro.
As reported in previously, the lysates
of cells infected with the
134.5
mutant
R3616 lack the specific eIF-2
phosphatase activity characteristic of
wild-type virus-infected cells (5, 19). Since the
134.5
compensatory mutants do not
phosphorylate eIF-2
(5), it was of interest to determine
whether US11 played a role in this process. Two series of
experiments were done to determine whether the US11 protein
can suppress the phosphorylation of exogenously added eIF-2
by
HSV-1-infected HeLa cell lysate in which PKR had been activated.
134.5
mutant R3616 were
mixed with 5 pmol of purified eIF-2, [
-32P]ATP
(2 to 10 Ci/mmol) and increasing amounts of either purified GST or the
chimeric protein GST-US11 in 10 µl of TKM buffer as previously described (5). The results (Fig.
4) demonstrated a dose-dependent
inhibition of the phosphorylation of eIF-2
by GST-US11
but not by GST, indicating that inhibition was mediated by the
US11 component. No phosphorylation of eIF-2
occurred in the absence of added eIF-2 (Fig. 4, lane 1) or in reaction
mixtures containing lysates of HeLa cells infected with the R5104
mutant. Two observations are particularly noteworthy. First, the
GST-US11 chimeric protein precluded the phosphorylation of
all eIF-2-associated proteins (e.g., eIF-2
and the
Mr-39,000 protein) but had less effect on the
cellular proteins which migrated near the top of the gel. Second,
GST-US11 but not GST was phosphorylated in this reaction.
Unlike the incremental reduction in phosphorylation of eIF-2
,
the phosphorylation of GST-US11 was not dose dependent and
saturated at approximately 13.5 pmol of added GST-US11.
|
-32P]ATP
(2 to 10 Ci/mmol), 0.09 mM ATP, 2.5 mM MgCl2,
and, where added, 5 pmol of eIF-2 and 22 pmol of GST-US11
or GST. On the basis of previous experiments involving infected cell
lysates depicted in Fig. 4 and kinase reactions using serial
dilutions of GST-US11 (not shown), we calculated the
concentration of US11 protein which effectively blocked the
phosphorylation of eIF-2
by the activated PKR. The results (Fig.
5) were as follows.
(i) PKR activated by preincubation with poly(I-C) phosphorylated
eIF-2
(Fig. 5, lanes 1 and 2), whereas
nonactivated PKR did not (lanes 9 and 10). (ii) GST-US11,
added at a level found to be just saturating in Fig. 4 and on the basis
on serial dilution experiments (not shown), blocked the
phosphorylation of eIF-2
by activated PKR (lanes 3 and 4),
whereas GST had no effect (lanes 7 and 8). (iii) GST-US11
more effectively inhibited the phosphorylation of eIF-2
than
that of the Mr-39,000 protein and that of
other proteins present in the reaction mixture, suggesting that
under the conditions used, the inhibitory effects of
US11 were more specific than those shown in Fig. 4. (iv)
GST-US11 (lanes 3 to 6) but not GST (lanes 7 and 8) was
phosphorylated in the presence of activated PKR. The levels of
phosphorylated US11 were significantly reduced and barely
detectable in the presence of nonactivated PKR (lanes 11 to 14).
Moreover, the phosphorylation of GST-US11 by PKR was
considerably greater in the absence (lanes 5 and 6) than in the
presence (lanes 3 and 4) of eIF-2. This observation suggests that
US11 protein and eIF-2
may be competing substrates for
the activated PKR.
|
US11 is more effective in blocking the phosphorylation
of PKR and of eIF-2
if present in the reaction mixture before rather
than after the activation of PKR by poly(I-C).
The purpose of this
series of experiments was to test the effectiveness of
GST-US11 in blocking the phosphorylation of eIF-2
before
and after activation of PKR. In these experiments, the reaction
mixtures contained identical amounts of reactants but the order of
addition differed.
when added prior to activation of PKR
than when added after PKR had already been exposed to poly(I-C).
