J Virol, January 1998, p. 180-190, Vol. 72, No. 1
0022-538X/98/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1998, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Reactivation of the Previously Silenced
Cytomegalovirus Major Immediate-Early Promoter in the Mouse Liver:
Involvement of NF
B
Peter
Löser,1
Gary S.
Jennings,2
Michael
Strauss,1,* and
Volker
Sandig2
Department of Molecular Cell Biology,
Humboldt-Universität,1 and
HepaVec
AG at the Max-Delbrück-Center for Molecular
Medicine,2 Berlin, Germany
Received 16 May 1997/Accepted 28 September 1997
 |
ABSTRACT |
The cytomegalovirus (CMV) major immediate-early promoter/enhancer
is active in many cell culture systems and is considered to be one of
the strongest promoters in vitro. However, when this promoter was used
in in vivo approaches to gene therapy, it was silenced within a few
weeks in several organs including the liver. In this study, we
demonstrated transcriptional inactivation of the CMV promoter in mouse
liver. In contrast to the CMV promoter, a hybrid promoter consisting of
a minimal CMV promoter and the enhancer II of hepatitis B virus was
active for at least 11 weeks in mouse liver. While investigating the
reason for the shutdown of the CMV promoter, we did not find evidence
for methylation of adenovirus DNA in the region of transgene insertion,
but we could show that the silenced CMV promoter was reactivated after lipopolysaccharide treatment of mice or partial hepatectomy. Both stimuli are known to activate the transcription factor NF
B, which binds to four sites in the CMV promoter/enhancer. We show that expression from the CMV promoter in hepatocyte-derived cell lines in
vitro depends on NF
B. In vivo experiments demonstrate that NF
B,
which is not present in mouse hepatocytes in vivo, is activated after
infection with recombinant adenoviruses and that the time course of
NF
B activation parallels that of CMV promoter-dependent expression.
Moreover, adenovirus infection of transgenic mice carrying a CMV
promoter-driven lacZ gene leads to strong activation of the
expression of this gene in the liver. Thus, NF
B is involved in the
activation of the CMV promoter in the liver.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Sufficient expression of transduced
genes is a major requirement in somatic gene therapy. To achieve high
levels of transgene expression in vivo, strong viral promoters have
been widely used. Since the human cytomegalovirus (CMV) major
immediate-early promoter/enhancer (8) (hereafter referred to
as the CMV promoter) is considered to be one of the strongest promoters
in vitro, it has been used for in vivo expression of reporter and
therapeutic genes by many investigators. However, although the CMV
promoter allowed for a very strong short-term expression of transduced
genes in vivo, it became silent within a few weeks after gene transfer
in many animal studies. In most cases, expression from the CMV promoter peaked at days 2 to 4 after delivery of the transgene and declined within 4 weeks to barely detectable or background activity. This silencing of the CMV promoter has been reported for both
immunocompetent and immunodeficient mice and also seems to be
independent of the vector system, the transduction method, and the
species used (13, 21, 24, 27, 39, 50, 62). Interestingly,
combination of the CMV promoter/enhancer with other regulatory elements
allowed for long-term expression in transplanted myoblasts as well as after adenovirus gene transfer to muscle and liver (13, 14, 29), implying that the inhibition of the CMV promoter can be overcome by other transcriptionally active elements. After adenovirus gene transfer to the liver, the CMV promoter was at least 10-fold stronger than any other viral and cellular promoters tested, but its
activity declined by several orders of magnitude within a few weeks
(21). However, the reason for the short-term nature of the
activity of the CMV promoter in liver is unclear, and no laboratory has
investigated this phenomenon in detail so far.
The human CMV promoter consists of at least four types of repetitive
sequence elements, referred to as the 17-, 18-, 19-, and 21-bp repeats,
which are present three to five times within the promoter/enhancer
region of the CMV promoter and which form complexes with nuclear
proteins (8, 19). The 18- and 19-bp repeats contain
consensus binding sites for NF
B and CREB/ATF, respectively, and were
shown to mediate the enhancement of CMV promoter activity by these
transcription factors (25, 48, 53). The 17-bp repeat was
suggested to bind to the transcription factor NF-1 (43). The
21-bp repeat binds to a negative regulator specific for
undifferentiated cells as well as to YY1 and was suggested to repress
CMV promoter-dependent transcription (31, 52). Other factors
which bind to the CMV promoter are AP-1 (48), SP 1 (34), and MDBP (63, 64).
