JVI Figure table search 04
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kim, V. N.
Right arrow Articles by Kingsman, A. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kim, V. N.
Right arrow Articles by Kingsman, A. J.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

J Virol, January 1998, p. 811-816, Vol. 72, No. 1
0022-538X/98/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1998, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.

Minimal Requirement for a Lentivirus Vector Based on Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1

V. Narry Kim,1 Kyriacos Mitrophanous,1 Susan M. Kingsman,1,2 and Alan J. Kingsman1,2,*

Biochemistry Department, Oxford University, Oxford OX1 3QU,1 and Oxford BioMedica Limited, The Medawar Centre, The Oxford Science Park, Oxford OX4 4GA,2 United Kingdom

Received 7 July 1997/Accepted 28 September 1997

    ABSTRACT
Top
Abstract
Text
References

The use of human immunodeficiency virus vectors for gene therapy is hampered by concern over their safety. This concern might be ameliorated, in part, if the viral accessory genes and proteins could be eliminated from the vector genomes and particles. Here we describe a minimal vector system that is capable of transducing nondividing cells and which does not contain tat, vif, vpr, vpu, and nef.

    TEXT
Top
Abstract
Text
References

To date, murine leukemia virus (MLV)-based retroviral vectors have been most frequently used for gene therapy. This is because of their efficient transfer, stable integration, and relatively long-term expression of foreign genes (43). However, one major drawback of these vectors is their inability to transduce mitotically inactive cells. Many types of cells that are attractive targets for research or clinical therapy do not divide or divide slowly. However, one subclass of retroviruses, the family Lentiviridae, can infect nondividing cells. This property makes these viruses, including human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), attractive for gene transfer into nondividing cells.

A number of efforts have been made to develop HIV type 1 (HIV-1)-based packaging systems following early studies to define the sequences required for packaging (25). A simple, replication-defective vector based on HIV-1 was first constructed and used for analysis of virus infectivity by Page et al. (35), and transfer of the foreign genes into a CD4+ T-cell line by a HIV-1-based vector was demonstrated (38). Other groups have designed HIV-1-based vectors that are Tat inducible (9) or that use heterologous internal promoters (46). Efforts to establish a stable producer cell line have also been made (13, 37, 57). The viral titers obtained with these vectors are generally low (102 to 104 infectious particles per ml), although some improvements came with pseudotyping of the vector particles with vesicular stomatitis virus glycoprotein (VSV-G). Pseudotyped vectors can be concentrated by simple ultracentrifugation without significant loss of infectivity (3, 39). Other advantages of pseudotyping with VSV-G are a broad host range and elimination of homologous recombination to generate replication-competent viruses. By use of this pseudotyped system, transduction of nondividing neuronal cells in vivo has been demonstrated, including sustained long-term gene expression in adult rat brains (33, 34). Taken together, these observations illustrate the promise of HIV vectors for use in gene therapy.

The remaining question is safety. To create a safe, replication-defective retroviral vector, viral components (gag-pol, env, and the vector genome) must be segregated onto three separate plasmids and the sequence overlap between them must be minimized. These tasks have been successfully achieved with no replication-competent virus detected (33, 40). Another concern about lentiviral vectors is that they are distinct from oncoretrovirus-based vectors in that they possess auxiliary genes in addition to the three common retroviral genes gag, pol, and env. Our relative ignorance of the functions of the products of these accessory genes makes them significant factors in considerations of the safety of lentiviral vectors. All of the HIV vector systems previously reported contain some or all of the accessory genes. HIV-1 has six such genes, vif, vpr, vpu, tat, rev, and nef (51, 54). Some of these have been associated with possible pathologies. For example, HIV-1 Tat has been implicated in the development of Kaposi's sarcoma (4, 5, 16). HIV-1 Vpr causes cell cycle arrest and apoptosis, and it has been suggested that this is the cause of T-cell dysfunction in AIDS patients (23). Also, extracellular Vpr present in peripheral blood has been suggested to contribute to tissue-specific pathologies associated with HIV infection since Vpr induces cell proliferation and differentiation (26, 27).

A safe and efficient vector system would exclude any nonessential viral proteins which may be present in the viral stock and which may have deleterious effects. It is therefore desirable to determine the requirement of each auxiliary gene for virus production, transduction, and integration and to eliminate any unnecessary genes from the system. In this study, we have constructed a minimal vector system which does not contain tat, vif, vpr, vpu, and nef. The only remaining auxiliary gene is therefore rev, which, with RRE, is required for efficient RNA handling in this system.

Vector production system. HIV-1-based vectors were designed to be produced from transient three-plasmid cotransfection into 293T cells (Fig. 1). The vector genome, the HIV-1 gag-pol gene, and the VSV-G gene were placed on three separate plasmids. This packaging system lacks the accessory genes nef, vpu, and vpr and has the potential to eliminate tat, rev, and vif (see later).


