Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Journal of Virology, October 1998, p. 7900-7908, Vol. 72, No. 10
INSERM U131 and Institut Paris-Sud sur les
Cytokines, 92140 Clamart, France1;
Departments of Microbiology and Molecular Genetics and
Medicine, Harvard Medical School and Brigham and Women's Hospital,
Boston, Massachusetts2; and
La Jolla
Institute of Allergy and Immunology, San Diego,
California3
Received 23 April 1998/Accepted 6 July 1998
In this study, we investigated the induction of cellular gene
expression by the Epstein-Barr Virus (EBV) latent membrane protein 1 (LMP1). Previously, LMP1 was shown to induce the expression of ICAM-1,
LFA-3, CD40, and EBI3 in EBV-negative Burkitt lymphoma (BL) cells and
of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGF-R) in epithelial cells. We
now show that LMP1 expression also increased Fas and tumor necrosis
factor receptor-associated factor 1 (TRAF1) in BL cells. LMP1 mediates
NF- Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) infection
of resting human B lymphocytes in vitro results in continuous cell
proliferation and transformation into lymphoblastoid cell lines (LCLs).
These latently infected cells express several EBV-encoded nuclear and
membrane proteins (reviewed in reference 36). The
EBV latent membrane protein 1 (LMP1) has a critical role in EBV-induced
B-cell transformation. LMP1 has transforming properties in rodent
fibroblast cell lines (2, 57) and is essential for the
ability of EBV to transform B cells, as demonstrated by genetic
analyses with recombinant EBV (32). LMP1 is also expressed
in most EBV-associated malignancies, including
lymphoproliferative disease, Hodgkin's disease, and nasopharyngeal
carcinoma (reviewed in reference 50).
Accumulating evidence supports the model that LMP1 mimics a
constitutively activated tumor necrosis factor receptor (TNFR). LMP1 directly interacts and constitutively associates in cells with
cytoplasmic signaling molecules of the TNFR family, TNFR-associated factor 1 (TRAF1), TRAF2, and TRAF3, and TNFR-associated death domain
protein, TRADD (Fig. 1) (5, 10, 31,
34, 46, 52). In B lymphocytes, expression of LMP1 induces effects
similar to those observed after cross-linking of CD40, a member of the TNFR family. These effects include increased expression of cell surface
markers and adhesion molecules and activation of NF-
0022-538X/98/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1998, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Role of the TRAF Binding Site and NF-
B Activation in
Epstein-Barr Virus Latent Membrane Protein 1-Induced Cell Gene
Expression
![]()
ABSTRACT
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials & Methods
Results
Discussion
References
B activation via two independent domains located in its
C-terminal cytoplasmic tail, a TRAF-interacting site that associates
with TRAF1, -2, -3, and -5 through a PXQXT/S core motif and a
TRADD-interacting site. In EBV-transformed B cells or transiently
transfected BL cells, significant amounts of TRAF1, -2, -3, and -5 are
associated with LMP1. In epithelial cells, very little TRAF1 is
expressed, and only TRAF2, -3, and -5, are significantly complexed with
LMP1. The importance of TRAF binding to the PXQXT/S motif in
LMP1-mediated gene induction was studied by using an LMP1 mutant that
contains alanine point mutations in this motif and fails to associate
with TRAFs. This mutant, LMP1(P204A/Q206A), induced 60% of wild-type
LMP1 NF-
B activation and had approximately 60% of wild-type LMP1
effect on Fas, ICAM-1, CD40, and LFA-3 induction. In contrast,
LMP1(P204A/Q206A) was substantially more impaired in TRAF1, EBI3, and
EGF-R induction. Thus, TRAF binding to the PXQXT/S motif has a
nonessential role in up-regulating Fas, ICAM-1, CD40, and LFA-3
expression and a critical role in up-regulating TRAF1, EBI3, and EGF-R
expression. Further, D1 LMP1, an LMP1 mutant that does not aggregate
failed to induce TRAF1, EBI3, Fas, ICAM-1, CD40, and LFA-3 expression confirming the essential role for aggregation in LMP1 signaling. Overexpression of a dominant form of I
B
blocked LMP1-mediated TRAF1, EBI3, Fas, ICAM-1, CD40, and LFA-3 up-regulation, indicating that NF-
B is an important component of LMP1-mediated gene induction from both the TRAF- and TRADD-interacting sites.
![]()
INTRODUCTION
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials & Methods
Results
Discussion
References
B (3, 26,
36, 40, 45, 58, 59). LMP1 is also similar to CD40 in induction of
stress-activated protein kinases and in effects on B-cell growth
(13, 16, 19, 37, 38).

View larger version (17K):
[in a new window]
FIG. 1.
Schematic representation of LMP1. LMP1 consists of a
23-aa N-terminal cytoplasmic domain, six hydrophobic transmembrane
domains separated by short reverse turns, and a 200-aa CTD. The two
signaling domains, LMP1 aa 187 to 231 (CTAR1/TES1) and aa 352 to 386 (CTAR2/TES2), are represented by empty boxes; the core of the TRAF
binding site, aa 201 to 210, is represented by a black box. Residues
directly implicated in TRAF or TRADD binding are indicated. Residues
marked with an asterisk were mutated to alanine in the
LMP1(P204A/Q206A) mutant. D1 LMP1 comprises the last two
transmembrane domains and the CTD, i.e., LMP1 aa 129 to 386.
LMP1 aggregation at the plasma membrane is essential for signaling and for B-lymphocyte growth transformation (15, 16, 19, 26, 29, 32, 42, 58). LMP1 constitutively signals because the six transmembrane domains (Fig. 1) enable ligand-independent, continuous aggregation in the plasma membrane. As a consequence of LMP1 aggregation, TRAFs and TRADD constitutively associate with the LMP1 carboxyl-terminal cytoplasmic domain (CTD) (10, 31). In contrast to LMP1, TNFRs associate with TRAFs or TRADD in response to ligand binding (25, 39, 53, 55).
While the important function of the 23 amino-terminal cytoplasmic amino
acids (aa) appears to be in orienting the first transmembrane domains
(29), two regions of the 200-aa CTD are critical for NF-
B
activation and for B-lymphocyte growth transformation (Fig. 1). The
region consisting of the membrane-proximal 45 residues of the
cytoplasmic tail (aa 187 to 231) mediates less than 30% of the
LMP1-induced NF-
B activation and has the functional designation CTAR1 (carboxyl-terminal activation region 1) (26, 45). This domain is both necessary and sufficient for initial B-lymphocyte transformation and also is designated TES1 (transformation effector site 1) (30, 33, 35). CTAR1/TES1 mediates the association of
LMP1 with TRAFs (10). In LCLs, at least 50% of TRAF3 or
TRAF1 associates with this site, whereas TRAF2 associates to a lesser extent. Point mutations within the LMP1 PXQXT/S core motif that is
important in TRAF interaction reduce NF-
B induction by CTAR1/TES1 (10). Our previous studies suggest that TRAF2 or TRAF1-TRAF2 heterodimers mediate NF-
B activation by CTAR1/TES1, while
TRAF3 may act as a negative modulator by displacing TRAF1 and
TRAF2 from the LMP1 CTD (10, 34).
