This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Chandran, K.
Right arrow Articles by Nibert, M. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Chandran, K.
Right arrow Articles by Nibert, M. L.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

J Virol, January 1998, p. 467-475, Vol. 72, No. 1
0022-538X/98/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1998, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.

Protease Cleavage of Reovirus Capsid Protein µ1/µ1C Is Blocked by Alkyl Sulfate Detergents, Yielding a New Type of Infectious Subvirion Particle

Kartik Chandran and Max L. Nibert*

Department of Biochemistry, College of Agricultural and Life Sciences, and Institute for Molecular Virology, Graduate School, University of Wisconsin---Madison, Madison, Wisconsin 53706

Received 9 June 1997/Accepted 1 October 1997

    ABSTRACT
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials & Methods
Results
Discussion
References

Mammalian reovirus virions undergo partial disassembly of the outer capsid upon exposure to proteases in vitro, producing infectious subvirion particles (ISVPs) that lack protein sigma 3 and contain protein µ1/µ1C as endoprotease-generated fragments µ1delta /delta and phi . ISVPs are thought to be required for two early steps in reovirus infection: membrane penetration and activation of the particle-bound viral transcriptase complexes. Genetic and biochemical evidence implicates outer-capsid protein µ1 in both these steps. To determine whether the cleavage of µ1/µ1C is relevant to the unique properties of ISVPs, we analyzed the properties of novel subvirion particles that lacked sigma 3 yet retained µ1/µ1C in an uncleaved but cleavable form. These detergent-plus-protease subvirion particles (dpSVPs) were produced by treating virions with chymotrypsin in the presence of micelle-forming concentrations of alkyl sulfate detergents. Infections with dpSVPs in murine L or canine MDCK cells provided evidence that the cleavage of µ1/µ1C during viral entry into these cells is dispensable for reovirus infection. Additionally, dpSVPs behaved like ISVPs in their capacity to permeabilize lipid bilayers and to undergo transcriptase activation in vitro, supporting the conclusion that cleavage of µ1/µ1C to µ1delta /delta and phi  during viral entry is not required for either membrane penetration or transcriptase activation in cells. The capacity of alkyl sulfate detergents to inhibit the cleavage of µ1/µ1C in a reversible fashion suggests a specific association between virus particle and detergent micelles that may mimic virus particle-phospholipid membrane interactions during reovirus entry into cells.

    INTRODUCTION
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials & Methods
Results
Discussion
References

All viruses must cross a membrane barrier to gain access to the cytoplasm of their host cells. In enveloped animal viruses, entry is achieved by a viral surface protein(s) that mediates fusion between viral and cellular membranes (27). Viruses that lack a lipid envelope, however, cannot use membrane fusion as a generalized mechanism to penetrate host membranes. Instead, entry by nonenveloped viruses is conceived to occur via either the local disruption of a host membrane (3) or the formation of a membrane-spanning pore (48), as mediated by a viral surface protein analogous to the fusion proteins of enveloped viruses.

A common theme that has emerged from studies of the fusion machinery of different enveloped viruses (e.g., togaviruses [36], orthomyxoviruses [32], and paramyxoviruses [49]) is the requirement for posttranslational proteolytic processing of fusion and/or accessory proteins prior to membrane penetration. In many instances, these cleavages prime the fusion proteins for membrane interaction by removing constraints on conformational changes needed for membrane insertion or by generating a new protein terminus that is hydrophobic and can insert into the membrane as a result of these conformational changes. Several groups of nonenveloped viruses, including the rotaviruses (2, 11, 31), adenoviruses (23), picornaviruses (35), and reoviruses (20, 30, 55, 59), also require proteolytic processing for efficient viral entry. To expand current knowledge of the requirement for proteolysis in membrane penetration by nonenveloped viruses, we performed studies to identify which proteolytic events make mammalian reoviruses competent for entry.

The maximally stable infectious form of reovirus is the virion, composed of eight proteins ranging from 12 to 600 in copy number (see references 28 and 45 for reviews). These eight structural proteins are organized into two concentric icosahedral capsids (19). The inner capsid encloses the viral genome, which consists of 10 double-stranded RNA segments. The structural framework of the outer capsid is formed by proteins µ1 (600 copies primarily as cleaved fragments µ1N and µ1C, but also some uncleaved µ1) and lambda 2 (60 copies). Several lines of evidence indicate that µ1 and its fragments effect the membrane penetration step during infection (24-26, 37, 41, 43, 44, 57). lambda 2 forms pentameric spikes at the fivefold axes of the outer capsid (19, 61) and is involved in the capping of mRNAs extruded through these spikes in the transcribing particle (12, 50). The other two outer-capsid proteins, sigma 1 (36 to 48 copies) and sigma 3 (600 copies), decorate the primary lattice formed by µ1 and lambda 2. sigma 1 is found at the fivefold axes and mediates viral attachment to host cell receptors preceding endocytic uptake of the virus (34). sigma 3 engages in close interactions with the underlying µ1 molecules, suggesting that its primary role may be to stabilize virions (16, 17), probably by regulating the exposure and conformational status of µ1 (19, 37, 43).

When virions are treated in vitro with exogenous proteases (such as chymotrypsin [CHT]), stepwise disassembly of the outer capsid is observed (5, 29, 51). sigma 3 is degraded, and µ1/µ1C is endoproteolytically cleaved to yield two particle-bound fragments (N-terminal µ1delta /delta and C-terminal phi  [41]), producing infectious subvirion particles (ISVPs) (5, 29, 51). The cleavage of µ1/µ1C is initiated shortly after sigma 3 degradation commences (4, 7, 41). Although both virions and ISVPs are infectious, only ISVPs can lead to interactions with lipid bilayers in vitro (25, 26, 37, 43, 57). This fact, along with observations that ISVP-like particles are generated from infecting virions at early times postinfection (7, 10, 52, 53, 55), has been taken as evidence that the ISVP is a necessary intermediate in reovirus infection. Indeed, the processing of virion proteins by one or more lysosomal cysteine proteases appears to be required for the infectivity of virions, but not ISVPs, in murine L-cell fibroblasts (1, 30). These results suggest that sigma 3 plays a key regulatory role in infection by reovirus virions: it stabilizes the outer capsid until the particle enters a suitable hydrolytic compartment along the endosomal-lysosomal pathway, where sigma 3 is degraded, and µ1/µ1C is cleaved to µ1delta /delta and phi  (43, 55). Membrane penetration, likely mediated by the cleavage products of µ1 (24-26, 37, 41, 43, 44, 57), can then ensue.

While it seems nearly certain that sigma 3 removal from reovirus virions is an obligatory step in entry into cells, the importance of the µ1/µ1C cleavage is less clear because it has not been experimentally separable from sigma 3 degradation (4, 7, 41). µ1, like the fusion proteins of enveloped viruses, probably undergoes structural rearrangements in order to interact with its target membrane during penetration (9, 39). It thus seems reasonable to hypothesize that the cleavage of µ1/µ1C into fragments µ1delta /delta and phi  is analogous to maturational cleavages that activate the fusion proteins of many enveloped viruses for membrane interaction, such as the cleavage of influenza virus hemagglutinin HA0 into fragments HA1 and HA2 (32). One possibility is that the cleavage of µ1/µ1C provides protein sequences on either side of the cleavage site with the conformational mobility needed to insert into the membrane bilayer during membrane disruption (41). In this report, we describe an investigation of the role played by the µ1/µ1C cleavage in reovirus infection.

    MATERIALS AND METHODS
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials & Methods
Results
Discussion
References

Reagents. All enzymes and chemicals were from Sigma Chemical Co. (St. Louis, Mo.) unless otherwise stated. Highly pure stocks of alkyl sulfate detergents were kindly provided by R. R. Rueckert (University of Madison---Wisconsin). Additional stocks of the alkyl sulfates sodium tetradecyl sulfate (14 carbons [14SO4]; Aldrich, Milwaukee, Wis.), sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) (12 carbons [12SO4], and sodium octyl sulfate (8 carbons [8SO4]) were also tested. Detergents from both sources gave identical results. Nucleotides were obtained from Pharmacia (Piscataway, N.J.), and [alpha -32P]GTP was obtained from Dupont NEN (Wilmington, Del.). RNasin was obtained from Promega (Madison, Wis.).