Specifically, the phosphorylation of eIF-2
was completely suppressed
by 0.8 pmol of GST-US11 added before activation of PKR
(Fig. 6, lane 5). In contrast, significant amounts of eIF-2
were
phosphorylated in the presence of much higher concentrations of
GST-US11 (e.g., 3.2 pmol [lane 10]) added after
activation of PKR. In these experiments, GST alone and the
GST-UL10 fusion protein had no effect on the phosphorylation of eIF-2
(lanes 6, 7, 13, and 14).
|
| |
DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In an earlier report, we showed that a DNA fragment containing the
US10 gene in its natural environment and the
US11 gene driven by the
47 promoter imparted on the
recipient
134.5
virus (R5104) the
phenotype of sustained protein synthesis, whereas in the absence of the
inserted DNA fragment the parent virus (R5103) lacked this capacity. We
reported also that the phenotype of R5104 was different from that of
the wild-type virus in two important respects even though both viruses
were capable of sustained protein synthesis. Specifically, unlike
the wild-type virus, R5104 did not induce the phosphorylation of
eIF-2
in infected cells by activated PKR. Moreover, the lysates of
cells infected with the R5104 virus lacked the eIF-2
-specific
phosphatase activity which is highly elevated and readily demonstrable
in wild-type virus-infected cells. We concluded that the gene affected
by the second site mutation which compensates for the absence of the
134.5 gene operates by a mechanism different from that
of the
134.5 gene. The suspicion also focused on the
US11 gene as the possible bearer of the compensatory
mutation. But in fact, the only mutation that we could identify with
certainty is the apparent replacement of the
2 promoter
with that of the
47 promoter.
In this article, we report the results of studies designed to test the
hypothesis that the compensatory mutation is in fact the expression of
the US11 as an early protein. The report consists of three
parts. In the first, we showed that in cells infected with R5104,
US11 is made earlier in infection. In the second series of
experiments, we showed a physical interaction between PKR and US11 protein. In the third, we showed that in in vitro
assays, in the presence of US11 the phosphorylation of
eIF-2
is impaired. The key experiment in this series dealt with the
order of addition of reagents. If US11 was added to the
reaction mixture before PKR was activated, both phosphorylation of PKR
and the phosphorylation of eIF-2
were blocked at lower
concentrations of US11 protein than if US11 was
added after PKR had been activated. The effect of US11
protein was dose dependent.
In essence, the conclusion to be reached from these studies is that
US11 can substitute for the
134.5 protein if
it is present in appropriate amounts or form early in infection and
that US11 protein blocks the shutoff of protein synthesis
by binding to PKR and preventing it from phosphorylating eIF-2
. The
results also raise three very interesting questions.
First and foremost, the mechanism by which US11 protein
blocks PKR is not known. There are two clues, however. The first is that US11 is phosphorylated in the presence of PKR. There
are, however, no data to unambiguously determine whether
US11 irreversibly blocks PKR or whether it merely competes
with eIF-2
for PKR. The second clue stems from the observation that
US11 is less effective if added to the reaction mixture
after activation of PKR. This observation suggests that activated PKR
has a much lower affinity for US11 than the preactivated
protein. If US11 binds to the activation site, it may be
expected that bound US11 interferes with access to the PKR
activation site by a third molecule.
The second question relates to the fact that US11 is packaged into the virion and upon entry of the virus into infected cells becomes associated with ribosomes. The question is why the US11 brought into the cell by the virus does not preclude the shutoff of protein synthesis by activated PKR. Indeed, in cells infected with R3616, which contain virion-associated US11, protein synthesis is shut off as early as in cells infected with the R5103 recombinant, which lacks the US11 gene (data not shown). These results suggest that US11 introduced into cells by the infecting virus may have a function other than that of precluding the shutoff of protein synthesis.
Finally, the question arises as to why
134.5 protein
evolved and supplanted US11 in precluding the shutoff of
protein synthesis. The
134.5 protein expresses at least
two functions. The entire gene is required for viral replication in the
central nervous system and only the 3'-terminal 70 codons are required
to block the shutoff of protein synthesis by activated PKR. This domain of the gene is homologous to the corresponding domain of GADD34, a
conserved mammalian gene expressed during growth arrest, during differentiation, or after DNA damage (8, 17).
We may speculate that the progenitor of HSV-1, HSV-2, and the simian B
virus acquired this domain from the corresponding cellular gene and
that in time, US11 acquired additional functions and may
have evolved a late promoter. The selective pressure is not difficult
to appreciate: whereas the modern US11 even under the best
circumstances precludes the phosphorylation of eIF-2
, the virus
carrying the
134.5 gene renders the activated PKR
totally impotent by dephosphorylating eIF-2
as rapidly as it is
formed, since none is detected.