Among transcription factors involved in activation of the CMV promoter,
NF
B is of special interest. Transcription factors of the NF
B/Rel
family play a central role in the regulation of a variety of cellular
and viral genes (for recent reviews, see references 2, 3,
56, and 59). Four NF
B consensus binding sites are present in the CMV promoter, and three of them are identical to the Ig
consensus binding site. Efficient transcription from the
CMV promoter was dependent on these sites (6, 46), although the effect of the
B binding site was strongly dependent on the cell
type used (43). Furthermore, reactivation of latent CMV infection in transplantation patients was correlated with TNF-
levels, and TNF-
dependent activation of the CMV promoter in the
monocytic cell line HL-60 was mediated by NF
B (15, 46). In the context of adenovirus vectors, stimulation of NF
B and/or CREB/ATF by several agents, such as phorbol esters, calcium ionophors, and forskolin, resulted in a strong activation of CMV promoter activity
in MRC5 and HeLa cells as well as in primary human vascular smooth
muscle cells (10, 57). Therefore, although the CMV promoter
is considered to be strong in most cell culture systems, its full
activity requires the presence of these transcription factors.
In contrast to the broad activity of the CMV promoter in vitro,
experiments with mice transgenic for CMV promoter-driven reporter constructs revealed a different situation in vivo. Although early studies reported CMV promoter-dependent expression in most tissues (18, 51), more detailed studies in both adult and embryonic transgenic mice suggested that the CMV promoter is active only in cell
types which are naturally infected by CMV (5, 30). Interestingly, all the studies are consistent insofar as the CMV promoter was silent or very weak in the livers of these transgenic mice.
In the present study, we show that the CMV promoter is specifically
silenced in the mouse liver while adenovirus DNA is present at nearly
unaltered levels. In contrast, a previously described hepatitis B virus
(HBV)-CMV hybrid promoter which is strong and liver specific in vivo
(37, 49) retained its activity for at least 11 weeks. The
silenced CMV promoter could be reactivated by lipopolysaccharide (LPS)
treatment or partial hepatectomy on day 28 after adenovirus infection.
In vitro studies showed that NF
B is required for full activity of
the CMV promoter in hepatocyte-derived cell lines. In vivo experiments
demonstrated that infection with recombinant adenovirus induces NF
B
activity in mouse hepatocytes and that activation of this transcription
factor follows the same time course as does CMV promoter-dependent
expression. Moreover, adenovirus infection strongly stimulated the
expression of a CMV promoter-driven
-galactosidase gene in
transgenic mice. Our data suggest a critical role for NF
B in CMV
promoter activity in mouse liver.
 |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
Viruses.
All the viruses used in this study have been
described previously (49). Briefly, adenovirus type 5 (Ad5)-CMVLDLR contains the cDNA for the human low-density lipoprotein
(LDL) receptor gene under transcriptional control of the human CMV
major immediate-early promoter. In Ad5-EIImCMVLDLR, the expression of
the human LDL receptor cDNA is driven by an HBV-CMV hybrid promoter
which consists of a basic CMV promoter and the enhancer II of HBV
(37). Ad5-RSVBG, in which the Escherichia coli
-galactosidase gene is expressed under the Rous sarcoma virus (RSV)
long terminal repeat (LTR) was used as a control virus. Ad-CMVBG was a
generous gift from R. Crystal.
Cell culture and reporter gene assays.