The distal region of LMP1 CTD, encompassing aa 352 to 386 and
designated CTAR2/TES2, is the major NF-
B-inducing domain (15, 26, 45) and mediates the association of LMP1 with TRADD
(31). An LMP1 CTAR2/TES2 double-point mutant that fails to
interact with TRADD is defective in NF-
B activation and in
B-lymphocyte transformation, while a second CTAR2/TES2 double-point
mutant that is wild type in NF-
B activation is also wild type
in B-lymphocyte transformation (31).
Although CTAR1/TES1 and CTAR2/TES2 both activate NF-
B, they are not
functionally equivalent. CTAR1/TES1 is a weak activator of NF-
B in
epithelial cells but is sufficient for initial transformation, whereas
CTAR2/TES2 is a strong activator of NF-
B and thus far found to be
insufficient for transformation in the absence of CTAR1/TES1
(30). Both domains can induce A20 expression in C33A epithelial cells, but only CTAR1/TES1 can induce epidermal growth factor receptor (EGF-R) expression in these cells (44).
Hence, CTAR1/TES1 has different effects on gene induction than
CTAR2/TES2. The studies reported here were undertaken to investigate
the specific role of TRAF binding to CTAR1/TES1 in LMP1-mediated cell
gene induction.
| |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Plasmids.
Plasmids pcLMP1 and pcLMP1(P204A/Q206A) were
constructed by inserting an EcoRI fragment of pSG5 LMP1 and
pSG5 LMP1(P204A/Q206A) (10), respectively, in the
EcoRI site of pcDNA3 (Invitrogen). pcDNA3-based expression
vectors use the cytomegalovirus (CMV) immediate-early
promoter/enhancer, and the pSG5-based expression vectors use the simian
virus 40 (SV40) early promoter. The Flag-tagged I
B
expression
vector with serines 32 and 36 mutated to alanines, pCMV4 I
B
S32AS36A, was provided by D. W. Ballard (Vanderbilt University)
(6). The green fluorescent protein (GFP) expression vector,
pEGFP-C1, was obtained from Clontech.
Cell lines and transfections. IB4 is an EBV-transformed LCL. BJAB and BL41 are EBV-negative Burkitt lymphoma (BL) cell lines. C33A is an epithelial cell line derived from a human cervical carcinoma. 293 is a human embryonal kidney cell line. Cell lines were grown in RPMI 1640 (B-cell lines) or Dulbecco's modified Eagle medium (DMEM) (293 and C33A) supplemented with 10% fetal calf serum. For transient expression, 4 × 106 to 107 cells were transfected by electroporation with a Bio-Rad electroporator at 200 V (C33A), 210 V (BJAB), or 220 V (BL41) and 960 µF at room temperature in 400 µl of RPMI 1640 medium containing 10% fetal calf serum (R10) and cultivated for 16 to 24 h. Transfection efficiency ranged from 20 to 40% for C33A cells, 40 to 70% for BJAB cells, and approximately 5% for BL41 cells, as assessed by cotransfection with GFP expression vector and fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) analysis. In some experiments, BL41 cells were electroporated with a BTX electroporator by one pulse at 200 V for 65 ms in 400 µl of ice-cold R10 and then placed on ice for 5 min before incubation in R10 at 37°C. Under these conditions, up to 15% of BL41 cells could be transfected. To establish BJAB or C33A cells stably expressing LMP1 or LMP1(P204A/Q206A), cells were electroporated with pcLMP1, pcLMP1(P204A/Q206A), or pcDNA3 vector control and selected 2 days after electroporation in complete medium supplemented with 3 (BJAB) or 1 (C33A) mg of Geneticin (Gibco BRL) per ml. Transfected BJAB were plated in 96-well plates, and G418-resistant cells were screened by immunoblotting. LMP1-expressing BJAB cells were cloned by limiting dilution. Macroscopically visible resistant C33A colonies were individually picked and expanded for immunoblot analysis.
Immunoprecipitations and immunoblots. LCLs or transfected cells obtained 16 to 18 h posttransfection were washed in phosphate-buffered saline and lysed for 30 min on ice in 0.5% Nonidet P-40 (NP-40) lysis buffer (50 mM Tris [pH 7.4], 150 mM NaCl, 3% glycerol, 1.5 mM EDTA) containing protease inhibitors (1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, pepstatin [1 µg/ml], leupeptin [1 µg/ml]). LCL lysates were prepared by Dounce homogenization. Cell lysates were centrifuged for 15 min at 14,000 × g and precleared with protein G-Sepharose beads (Pharmacia) for 1 to 2 h. Cleared lysates were incubated with anti-Flag M2 affinity gel (International Biotechnologies Inc.) for 2 h at 4°C. Beads were then washed five times with 1 ml of 0.5% NP-40 lysis buffer, and bound proteins were recovered by boiling in sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) sample buffer. Eluted proteins were separated by SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (PAGE) and transferred to nitrocellulose membrane for immunoblotting. TRAFs and EGF-R were detected with rabbit polyclonal antisera recognizing TRAF1 (H-132 or S-19), TRAF2 (C-20), TRAF3 (H-122), TRAF5 (H-257), TRAF6 (H-274), or EGF-R (1005) or with goat polyclonal antisera recognizing TRAF4 (N-16), TRAF5 (C-19), or TRAF6 (C-20) at 1 µg/ml (Santa Cruz Biotechnology). TRAF5 antibody H-257 was found to also detect TRAF3 in immunoprecipitation experiments but not upon immunoblotting. EBI3 was detected with affinity-purified EBI3 rabbit antisera (9). Binding of rabbit or goat antibodies was detected with horseradish peroxidase-conjugated protein A (1:7,500 dilution; Amersham) or horseradish peroxidase-conjugated donkey anti-goat antibodies (1:5,000 dilution in Tris-buffered saline-0.5% milk; Santa Cruz Biotechnology), respectively. Wild-type and mutant LMP1 were detected with anti-LMP1 monoclonal antibody S12 followed by sheep anti-mouse antibodies conjugated to horseradish peroxidase (1:5,000 dilution; Amersham). Flag-tagged proteins were detected by with anti-Flag monoclonal antibody M2 or M5 (International Biotechnology Inc.).