View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		FIG. 1.   Basic components of the packaging system. Vector genome plasmids pH5Z, pH3Z, and pH4Z were derived from pWI3 (24) and inserted into pBluescript KS+ (Stratagene). They have a number of structural features in common. To achieve efficient packaging by HIV cores, the vectors contain the first 778 nt of gag (36). A frameshift mutation created by filling in at the ClaI site (HIV-1 HXB2 coordinate 830 [GenBank accession no. M28248]) prevents translation of these gag sequences. The coordinates for HIV-1 sequences follow the Los Alamos numbering system (32). The remaining gag-pol sequences were removed by a deletion between PstI (HXB2 nt 1415) and EcoRI (HXB2 nt 5743). A second deletion between NdeI (HXB2 nt 6402) and BglII (HXB2 nt 7620) removes part of env. The remaining HIV-1 sequences in the vectors include RRE and rev to support efficient mRNA export. The beta -galactosidase reporter gene is expressed from an internal HCMV promoter. The differences among the three vector constructs, pH5Z, pH3Z, and pH4Z, are described in the text. HIV-1 gag-pol gene expression plasmids pGP-RRE1, pGP-CTEr, pGP-CTE, and pGP-RRE3 were constructed by first inserting the NarI-EcoRI gag-pol fragment (HXB2 nt 637 to 5743) from pWI3 into pCI-neo (Promega). The StyI-StyI fragment containing RRE (HXB2 nt 7721 to 8053) of pWI3 was inserted downstream of the gag-pol coding region, resulting in pGP-RRE1 and pGP-RRE3. In the case of pGP-RRE3, a frameshift mutation in vif was introduced by filling in of the NdeI site (HXB2 nt 5122). The CTE (MPMV nt 7886 to 8373 [GenBank accession no. M12349]) was derived from an MPMV proviral clone, pSHRM15 (a kind gift from Eric Hunter), and inserted in either the reverse (pGP-CTEr) or the correct (pGP-CTE) orientation. VSV-G was expressed from the HCMV immediate-early enhancer-promoter in plasmid pRV67 (42a). CMV is the HCMV promoter, Psi  is the HIV-1 packaging signal, lacZ is the beta -galactosidase-encoding gene, and pA is the polyadenylation signal. The orientations of the CTE are indicated by arrows as follows: left-arrow  for the reverse and right-arrow for the correct orientation.

Virus was generated by calcium phosphate transfection of 293T cells and used for transduction as previously described (12) but with the following modifications. After incubation of the cells on 60-mm-diameter dishes with DNA-calcium phosphate precipitates for 12 h, the medium was replaced with 2.5 ml of fresh medium and incubated for 36 h and then the supernatant was used for transduction in the presence of Polybrene (8 µg/µl). No replication-competent virus from the packaging system was detected after 51 days of culturing (11 passages).

Tat independence. The first distinct property of our vector system is that Tat is not expressed from the packaging components, the gag-pol expression plasmids and pRV67 (Fig. 1). HIV-1 Tat is a strong transcriptional trans activator and functions through a Tat activation response element located downstream of the transcription initiation site. Tat is essential for viral replication, and it is expressed from all of the previously reported production systems. However, in single-cycle infection (transduction), Tat is dispensable if the basic transcription level of the vector genome is high enough in the producer system and if any transgene is expressed from a promoter other than the HIV-1 long terminal repeat (LTR). We previously reported that a high-titer MLV stock can be produced by replacing the MLV U3 promoter with the human cytomegalovirus (HCMV) promoter (47), and so this strategy was applied to the HIV-1 vectors. Two HIV-1-based vectors, pH3Z and pH4Z, were constructed with the potent HCMV promoter (-521 to -1) by replacing U3 of the 5' LTR (Fig. 1). pH3Z retains the tat coding region, while pH4Z lacks it due to a deletion (HXB2 nucleotides [nt] 5749 to 5880) encompassing the first 50 bp of the tat gene. These vectors were evaluated in comparison to pH5Z, which possesses the intact HIV-1 LTR structure and the tat gene (Table 1). The presence or absence of Tat expression from these vectors was confirmed in appropriate cotransfection studies. Each of the vector plasmids (1 µg) was cotransfected with pLTR-luc (1 µg), in which luciferase expression is Tat dependent. In the case of pH5Z and pH3Z, luciferase expression was activated 58- and 68-fold, respectively, but with pH4Z, no activation was observed (data not shown).