Cells and viruses. Spinner-adapted murine L cells were grown in suspension in Joklik's modified minimal essential medium (Irvine Scientific, Irvine, Calif.) supplemented to contain 2% fetal bovine serum, 2% neonatal bovine serum (HyClone Laboratories, Logan, Utah), 2 mM glutamine, and penicillin (1 U/ml)-streptomycin (1 µg/ml) (Irvine Scientific). Plaque assays to determine infectious titers were performed as described previously (22).

Preparation of purified virions. Purified virions of strain type 1 Lang (T1L) were obtained as described previously (41). Virion buffer contains 150 mM NaCl, 10 mM MgCl2, and 10 mM Tris (pH 7.5). Particle concentrations of purified virion preparations were measured as described previously (54). To generate purified virions containing [35S]methionine/cysteine-labeled proteins, Tran35S-label (12.5 µCi/ml; ICN Biochemicals, Costa Mesa, Calif.) was added to the virus-cell suspension at the initiation of infection. Specific activities of the labeled virions were approx 2 × 106 particles/cpm for Fig. 6B and 106 particles/cpm for all other experiments.

ISVPs and dpSVPs. ISVPs were prepared by digestion of virions with CHT as described previously (41). Detergent-plus-protease subvirion particles (dpSVPs) were also generated as described above except that detergents were included in the CHT digestion reactions. Inclusion of 2 mM SDS (12SO4) or 1 mM 14SO4 resulted in virus particles designated 12-dpSVPs and 14-dpSVPs, respectively. Terminated reactions were often prepared directly for SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (PAGE). Alternatively, reactions were diluted into phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) at room temperature and analyzed for infectious titers by plaque assay.

dpSVPs were purified from reaction mixtures as follows. CHT-detergent treatment mixtures originally containing 5 × 1012 T1L virions/ml were treated with phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, incubated at 4°C for 20 min, and centrifuged at 16,000 × g for 2 min to remove precipitated detergent. Supernatants were loaded atop 11-ml step gradients containing the following layers (from the bottom up): CsCl at 1.50 g/cm3 (3 ml), CsCl at 1.30 g/cm3 (2 ml), 20% (wt/vol) sucrose (3 ml), and 5% sucrose (3 ml). After centrifugation in a Beckman SW41 rotor at 25,000 rpm and 5°C for 2 h, dpSVPs could be recovered as an optically homogeneous band near the junction of the two CsCl layers. Particles were dialyzed into virion buffer and stored at 4°C. Particle concentrations were measured in the manner described previously for measuring ISVP concentrations (54).

Measurement of CMCs. To determine detergent critical micellar concentrations (CMCs) for different detergents in virion buffer at 37°C, we used the dye solubilization method of Vuillez-Le Normand and Eiselé (60). Assays were performed as described previously (60) except that (i) the dye was dried in microtubes by lyophilization and (ii) 200 µl of detergent was added to each tube to solubilize the dye. Solubilization was allowed to proceed for 16 to 24 h before 150-µl aliquots of each dilution were removed to a microplate and used to measure A595 in a microplate reader (Bio-Rad, Hercules, Calif.).

SDS-PAGE. Samples were prepared for SDS-PAGE as described previously (41). SDS-PAGE was carried out on 10% acrylamide gels, and proteins were visualized by staining with Coomassie brilliant blue. Gels loaded with radiolabeled proteins were dried onto filter paper and visualized with the PhosphorImager system (Molecular Dynamics, Sunnyvale, Calif.).

Single-step growth curves. T1L virions, ISVPs, or 14-dpSVPs were allowed to attach to L cells (2 × 107 cells/ml) suspended in growth medium at a multiplicity of infection (MOI) of 3 PFU/cell. Attachment was carried out with periodic mixing at 4°C for 1 h. The cell-virus suspension was sedimented at 400 × g at 4°C, and the cell pellet was washed with ice-cold PBS to remove unbound virus. Cells were resuspended in growth medium and dispensed into 2-dram (7.4-ml) glass vials at a density of 4 × 105 cells/vial. Vials were transferred to a 37°C incubator, and time points were taken by freezing individual vials at specified times. Duplicate vials were set up for each time point. Vials were subjected to freeze-thawing to generate cell lysates that were analyzed for infectious titers by plaque assay. Growth curves of reovirus particles in the presence of NH4Cl were generated in the same fashion except that 20 mM NH4Cl was included in the growth medium.

Endpoint experiments for infectivity. Growth of T1L virions, ISVPs, and 14-dpSVPs over a 24-h period in L cells was monitored in the absence and presence of inhibitors of virion infectivity. Experiments were set up as described for single-step growth curves, but only 0- and 24-h time points were collected for each particle type and drug treatment. NH4Cl (20 mM in virion buffer), and trans-epoxysuccinyl-L-leucylamido-(4-guanidino)butane (E-64; 300 µM in dimethyl sulfoxide) were the inhibitors used. Cells were incubated with 300 µM E-64 at 37°C for 1 h prior to virus attachment to maximize the inhibitory effect of this agent (29). Dimethyl sulfoxide alone did not significantly inhibit viral growth at the concentration (1%, vol/vol) used in these experiments (data not shown).

Determination of the extent of proteolysis of T1L virus particles within L cells. L-cell monolayers in 60-mm-diameter dishes were incubated at 4°C for 20 min, washed with ice-cold PBS, and then infected with purified [35S]methionine/cysteine-labeled virions or 14-dpSVPs at an MOI of 8 × 104 particles/cell. Virus attachment to cells was allowed to proceed for 2 h, after which unbound inoculum was removed by washing with PBS. Cells were overlaid with growth medium containing no drug, 20 mM NH4Cl, or 300 µM E-64 and incubated at 37°C for 4 h. A mock sample (no drug, 0-h incubation at 37°C) was also included for each particle type. At 0 or 4 h postinfection, cells were chilled, scraped into ice-cold lysis buffer (0.5% [vol/vol] Triton X-100, 140 mM NaCl, 10 mM Tris [pH 7.4]), and incubated on ice for 30 min. The cell lysates were then centrifuged at 940 × g for 10 min, and the resulting postnuclear supernatants were diluted into 9 volumes of ice-cold acetone. Precipitated protein was sedimented at 9,000 × g for 15 min, supernatants were decanted, and pellets were dried overnight under reduced pressure. The lyophilized protein was suspended in sample buffer and boiled briefly. Equal counts of radioactivity per lane were loaded onto a 10% acrylamide gel for SDS-PAGE.

Hemolysis experiments. The capacity of T1L virions, ISVPs, 14-dpSVPs, and cores to lyse erythrocytes (RBCs) was determined. Citrated bovine calf RBCs (Colorado Serum Co., Denver, Colo.) were washed with ice-cold PBS and suspended in PBS at a stock concentration of 30% just prior to use. Hemolysis reactions contained Tris-Cl (10 mM, pH 7.5), NaCl or CsCl (200 mM), RBCs (3%), and either purified virus particles (3 × 1012 particles/ml) or Triton X-100 (1%) in a total volume of 30 µl. Reactions were initiated by transfer to 37°C and terminated by removal onto ice after 40 min. Samples were centrifuged at 300 × g for 5 min, and 15 µl of the supernatant was diluted into 185 µl of virion buffer in a microplate (Costar, Cambridge, Mass.). The extent of hemoglobin release from RBCs was determined by measuring A415 with a microplate reader and expressed as a percentage (taking hemolysis induced by Triton X-100 to be 100%).

Transcriptase activation experiments. The transcriptase activity of T1L virions, ISVPs, 14-dpSVPs, and cores in the presence of NaCl or CsCl was measured in vitro as described previously (38) except that reaction mixtures included NaCl or CsCl (200 mM) and purified virus particles (3 × 1012 particles/ml) in a total volume of 30 µl. Reactions were initiated by transfer to 37°C and terminated by removal onto ice after 1 h. Each reaction volume was spotted onto a 3-mm-diameter cellulose paper circle (Whatman, Maidstone, England), and 32P-labeled transcripts were detected by trichloroacetic acid precipitation onto the filter followed by liquid scintillation counting (38).