Cell surface immunofluorescence and FACS analysis. Cell surface immunofluorescence of transfected cells was performed by two-color FACS analysis. Cells (5 × 106 cells per transfection) were electroporated with wild-type or mutant LMP1 expression vector, together with 3 µg of GFP reporter plasmid; 16 to 24 h posttransfection, cells (106 per staining) were washed in phosphate-buffered saline supplemented with 0.2% fetal bovine serum and 0.01% sodium azide and then incubated for 30 min on ice with phycoerythrin (PE)-conjugated monoclonal antibodies CD40-PE (Serotec), CD54 (ICAM-1)-PE (Pharmingen), CD58 (LFA-3)-PE (Serotec), and CD95 (Fas)-PE (Pharmingen). Cells were then washed and analyzed on a FACScan or FACScalibur flow cytometer (Becton Dickinson) with Cellquest software. Viable cells were gated by forward and side scatter. Transfected (GFP-positive) cells were further gated (green fluorescence; FL1) and surface expression in these cells was detected as red fluorescence (FL2). A minimum of 5,000 GFP-positive cells were analyzed.
NF-
B assays.
293 cells were transfected with 350 ng of
the luciferase reporter driven by three NF-
B binding sites from the
major histocompatibility complex class I promoter (45), 350 ng of pGK-
-galactosidase, and 375 ng of pcDNA3-based expression
plasmids by using Superfect (Qiagen). The day before transfection, 293 cells (5 × 105 per well) were plated in a six-well
plate in 2 ml of medium. Immediately prior to transfection, 1 ml of
medium was removed. Fifteen microliters of Superfect were added to the
DNA diluted in 150 µl of DMEM, and complexes were allowed to form for
10 min. Superfect-DNA complexes were added dropwise to the cells.
Following a 3- to 4-h incubation, the transfection medium was replaced
with 1 ml of culture medium. The cells were harvested 20 to 24 h
after addition of the Superfect-DNA to the cultures. The transfection was performed in duplicate, and the cells were pooled for subsequent analysis. One half of the cells was used to determine luciferase and
-galactosidase activities as instructed by the manufacturers (Promega and Tropix, respectively); the other half was lysed in lysis
buffer (1% NP-40, 1% deoxycholate, 50 mM Tris [pH 7.5], 150 mM NaCl, 1 mM EDTA, 400 µM Na3VO4,
1 mM NaF, 20 µg of aprotinin per ml, 1 mM
phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride. Insoluble material was removed by
centrifugation, and protein determinations were made by using the
bicinchoninic acid protein assay reagent (Pierce). Equivalent amounts
of protein were analyzed by Western blot with anti-LMP1 monoclonal
antibody S12.
| |
RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
LMP1(P204A/Q206A) is markedly impaired in TRAF association but
induces 60% of wild-type LMP1 NF-
B activation.
Previous
studies found that mutation of either P204 or Q206 to alanine within
the PXQXT/S motif in the context of CTAR1/TES1 (Fig. 1) abrogated
TRAF2 binding, reduced TRAF1 binding, but had almost no
effect on TRAF3 binding. LMP1(1-231) mutants with P204A or
Q206A were significantly impaired in NF-
B activation but still retained 10 to 15% of LMP1(1-231) NF-
B activation
(10). To construct a putative null mutation for TRAF
binding and CTAR1/TES1 signaling, both P204 and Q206 were mutated
to alanine within full-length LMP1 to yield LMP1(P204A/Q206A).
LMP1(P204A/Q206A) was similar to wild-type LMP1 in
intracellular localization in EBV-negative BL cell line (BJAB)
(data not shown). LMP1(P204A/Q206A) was nearly as stable as
wild-type LMP1. Usually, no more than twofold LMP1(P204A/Q206A) expression vector was required to achieve protein expression
equivalent to that of wild-type LMP1, as assessed by Western blotting
(data not shown). Nevertheless, the double-point mutation had a
profound effect on the ability of TRAFs to associate with LMP1. While
high amounts of the endogenous TRAF1, TRAF2, and TRAF3
coimmunoprecipitated with wild-type Flag-tagged LMP1 (Flag-LMP1) from
transiently transfected BJAB cells, TRAF1 and TRAF2 did not
coimmunoprecipitate with Flag-LMP1(P204A/Q206A) and only a
trace of TRAF3 associated with Flag-LMP1(P204A/Q206A) (Fig.
2A, left, lanes 5 and 6). Although
CTAR2/TES2 mediates NF-
B activation through a TRADD-TRAF2
interaction (31), no TRAF2 binding to CTAR2/TES2 could
be detected in the Flag-LMP1(P204A/Q206A) immunoprecipitate under
the experimental conditions used.
|
B activation as
LMP1 when expressed at levels comparable to those of LMP1 in 293 cells
(Fig. 3). This result is consistent with
previous data for LMP1 mutants deleted for the CTAR1/TES1 or the TRAF
binding site, which showed that CTAR1/TES1 is less active in
NF-
B activation than CTAR2/TES2 and that deletion of CTAR1/TES1 only
modestly decreased NF-
B activation (30, 45).
|
LMP1(P204A/Q206A) cannot induce EGF-R expression in stably transfected C33A cells. LMP1 or LMP1(1-231) can induce EGF-R expression in C33A epithelial cells, while LMP1 deleted of aa 187 to 351 cannot, compatible with the notion that the TRAF binding site (LMP1 aa 199 to 210) mediates EGF-R induction (44). To more precisely assess the involvement of the TRAF signaling pathway in EGF-R induction, C33A cells were stably transfected with wild-type LMP1 or LMP1(P204A/Q206A) and tested by immunoblotting for EGF-R induction (Fig. 4). While six pcDNA3 vector control-transfected clones lacked EGF-R expression, EGF-R expression was detected in all five C33A clones transfected with the pcDNA3-LMP1 expression vector. The level of EGF-R expression varied among these clones (Fig. 4 [lanes 3, 4, 9, and 10] and data not shown). In contrast, 8 of 10 clones of C33A cells transfected with the pcDNA3-LMP1(P204A/Q206A) expression vector failed to express EGF-R, and the two other clones had barely detectable EGF-R expression (Fig. 4 [lanes 5, 6, 11, and 12] and data not shown). The failure of LMP1(P204A/Q206A) to induce EGF-R expression in C33A cells was not due to lower LMP1(P204A/Q206A) expression. By immunoblotting, LMP1(P204A/Q206A) was expressed at levels similar to or higher than those of wild-type LMP1 (Fig. 4 and data not shown). Thus, these data more precisely link LMP1 induction of EGF-R expression in C33A cells to TRAF-mediated signaling.
|
Efficient LMP1-mediated induction of TRAF1 and EBI3 expression in
BL cells is dependent on TRAF binding to the PXQXT/S motif within
CTAR1/TES1.