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		TABLE 1.   Transduction efficiency of the tat-deficient HIV vectora

Supernatants from 293T cells transfected with each of the vector plasmids and pGP-RRE3 and pRV67 were assayed for transduction efficiency (Table 1). The tat-negative vector (pH4Z) yielded titers of 3.0 × 105 ± 0.4 × 105 lacZ CFU (LFU)/ml, which is comparable to those from the tat-positive vector (pH3Z) (2.9 × 105 ± 0.4 × 105 LFU/ml). These titers were about 3.2 times lower than those (9.7 × 105 ± 2.4 × 105 LFU/ml) from the HIV-1 LTR-driven, tat-positive vector (pH5Z). Nevertheless, this result demonstrates that, as expected, high-titer HIV vectors can be generated without the Tat trans activator, as long as the viral promoter is replaced with a strong constitutive promoter. Clearly, in this system, Tat is not required for any other functions in addition to its expression activation role.

Other studies have suggested a role for Tat in regulating other steps in the viral life cycle (22). For example, Harrich et al. recently, described the contribution of Tat to efficient reverse transcription (20), which appears contradictory to our result. The difference between these results and those described here might be due to differences in the virus production systems.

Requirement of Rev/RRE. Next, we considered the possibility of constructing a rev-independent vector system. The posttranscriptional trans activator Rev and its responsive element, RRE, play a role in exporting the unspliced or partially spliced viral RNA to the cytoplasm (15, 30). The requirement of Rev in trans and RRE in cis has been shown to be partially substituted by other cis-acting elements (termed constitutive transport elements [CTEs]) from Mason-Pfizer monkey virus (MPMV) and related viruses (8, 58). It should be possible, therefore, to construct a Rev/RRE-independent HIV-1 vector production system by replacing HIV-1 Rev/RRE with a CTE.

Three gag-pol expression plasmids were analyzed: one with RRE (pGP-RRE1), one with a CTE in the reverse orientation (pGP-CTEr), and one with a CTE in the correct orientation (pGP-CTE) (Fig. 1 and Table 2). Quantitation of reverse transcriptase (RT) activity was used to measure pol expression (Quan-T-RT; Amersham) (Table 2). Although pol expression from pGP-CTE was significantly higher than that from pGP-RRE1 (without Rev) or that from pGP-CTEr, it was still only 2.8% of that from pGP-RRE1 in the presence of Rev (Table 2). The resulting viral titers from three-plasmid cotransfection using each of the gag-pol expression plasmids reflected the expression level of pol (Table 2). The highest titer, 3.1 × 105 LFU/ml, was achieved with the RRE-containing construct (pGP-RRE1). In conclusion, Rev/RRE gives maximal HIV-1 gag-pol expression and the substitution of Rev/RRE with an MPMV CTE was not able to provide a substantial Rev/RRE function in this context. Recently, Srinivasakumar and coworkers (49) reported a stable HIV-1 packaging system which is independent of Rev/RRE. The apparent discrepancy between these results and our own might be due to the different CTE-containing fragments used. In the system described by Srinivasakumar et al., both the MPMV CTE and its associated polyadenylation signal were used, while in our study, the polyadenylation signal was not present. Therefore, it is not clear whether the MPMV CTE, on its own, is sufficient to substitute for HIV-1 Rev/RRE. It is conceivable that the polyadenylation signal is an essential component of the RNA transport system. In addition, it is clear from other studies that CTEs function with various efficiencies, compared to Rev/RRE, depending on the assay system (8, 42, 52, 58).

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		TABLE 2.   Requirement of Rev/RRE for efficient vector productiona

Assessment of the requirements for the individual accessory genes. The HIV-1-based vector production system described above does not contain vpr, vpu, or nef. This suggests that these genes are not absolutely required for the function of the vector system. However, this minimal vector system provides a convenient way to examine the roles of individual accessory genes in single-cycle infection and to determine any quantitative effects they may have on transduction efficiency. Each accessory gene was expressed in addition to the basic vector components, and transduction efficiencies of dividing and nondividing cells were measured. vif is expressed from gag-pol expression plasmid pGP-RRE1 through alternative splicing, whereas pGP-RRE3 contains a frameshift mutation which abolishes the expression of functional Vif (18). The expression plasmids for vpr and vpu were constructed by inserting appropriate PCR fragments from pNL4-3 into pCI-neo to produce pCI-vpr and pCI-vpu. Similarly, Nef is expressed from the HCMV promoter in plasmid pCMV-nef (42b). Expression of each gene was verified by Western blot analysis with the appropriate antibody (data not shown). Vector preparations resulting from three- or four-plasmid cotransfections were used for transduction of dividing and nondividing cells. The transfection efficiency of each combination was similar based on beta -galactosidase assay of the transfected cells (data not shown). Cells were arrested by using the DNA polymerase alpha inhibitor aphidicolin, which has been used to arrest the cell cycle in G1/S phase to study HIV-1 infection in nondividing cells (11, 19, 28, 34). The MLV-derived vector HIT111 (47) served as a control. The transduction efficiency of the MLV-based vector was only 4 ± 3 LFU/ml on growth-arrested cells, indicating that aphidicolin treatment was working effectively (Table 3).