    RESULTS
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials & Methods
Results
Discussion
References

SDS inhibits cleavage of µ1/µ1C by CHT. When virions of reovirus strain T1L were treated with CHT under defined conditions in vitro, the particles underwent processing to generate ISVPs (Fig. 1A), in that the sigma 3 protein was rapidly degraded into small peptides and the µ1/µ1C protein was cleaved in a more limited fashion to yield the stable fragments µ1delta /delta (63/59 kDa; N-terminal portions of µ1/µ1C) and phi  (13 kDa; C-terminal portion of µ1/µ1C, not resolved from the dye front in Fig. 1A but seen in other gels) (41). As expected, the T1L sigma 1 protein and proteins associated with the viral core were not cleaved.


View larger version (35K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 1.   Effect of SDS on cleavage of µ1/µ1C protein by CHT. (A) Purified 35S-labeled T1L virions (5 × 1012 particles/ml) were treated with CHT at 37°C for specified times. Viral proteins were resolved by SDS-PAGE and visualized by phosphorimaging to monitor cleavages of proteins sigma 3 and µ1/µ1C. (B) The experiment was performed exactly as for panel A except that SDS (2 mM) was included in the CHT digestion reactions. (C) To illustrate the rapid inhibitory action of SDS on µ1/µ1C cleavage, SDS (2 mM) was added to a single CHT digest of virions, 2 min after initiation of the reaction. Time points from 3 to 40 min were collected from this single digest, whereas 1- and 2-min time points were obtained from separate digests. (D) The gels in panels A to C were captured as bitmap files, and protein bands corresponding to delta  and sigma 2 were quantitated for each lane, using the ImageQuant program (Molecular Dynamics). The band intensity of delta  was divided by the corresponding intensity of sigma 2 in the same lane, to correct for variations in gel loading. The relative band intensity of delta  band is plotted against time of CHT digestion for gels in panels A (square ), B (open circle ), and (down-triangle). In panels A to C, a reference lane was loaded with untreated virions (V).

Different results were obtained when the treatment was performed in the presence of 2 mM SDS (Fig. 1B). In that case, degradation of sigma 3 was accelerated, as indicated by the failure to detect intact sigma 3 or sigma 3-containing peptides after 1 min of CHT digestion. In addition, the T1L sigma 1 protein was made newly sensitive to CHT cleavage by the presence of SDS. In contrast to the SDS-enhanced degradation of sigma 3 and sigma 1, the CHT-mediated cleavage of µ1/µ1C was blocked by SDS. Even after 60 min of treatment, the amount of uncleaved µ1/µ1C remained unchanged and the amount of delta  fragment was no greater than the small amount normally found in purified virions. The reovirus core proteins remained resistant to CHT cleavage in the presence of SDS (Fig. 1B). Similar results were obtained for strains type 2 Jones, type 3 Dearing, and type 3 clone 9 (data not shown) except that the sigma 1 protein of type 3 Dearing was sensitive to CHT cleavage in the absence of SDS, as previously reported (40). Thus, the capacity of SDS to block µ1/µ1C cleavage by CHT during the generation of ISVPs is common to strains representing the three known serotypes of mammalian reoviruses.

Inhibition of µ1/µ1C cleavage is not explained by a gradual reduction in CHT activity. The observation that 2 mM SDS enhanced cleavage of sigma 3 and sigma 1 (Fig. 1B) suggested that its capacity to block cleavage of µ1/µ1C could not be explained by a general inhibition of CHT activity. Nonetheless, since µ1/µ1C cleavage begins later in the time course and proceeds at a slower pace (Fig. 1A), it was possible that its inhibition by SDS reflected a gradual reduction in CHT activity in the presence of detergent. To address this possibility, we performed experiments in which CHT treatment of T1L virions was begun without SDS. SDS (2 mM) was then added to the reaction after 2 min of digestion, when sigma 3 had been degraded into small peptides but only about 40% of µ1/µ1C had been cleaved. In this case, it was observed that cleavage of µ1/µ1C ceased immediately upon addition of SDS, at the same time that sigma 1 was made newly sensitive to degradation (Fig. 1C and D). These findings provide evidence that the inhibition of µ1/µ1C cleavage by SDS is not a consequence of gradual reduction in CHT activity.

Micelles of alkyl sulfate detergents are needed for inhibiting µ1/µ1C cleavage by CHT. Reasoning that chemical relatives of SDS might also inhibit µ1/µ1C cleavage, we examined the capacities of alkyl sulfate detergents with different carbon chain lengths to block µ1/µ1C cleavage. Like SDS (12SO4), 14SO4, decyl sulfate (10 carbons [10SO4]), and 8SO4 were found to block µ1/µ1C cleavage by CHT without slowing the cleavage of sigma 3 (data not shown). However, dose-response curves indicated that the inhibition of cleavage titrated at a different concentration range for each alkyl sulfate. Specifically, the concentrations of alkyl sulfate required for half-maximal inhibition of the µ1/µ1C cleavage (IC50) were found to be 0.16 (±0.03 [standard deviation {SD}]) mM for 14SO4, 0.58 (±0.03) mM for 12SO4, 4.5 (±0.03) mM for 10SO4, and 24 (±0.9) mM for 8SO4 (Fig. 2B). Each of these concentrations approximated the CMC of the respective detergent (54) at conditions similar to those used for CHT treatment, suggesting that detergent micelles are required for blocking µ1/µ1C cleavage.


View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 2.   Concentrations of alkyl sulfate detergents required to inhibit µ1/µ1C cleavage by CHT. (A) Purified 35S-labeled reovirus T1L virions (5 × 1011 particles/ml) were digested with CHT at 37°C for 20 min in the presence of different concentrations of 12SO4. Viral proteins were resolved by SDS-PAGE, and visualized by phosphorimaging. CHT digestion reactions of virions in the presence of 8SO4, 10SO4, or 14SO4 were performed in a similar fashion (data not shown). (B) From the preceding gels, the intensity of the delta  band divided by that of the sigma 2 band was calculated for each concentration of detergent and used as a measure of the extent of µ1/µ1C cleavage. delta /sigma 2 ratios were normalized to unity and plotted against detergent concentration. Representative detergent dose-response curves are shown for 8SO4, 10SO4, 12SO4, and 14SO4. CMC values independently measured for each of these detergents in virion buffer at 37°C are displayed as dotted vertical lines. (C) The dose-response curves in panel B were generated in triplicate, and each curve was separately fit to a logistic equation by using SigmaPlot software (SPSS, Chicago, Ill.) to calculate the IC50. The average of the log10 IC50 is plotted against the average of the log10 CMC for each detergent. Error bars for both x and y axes are shown but are embedded within the markers. The line corresponding to exact correlation between detergent CMC and IC50 is shown.

To confirm the involvement of detergent micelles in the inhibition of µ1/µ1C cleavage, we measured the CMC of each detergent at the same conditions used for CHT treatment (in virion buffer at 37°C) (58). The values were determined to be 0.11 (±0.02) mM for 14SO4, 0.54 (±0.03) mM for 12SO4, 5.1 (±0.1) mM for 10SO4, and 28 (±4) mM for 8SO4 (Fig. 2B), which are very similar to the IC50s for inhibition of µ1/µ1C cleavage by each detergent (Fig. 2B and C). These findings strongly suggest that the alkyl sulfates must form micelles before blocking the cleavage of µ1/µ1C at the delta -phi junction. The results also indicate that, within the tested limits, the length of its carbon chain does not affect the capacity of an alkyl sulfate to block µ1/µ1C cleavage, except insofar as chain length affects CMC. The same concentrations of 12SO4, 10SO4, and 8SO4 that blocked µ1/µ1C cleavage also made the T1L sigma 1 protein sensitive to CHT cleavage. Thus, micelles of these detergents appear to be required for enhancing sigma 1 cleavage as well. 14SO4 was the only alkyl sulfate tested that did not render the T1L sigma 1 protein sensitive to CHT cleavage (see below).