TRAF1 is not expressed in most tissues and is induced
in B lymphocytes by EBV infection (46). We noted that
transient or stable transfection of BJAB or BL41 BL cells with LMP1
expression vectors specifically induced TRAF1 expression. Transient
transfection of BJAB cells with the SV40 promoter-driven pSG5 LMP1
expression vector resulted in increased TRAF1 expression compared to
the low level observed in pSG5 vector control-transfected cells (Fig. 5A, lane 1 to 4). Similarly, stable
expression of LMP1 in BJAB cells under control of the
metallothionein or CMV promoter resulted in higher levels of
TRAF1 expression (Fig. 5B, lanes 2, 6, and 7). LMP1-induced TRAF1
expression levels were similar to those observed in EBV-transformed B
lymphocytes (Fig. 5B; compare TRAF1 signal in lanes 2, 6, and 7 with
TRAF1 signal in IB4 LCL in lane 3). In contrast, stable expression of
LMP1(P204A/Q206A) in BJAB cells did not alter TRAF1 expression,
despite similar levels of LMP1 and LMP1(P204A/Q206A) expression
(Fig. 5B, lanes 8 and 9). Transient expression of LMP1(P204A/Q206A)
in BJAB cells also did not usually result in significant increases in
TRAF1 expression (Fig. 5A, lanes 5 to 7). High-level
LMP1(P204A/Q206A) transient expression or transient expression of
an LMP1 mutant deleted of CTAR1/TES1 (Flag-tagged LMP1
187-351
[31]) weakly induced TRAF1 expression in some
experiments (data not shown). TRAF1 induction was cell type specific,
since neither transient nor stable LMP1 expression in C33A cells, nor
transient LMP1 expression in 293 cells, caused detectable increased
TRAF1 expression (Fig. 2A, right, and data not shown).
|
187-351 (data not shown). Altogether, these data indicate that efficient LMP1 up-regulation of TRAF1 and EBI3 expression in B lymphocytes is dependent on the TRAF binding to CTAR1/TES1. CTAR2/TES2 can induce only low-level TRAF1 and EBI3 expression.
TRAF binding to CTAR1/TES1 is not required for LMP1 up-regulation of ICAM-1, Fas, CD40, or LFA-3. BL41 cells stably expressing LMP1 have higher levels of CD40, ICAM-1, and LFA-3 than vector-derived control clones (59). Similarly, transient cotransfection of LMP1 and GFP expression vectors in BL41 cells resulted in substantial up-regulation of ICAM-1, CD40, and LFA-3 expression on the GFP-positive cells (Fig. 6). Levels of induction of ICAM-1, CD40, and LFA-3 observed in BL41 cells by transient transfection are similar to those found in DG75 BL cells following induction of LMP1 expression under control of a tetracycline-regulated promoter (14). We now find that transient or stable LMP1 expression in BL41 cells also induces Fas expression (Fig. 6 and data not shown). BJAB cells constitutively express high levels of CD40, LFA-3, and Fas, and these proteins were not further up-regulated by LMP1 expression (data not shown). However, LMP1 expression did up-regulate ICAM-1 expression on BJAB cells (data not shown).
|
LMP1-mediated protein induction is NF-
B dependent.
Since
the efficiency by which LMP1 and LMP1 mutants induce ICAM-1, Fas, CD40,
and LFA-3 surface expression correlates with their relative ability to
induce NF-
B, NF-
B activation is likely to be an important
mediator of the up-regulation of these four cell surface antigens. To
more directly assess the role of NF-
B in LMP1-mediated gene
induction, we evaluated the extent to which a dominant mutant of
I
B
which is resistant to activation-induced degradation, I
B
S32AS36A (6), would abrogate these LMP1-induced effects.
B
S32AS36A (0, 3, 6, and 10 µg). ICAM-1, Fas,
CD40, and LFA-3 levels were analyzed by FACS. Expression of
I
B
S32AS36A alone consistently caused a very small decrease
in ICAM-1, Fas, CD40, and LFA-3 expression on BL41 cells (Fig. 7A and
data not shown). Cell viability and
transfection efficiency were unaffected (data not shown).
Transfection of BL41 cells with 5 µg of pSG5 LMP1 induced
increased ICAM-1, Fas, CD40, and LFA-3 levels, and 15 µg
of pSG5 LMP1 induced even higher levels (Fig. 7A and data not
shown). Coexpression of increasing amounts of I
B
S32AS36A resulted in a dose-dependent inhibition of LMP1 induction of
ICAM-1, Fas, CD40, and LFA-3 surface expression, with over 90%
inhibition when 10 µg of pCMV4 I
B
S32AS36A was
cotransfected (Fig. 7A and data not shown). Under these conditions,
I
B
S32AS36A coexpression did not significantly affect LMP1
levels (Fig. 7B). Thus, NF-
B activation is an essential mediator of
LMP1 induction of ICAM-1, Fas, CD40, and LFA-3 expression.
|
B activation in TRAF1 and
EBI3 induction. Transfection of BJAB cells with only 1 µg of pSG5
LMP1 resulted in significant TRAF1 and EBI3 induction (Fig.
8A, lane 2). In contrast, cotransfection
of BJAB cells with as much as 15 µg of pSG5 LMP1 together with 3 to
10 µg of I
B
S32AS36A expression vector completely inhibited
TRAF1 or EBI3 induction (Fig. 8A, lanes 6 to 8). Although coexpression
of I
B
S32AS36A decreased LMP1 expression, LMP1 levels were higher
than the levels observed following transfection with 1 µg of pSG5
LMP1 (Fig. 8A, lanes 2 and 6 to 8). Cell surface ICAM-1 expression was
analyzed in parallel by FACS. Increased LMP1 expression was accompanied
by dose-dependent increased ICAM-1 surface expression. Transfection of
3 or 6 µg of I
B
S32AS36A expression vector resulted in over
90% inhibition of ICAM-1 induction, and cotransfection of 10 µg
resulted in 100% inhibition of ICAM-1 induction (data not shown).
|
B
S32AS36A had less effect on LMP1
expression levels. Nevertheless, I
B
S32AS36A coexpression clearly inhibited LMP1-induced TRAF1, EBI3, or ICAM-1 expression (Fig. 8B and data not shown). Thus, NF-
B activation is also
essential for LMP1-induced EBI3 and TRAF1 expression.