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		TABLE 3.   Effect of accessory gene expression on transduction efficiencya

Vif is indispensable in a certain range of T-cell lines (i.e., CEM and H9) and peripheral blood lymphocytes but not in some T-cell lines (i.e., SupT1, C8166, and Jurkat) and other cell lines (i.e., HeLa and Cos) (17, 44, 56). The cell type used to produce Vif-defective virus determines viral infectivity, which indicates that cells that are nonrestrictive to Vif-defective virus contain a complementing host factor(s). In this system, expression of vif did not have an influence on viral particle production (based on RT assay of the supernatants; data not shown) or viral titer (Table 3). This result shows that Vif can be excluded from the HIV packaging system when using 293T cells as producer cells.

The viral determinants that confer the ability to infect nondividing cells appear to reside in the p17 matrix (MA) protein (10, 55) and Vpr (21). Viruses with mutations in the MA protein that disrupt the nuclear localization sequence fail to replicate efficiently in nondividing cells in the absence of a functional vpr gene (21). Similarly, mutations in Vpr only show an apparent phenotype when the p17 nuclear localization sequence is absent. These data indicate that these viral factors function as redundant karyophilic components of the HIV-1 preintegration complex. This, in turn, suggests that Vpr would not be necessary in a vector that is to be used for the transduction of nondividing cells as long as the system contains a functional MA protein. To test this, Vpr-positive or Vpr-negative viral particles were produced by cotransfection of pCI-vpr along with plasmids pH4Z, pGP-RRE3, and pRV67. The immunoblots demonstrating vpr expression and incorporation are shown in Fig. 2A and B. Firstly, the Gag-Pol protein profiles of the viral particles from the vector systems are identical in the presence or absence of Vpr (lanes 3 and 4). Secondly, the amount of Vpr in the viral particles from the four-plasmid cotransfection is comparable to that from a wild-type proviral clone, pNL4-3 (lanes 5 and 8), although there are some minor differences in the profiles, perhaps due to differing processing rates. This suggests that Vpr was incorporated into viral particles efficiently. The transduction efficiencies were assayed on dividing and cell cycle-arrested cells (Table 3). As expected, the HIV-based vector transduced aphidicolin-treated 293T cells as efficiently as dividing cells whether it contained Vpr or not. Similar results were obtained with HeLa cells (data not shown).


View larger version (45K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		FIG. 2.   Western blot analysis of viral proteins in viral particles produced by four-plasmid cotransfection. Eight micrograms of pNL4-3, 6 µg of pGP-RRE3, 7 µg of pH4Z, 4 µg of pRV67, and 3 µg of pCI-vpr were transfected, and the total amount of DNA was kept at 20 µg by addition of pCI-neo. At 48 h after transfection, viral pellets were collected from 1 ml of supernatant and separated on sodium dodecyl sulfate-10% (A) or -20% (B) polyacrylamide gels. Expression of viral proteins was visualized by using HIV-1-positive human serum (A) or rabbit anti-Vpr serum (B). Kb, kilodaltons.

Vpu has been shown to slightly enhance viral particle release from various cell types (45, 50, 53). To evaluate its role in this vector system, a vpu expression plasmid, pCI-vpu, was used in a four-plasmid strategy similar to that used for Vpr analysis. No significant increase in titer was observed, suggesting that Vpu is not necessary in this HIV-based vector system (Table 3). In agreement with this result, in a previous report (33), inclusion of vpu in the vector production system did not influence the titer. It is not clear why Vpu does not increase the transduction efficiency of the vectors, but it is conceivable that it is a function of using VSV-G as the envelope protein rather than HIV-1 envelope protein gp160. HIV-2 does not require Vpu activity, and HIV-2 Env can functionally replace Vpu to enhance HIV-1 core particle release (6, 7, 41). Release of particles bearing VSV-G might be similar to HIV-2 in not requiring the activity of Vpu.

Enhancement of viral infectivity by Nef has been well documented (2, 31, 48). To examine this in our vector system, the nef expression plasmid was cotransfected along with the three basic components of the system. Unexpectedly, the titer was three to four times lower in the presence of Nef (Table 3). However, this was only the case when VSV-G was used as the envelope protein. The enhancing effect of nef was clear with the HIV-1 HXB2 envelope or MLV amphotropic envelope protein (data not shown). The titer of the vector was increased 12-fold with the HIV-1 envelope protein and 2.5-fold with the MLV amphotropic envelope protein. A similar observation has been reported during the course of this study, and it was suggested that Nef functions at viral entry, which is altered by pseudotyping with VSV-G (1). For practical purposes, Nef should clearly not be included in the packaging system.