Purification of dpSVPs. To characterize the particles generated by detergent and CHT treatments (dpSVPs), we isolated them by centrifugation through sucrose-CsCl gradients. We then examined the protein contents of purified dpSVPs by SDS-PAGE and found them to be as expected from previous analyses of raw digests. Thus, 12-dpSVPs contained degraded sigma 3 and sigma 1 but uncleaved µ1/µ1C, while 14-dpSVPs contained degraded sigma 3 but uncleaved sigma 1 and µ1/µ1C (Fig. 3). When these particles were used as substrates for a second round of CHT treatment, the µ1/µ1C protein was cleaved to yield the fragments µ1delta /delta (Fig. 3) and phi  (data not shown), providing evidence that each detergent was removed from the particles during purification and that the inhibition of µ1/µ1C cleavage by each detergent is reversible.


View larger version (51K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 3.   In vitro treatment of purified dpSVPs with CHT. Purified aliquots of T1L virions, 12-dpSVPs, and 14-dpSVPs at 5 × 1012 particles/ml were left untreated or digested with CHT for 10 min at 37°C. Viral proteins were resolved by SDS-PAGE and visualized by Coomassie brilliant blue staining.

Infectivity of dpSVPs. To determine whether dpSVPs might be useful for studies of reovirus entry into cells, we measured the infectivities of different purified preparations of virions and their CHT-generated dpSVPs. Comparing the plaque titer with the particle concentration of each purified preparation yielded a ratio for the number of particles per PFU of each (Table 1). In summary, these experiments showed that the purified 14-dpSVPs retained full infectivity relative to virions. In contrast, the infectivity of purified 12-dpSVPs was greatly reduced. The loss of infectivity observed upon CHT and 12SO4 treatment correlated with the cleavage of sigma 1.

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 1.   Infectivities of purified dpSVPs

We also measured the infectivities of dpSVPs directly from raw digests. T1L virions in the presence of no detergent, 2 mM 12SO4, or 1 mM 14SO4 were incubated with CHT over a time course, and aliquots were removed at intervals for determining infectivity (Fig. 4). To confirm that the protein contents of the particles were as expected, namely, ISVPs or dpSVPs according to the digestion conditions, samples from each series were also analyzed by SDS-PAGE (data not shown). T1L ISVPs and 14-dpSVPs exhibited little change in infectivity over the time course (Fig. 4). In contrast, 12-dpSVPs rapidly lost infectivity, dropping to about 0.001 times the starting titer by 10 min. As noted above, the maintenance of infectivity in 14SO4 and its loss in 12SO4 correlated with the sensitivity of protein sigma 1 to cleavage by CHT (Fig. 1B and C). Since treatments with 14SO4 and CHT had no adverse effects on infectivity, we used 14-dpSVPs for further studies of reovirus entry.


View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 4.   Infectivity of dpSVPs in raw digests measured as a function of time. Purified T1L virions (5 × 1012 particles/ml) were incubated with CHT (open circle ), CHT plus 14SO4 (1 mM) (triangle ), or CHT plus 12SO4 (2 mM) (square ) at 37°C over a time course. Reactions were terminated at specified times, and infectious titers were determined by plaque assay. Each point represents an average of two independent log10 PFU/milliliter determinations (SD < 0.30 log10 PFU/ml). The infectious titer of untreated virions was obtained from three independent determinations and is depicted as the mean log10 PFU/milliliter value at 0 min (diamond ).

Growth curves with 14-dpSVPs. ISVPs differ from virions in several biochemical characteristics, including the absence of sigma 3, the cleavage of µ1/µ1C into fragments µ1delta /delta and phi , and an apparent change in sigma 1 protein conformation (19). In addition, ISVPs differ from virions in several properties relating to entry into cells, which must be attributable to one or more of these biochemical differences (reviewed in reference 42). One such difference is that ISVPs exhibit a shortened lag phase in their single-cycle growth curve relative to virions (5, 13, 55). A likely basis for this difference is the requirement for sigma 3 to be removed from virions by lysosomal proteases (30, 55, 59). ISVPs, having already lost sigma 3 in vitro, can bypass this proteolytic step and presumably gain access to the cytoplasm of the host cell earlier than virions. In addition to sigma 3 degradation, virions also undergo µ1/µ1C cleavage at early times of infection, whereas this cleavage has already been effected in vitro during generation of ISVPs (41). A requirement for µ1/µ1C cleavage during viral entry may also contribute to virions having a longer lag phase in their growth curve than ISVPs.

To determine the contribution of µ1/µ1C cleavage to the more rapid growth of ISVPs, we compared single-cycle growth curves generated in parallel for T1L virions, ISVPs, and 14-dpSVPs. The results confirmed the difference in growth kinetics between virions and ISVPs and also demonstrated that the growth kinetics of ISVPs and 14-dpSVPs are very similar, despite their difference in µ1/µ1C cleavage (Fig. 5). These findings suggest that the cleavage of µ1/µ1C into fragments µ1delta /delta and phi  during viral entry into host cells contributes little or nothing to the shortened lag phase of ISVPs.


View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 5.   Single-step growth curves of 14-dpSVPs in L cells. L-cell monolayers were infected with purified T1L virions, ISVPs, or 14-dpSVPs at an MOI of 3 PFU/cell and harvested at different times postinfection. The infectious titer in each sample was measured by plaque assay. Each point represents the average of two independent log10 PFU/milliliter determinations (SD < 0.50 log10 PFU/ml for all time points).

Infectivity of 14-dpSVPs in the presence of NH4Cl or E-64. Another property in which virions and ISVPs differ is that ISVPs can replicate in the presence of NH4Cl or E-64, while virions cannot (30, 55). The evidence indicates that these agents block infectivity by blocking the cleavage of outer-capsid proteins during infection with virions, and that they in turn have no effect on the infectivity of ISVPs because cleavage of the outer-capsid proteins has already been effected in vitro with those particles. The capacity of NH4Cl and E-64 to block removal of sigma 3 from virions during entry almost certainly contributes to the sensitivity of virions to these compounds (42, 43, 55). However, because sigma 3 removal is prerequisite for µ1/µ1C cleavage to occur, experiments to date (4, 37) have been unable to assess conclusively whether the latter cleavage makes any significant contribution to the capacity of ISVPs to replicate in the presence of NH4Cl or E-64.

To test the contribution of µ1/µ1C cleavage to the capacity of ISVPs to replicate in the presence of either NH4Cl or E-64, we measured the infectivities of T1L virions, ISVPs, and 14-dpSVPs in the presence of these agents. The results confirmed the effects of NH4Cl and E-64 on infections by virions or ISVPs and also showed that 14-dpSVPs, like ISVPs, retain full infectivity in the presence of these compounds (Fig. 6A). In addition, single-cycle growth curves determined for ISVPs and 14-dpSVPs in the presence of NH4Cl (data not shown) were virtually identical, allowing us to rule out the possibility that these compounds can affect the time course of infection by 14-dpSVPs without reducing the final yield of viral progeny. Since not even a minor difference in the responses of 14-dpSVPs and ISVPs to NH4Cl was observed, the findings suggest that the cleavage of µ1/µ1C into fragments µ1delta /delta and phi  during viral entry contributes little or nothing to the capacity of ISVPs to replicate in the presence of NH4Cl.


View larger version (27K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 6.   Infectivity of 14-dpSVPs in L cells in the absence and presence of NH4Cl or E-64. (A) T1L virions, ISVPs, or 14-dpSVPs were used to infect L-cell monolayers at an MOI of 3 PFU/cell in the absence and presence of NH4Cl (20 mM) or E-64 (300 µM) in the cell growth medium. Samples were harvested at 24 h postinfection (hpi), and infectious titers were measured by plaque assay. Each bar is the mean log10 PFU/milliliter derived from three independent experiments. (B) Intracellular proteolysis of reovirus particles during infection in L cells. L-cell monolayers were infected with purified 35S-labeled T1L virions or 14-dpSVPs at an MOI of 8 × 104 particles/cell, with NH4Cl (20 mM) or E-64 (300 µM) absent or present in the cell growth medium, and incubated at 37°C for 4 h. Proteins present in cytoplasmic extracts prepared from these samples were resolved by SDS-PAGE, and viral proteins were visualized by phosphorimaging. Reference lanes loaded with untreated virions and 14-dpSVPs are also shown.