| |
DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
These experiments demonstrate new roles for LMP1 in up-regulating
cell gene expression and evaluate the importance of TRAF association
with the CTAR1/TES1 PXQXT/S site and NF-
B activation in LMP1
signaling. LMP1 induces Fas expression. LMP1 may thereby cause
EBV-infected B lymphocytes to display high levels of Fas, be more
sensitive to Fas ligand, and promote apoptosis. Although TRADD
interaction with CTAR2/TES2 could also, in itself, have a proapoptotic
effect, we have so far been unable to demonstrate such an effect. While
LMP1 cytotoxicity has been demonstrated in several cell lines including
BALB/c 3T3 cells (17), LMP1-induced apoptosis has been
observed only in RHEK-1 cells (43). The absence of a net
apoptotic effect in most cells is probably due to LMP1 activation of
NF-
B and up-regulation of antiapoptotic genes including bcl-2 and A20 (20, 40). The latter effects enable
LMP1 to protect BL cells from apoptosis (20).
We now show that LMP1 stimulates TRAF1 expression. TRAF1 interacts with
CTAR1/TES1 in B lymphocytes and has a coactivating effect on NF-
B
induction (10). Thus, TRAF1 up-regulation contributes to
high-level NF-
B activation, and this is likely to be important in
the antiapoptotic and transforming effects of LMP1. Since LMP1 has both
pro- and antiapoptotic effects, the net LMP1 effect may depend on the
cell type and stage of differentiation and activation, as well as the
presence of Fas ligand and other environmental factors.
A significant amount of TRAF5 has now been demonstrated to be
constitutively associated with LMP1 in EBV-transformed B cells, and
that association is dependent on the PXQXT/S motif in CTAR1/TES1. Since
both TRAF2 and TRAF5 can activate NF-
B and bind to the same site on
LMP1, the negative effect of overexpression of a dominant negative
mutant form of TRAF2 on NF-
B induction by CTAR1/TES1 (34)
is probably not only an effect on TRAF2 binding; TRAF5 probably
also mediates NF-
B activation from this site.
The LMP1(P204A/Q206A) double-point mutation almost completely
disrupted the ability of LMP1 to associate with TRAFs and enabled a
more precise genetic linkage of LMP1 effects with TRAF association. This LMP1 mutant was impaired in induction of EGF-R, TRAF1, and EBI3 expression, compatible with the notion that TRAF aggregation through CTAR1/TES1 has a unique activity that is not readily provided by the rest of LMP1, despite its ability to engage TRADD. In contrast, the expression of ICAM-1, Fas, CD40, and LFA-3 was induced by LMP1(P204A/Q206A) at a level that was about 60% of that
obtained by wild-type LMP1, which correlates with the 60% of wild-type NF-
B activation mediated by the TRADD binding site
(31). These latter data are in agreement with previous
deletion analyses showing that both CTAR1/TES1 and CTAR2/TES2 can
independently mediate ICAM-1 and CD40 induction in various cell lines
and that both are required for optimal induction of these two cell
surface molecules (26).
The results described here provide additional evidence for a role of
the TRAFs in gene induction mediated by TNFRs. TRAFs have been
implicated in CD40-mediated gene induction. Overexpression of dominant
negative mutant forms of TRAF3 or TRAF5 was shown to block
CD40-mediated CD23 induction (7, 28) In addition, mutation
of T-234 to alanine within the PXQXT motif in CD40 cytoplasmic tail
disrupts TRAF2, TRAF3, and TRAF5 binding and abolishes or decreases
CD40-mediated ICAM-1, LFA-1, Fas, CD23, B7.1, and LT-
induction in B
lymphocytes (18, 21, 23). . However, mutation of T-234 to
alanine disrupted not only TRAF binding but also Jak3 binding,
and therefore Jak3 may be responsible for some of CD40's effects on
gene induction (18). TRAF signaling from LMP1 or CD40 has
also been implicated in NF-
B-mediated interleukin-6 induction in
epithelial cells. Both CTAR1/TES1 and CTAR2/TES2 contribute to
interleukin-6 induction. Mutations within the PXQXT/S motif or
overexpression of dominant negative mutants of TRAF2 or TRAF3 inhibited
interleukin-6 induction by CTAR1/TES1 (12).
Although CTAR1/TES1 and CTAR2/TES2 appear to contribute differentially
to the LMP1-induced gene effects studied here, it is not clear how
these distinct effects are biochemically mediated. CTAR1/TES1 and
CTAR2/TES2 activate NF-
B through direct and indirect interactions
with TRAF2, respectively, and might, at this stage, be predicted to be
comparable in their effects (31, 34). However, the data
presented here and previously (44), support a unique role
for the LMP1 TRAF binding site in EGF-R, TRAF1, and EBI3 up-regulation and probably in resting B-lymphocyte growth
transformation. The unique role for CTAR1/TES1 could be in activation
of distinct NF-
B/Rel family members. We showed that CTAR1/TES1
engages TRAF5 in vivo, but TRAF5 appears to be similar to TRAF2 in
downstream effects (1, 28, 47, 54). TRAF2 and TRAF5 also
mediate stress-activated protein kinase activation from TNFRs (41,
48, 49, 54), and LMP1 also induces stress-activated protein
kinases (13, 19, 37). Recent studies suggest that CTAR1/TES1
and CTAR2/TES2 may differ in these as yet poorly characterized
pathways (13, 37). Alternatively, the unique ability
of CTAR1/TES1 to associate with TRAF3 at a high level may explain the
difference. TRAF3 has been implicated in down-modulating NF-
B
activity and in affecting cell death in HT29 cells (10, 51,
55) and is likely to mediate other activities. Analysis of the
TRAF1, EBI3, and EGF-R promoters may be useful in determining the
functional differences between CTAR1/TES1 and CTAR2/TES2.
The data presented here cast the role of TRAF1 in LMP1 signaling in a
somewhat different light than previous experiments using LCLs or B
lymphoblasts. In such cells, LMP1 appears to largely engage TRAF2
through TRAF1, as a TRAF1-TRAF2 heterodimer (10). Furthermore, in B lymphocytes, TRAF1 is expressed at a high level in
response to LMP1 and can synergize with LMP1 in NF-
B activation (10). We now show that in the near absence of TRAF1 in
epithelial cells, TRAF2 can associate at a high level with LMP1.
Signaling from CTAR1/TES1 through TRAF2, and TRAF5 is therefore likely
to be centrally important for the effects of LMP1 on
epithelial cell growth, including effects on early lesions of
nasopharyngeal carcinoma.