HepG2 (human
hepatoma) cells and HepSV40 (mouse liver) (45) cells were
grown in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (DMEM) containing 10%
fetal calf serum (FCS). Transfection was performed using a modified
calcium phosphate coprecipitation method as described previously
(35). Infection with Ad5-CMVBG was carried out in 24-well
plates at low doses (0.2 to 1 PFU/cell) and at a cell density of
105 cells/well. For stimulation experiments, medium was
replaced with DMEM containing 1% FCS 12 h after transfection and
the cells were stimulated with phorbol myristate acetate (PMA) (50 ng/ml) and/or forskolin (10 µM) (Sigma, Deisenhofen, Germany) for
24 h. Luciferase and
-galactosidase assays were performed as
described previously (37).
Animal procedures.
Experiments in this study were performed
with 8-week-old female C57BL/6 mice. This mouse strain had been shown
to allow for prolonged transgene expression from the RSV LTR in earlier
studies (4). The mice were given tail vein injections of
109 PFU of Ad5-CMVLDLR, Ad5-EIImCMVLDLR, or Ad5-RSVBG. At
3, 7, 14, 28 and 77 days after infection, the animals were killed and
their livers were frozen in liquid nitrogen immediately. The livers were then pulverized in liquid nitrogen, and the homogenate was used
for separate RNA and DNA isolation.
For restimulation experiments, the animals were injected
intraperitoneally (i.p.) with 50 µg of LPS (from Escherichia
coli serotype O111:B4) (Sigma, Deisenhofen, Germany), 100 µg of
LPS, or NaCl on day 28 after infection with 2 × 109
PFU of Ad5-CMVLDLR. At the same time, a second group of mice which had
received the same virus dose was subjected to partial hepatectomy as
described by Jennings et al. (26). At 16 h after the
LPS treatment or partial hepatectomy, the mice were sacrificed and
their livers were analyzed for transgene expression.
Transgenic mice of the HCMV-1 line carry the E. coli lacZ
gene under transcriptional control of the CMV promoter (
524 to +13)
and were a generous gift of P. J. Mitchell (for details, see
reference 30). Offspring positive for the
lacZ gene were produced by mating male HCMV-1 mice to
background strain (Swiss ICR) and checked for transgene expression by
5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl-
-D-galactopyranoside (X-Gal)
staining of ear and tail tissue samples. Stimulation experiments were
performed with 8-week-old female animals by tail vein injection of
2 × 109 or 1 × 1010 PFU of
Ad5-CMVLDLR.
Southern blotting and RNase protection assay.
RNA and
genomic DNA were isolated separately from the same piece of tissue by
standard methods. Detection of adenovirus DNA in genomic DNA from mouse
liver has been described previously (49). Briefly, 10 µg
of genomic DNA was digested with NcoI, separated in a 1%
agarose gel, blotted on Hybond N+ nylon membrane (Amersham,
Little Chalfont, United Kingdom), and probed with a probe specific for
a 1,785-bp adenovirus DNA fragment which is released by NcoI
digestion of the Ad5 genome. For detection of potential methylation of
the CMV promoter, genomic mouse liver DNA harvested on day 3 or 25 after infection of mice with Ad5-CMVLDLR was digested with restriction
endonucleases which are blocked by CpG methylation. DNA fragments were
processed as described above and probed with a probe specific for the
CMV immediate-early promoter.
The RNase protection assays used to specifically detect human LDL
receptor RNA in mouse liver and mouse GAPDH RNA have been described
elsewhere (49).
Separation of hepatocytes from NPCs.
To separate mouse
hepatocytes from nonparenchymal cells (NPCs), liver pefusion was
performed as follows. The mice were anesthetized by i.p. injection of
0.1 mg of Ketanest (Parker-Davis, Berlin, Germany) per g of body weight
and 4 µl of 0.4% Rompun (Bayer, Leverkusen, Germany) per g of body
weight. After laparotomy, the liver was perfused via the portal vein
for 5 min with a preperfusion solution (30 mM glucose, 25 mM HEPES [pH
7.5], 300 mM NaCl, 60 mM KCl, 3 mM KH2PO4, 0.5 mM EGTA, 0.5 mM glutamine) and for 8 min with a collagenase solution
(30 mM glucose, 25 mM HEPES [pH 7.5], 120 mM NaCl, 48 mM KCl, 1.2 mM
KH2PO4, 3 mM CaCl2, 0.5 mM glutamine, 150 ml of DMEM [high glucose] per liter, 0.4%
collagenase) (Boehringer Mannheim, Germany) at a flow rate of 3 ml/min.