Cleavage of µ1/µ1C protein during infection of L cells with 14-dpSVPs. The capacity of 14-dpSVPs to initiate infection of L cells in the presence of either NH4Cl or E-64 suggested that cleavage of µ1/µ1C at the delta -phi junction during entry is not required for reovirus infection of these cells. It remained possible, however, that µ1/µ1C cleavage continues to occur during infections with 14-dpSVPs even in the presence of NH4Cl or E-64. For example, µ1/µ1C cleavage might be mediated by a cellular protease that does not require low pH and is not inhibited by E-64. If so, then µ1/µ1C cleavage within cells might yet be required for infection. To test whether µ1/µ1C cleavage occurs during infections with 14-dpSVPs, with or without NH4Cl or E-64 being present, we used radiolabeled virions and 14-dpSVPs to initiate infection in the presence or absence of each inhibitor, recovered the radiolabeled particles at 4 h postinfection, and used SDS-PAGE to monitor the extent of µ1/µ1C cleavage (Fig. 6B). The gels showed that with either virions or 14-dpSVPs, cleavage of µ1/µ1C to generate the µ1delta /delta fragment occurred normally in the absence of inhibitors but was substantially reduced by either NH4Cl or E-64 (Fig. 6B). In fact, little or no additional cleavage of µ1/µ1C was observed even at 10 h postinfection in the presence of these agents (data not shown). Since either NH4Cl or E-64 was capable of greatly reducing the extent of µ1/µ1C cleavage within cells, but 14-dpSVPs remained fully infectious in the presence of each inhibitor, these findings strongly suggest that the cleavage of µ1/µ1C at the delta -phi junction during viral entry is dispensable for reovirus infection of L cells.

Infectivity of 14-dpSVPs in MDCK cells. To determine whether the infective properties of 14-dpSVPs were unique to L cells, we performed an experiment similar to that shown in Fig. 6A, but this time using MDCK cells. The behaviors of T1L virions, ISVPs, and 14-dpSVPs were determined in parallel for comparison. The results showed that E-64 was as effective at blocking infection with virions in MDCK cells as in L cells (Fig. 7). In addition, again as in L cells, E-64 was incapable of blocking infection with either ISVPs or 14-dpSVPs in MDCK cells (Fig. 7). These findings strongly suggest that the cleavage of µ1/µ1C at the delta -phi junction during viral entry is dispensable for infection of MDCK cells as well and raise the possibility that this cleavage is dispensable for infection of all cells. Similar studies were attempted with NH4Cl but could not be adequately completed due to the high concentrations of this compound that were needed to block infection of MDCK cells with virions (data not shown).


View larger version (33K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 7.   Infectivity of 14-dpSVPs in MDCK cells in the absence and presence of NH4Cl or E-64. The infectivities of purified T1L virions, ISVPs, or 14-dpSVPs in MDCK cells in the absence or presence of E-64 (300 µM) were determined exactly as for Fig. 6A except that MDCK cells were substituted for the L cells. Each bar represents an average log10 PFU/milliliter derived from three independent experiments. hpi, hours postinfection.

Capacity of 14-dpSVPs to mediate hemolysis of RBCs. To initiate infection, reovirus particles must penetrate a cellular membrane in a process involving µ1 and/or one or more of its fragments, thereby gaining access to the host cell's cytoplasm (24-26, 37, 41, 43, 44, 57). The capacity of 14-dpSVPs to replicate normally in L or MDCK cells at conditions that resulted in substantial blockade of µ1/µ1C cleavage provided indirect evidence that cleavage of µ1/µ1C during entry is dispensable for membrane penetration. To test the role of µ1/µ1C cleavage in membrane penetration more directly, we examined the capacity of virions, ISVPs, 14-dpSVPs, and cores to permeabilize lipid bilayers in vitro, using a hemolysis assay. In the presence of NaCl, none of the reovirus particle types demonstrated lysis of RBCs (Fig. 8A). However, when NaCl was replaced by CsCl, which is known to activate reovirus ISVPs for interaction with lipid bilayers (39, 57), ISVPs but not virions or cores induced hemolysis as expected (Fig. 8A). 14-dpSVPs induced hemolysis under the same conditions and to a similar extent as ISVPs (Fig. 8A), providing additional evidence that µ1/µ1C cleavage at the delta -phi junction during viral entry is dispensable for membrane penetration by mammalian reoviruses.


View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 8.   Capacity of 14-dpSVPs to effect hemolysis and undergo activation of the virus-bound transcriptase. (A) Bovine calf RBCs were incubated with purified T1L virions, ISVPs, 14-dpSVPs, or cores (3 × 1012 particles/ml) at 37°C for 1 h in the presence of NaCl or CsCl (200 mM). The extent of hemolysis was determined by measuring A415 and expressed as a percentage (taking hemolysis induced by Triton X-100 to be 100%). Each bar represents the average ± SD for three trials. (B) Purified T1L virions, ISVPs, 14-dpSVPs, or cores (3 × 1012 particles/ml) were incubated with a transcription reaction mixture including ribonucleoside triphosphates (2 mM each) and [alpha -32P]GTP (2.25 µCi) at 37°C for 1 h in the presence of NaCl or CsCl (200 mM). 32P incorporation into reovirus transcripts was quantified by trichloroacetic acid precipitation onto filter paper followed by liquid scintillation counting. Each bar represents the average ± SD for three trials.

Capacity of 14-dpSVPs to undergo transcriptase activation. In conjunction with viral entry, the particle-bound viral transcriptase activity must be switched on, allowing viral mRNAs to be synthesized in the cytoplasm of the infected cell (7, 43). The infectivity of 14-dpSVPs in L or MDCK cells in the presence of NH4Cl or E-64 suggested that cleavage of µ1/µ1C during viral entry is not necessary for infecting reovirus particles to undergo transcriptase activation. To test the role of µ1/µ1C cleavage in transcriptase activation more directly, we examined the capacity of T1L virions, ISVPs, 14-dpSVPs, and cores to undergo transcriptase activation in vitro. As expected, cores, which possess a constitutively active transcriptase, displayed transcriptase activity in the presence of either NaCl or CsCl (Fig. 8B). ISVPs exhibited transcriptase activity upon addition of CsCl but not NaCl, Cs+ being an activating monovalent cation (8), while virions were inactive in the presence of either NaCl or CsCl (Fig. 8B). 14-dpSVPs underwent switch-on of transcriptase activity at the same conditions and to a similar extent as ISVPs (Fig. 8B), providing additional evidence that cleavage of µ1/µ1C to µ1delta /delta and phi  during viral entry is dispensable for transcriptase activation.

    DISCUSSION
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials & Methods
Results
Discussion
References

Is µ1/µ1C cleavage required for membrane penetration by mammalian reoviruses? Genetic and biochemical evidence indicates that the reovirus µ1 protein is involved in membrane penetration during viral entry into cells, perhaps via direct interactions with the membrane bilayer. For example, only ISVPs (which have µ1 and its fragments as the major surface proteins) can permeabilize lipid bilayers in in vitro assays, and they do so in a manner genetically controlled by the M2 gene, which encodes µ1 (25, 26, 37, 39, 43, 57). Since proteolytic processing of certain proteins is required for penetration into their host cells by a number of enveloped and nonenveloped viruses (see the introduction), the cleavage of µ1/µ1C at the delta -phi junction, which normally accompanies the degradation of sigma 3 during viral entry, was thought to be necessary for membrane penetration by these viruses (41). In this study, however, we demonstrated that µ1/µ1C cleavage during entry is dispensable for reovirus infection and that particles with uncleaved µ1/µ1C (14-dpSVPs) can permeabilize lipid bilayers in vitro with a similar efficacy as particles with cleaved µ1/µ1C (ISVPs), suggesting that this cleavage may not be required for membrane penetration.

Structural features of µ1 consistent with a role in membrane interaction include the modification of its N terminus with a myristoyl group (44) and the presence of several predicted amphipathic alpha -helices, including one pair that flanks the cleavage junction between fragments µ1delta /delta and phi  in ISVPs (41). Such findings have engendered a model for membrane penetration in which µ1 is analogous to the fusion proteins of enveloped viruses (41). Features of that model include the interaction of the N-myristoyl group and the amphipathic alpha -helices described above with cellular membranes during entry. The model also predicted that cleavage of protein µ1/µ1C to µ1delta /delta and phi  is required to remove existing conformational restraints on µ1, as seen with the influenza virus protein hemagglutinin (27), allowing one or both of the helices that flank the delta -phi cleavage junction to partition into the target membrane. Our current results suggest that the cleavage aspect of the preceding model is incorrect.