Viruses appear to have evolved myriad mechanisms designed to defeat the shutoff of proteins synthesis resulting from the activation of PKR by double-stranded RNA. These range from selective destruction or inactivation of PKR to precluding double-stranded RNA from activating PKR (2-4, 6, 7, 10, 28, 30, 34). In the case of poxviruses, two viral protein employing different pathways are dedicated to the task of nullifying PKR as a threat to viral replication (4, 10). HSV is unique in two respects. First, it has sequestered a cellular function to perform this task, and second, it may have retained the vestiges of an older, now cryptic mechanism to block this host response to infection.
| |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
We thank Suzanne Hessefort for technical assistance.
This study was aided by grants from the National Cancer Institute (CA47451) to B.R. and from the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (HL30121) to M.G. Grant support was also provided to K.A.C. by the Pediatric Scientist Development Program of the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development administered by the Association of Medical School Pediatric Department Chairmen Inc.
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
* Corresponding author. Mailing address: The Marjorie B. Kovler Viral Oncology Laboratories, The University of Chicago, 910 East 58th St., Chicago, IL 60637. Phone: (773) 702-1898. Fax: (773) 702-1631. E-mail: bernard{at}cummings.uchicago.edu.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| 1. |
Baines, J. D., and B. Roizman.
1993.
The UL10 gene of herpes simplex virus 1 encodes a novel glycoprotein, gM, which is present in the virion and in the plasma membrane of infected cells.
J. Virol.
67:1441-1452 |
| 2. |
Black, T. L.,
G. N. Barber, and M. G. Katze.
1993.
Degradation of the interferon-induced 68,000-Mr protein kinase by poliovirus requires RNA.
J. Virol.
67:791-800 |
| 3. |
Brand, S. R.,
R. Kobayashi, and M. B. Mathews.
1997.
The tat protein in human immunodeficiency virus type 1 is a substrate and inhibitor of the inhibitor of the interferon-induced, virally activated protein kinase, PKR.
J. Biol. Chem.
272:8388-8395 |
| 4. |
Carroll, K.,
O. Elroy-Stein,
B. Moss, and R. Jagus.
1993.
Recombinant vaccinia virus K3L gene product prevents activation of double-stranded RNA-dependent, initiation factor 2 -specific protein kinase.
J. Biol. Chem.
268:12837-12842 |
| 5. |
Cassady, K. A.,
M. Gross, and B. Roizman.
1998.
The second-site mutation in the herpes simplex virus recombinants lacking the 134.5 genes preclude shutoff of protein synthesis by blocking the phosphorylation of eIF-2 .
J. Virol.
72:7005-7011 |
| 6. |
Chou, J.,
E. R. Kern,
R. J. Whitley, and B. Roizman.
1990.
Mapping of herpes simplex virus-1 neurovirulence to 134.5, a gene nonessential for growth in cell culture.
Science
250:1262-1266 |
| 7. |
Chou, J., and B. Roizman.
1992.
The 134.5 gene of herpes simplex virus 1 precludes neuroblastoma cells from triggering the total shutoff of protein synthesis characteristic of programmed cell death in neuronal cells.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
89:3266-3270 |
| 8. |
Chou, J., and B. Roizman.
1994.
Herpes simplex virus 1 134.5 gene function, which blocks the host response to infection maps in the homologous domain of the genes expressed during growth arrest and DNA damage.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
91:5247-5251 |
| 9. |
Chou, J.,
J.-J. Chen,
M. Gross, and B. Roizman.
1995.
Association of a Mr 90,000 phosphoprotein with protein kinase PKR in cells exhibiting enhanced phosphorylation of translation initiation factor eIF-2 and premature shutoff of protein synthesis after infection with 134.5 mutants of herpes simplex virus 1.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
92:10516-10520 |
| 10. |
Davies, M. V.,
H. W. Chang,
B. L. Jacobs, and R. J. Kaufman.
1993.
The E3L and K3L vaccinia virus gene products stimulate translation through inhibition of the double-stranded RNA-dependent protein kinase by different mechanisms.
J. Virol.
67:1688-1692 |
| 11. | Diaz, J. J., M. Duc-Dodon, N. Schaerer-Uthurralt, D. Simonin, K. Kindbeiter, L. Gazzolo, and J. J. Madjar. 1996. Post-transcriptional transactivation of human retroviral envelope glycoprotein expression by herpes simplex virus US11 protein. Nature (London) 379:273-277[Medline]. |
| 12. | Diaz-Latoud, C., J. J. Diaz, N. Fabre-Jonca, K. Kindbeiter, J. J. Madjar, and A. P. Arrigo. 1997. Herpes simplex virus US11 protein enhances recovery of protein synthesis and survival in heat shock treated HeLa cells. Cell Stress Chaperones 2:119-131. [Medline] |
| 13. |
Ejercito, P. M.,
E. D. Kieff, and B. Roizman.
1968.