In conclusion, we have set up a minimal HIV-1-based vector production system that requires only the rev/RRE accessory system. It lacks tat, vif, vpr, vpu, and nef. The rev/RRE components could be removed by using a sequence such as the MPMV CTE, thereby eliminating all accessory proteins, but this does lead to a significant reduction in titer. The vector described here can transduce nondividing cells, as well as proliferating cells, with a titer of up to 8.6 × 105 LFU/ml. Furthermore, it can be concentrated easily by using ultracentrifugation with 97% recovery (data not shown). With some further refinement of the constructs, such as removal of the packaging signal present in the Gag-Pol cassette, this system should be far more acceptable as a clinical gene delivery system than previously described HIV-based vectors.

The results presented here are restricted to analyses of gene transfer in vitro. It is conceivable that the auxiliary proteins have significant effects in different tissues in vivo. However, a recent report, which substantially corroborates our findings here, showed that multiple mutations in vif, vpr, vpu, and nef did not have a significant influence on transduction of cells, including nondividing cells, in culture or in vivo (59). Only Vpr increased transduction of macrophages twofold, but this effect was seen in neither growth-arrested cells nor differentiated neurons. Our further modification that removes Tat from the system is unlikely to substantially alter the conclusions drawn from the work by Zufferey et al., given what we know of the functions of Tat. It seems likely, therefore, that lentiviral vectors without accessory genes will prove to be valuable gene therapy vectors for a range of cell types.

The system has other advantages for HIV therapy. Replacement of the HIV-1 LTR with a constitutive HCMV promoter permits the use of anti-Tat molecules such as Tat transdominant mutants (14) or Tat activation response element decoys (29) as therapeutic agents, as they do not affect vector production.

    ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We thank Eric Hunter for providing plasmid pSHRM15 and Lee Ratner for providing Vpr antibody. We thank Paula Cannon for discussion.

V.N.K. was supported by grants from the Ministry of Education (Korea) and the UK Overseas Research Students Awards Scheme. K.M. was supported by a UK MRC fellowship.

    FOOTNOTES

* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Biochemistry Department, Oxford University, South Parks Rd., Oxford OX1 3QU, United Kingdom. Phone: 44-1865-275249. Fax: 44-1865-275259. E-mail: akingsmn{at}bioch.ox.ac.uk.