While it is possible that the amphipathic alpha -helices predicted to flank the delta -phi junction do not really exist or are not involved in membrane penetration, findings with the bacterial toxin colicin A (14) suggest another model in which these helices may interact with membrane in a cleavage-independent manner. In the case of colicin A, two amphipathic alpha  helices joined by a short connector loop (47) constitute the initial membrane insertion domain (33). This helix-loop-helix structure is inserted into the target membrane upon an acid-triggered conformational change in the pore-forming domain of the colicin protein (58), without necessity for a proteolytic cleavage within the loop to free the helices for membrane insertion. A similar mechanism is used by diphtheria toxin (46). More detailed biochemical studies of membrane interaction by µ1 are warranted to determine whether this or some other model for membrane penetration is most applicable to reovirus entry into cells.

Is µ1/µ1C cleavage required for transcriptase activation? The reovirus transcriptase enzymes, which are responsible for the synthesis of mRNAs during viral replication, are located within the inner capsid of the reovirus particle (18, 50). The capacity of these enzymes to synthesize full-length mRNAs is latent in virions and ISVPs but active in core particles derived by in vitro protease treatment of virions or ISVPs (see references 45 and 50 for reviews). A strain difference in the treatment conditions needed to generate cores and activate transcript elongation was mapped to the M2 gene, suggesting that µ1 plays a regulatory role in the switch-on of transcriptase activity (15). According to a current model, virions undergo transcriptase activation via two steps (7, 21, 43). In the first step, virions undergo proteolysis to ISVPs. Then, protease-independent structural changes in µ1, which we believe are linked to membrane penetration (45), yield transcriptionally active particles. Since cleavage of the µ1/µ1C protein at the delta -phi junction normally accompanies the first, protease-dependent step, it has been speculated (6, 21, 43) that this cleavage may be necessary for the conformational changes in µ1 that yield transcriptase activation. However, our results indicating that cleavage at the delta -phi junction during entry is dispensable for infection and that 14-dpSVPs can undergo transcriptase activation in vitro suggest that this cleavage is not necessary for the switch-on of reovirus transcription.

Why is µ1/µ1C cleavage conserved among reoviruses? Despite the evidence presented in this study, cleavage of µ1/µ1C to generate the µ1delta /delta fragment is highly conserved among all three serotypes of mammalian reoviruses. This conservation also extends to the genetically distinct avian reoviruses, which exhibit similar entry-related cleavages in µ2, the polypeptide analogous to µ1 in those viruses (20). It is thus possible that cleavage at the delta -phi junction during entry is required for infection of host mammals in nature. Alternatively, this cleavage may simply reflect some structural aspect of µ1 that is essential for one or more of its functions. For example, the delta -phi cleavage site may lie within a solvent-exposed loop whose exposure and flexibility is vital for µ1 function. Sites within this loop that are susceptible to protease cleavage during reovirus entry may not be subject to negative selection because, as we showed in this study, cleavage in this region of µ1/µ1C has a neutral effect on viral infectivity.

How do alkyl sulfate detergents inhibit µ1/µ1C cleavage? Earlier studies of the effects of alkyl sulfate detergents on reovirus virions concluded that SDS (1%) elutes sigma 3 from particles without observable effects on other polypeptides (16, 17). The effect of detergent treatment on the proteolytic digestion of virion proteins was not investigated. We now report that the simultaneous treatment of virions with micelle-forming concentrations of alkyl sulfate detergent and protease affects not only sigma 3 but also sigma 1 and µ1/µ1C, two other components of the outer capsid; however, the nature of these effects is not the same for all three polypeptides. In particular, sigma 3 is rendered hypersensitive to protease digestion, and sigma 1, normally resistant to protease treatment in the case of T1L, is newly sensitized to protease cleavage by all but one of the alkyl sulfates tested. The capacity of alkyl sulfates to enhance the protease sensitivity of sigma 3 and sigma 1 is as one might expect for these known protein denaturants. In contrast, the cleavage of µ1/µ1C to µ1delta /delta and phi , which normally occurs upon addition of protease, is completely but reversibly blocked by alkyl sulfates. Denaturation of viral proteins by detergent is unlikely to account for the reversible blockade of a specific proteolytic cleavage.

To account for the blockade of µ1/µ1C cleavage by alkyl sulfates, we propose a model in which detergent micelles bind to the viral outer capsid without causing global protein denaturation. Bound micelles may block the µ1/µ1C cleavage either by directly excluding protease molecules from their recognition sites on the viral surface or by eliciting conformational changes in the outer capsid that render these sites inaccessible to protease. The postulated virus-detergent interactions appear to represent a special case of intrinsic binding cooperativity as defined by Tanford (56), where a protein has a hydrophobic loop or tail that can serve either as a nucleus for the formation of an amphiphilic micelle or as a target for the insertion of preformed micelles. Because protein µ1 is a major component of the outer capsid (600 copies) and suffers blockade of cleavage by the detergent, we consider it likely that the regions of the viral particle involved in detergent interaction are located in µ1. Virus-micelle binding may mimic early phases of the µ1-phospholipid membrane interaction postulated to occur during viral entry. For example, a reversible surface-seeking interaction between reovirus ISVPs and phospholipid membranes, mediated by a constitutively exposed region of the µ1 protein, may occur during the initial phases of membrane penetration before extensive conformational changes in the ISVP have taken place. We are currently designing experiments to address these hypotheses.

    ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We thank Rebecca Margraf and Stephan Harrison for technical assistance; Michael Parsons, Rebecca Leidner, and Xiu-Hua Zhou for laboratory support; and the other members of our laboratory for helpful discussions. We are also grateful to Simon Noble, Roland Rueckert, and Leslie Schiff for critical reviews of a preliminary version of the manuscript.

This work was supported by NIH grant R29 AI39533 and by a grant to the Institute for Molecular Virology from the Lucille P. Markey Charitable Trust. M.L.N. received additional support as a Shaw Scientist from the Milwaukee Foundation. K.C. was additionally supported by predoctoral fellowships from the Wisconsin Alumni Research Foundation and the Howard Hughes Medical Institute.

    FOOTNOTES

* Corresponding author. Mailing address: 1525 Linden Dr., Madison, WI 53706. Phone: (608) 262-4536. Fax: (608) 262-7414. E-mail: MLNIBERT{at}FACSTAFF.WISC.EDU.

    REFERENCES
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials & Methods
Results
Discussion
References