Characterization of herpes simplex virus strains differing in their effect on social behavior of cells.
J. Gen. Virol.
2:357-364 |
| 14. |
Gross, M., and D. A. Kaplansky.
1980.
Identification of a Mr = 39,000 phosphoprotein in highly purified preparations of rabbit reticulocyte eIF-2 that is distinct from the Mr = 35,000 subunit phosphorylated by the hemin-controlled translational repressor.
J. Biol. Chem.
255:6270-6275 |
| 15. | Gross, M., W. M. Knish, and A. Kwan. 1981. Rabbit reticulocyte double-stranded RNA-activated protein kinase and the hemin-controlled translational repressor phosphorylate the same Mr 1500 peptide of eukaryotic initiation factor 2 alpha. FEBS Lett. 125:223-226[Medline]. |
| 16. | Gross, M., and D. A. Kaplansky. 1983. Differential effect of Mn2+ on the hemin-controlled translational repressor and the double stranded RNA-activated inhibitor. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 740:255-263[Medline]. |
| 17. |
He, B.,
J. Chou,
D. A. Lieberman,
B. Hoffman, and B. Roizman.
1996.
The carboxy terminus of murine MyD116 gene substitutes for the corresponding domain of the 134.5 gene of herpes simplex virus to preclude the premature shutoff of total protein synthesis in infected human cells.
J. Virol.
70:84-90[Abstract].
|
| 18. |
He, B.,
J. Chou,
R. Brandimarti,
I. Mohr,
Y. Gluzman, and B. Roizman.
1997.
Suppression of the phenotype of 134.5 herpes simplex virus 1: failure of activated RNA-dependent protein kinase to shut off protein synthesis is associated with a deletion in the domain of the 47 gene.
J. Virol.
71:6049-6054[Abstract].
|
| 19. |
He, B.,
M. Gross, and M. Roizman.
1997.
The 134.5 protein of herpes simplex virus 1 complexes with protein phosphatase 1 to dephosphorylate the subunit of eukaryotic translation initiation factor 2 and preclude the shutoff of protein synthesis by double-stranded RNA-activated protein kinase.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
94:843-848 |
| 20. | Hill, A., P. Jugovic, I. York, G. Russ, J. Bennink, J. Yewdell, H. Ploegh, and D. Johnson. 1995. Herpes simplex virus turns off the TAP to evade host immunity. Nature (London) 375:411-415[Medline]. |
| 21. |
Jacquemont, B., and B. Roizman.
1975.
RNA synthesis in cells infected with herpes simplex virus. X. Properties of viral symmetrical transcripts and double-stranded RNA prepared from them.
J. Virol.
15:707-713 |
| 22. |
Johnson, P. A.,
C. MacLean,
H. S. Marsden,
R. G. Dalziel, and R. D. Everett.
1986.
The product of gene Us11 of herpes simplex virus type 1 is expressed as a true late gene.
J. Gen. Virol.
67:871-883 |
| 23. | Katze, M. 1995. Regulation of interferon-induced PKR: can viruses cope? Trends Microbiol. 3:75-78[Medline]. |
| 24. |
Kawaguchi, Y.,
C. Van Sant, and B. Roizman.
1997.
Herpes simplex virus 1 regulatory protein ICP0 interacts with and stabilizes the cell cycle regulator cyclin D3.
J. Virol.
71:7328-7336[Abstract].
|
| 25. |
Kozak, M., and B. Roizman.
1975.
RNA synthesis in cells infected with herpes simplex virus. IX. Evidence for accumulation of abundant symmetrical transcripts in nuclei.
J. Virol.
15:36-40 |
| 26. |
Kwong, A. D., and N. Frenkel.
1987.
Herpes simplex virus-infected cells contain a function(s) that destabilizes both host and viral mRNAs.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
84:1926-1930 |
| 27. |
Kwong, A. D., and N. Frenkel.
1989.
The herpes simplex virus virion host shutoff function.
J. Virol.
63:4834-4839 |
| 28. |
Lee, T. G.,
N. Tang,
S. Thompson,
J. Miller, and M. G. Katze.
1994.