    REFERENCES
Top
Abstract
Text
References

1. Aiken, C. 1997. Pseudotyping human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) by the glycoprotein of vesicular stomatitis virus targets HIV-1 entry to an endocytic pathway and suppresses both the requirement for Nef and the sensitivity to cyclosporin A. J. Virol. 71:5871-5877[Abstract].
2. Aiken, C., and D. Trono. 1995. Nef stimulates human immunodeficiency virus type 1 proviral DNA synthesis. J. Virol. 69:5048-5056[Abstract].
3. Akkina, R. K., R. M. Walton, M. L. Chen, Q.-X. Li, V. Planelles, and I. S. Y. Chen. 1996. High-efficiency gene transfer into CD34+ cells with a human immunodeficiency virus type 1-based retroviral vector pseudotyped with vesicular stomatitis virus envelope glycoprotein G. J. Virol. 70:2581-2585[Abstract].
4. Albini, A., G. Barillari, R. Benelli, R. C. Gallo, and B. Ensoli. 1995. Angiogenic properties of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 Tat protein. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 92:4838-4842[Abstract/Free Full Text].
5. Barillari, G., R. Gendelman, R. C. Gallo, and B. Ensoli. 1993. The Tat protein of human immunodeficiency virus type 1, a growth factor for AIDS Kaposi sarcoma and cytokine-activated vascular cells, induces adhesion of the same cell types by using integrin receptors recognizing the RGD amino acid sequence. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 90:7941-7945[Abstract/Free Full Text].
6. Bour, S., U. Schubert, K. Peden, and K. Strebel. 1996. The envelope glycoprotein of human immunodeficiency virus type 2 enhances viral particle release: a Vpu-like factor? J. Virol. 70:820-829[Abstract].
7. Bour, S., and K. Strebel. 1996. The human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) type 2 envelope protein is a functional complement to HIV type 1 Vpu that enhances particle release of heterologous retroviruses. J. Virol. 70:8285-8300[Abstract].
8. Bray, M., S. Prasad, J. W. Dubay, E. Hunter, K.-T. Jeang, D. Rekosh, and M.-L. Hammarskjold. 1994. A small element from the Mason-Pfizer monkey virus genome makes human immunodeficiency virus type 1 expression and replication Rev-independent. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 91:1256-1260[Abstract/Free Full Text].
9. Buchschacher, G. L., Jr., and A. T. Panganiban. 1992. Human immunodeficiency virus vectors for inducible expression of foreign genes. J. Virol. 66:2731-2739[Abstract/Free Full Text].
10. Bukrinsky, M. I., S. Haggerty, M. P. Dempsey, N. Sharova, A. Adzhubel, L. Spitz, P. Lewis, D. Goldfarb, M. Emerman, and M. Stevenson. 1993. A nuclear localization signal within HIV-1 matrix protein that governs infection of non-dividing cells. Nature 365:666-669[Medline].
11. Bukrinsky, M. I., N. Sharova, M. P. Dempsey, T. L. Stanwick, A. G. Bukrinskaya, S. Haggerty, and M. Stevenson. 1992. Active nuclear import of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 preintegration complexes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 89:6580-6584[Abstract/Free Full Text].
12. Cannon, P. M., N. Kim, S. M. Kingsman, and S. J. Kingsman. 1996. Murine leukemia virus-based Tat-inducible long terminal repeat replacement vectors: a new system for anti-human immunodeficiency virus gene therapy. J. Virol. 70:8234-8240[Abstract].
13. Carroll, R., J.-T. Lin, E. J. Dacquel, J. D. Mosca, D. S. Burke, and D. C. St. Louis. 1994. A human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1)-based retroviral vector system utilizing stable HIV-1 packaging cell lines. J. Virol. 68:6047-6051[Abstract/Free Full Text].
14. Echetebu, C. O., H. Rhim, C. H. Herrmann, and A. P. Rice. 1994. Construction and characterization of a potent HIV-2 Tat transdominant mutant protein. J. Acquired Immune Defic. Syndrome 7:655-664.
15. Emerman, M., R. Vazeux, and K. Peden. 1989. The rev gene product of the human immunodeficiency virus affects envelope-specific RNA localization. Cell 57:1155-1165[Medline].
16. Ensoli, B., G. Barillari, S. Z. Salahuddin, R. C. Gallo, and F. Wong-Staal. 1990. Tat protein of HIV-1 stimulates growth of cells derived from Kaposi's sarcoma lesions of AIDS patients. Nature 345:84-86[Medline].
17. Fan, L., and K. Peden. 1992. Cell-free transmission of Vif mutants of HIV-1. Virology 190:19-29[Medline].
18. Goncalves, J., B. Shi, X. Yang, and D. Gabuzda. 1995. Biological activity of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 Vif requires membrane targeting by C-terminal basic domains. J. Virol. 69:7196-7204[Abstract].
19. Gulizia, J., M. P. Dempsey, N. Sharova, M. I. Bukrinsky, L. Spitz, D. Goldfarb, and M. Stevenson. 1994. Reduced nuclear import of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 preintegration complexes in the presence of a prototypic nuclear targeting signal. J. Virol. 68:2021-2025[Abstract/Free Full Text].
20. Harrich, D., C. Ulich, L. F. Garcia-Martinez, and R. B. Gaynor. 1997. Tat is required for efficient HIV-1 reverse transcription. EMBO J. 16:1224-1235[Medline].