Overexpression of a nondegradable I
B
S32AS36A construct abolishes
all of the LMP1-mediated protein induction that we have studied,
confirming an important role for NF-
B activation in LMP1-mediated
signaling. NF-
B sites have been identified in the Fas promoter and
in the ICAM-1 promoter (4, 8, 56). The NF-
B site in the
ICAM-1 promoter is required for TNF-
-induced ICAM-1 expression
(22). NF-
B was not previously known to have a role in
CD40 and LFA-3 gene induction, and the role may be indirect since the
results of a computer search indicate that the human CD40 and LFA-3
promoters do not have obvious NF-
B sites.
| |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
Dean Ballard provided the I
B
S32AS36A expression vector.
David Davidson provided advice on BL41 electroporation. Fred Wang provided the BJAB cell lines that are stably transfected with LMP1
under the control of the metallothionein promoter.
This work was supported by PHS grant CA47006 from the National Cancer Institute (E.K.) and by the Institut National de la Santé et la Recherche Médicale and Université Paris-Sud (O.D.). E.C.M. was supported by NIH training grant AI 07061-20.
| |
ADDENDUM |
|---|
After submission of this paper, Miller et al. (44a) reported that mutations of the LMP1 PXQXT/S motif impaired the ability of LMP1 to induce EGF-R induction in C33A epithelial cells.
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Channing Laboratory, 181 Longwood Ave., Boston, MA 02115. Phone: (617) 525-4252. Fax: (617) 525-4251. E-mail: ekieff{at}rics.bwh.harvard.edu.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| 1. |
Aizawa, S.,
H. Nakano,
T. Ishida,
R. Horie,
M. Nagai,
K. Ito,
H. Yagita,
K. Okumura,
J. Inoue, and T. Watanabe.
1997.
Tumor necrosis factor receptor-associated factor (TRAF) 5 and TRAF2 are involved in CD30-mediated NF- B activation.
J. Biol. Chem.
272:2042-2045 |
| 2. | Baichwal, V. R., and B. Sugden. 1988. Transformation of Balb 3T3 cells by the BNLF-1 gene of the Epstein-Barr virus. Oncogene 2:461-467[Medline]. |
| 3. | Banchereau, J., F. Bazan, D. Blanchard, F. Briere, J. P. Galizzi, C. van Kooten, Y. J. Liu, F. Rousset, and S. Saeland. 1994. The CD40 antigen and its ligand. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 12:881-922[Medline]. |
| 4. | Behrmann, I., H. Walczak, and P. H. Krammer. 1994. Structure of the human APO-1 gene. Eur. J. Immunol. 24:3057-3062[Medline]. |
| 5. |
Brodeur, S. R.,
G. Cheng,
D. Baltimore, and D. A. Thorley-Lawson.
1997.
Localisation of the major NF- B-activating site and the sole TRAF3 binding site of LMP-1 defines two distinct signaling motifs.
J. Biol. Chem.
272:19777-19784 |
| 6. |
Chen, Z.,
J. Hagler,
V. J. Palombella,
F. Melandri,
D. Scherer,
D. Ballard, and T. Maniatis.
1995.
Signal-induced site-specific phosphorylation targets I- B to the ubiquitin-proteasome pathway.
Genes Dev.
9:1586-1597 |
| 7. |
Cheng, G.,
A. M. Cleary,
Z. S. Ye,
D. I. Hong,
S. Lederman, and D. Baltimore.
1995.
Involvement of CRAF1, a relative of TRAF, in CD40 signaling.
Science
267:1494-1498 |
| 8. | Cheng, J., C. Liu, W. J. Koopman, and J. D. Mountz. 1995. Characterization of the human Fas gene. Exon/intron organization and promoter region. J. Immunol. 154:1239-1245[Abstract]. |
| 9. | Devergne, O., M. Hummel, H. Koeppen, M. Le Beau, E. C. Nathanson, E. Kieff, and M. Birkenbach. 1996. A novel interleukin-12 p40-related protein induced by latent Epstein-Barr virus infection in B lymphocytes. J. Virol. 70:1143-1153[Abstract]. |
| 10. |
Devergne, O.,
E. Hatzivassiliou,
K. M. Izumi,
K. M. Kaye,
M. F. Kleijnen,
E. Kieff, and G. Mosialos.
1996.
Association of TRAF1, TRAF2, and TRAF3 with an Epstein-Barr virus LMP1 domain important for B-lymphocyte transformation: role in NF- B activation.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
16:7098-7108[Abstract].
|
| 11. |
Devergne, O.,
M. Birkenbach, and E. Kieff.
1997.
Epstein-Barr virus-induced gene 3 and the p35 subunit of interleukin 12 form a novel heterodimeric hematopoietin.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
94:12041-12046 |
| 12. |
Eliopoulos, A. G.,
M. Stack,
C. W. Dawson,
K. M. Kaye,
L. Hodgkin,
S. Sihota,
M. Rowe, and L. S. Young.
1997.
Epstein-Barr virus-encoded LMP1 and CD40 mediate IL-6 production in epithelial cells via an NF- B pathway involving TNF receptor-associated factors.
Oncogene
14:2899-2916[Medline].
|
| 13. | Eliopoulos, A. G., and L. S. Young. 1998. Activation of the c-jun N-terminal kinase (JNK) pathway by the Epstein-Barr virus-encoded latent membrane protein 1 (LMP1). Oncogene 16:1731-1742[Medline]. |
| 14. | Floettmann, J. E., K. Ward, A. B. Rickinson, and M. Rowe. 1996. Cytostatic effect of Epstein-Barr virus latent membrane protein-1 (LMP1) analyzed using tetracycline-regulated expression in B cell lines. Virology 223:29-40[Medline]. |
| 15. |
Floettmann, J. E., and M. Rowe.
1997.
Epstein-Barr virus latent membrane protein 1 (LMP1) C-terminus activation region 2 (CTAR2) maps to the far C-terminus and requires oligomerisation for NF- B activation.
Oncogene
15:1851-1858[Medline].
|
| 16. | Gires, O., U. Zimber-Strobl, R. Gonella, M. Ueffing, G. Marshall, R. Zeidler, D. Pich, and W. Hammerschmidt. 1997. Latent membrane protein 1 of Epstein-Barr virus mimics a constitutively active receptor molecule. EMBO J. 16:6131-6140[Medline]. |
| 17. |
Hammerschmidt, W.,
B. Sugden, and V. R. Baichwal.
1989.
The transforming domain alone of the latent membrane protein of Epstein-Barr virus is toxic to cells when expressed at high levels.