The 58,000-dalton cellular inhibitor of the interferon-inducible double-stranded RNA-activated protein kinase (PKR) is a member of the tetratricopeptide repeat.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
14:2331-2342 |
| 29. |
Longnecker, R., and B. Roizman.
1986.
Generation of an inverting herpes simplex virus 1 mutant lacking the L-S junction a sequences, an origin of DNA synthesis and several genes including those specifying glycoprotein E and the 47 gene.
J. Virol.
58:583-591 |
| 30. | Lu, Y., M. Wambach, M. G. Katze, and R. M. Krug. 1995. Binding of the influenza virus NS1 protein to the protein kinase that phosphorylates the eIF-2 translation initiation factor. Virology 214:222-228[Medline]. |
| 31. | Maclean, C. A., F. J. Rixon, and H. S. Marsden. 1987. The products of gene US11 of herpes simplex virus type 1 are DNA-binding and localize to the nucleoli of infected cells. J. Gen. Virol. 43:1921-1937. |
| 32. | McMillan, N. A., R. F. Chun, D. P. Siderovski, J. Galabru, W. M. Toone, C. E. Samuel, T. W. Mak, A. G. Hovanessian, K. T. Jeang, and B. R. Williams. 1995. HIV-1 Tat directly interacts with the interferon-induced, double-stranded RNA-dependent kinase, PKR. Virology 213:413-424[Medline]. |
| 33. | Maniatis, T., E. F. Fritsch, and J. Sambrook. 1982. Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y. |
| 34. |
Mathews, M. B., and T. Schenk.
1991.
Adenovirus virus-associated RNA and translation control.
J. Virol.
65:5657-5662 |
| 35. | Mohr, I., and Y. Gluzman. 1996. A herpesvirus genetic element which affects translation in the absence of viral GADD34 function. EMBO J. 15:4759-4766[Medline]. |
| 36. |
Purves, F. C.,
D. Spector, and B. Roizman.
1992.
UL34, the target of the herpes simplex virus US3 protein kinase, is a membrane protein which in its unphosphorylated state associates with novel phosphoproteins.
J. Virol.
66:4295-4303 |
| 37. | Puvion-Dutilleul, F., E. Pichard, P. Shedrick, F. Arratric, and E. Puvion. 1985. Appearance of host-specific nucleolar proteins in intranuclear `dense bodies' following herpes simplex infection. Eur. J. Cell Biol. 39:458-468. |
| 38. | Roizman, B. R., and A. E. Sears. 1996. Herpes simplex viruses and their replication, p. 2231-2295. In B. N. Fields, D. M. Knipe, and P. M. Howley (ed.), Virology, 3rd ed. Lippincott-Raven Press, New York, N.Y. |
| 39. |
Roller, R., and B. Roizman.
1990.
The herpes simplex virus US11 open reading frame encodes a sequence-specific RNA-binding protein.
J. Virol.
64:3463-3470 |
| 40. |
Roller, R., and B. Roizman.
1991.
Herpes simplex virus 1 RNA-binding protein US11 negatively regulates the accumulation of a truncated viral mRNA.
J. Virol.
65:5873-5879 |
| 41. |
Roller, R., and B. Roizman.
1992.
The herpes simplex virus 1 RNA binding protein US11 is a virion component and associates with ribosomal 60S subunit.
J. Virol.
66:3624-3632 |
| 41a. | Roller, R., and B. Roizman. Unpublished data. |
| 42. | Smith, D. B., and L. M. Corcoron. 1995. Expression and purification of glutathione-S-transferase fusion proteins, p. 16-28-16-31. In F. M. Ausubel, R. Brent, R. E. Kingston, D. D. Moore, J. G. Seidman, J. A. Smith, and K. Struhl (ed.), Short protocols in molecular biology, 3rd ed. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, N.Y. |
| 43. |
Ward, P. L.,
G. Campadelli-Fiume,
E. Avitabile, and B. Roizman.
1994.
Localization and putative function of the UL20 membrane protein in cells infected with herpes simplex virus 1.
J. Virol.
68:7406-7417 |
| 44. | Zelus, B. D., R. S. Stewart, and J. Ross. 1996. The virion host shutoff protein of herpes simplex virus type 1: messenger ribonucleolytic activity in vitro. J. Virol. 70:2411-2419[Abstract]. |
This article has been cited by other articles:
| ||||||||||||||