1. Baer, G. S., and T. S. Dermody. 1997. Mutations in reovirus outer-capsid protein sigma 3 selected during persistent infections of L cells confer resistance to protease inhibitor E64. J. Virol. 71:4921-4928[Abstract].
2. Bass, D., M. R. Baylor, C. Chen, E. M. Mackow, M. Bremont, and H. B. Greenberg. 1992. Liposome-mediated transfection of intact viral particles reveals that membrane penetration determines permissivity of tissue culture cells to rotavirus. J. Clin. Invest. 90:2313-2320.
3. Blumenthal, R., P. Seth, M. C. Willingham, and I. Pastan. 1986. pH dependent lysis of liposomes by adenovirus. Biochemistry 25:2231-2237[Medline].
4. Bodkin, D. K., M. L. Nibert, and B. N. Fields. 1989. Proteolytic digestion of reovirus in the intestinal lumens of neonatal mice. J. Virol. 63:4676-4681[Abstract/Free Full Text].
5. Borsa, J., T. P. Copps, M. D. Sargent, D. G. Long, and J. D. Chapman. 1973. New intermediate subviral particles in the in vitro uncoating of reovirus virions by chymotrypsin. J. Virol. 11:552-564[Abstract/Free Full Text].
6. Borsa, J., D. G. Long, M. D. Sargent, T. P. Copps, and J. D. Chapman. 1974. Reovirus transcriptase activation in vitro: involvement of an endogenous uncoating activity in the second stage of the process. Intervirology 4:171-188[Medline].
7. Borsa, J., M. D. Sargent, P. A. Lievaart, and T. P. Copps. 1981. Reovirus: evidence for a second step in the intracellular uncoating and transcriptase activation process. Virology 111:191-200[Medline].
8. Borsa, J., M. D. Sargent, D. G. Long, and J. D. Chapman. 1973. Extraordinary effects of specific monovalent cations on activation of reovirus transcriptase by chymotrypsin in vitro. J. Virol. 11:207-217[Abstract/Free Full Text].
9. Chandran, K., and M. L. Nibert. Unpublished data.
10. Chang, C. T., and H. J. Zweerink. 1971. Fate of parental reovirus in infected cell. Virology 46:544-555[Medline].
11. Clark, S. M., J. R. Roth, M. L. Clark, B. B. Barnett, and E. S. Spendlove. 1981. Trypsin enhancement of rotavirus infectivity. J. Virol. 39:816-822[Abstract/Free Full Text].
12. Cleveland, D. R., H. Zarbl, and S. Millward. 1986. Reovirus guanylyltransferase is L2 gene product lambda 2. J. Virol. 60:307-311[Abstract/Free Full Text].
13. Cox, D. C., and W. Clinkscales. 1976. Infectious reovirus subviral particles: virus replication, cellular cytopathology, and DNA synthesis. Virology 74:259-261[Medline].
14. Cramer, W. A., F. S. Cohen, A. R. Merrill, and H. Y. Song. 1990. Structure and dynamics of the colicin E1 channel. Mol. Microbiol. 4:519-526[Medline].
15. Drayna, D., and B. N. Fields. 1982. Activation and characterization of the reovirus transcriptase: genetic analysis. J. Virol. 41:110-118[Abstract/Free Full Text].
16. Drayna, D., and B. N. Fields. 1982. Biochemical studies on the mechanism of chemical and physical inactivation of reovirus. J. Gen. Virol. 63:161-170[Abstract/Free Full Text].
17. Drayna, D., and B. N. Fields. 1982. Genetic studies on the mechanism of chemical and physical inactivation of reovirus. J. Gen. Virol. 63:149-159[Abstract/Free Full Text].
18. Dryden, K. A., D. L. Farsetta, G.-J. Wang, J. M. Keegan, B. N. Fields, T. S. Baker, and M. L. Nibert. Submitted for publication.
19. Dryden, K. A., G. Wang, M. Yeager, M. L. Nibert, K. M. Coombs, D. B. Furlong, B. N. Fields, and T. S. Baker. 1993. Early steps in reovirus infection are associated with dramatic changes in supramolecular structure and protein conformation: analysis of virions and subviral particles by cryoelectron microscopy and image reconstruction. J. Cell Biol. 122:1023-1041[Abstract/Free Full Text].
20. Duncan, R. 1996. The low pH-dependent entry of avian reovirus is accomplished by two specific cleavages of the major outer capsid protein µ2C. Virology 29:179-189.
21. Ewing, D. D., M. D. Sargent, and J. Borsa. 1985. Switch-on of transcriptase function in reovirus: analysis of polypeptide changes using 2-D gels. Virology 144:448-456[Medline].
22. Furlong, D. B., M. L. Nibert, and B. N. Fields. 1988. sigma 1 protein of mammalian reoviruses extends from the surfaces of viral particles. J. Virol. 62:246-256[Abstract/Free Full Text].
23. Greber, U. F., P. Webster, J. Weber, and A. Helenius. 1996. The role of the adenovirus protease on virus entry into cells. EMBO J. 15:1766-1777[Medline].
24. Hazelton, P. R., and K. C. Coombs. 1995. The reovirus mutant tsA279 has temperature-sensitive lesions in the L2 and M2 genes: the M2 gene is associated with decreased viral protein production and blockade in transmembrane transport. Virology 207:46-58[Medline].
25. Hooper, J. W., and B. N. Fields. 1996. Monoclonal antibodies to reovirus sigma 1 and µ1 proteins inhibit chromium release from mouse L cells. J. Virol. 70:672-677[Abstract].
26. Hooper, J. W., and B. N. Fields. 1996. Role of the µ1 protein in reovirus stability and capacity to cause chromium release from host cells. J. Virol. 70:459-467[Abstract].
27. Hughson, F. M. 1995. Structural characterization of viral fusion proteins. Curr. Biol. 5:265-274[Medline].
28. Joklik, W. K. 1985. Recent progress in reovirus research. Annu. Rev. Genet. 19:537-575[Medline].
29. Joklik, W. K. 1972. Studies on the effect of chymotrypsin on reovirions. Virology 49:700-801[Medline].
30. Jones, L., K. Subramanian, R. Margraf, B. N. Fields, and M. L. Nibert. Submitted for publication.
31. Kaljot, K. T., R. D. Shaw, D. H. Rubin, and H. B. Greenberg. 1988. Infectious rotavirus enters cells by direct cell membrane penetration, not by endocytosis. J. Virol. 62:1136-1144[Abstract/Free Full Text].
32. Klenk, H. D., R. Rott, M. Orlich, and J. Blodorn. 1975. Activation of influenza A viruses by trypsin treatment. Virology 68:426-439[Medline].
33. Lakey, J. H., D. Massotte, F. Heitz, J. L. Dasseux, J. F. Faucon, M. W. Parker, and F. Pattus. 1991. Membrane insertion of the pore-forming domain of colicin A. A spectroscopic study. Eur. J. Biochem. 196:599-607[Medline].
34. Lee, P. W., E. C. Hayes, and W. K. Joklik. 1981. Protein sigma 1 is the reovirus cell attachment protein. Virology 108:156-163[Medline].
35. Lee, W.-M., S. S. Monroe, and R. R. Rueckert. 1993. Role of maturation cleavage in infectivity of picornaviruses: activation of an infectosome. J. Virol. 67:2110-2122[Abstract/Free Full Text].
36. Lobigs, M., and H. Garoff. 1990. Fusion function of the Semliki Forest virus spike is activated by proteolytic cleavage of the envelope glycoprotein precursor p62. J. Virol. 64:1233-1240[Abstract/Free Full Text].
37. Lucia-Jandris, P., J. W. Hooper, and B. N. Fields. 1993. Reovirus M2 gene is associated with chromium release from mouse L cells. J. Virol. 67:5339-5345[Abstract/Free Full Text].
38. Luongo, C. L., K. A. Dryden, D. L. Farsetta, R. L. Margraf, T. F. Severson, N. H. Olson, B. N. Fields, T. S. Baker, and M. L. Nibert. 1997. Localization of a C-terminal region of lambda 2 protein in reovirus cores. J. Virol. 71:8035-8040[Abstract].
39. Nibert, M. L. 1993. . Ph.D. thesis. Harvard University, Cambridge, Mass.
40. Nibert, M. L., J. D. Chappell, and T. S. Dermody. 1995. Infectious subvirion particles of reovirus type 3 Dearing exhibit a loss in infectivity and contain a cleaved sigma 1 protein. J. Virol. 69:5057-5067[Abstract].
41. Nibert, M. L., and B. N. Fields. 1992. A carboxy-terminal fragment of protein µ1/µ1C is present in infectious subvirion particles of mammalian reoviruses and is proposed to have a role in penetration. J. Virol. 66:6408-6418[Abstract/Free Full Text].
42. Nibert, M. L., and B. N. Fields. 1994. Early steps in reovirus infection of cells, p. 341-364. In E. Wimmer (ed.), Cellular receptors for animal viruses. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.
43. Nibert, M. L., D. B. Furlong, and B. N. Fields. 1991. Mechanisms of viral pathogenesis. Distinct forms of reoviruses and their roles during replication in cells and host. J. Clin. Invest. 88:727-734.
44. Nibert, M. L., L. A. Schiff, and B. N. Fields. 1991. Mammalian reoviruses contain a myristoylated structural protein. J. Virol. 65:1960-1967[Abstract/Free Full Text].
45. Nibert, M. L., L. A. Schiff, and B. N. Fields. 1996. Reoviruses and their replication, p. 1557-1596. In B. N. Fields, D. M. Knipe, and P. M. Howley (ed.), Fields virology, 3rd ed. Lippincott-Raven, Philadelphia, Pa.
46. Oh, K. J., H. Zhan, C. Cui, K. Hideg, R. J. Collier, and W. L. Hubbell. 1996. Organization of diphtheria toxin T domain in bilayers: a site-directed spin labeling study. Science 273:810-812[Abstract].
47. Parker, M. W., F. Pattus, A. D. Tucker, and D. Tsernglou. 1989. Structure of the membrane pore-forming fragment of colicin A. Nature 337:93-96[Medline].
48. Rueckert, R. R. 1996. Picornaviridae, p. 477-519. In B. N. Fields, D. M. Knipe, and P. M. Howley (ed.), Fundamental virology, 3rd ed. Lippincott-Raven Publishers, Philadelphia, Pa.
49. Scheid, A., and P. W. Choppin. 1974. Identification of biological activities of paramyxovirus glycoproteins. Activation of cell fusion, hemolysis, and infectivity of proteolytic cleavage of an inactive precursor protein of Sendai virus. Virology 57:475-490[Medline].
50. Shatkin, A. J., and M. Kozak. 1983. Biochemical aspects of reovirus transcription and translation, p. 79-106. In W. K. Joklik (ed.), The Reoviridae. Plenum Press, New York, N.Y.
51. Shatkin, A. J., and A. J. LaFiandra. 1972. Transcription by infectious subviral particles of reovirus. J. Virol. 10:698-706[Abstract/Free Full Text].
52. Silverstein, S. C., C. Astell, D. H. Levin, M. Schonberg, and G. Acs. 1972. The mechanisms of reovirus uncoating and gene activation in vivo. Virology 47:797-806[Medline].
53. Silverstein, S. C., M. Schonberg, D. H. Levin, and G. Acs. 1970. The reovirus replicative cycle: conservation of parental RNA and protein. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 67:275-281[Abstract/Free Full Text].
54. Smith, R. E., H. J. Zweerink, and W. K. Joklik. 1969. Polypeptide components of virions, top component and cores of reovirus type 3. Virology 39:791-810[Medline].
55. Sturzenbecker, L. J., M. Nibert, D. Furlong, and B. N. Fields. 1987. Intracellular digestion of reovirus particles requires a low pH and is an essential step in the viral infectious cycle. J. Virol. 61:2351-2361[Abstract/Free Full Text].
56. Tanford, C. 1980. . The hydrophobic effect, 2nd ed. John Wiley & Sons, New York, N.Y.
57. Tosteson, M. T., M. L. Nibert, and B. N. Fields. 1993. Ion channels induced in lipid bilayers by subvirion particles of the nonenveloped mammalian reoviruses. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 90:10549-10552[Abstract/Free Full Text].
58. van der Goot, F. G., J. M. Gonzalez-Manas, J. H. Lakey, and F. Pattus. 1991. A "molten globule" membrane insertion intermediate of the pore-forming domain of colicin A. Nature 354:408-410[Medline].
59. Virgin, H. W. IV., M. A. Mann, and K. L. Tyler. 1994. Protective antibodies inhibit reovirus internalization and uncoating by intracellular proteases. J. Virol. 68:6719-6729[Abstract/Free Full Text].
60. Vuillez-Le Normand, B., and J. L. Eiselé. 1993. Determination of detergent critical micellar concentration by solubilization of a colored dye. Anal. Biochem. 208:241-243[Medline].
61. White, C. K., and H. J. Zweerink. 1976. Studies on the structure of reovirus cores: selective removal of polypeptide lambda 2. Virology 70:171-180[Medline].