J. Virol.
63:2469-2475 |
| 18. | Hanissian, S. H., and R. S. Geha. 1997. Jak3 is associated with CD40 and is critical for CD40 induction of gene expression in B cells. Immunity 6:379-387[Medline]. |
| 19. |
Hatzivassiliou, E.,
W. E. Miller,
N. Raab-Traub,
E. Kieff, and G. Mosialos.
1998.
A fusion of the EBV latent membrane protein 1 (LMP1) transmembrane domains to the CD40 cytoplasmic domain is similar to LMP1 in constitutive activation of epidermal growth factor receptor expression, nuclear factor- B and stress-activated protein kinase.
J. Immunol.
160:1116-1121 |
| 20. | Henderson, S., M. Rowe, C. Gregory, C. D. Croom, F. Wang, R. Longnecker, E. Kieff, and A. Rickinson. 1991. Induction of Bcl-2 expression by Epstein-Barr virus latent membrane protein protects infected B cells from programmed cell death. Cell 65:1107-1115[Medline]. |
| 21. | Hostager, B. S., Y. Hsing, D. E. Harms, and G. A. Bishop. 1996. Different CD40-mediated signaling events require distinct structural features. J. Immunol. 157:1047-1053[Abstract]. |
| 22. |
Hou, J.,
V. Baichwal, and Z. Cao.
1994.
Regulatory elements and transcription factors controlling basal and cytokine-induced expression of the gene encoding intercellular adhesion molecule 1.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
91:11641-11645 |
| 23. |
Hsing, Y.,
B. S. Hostager, and G. A. Bishop.
1997.
Characterization of CD40 signaling determinants regulating nuclear factor- B activation in B lymphocytes.
J. Immunol.
159:4898-4906[Abstract].
|
| 24. |
Hsu, H.,
J. Xiong, and D. V. Goeddel.
1995.
The TNF receptor 1-associated protein TRADD signals cell death and NF- B activation.
Cell
81:495-504[Medline].
|
| 25. | Hsu, H., H. B. Shu, M. P. Pan, and D. V. Goeddel. 1996. TRADD-TRAF2 and TRADD-FADD interactions define two distinct TNF receptor-1 signal transduction pathways. Cell 84:299-308[Medline]. |
| 26. |
Huen, D. S.,
S. A. Henderson,
D. Croom-Carter, and M. Rowe.
1995.
The Epstein-Barr virus latent membrane protein-1 (LMP1) mediates activation of NF- B and cell surface phenotype via two effector regions in its carboxy-terminal cytoplasmic domain.
Oncogene
10:549-560[Medline].
|
| 27. |
Ishida, T.,
S.-I. Mizushima,
S. Azuma,
N. Kabayashi,
T. Tojo,
K. Suzuki,
S. Aizawa,
T. Watanabe,
G. Mosialos,
E. Kieff,
T. Yamamoto, and J.-I. Inoue.
1996.
Identification of TRAF6, a novel tumor necrosis factor receptor-associated protein that mediates signaling from an amino-terminal domain of the CD40 cytoplasmic region.
J. Biol. Chem.
271:28745-28748 |
| 28. |
Ishida, T.,
T. Tojo,
T. Aoki,
N. Kobayashi,
T. Ohishi,
T. Watanabe,
T. Yamamoto, and J. Inoue.
1996.
TRAF5, a novel tumor necrosis factor receptor-associated factor family protein, mediates CD40 signaling.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
93:9437-9442 |
| 29. |
Izumi, K. M.,
K. M. Kaye, and E. Kieff.
1994.
Epstein-Barr virus recombinant molecular genetics analysis of the LMP1 amino-terminal cytoplasmic domain reveals a probable structural role, with no component essential for primary B-lymphocyte growth transformation.
J. Virol.
68:4369-4376 |
| 30. |
Izumi, K. M.,
K. M. Kaye, and E. D. Kieff.
1997.
The Epstein-Barr virus LMP1 amino acid sequence that engages tumor necrosis factor receptor associated factors is critical for primary B lymphocyte growth transformation.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
94:1447-1452 |
| 31. |
Izumi, K. M., and E. D. Kieff.
1997.
The Epstein-Barr virus oncogene product latent membrane protein 1 engages the tumor necrosis factor receptor-associated death domain protein to mediate B lymphocyte growth transformation and activate NF- B.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
94:12592-12597 |
| 32. |
Kaye, K. M.,
K. M. Izumi, and E. Kieff.
1993.
Epstein-Barr virus latent membrane protein 1 is essential for B lymphocyte transformation.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
90:9150-9154 |
| 33. | Kaye, K. M., K. M. Izumi, G. Mosialos, and E. Kieff. 1995. The Epstein-Barr virus LMP1 cytoplasmic carboxy terminus is essential for B lymphocyte transformation: fibroblast cocultivation complements a critical function within the terminal 155 residues. J. Virol. 69:675-683[Abstract]. |
| 34. |
Kaye, K. M.,
O. Devergne,
J. N. Harada,
K. M. Izumi,
R. Yalamanchili,
E. Kieff, and G. Mosialos.
1996.
Tumor necrosis factor receptor associated factor 2 is a mediator of NF- B activation by latent membrane protein 1, the Epstein-Barr virus transforming protein.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
93:11085-11090 |
| 35. | Kaye, K. M., K. M. Izumi, E. Johannsen, and E. Kieff. Unpublished results. |
| 36. | Kieff, E. 1996. Epstein-Barr virus and its replication, p. 2343-2396. In B. N. Fields, D. M. Knipe, P. M. Howley, et al. (ed.), Virology, 3rd ed. Raven Press, Ltd., Philadelphia, Pa. |
| 37. | Kieser, A., E. Kilger, O. Gires, M. Ueffing, W. Kolch, and W. Hammerschmidt. 1997. Epstein-Barr virus latent membrane protein-1 triggers AP-1 activity via the c-jun N-terminal kinase cascade. EMBO J. 16:6478-6485[Medline]. |
| 38. | Kilger, E., E. Kilger, O. Gries, M. Ueffling, W. Kolch, and W. Hammerschmidt. 1998. Epstein-Barr virus-mediated B-cell proliferation is dependent upon latent membrane protein 1, which simulates an activated CD40 receptor. EMBO J. 17:1700-1709[Medline]. |
| 39. |
Kuhne, M. R.,
M. Robbins,
J. E. Hambor,
M. F. Mackey,
Y. Kosaka,
T. Nishimura,
J. P. Gigley,
R. J. Noelle, and D. M. Calderhead.
1997.
Assembly and regulation of the CD40 receptor complex in human B cells.