21. Heinzinger, N. K., M. I. Bukinsky, S. A. Haggerty, A. M. Ragland, V. Kewalramani, M. A. Lee, H. E. Gendelman, L. Ratner, M. Stevenson, and M. Emerman. 1994. The Vpr protein of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 influences nuclear localization of viral nucleic acids in nondividing host cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 91:7311-7315[Abstract/Free Full Text].
22. Huang, L. M., A. Joshi, R. Willey, J. Orenstein, and K. T. Jeang. 1994. Human immunodeficiency viruses regulated by alternative trans-activators: genetic evidence for a novel non-transcriptional function of Tat in virion infectivity. EMBO J. 13:2886-2896[Medline].
23. Jowett, J. B., V. Planelles, B. Poon, N. P. Shah, M.-L. Chen, and I. S. Y. Chen. 1995. The human immunodeficiency virus type 1 vpr gene arrests infected T cells in the G2 + M phase of the cell cycle. J. Virol. 69:6304-6313[Abstract].
24. Kim, S. Y., R. Byrn, J. Groopman, and D. Baltimore. 1989. Temporal aspects of DNA and RNA synthesis during human immunodeficiency virus infection: evidence for differential gene expression. J. Virol. 63:3708-3713[Abstract/Free Full Text].
25. Lever, A., H. Gottlinger, W. Haseltine, and J. Sodroski. 1989. Identification of a sequence required for efficient packaging of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 RNA into virions. J. Virol. 63:4085-4087[Abstract/Free Full Text].
26. Levy, D. N., L. S. Fernandes, W. V. Williams, and D. B. Weiner. 1993. Induction of cell differentiation by human immunodeficiency virus 1 vpr. Cell 72:541-550[Medline].
27. Levy, D. N., Y. Refaeli, and D. B. Weiner. 1995. Extracellular Vpr protein increases cellular permissiveness to human immunodeficiency virus replication and reactivates virus from latency. J. Virol. 69:1243-1252[Abstract].
28. Li, G., M. Simm, M. J. Potash, and D. J. Volsky. 1993. Human immunodeficiency virus type 1 DNA synthesis, integration, and efficient viral replication in growth-arrested T cells. J. Virol. 67:3969-3977[Abstract/Free Full Text].
29. Lisziewicz, J., D. Sun, J. Smythe, P. Lusso, F. Lori, A. Louie, P. Markham, J. Rossi, M. Reitz, and R. C. Gallo. 1993. Inhibition of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 replication by regulated expression of a polymeric Tat activation response RNA decoy as a strategy for gene therapy in AIDS. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 90:8000-8004[Abstract/Free Full Text].
30. Malim, M. H., J. Hauber, S. Y. Le, J. V. Maizel, and B. R. Cullen. 1989. The HIV-1 rev trans-activator acts through a structured target sequence to activate nuclear export of unspliced viral mRNA. Nature 338:254-257[Medline].
31. Miller, M. D., M. T. Warmerdam, I. Gaston, W. C. Greene, and M. B. Feinberg. 1994. The human immunodeficiency virus-1 nef gene product: a positive factor for viral infection and replication in primary lymphocytes and macrophages. J. Exp. Med. 179:101-113[Abstract/Free Full Text].
32. Myers, G., B. Korber, S. Wain-Hobson, K. T. Jeang, L. E. Henderson, and G. Pavlakis. 1994. . Human retroviruses and AIDS. A compilation and analysis of nucleic acid and amino acid sequences. Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, N.Mex.
33. Naldini, L., U. Blomer, F. H. Gage, D. Trono, and I. M. Verma. 1996. Efficient transfer, integration, and sustained long-term expression of the transgene in adult rat brains injected with a lentiviral vector. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 93:11382-11388[Abstract/Free Full Text].
34. Naldini, L., U. Blomer, P. Gallay, D. Ory, R. Mulligan, F. H. Gage, I. M. Verma, and D. Trono. 1996. In vivo gene delivery and stable transduction of nondividing cells by a lentiviral vector. Science 272:263-267[Abstract].
35. Page, K. A., N. R. Landau, and D. R. Littman. 1990. Construction and use of a human immunodeficiency virus vector for analysis of virus infectivity. J. Virol. 64:5270-5276[Abstract/Free Full Text].
36. Parolin, C., T. Dorfman, G. Palú, H. Göttlinger, and J. Sodroski. 1994. Analysis in human immunodeficiency virus type 1 vectors of cis-acting sequences that affect gene transfer into human lymphocytes. J. Virol. 68:3888-3895[Abstract/Free Full Text].
37. Poeschla, E., P. Corbeau, and F. Wong-Staal. 1996. Development of HIV vectors for anti-HIV gene-therapy. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 93:11395-11399[Abstract/Free Full Text].
38. Poznansky, M., A. Lever, L. Bergeron, W. Haseltine, and J. Sodroski. 1991. Gene transfer into human lymphocytes by a defective human immunodeficiency virus type 1 vector. J. Virol. 65:532-536[Abstract/Free Full Text].
39. Reiser, J., G. Harmison, S. Kluepfel Stahl, R. O. Brady, S. Karlsson, and M. Schubert. 1996. Transduction of nondividing cells using pseudotyped defective high-titer HIV type 1 particles. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 93:15266-15271[Abstract/Free Full Text].
40. Richardson, J. H., J. F. Kaye, L. A. Child, and A. M. Lever. 1995. Helper virus-free transfer of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 vectors. J. Gen. Virol. 76:691-696[Abstract/Free Full Text].
41. Ritter, G. D., Jr., G. Yamshchikov, S. J. Cohen, and M. J. Mulligan. 1996. Human immunodeficiency virus type 2 glycoprotein enhancement of particle budding: role of the cytoplasmic domain. J. Virol. 70:2669-2673[Abstract].