J Virol, January 1998, p. 467-475, Vol. 72, No. 1
0022-538X/98/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1998, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.



This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Zhang, L., Agosto, M. A., Ivanovic, T., King, D. S., Nibert, M. L., Harrison, S. C. (2009). Requirements for the Formation of Membrane Pores by the Reovirus Myristoylated {micro}1N Peptide. J. Virol. 83: 7004-7014 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Agosto, M. A., Myers, K. S., Ivanovic, T., Nibert, M. L. (2008). A positive-feedback mechanism promotes reovirus particle conversion to the intermediate associated with membrane penetration. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 105: 10571-10576 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Agosto, M. A., Middleton, J. K., Freimont, E. C., Yin, J., Nibert, M. L. (2007). Thermolabilizing Pseudoreversions in Reovirus Outer-Capsid Protein {micro}1 Rescue the Entry Defect Conferred by a Thermostabilizing Mutation. J. Virol. 81: 7400-7409 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Agosto, M. A., Ivanovic, T., Nibert, M. L. (2006). Mammalian reovirus, a nonfusogenic nonenveloped virus, forms size-selective pores in a model membrane. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 103: 16496-16501 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Odegard, A. L., Chandran, K., Zhang, X., Parker, J. S. L., Baker, T. S., Nibert, M. L. (2004). Putative Autocleavage of Outer Capsid Protein {micro}1, Allowing Release of Myristoylated Peptide {micro}1N during Particle Uncoating, Is Critical for Cell Entry by Reovirus. J. Virol. 78: 8732-8745 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Golden, J. W., Bahe, J. A., Lucas, W. T., Nibert, M. L., Schiff, L. A. (2004). Cathepsin S Supports Acid-independent Infection by Some Reoviruses. J. Biol. Chem. 279: 8547-8557 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Chandran, K., Parker, J. S. L., Ehrlich, M., Kirchhausen, T., Nibert, M. L. (2003). The {delta} Region of Outer-Capsid Protein {micro}1 Undergoes Conformational Change and Release from Reovirus Particles during Cell Entry. J. Virol. 77: 13361-13375 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Chandran, K., Farsetta, D. L., Nibert, M. L. (2002). Strategy for Nonenveloped Virus Entry: a Hydrophobic Conformer of the Reovirus Membrane Penetration Protein {micro}1 Mediates Membrane Disruption. J. Virol. 76: 9920-9933 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Golden, J. W., Linke, J., Schmechel, S., Thoemke, K., Schiff, L. A. (2002). Addition of Exogenous Protease Facilitates Reovirus Infection in Many Restrictive Cells. J. Virol. 76: 7430-7443 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Jane-Valbuena, J., Breun, L. A., Schiff, L. A., Nibert, M. L. (2002). Sites and Determinants of Early Cleavages in the Proteolytic Processing Pathway of Reovirus Surface Protein {sigma}3. J. Virol. 76: 5184-5197 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Middleton, J. K., Severson, T. F., Chandran, K., Gillian, A. L., Yin, J., Nibert, M. L. (2002). Thermostability of Reovirus Disassembly Intermediates (ISVPs) Correlates with Genetic, Biochemical, and Thermodynamic Properties of Major Surface Protein {micro}1. J. Virol. 76: 1051-1061 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Chandran, K., Zhang, X., Olson, N. H., Walker, S. B., Chappell, J. D., Dermody, T. S., Baker, T. S., Nibert, M. L. (2001). Complete In Vitro Assembly of the Reovirus Outer Capsid Produces Highly Infectious Particles Suitable for Genetic Studies of the Receptor-Binding Protein. J. Virol. 75: 5335-5342 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Baer, G. S., Ebert, D. H., Chung, C. J., Erickson, A. H., Dermody, T. S. (1999). Mutant Cells Selected during Persistent Reovirus Infection Do Not Express Mature Cathepsin L and Do Not Support Reovirus Disassembly. J. Virol. 73: 9532-9543 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Chandran, K., Walker, S. B., Chen, Y., Contreras, C. M., Schiff, L. A., Baker, T. S., Nibert, M. L. (1999). In Vitro Recoating of Reovirus Cores with Baculovirus-Expressed Outer-Capsid Proteins µ1 and sigma 3. J. Virol. 73: 3941-3950 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Jané-Valbuena, J., Nibert, M. L., Spencer, S. M., Walker, S. B., Baker, T. S., Chen, Y., Centonze, V. E., Schiff, L. A. (1999). Reovirus Virion-Like Particles Obtained by Recoating Infectious Subvirion Particles with Baculovirus-Expressed sigma 3 Protein: an Approach for Analyzing sigma 3 Functions during Virus Entry. J. Virol. 73: 2963-2973 [Abstract] [Full Text]  

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Chandran, K.
Right arrow Articles by Nibert, M. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Chandran, K.
Right arrow Articles by Nibert, M. L.