J. Exp. Med.
186:337-342 |
| 40. |
Laherty, C. D.,
H. M. Hu,
A. W. Opipari,
F. Wang, and V. M. Dixit.
1992.
The Epstein-Barr virus LMP1 gene product induces A20 zinc finger protein expression by activating nuclear factor- B.
J. Biol. Chem.
267:24157-24160 |
| 41. |
Lee, S. Y.,
A. Reichlin,
A. Santana,
K. A. Kokol,
M. C. Nussenzweig, and Y. Choi.
1997.
TRAF2 is essential for JNK but not NF- B activation and regulates lymphocyte proliferation and survival.
Immunity
7:703-713[Medline].
|
| 42. |
Liebowitz, D.,
J. Mannick,
K. Takada, and E. Kieff.
1992.
Phenotypes of Epstein-Barr virus LMP1 deletion mutants indicate transmembrane and amino-terminal cytoplasmic domains necessary for effects in B-lymphoma cells.
J. Virol.
66:4612-4616 |
| 43. |
Lu, J. J.,
J. Y. Chen,
T. Y. Hsu,
W. C. Yu,
I. J. Su, and C. S. Yang.
1996.
Induction of apoptosis in epithelial cells by Epstein-Barr virus latent membrane protein 1.
J. Gen. Virol.
77:1883-1892 |
| 44. |
Miller, W. E.,
G. Mosialos,
E. Kieff, and N. Raab-Traub.
1997.
Epstein-Barr virus LMP1 induction of the epidermal growth factor receptor is mediated through a TRAF signaling pathway distinct from NF- B activation.
J. Virol.
71:586-594[Abstract].
|
| 44a. |
Miller, W. E.,
J. L. Cheshire, and N. Raab-Traub.
1998.
Interaction of tumor necrosis factor receptor-associated factor signaling proteins with the latent membrane protein 1 PXQXT motif is essential for induction of epidermal growth factor receptor expression.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
18:2835-2844 |
| 45. |
Mitchell, T., and B. Sugden.
1995.
Stimulation of NF- B mediated transcription by mutant derivatives of the latent membrane protein of the Epstein-Barr virus.
J. Virol.
69:2968-2976[Abstract].
|
| 46. | Mosialos, G., M. Birkenbach, R. Yalamanchili, T. VanArsdale, C. Ware, and E. Kieff. 1995. The Epstein-Barr virus transforming protein LMP1 engages signaling proteins for the tumor necrosis factor receptor family. Cell 80:389-399[Medline]. |
| 47. |
Nakano, H.,
H. Oshima,
W. Chung,
L. Williams-Abbott,
C. F. Ware,
H. Yagita, and K. Okumura.
1996.
TRAF5, an activator of NF-kappaB and putative signal transducer for the lymphotoxin-beta receptor.
J. Biol. Chem.
271:14661-14664 |
| 48. |
Natoli, G.,
A. Costanzo,
A. Ianni,
D. J. Templeton,
J. R. Woodgett,
C. Balsano, and M. Levrero.
1997.
Activation of SAPK/JNK by TNF receptor 1 through a non cytotoxic TRAF2-dependent pathway.
Science
275:200-203 |
| 49. |
Reinhard, C.,
B. Shamoon,
V. Shyamala, and L. T. Williams.
1997.
Tumor necrosis factor -induced activation of c-jun N-terminal kinase is mediated by TRAF2.
EMBO J.
16:1080-1092[Medline].
|
| 50. | Rickinson, A. B., and E. Kieff. 1996. Epstein-Barr virus, p. 2397-2446. In B. N. Fields, D. M. Knipe, P. M. Howley, R. M. Chanock, J. L. Melnick, T. P. Monath, B. Roizman, and S. Straus (ed.), Virology, 3rd ed. Raven Press, Ltd., Philadelphia, Pa. |
| 51. |
Rothe, M.,
V. Sarma,
V. M. Dixit, and D. V. Goeddel.
1995.
TRAF2-mediated activation of NF-kappa B by TNF receptor 2 and CD40.
Science
269:1424-1427 |
| 52. | Sandberg, M., W. Hammerschmidt, and B. Sugden. 1997. Characterization of LMP1's association with TRAF1, TRAF2, and TRAF3. J. Virol. 71:4649-4656[Abstract]. |
| 53. |
Shu, H. B.,
M. Takeuchi, and D. V. Goeddel.
1996.
The tumor necrosis factor receptor 2 signal transducers TRAF2 and c-IAP1 are components of the tumor necrosis factor receptor 1 signaling complex.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
93:13973-13978 |
| 54. |
Song, H. Y.,
C. H. Regnier,
C. J. Kirschning,
D. V. Goeddel, and M. Rothe.
1997.
Tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-mediated kinases cascades: bifurcation of nuclear factor- B and c-jun N-terminal kinase (JNK/SAPK) pathways at the TNF receptor-associated factor 2.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
94:9792-9796 |
| 55. |
VanArsdale, T. L.,
S. L. VanArsdale,
W. R. Force,
B. N. Walter,
G. Mosialos,
E. Kieff,
J. C. Reed, and C. F. Ware.
1997.
Lymphotoxin-beta receptor signaling complex: role of tumor necrosis factor receptor-associated factor 3 recruitment in cell death and activation of nuclear factor kappaB.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
94:2460-2465 |
| 56. |
Voraberger, G.,
R. Schafer, and C. Stratowa.
1991.
Cloning of the human gene for intercellular adhesion molecule 1 and analysis of its 5'-regulatory region. Induction by cytokines and phorbol ester.
J. Immunol.
147:2777-2786 |
| 57. | Wang, D., D. Liebowitz, and E. Kieff. 1985. An EBV membrane protein expressed in immortalized lymphocytes transforms established rodent cells. Cell 43:831-840[Medline]. |
| 58. |
Wang, D.,
D. Liebowitz,
F. Wang,
C. Gregory,
A. B. Rickinson,
R. Larson,
T. Springer, and E. Kieff.
1988.
Epstein-Barr virus latent infection membrane protein alters the human B-lymphocyte phenotype: deletion of the amino terminus abolishes activity.
J. Virol.
62:4173-4184 |
| 59. |
Wang, F.,
C. Gregory,
C. Sample,
M. Rowe,
D. Liebowitz,
R. Murray,
A. Rickinson, and E. Kieff.
1990.
Epstein-Barr virus latent membrane protein (LMP1) and nuclear proteins 2 and 3C are effectors of phenotypic changes in B lymphocytes: EBNA2 and LMP1 cooperatively induce CD23.
J. Virol.
64:2309-2318 |
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»