42. Rizvi, T. A., R. D. Schnidt, K. A. Lew, and M. E. Keeling. 1996. Rev/RRE-independent Mason-Pfizer monkey virus constitutive transport element-dependent propagation of SIVmac239 vectors using a single round of replication assay. Virology 222:457-463[Medline].
42a. Romano, G., et al. Unpublished data.
42b. Ronaldson, E. L., et al. Unpublished data.
43. Ross, G., R. Erickson, D. Knorr, A. Motulsky, R. Parkman, J. Samulski, S. Straus, and B. Smith. 1996. Gene therapy in the United States: a five year status report. Hum. Gene Ther. 7:1781-1790[Medline].
44. Sakai, H., R. Shibata, J.-I. Sakuragi, S. Sakuragi, M. Kawamura, and A. Adachi. 1993. Cell-dependent requirement of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 Vif protein for maturation of virus particles. J. Virol. 67:1663-1666[Abstract/Free Full Text].
45. Schubert, U., K. A. Clouse, and K. Strebel. 1995. Augmentation of virus secretion by the human immunodeficiency virus type 1 Vpu protein is cell type independent and occurs in cultured human primary macrophages and lymphocytes. J. Virol. 69:7699-7711[Abstract].
46. Shimada, T., H. Fujii, H. Mitsuya, and A. W. Nienhuis. 1991. Targeted and highly efficient gene transfer into CD4+ cells by a recombinant human immunodeficiency virus retroviral vector. J. Clin. Invest. 88:1043-1047.
47. Soneoka, Y., P. M. Cannon, E. E. Ramsdale, J. C. Griffiths, G. Romano, S. M. Kingsman, and A. J. Kingsman. 1995. A transient three-plasmid expression system for the production of high titer retroviral vectors. Nucleic Acids Res. 23:628-633[Abstract/Free Full Text].
48. Spina, C. A., T. J. Kwoh, M. Y. Chowers, J. C. Guatelli, and D. D. Richman. 1994. The importance of nef in the induction of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 replication from primary quiescent CD4 lymphocytes. J. Exp. Med. 179:115-123[Abstract/Free Full Text].
49. Srinivasakumar, N., N. Chazal, C. Helga-Maria, S. Prasad, M.-L. Hammarskjold, and D. Rekosh. 1997. The effect of viral regulatory protein expression on gene delivery by human immunodeficiency virus type 1 vectors produced in stable packaging cell lines. J. Virol. 71:5841-5848[Abstract].
50. Strebel, K., T. Klimkait, F. Maldarelli, and M. A. Martin. 1989. Molecular and biochemical analyses of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 vpu protein. J. Virol. 63:3784-3791[Abstract/Free Full Text].
51. Subbramanian, R. A., and E. A. Cohen. 1994. Molecular biology of the human immunodeficiency virus accessory proteins. J. Virol. 68:6831-6835[Free Full Text].
52. Tabernero, C., A. S. Zolotukhin, A. Valentin, G. N. Pavlakis, and B. K. Felber. 1996. The posttranscriptional control element of the simian retrovirus type 1 forms an extensive RNA secondary structure necessary for its function. J. Virol. 70:5998-6011[Abstract].
53. Terwilliger, E. F., E. A. Cohen, Y. C. Lu, J. G. Sodroski, and W. A. Haseltine. 1989. Functional role of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 vpu. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 86:5163-5167[Abstract/Free Full Text].
54. Trono, D. 1995. HIV accessory proteins: leading roles for the supporting cast. Cell 82:189-192[Medline].
55. von Schwedler, U., R. S. Kornbluth, and D. Trono. 1994. The nuclear localization signal of the matrix protein of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 allows the establishment of infection in macrophages and quiescent T lymphocytes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 91:6992-6996[Abstract/Free Full Text].
56. von Schwedler, U., J. Song, C. Aiken, and D. Trono. 1993. vif is crucial for human immunodeficiency virus type 1 proviral DNA synthesis in infected cells. J. Virol. 67:4945-4955[Abstract/Free Full Text].
57. Yu, H., A. B. Rabson, M. Kaul, Y. Ron, and J. P. Dougherty. 1996. Inducible human immunodeficiency virus type 1 packaging cell lines. J. Virol. 70:4530-4537[Abstract].
58. Zolotukhin, A. S., A. Valentin, G. N. Pavlakis, and B. K. Felber. 1994. Continuous propagation of RRE(-) and Rev(-)RRE(-) human immunodeficiency virus type 1 molecular clones containing a cis-acting element of simian retrovirus type 1 in human peripheral blood lymphocytes. J. Virol. 68:7944-7952[Abstract/Free Full Text].
59. Zufferey, R., D. Nagy, R. J. Mandel, L. Naldini, and D. Trono. 1997. Multiply attenuated lentiviral vector achieves efficient gene delivery in vivo. Nat. Med. 15:871-875.

J Virol, January 1998, p. 811-816, Vol. 72, No. 1
0022-538X/98/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1998, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.


This article has been cited by other articles:


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kim, V. N.
Right arrow Articles by Kingsman, A. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kim, V. N.
Right arrow Articles by Kingsman, A. J.

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
J. Bacteriol. Mol. Cell. Biol. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev.
Clin. Vaccine Immunol. ALL ASM JOURNALS