After perfusion, liver cells were dispersed on a petri dish in DMEM and
the resulting suspension was filtered through a 100-µm cell strainer
(Falcon, Franklin Lakes, N.J.). The suspension was then transferred
onto ice and centrifuged for 2 min at 45 × g at 4°C, and the supernatant was removed. The pellet was carefully resuspended in DMEM and recentrifuged. This procedure was performed two more times.
The pellet, which contains nearly exclusively hepatocytes, was used for
preparation of nuclear extracts.
Nuclear extracts and EMSA.
Nuclear extracts were prepared
from whole liver or from isolated hepatocytes, respectively. For
extract preparation from whole liver, mice were killed and the liver
was removed from each mouse immediately and transferred to ice-cold
phosphate-buffered saline (PBS). The whole procedure was performed at
4°C. After three washes in PBS, the liver was minced and transferred
to 10 ml of homogenization buffer (sucrose solution 1) (0.32 M sucrose,
10 mM HEPES [pH 7.5], 0.15 mM spermine, 0.5 mM spermidine, 1 mM EGTA,
0.1 mM EDTA, 3 mM CaCl2, 1 mM magnesium acetate, 1 mM
dithiothreitol [DTT], 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride [PMSF],
0.1% Triton X-100). For preparation of nuclear extracts from isolated
hepatocytes, the hepatocyte pellet was resuspended in 10 ml of
homogenization buffer. The cells were homogenized by five strokes in a
Wheaton L Dounce homogenizer followed by five strokes in a Wheaton S
Dounce homogenizer. The homogenate was mixed with 20 ml of sucrose
solution 2 (2 M sucrose, 10 mM HEPES [pH 7.5], 5 mM magnesium
acetate, 0.1 mM EDTA, 1 mM DTT, 1 mM PMSF), and the mixture was used to
overlay 10 ml of saccharose solution 2 in a Beckman SW28 centrifuge
tube. The tubes were centrifuged for 50 min at 25,000 rpm in an SW28 rotor at 4°C, and the nuclear pellet was washed twice in wash solution (10 mM HEPES [pH 7.5], 25 mM KCl, 5 mM magnesium acetate, 0.1 mM EDTA, 1 mM EGTA, 0.15 mM spermine, 0.5 mM spermidine, 1 mM DTT,
0.5 mM PMSF, 20% glycerol). The integrity of nuclei was checked under
a microscope, and nuclear proteins were extracted with 100 to 150 µl
of nuclear extraction buffer (20 mM HEPES [pH 7.5], 420 mM NaCl, 1.5 mM MgCl2, 0.2 mM EDTA, 0.5 mM DTT, 0.5 mM PMSF, 2 µg of
aprotinin per ml, 1 µg of leupeptin per ml, 25% glycerol) with
gentle stirring for 30 min at 4°C. The nuclear extracts were then
centrifuged for 30 min in a Beckman TLA 100.3 rotor at 25,000 rpm at
4°C, the supernatant was dialyzed against a 1,000-fold volume of
dialysis buffer (20 mM HEPES [pH 7.5], 100 mM KCl, 0.2 mM EDTA, 0.5 mM DTT, 0.5 mM PMSF, 20% glycerol) for 3 to 4 h at 4°C, and the
dialysate was again centrifuged for 30 min at 25,000 × g at 4°C. The protein concentration in the resulting
supernatant was measured by the Bradford method, and the supernatant
was aliquoted, frozen in liquid nitrogen, and stored at
80°C.
An electrophoretic mobility shift assay (EMSA) for the detection of
NF
B was performed as described elsewhere (42) with the
addition of 0.1% NP-40. Oligonucleotides containing the H-2K consensus
sequence (...GGATTCCCC...) or the
B consensus site
present three times in the CMV promoter (...GGGACTTTCC...)
were radiolabelled by Klenow fill in and used as probes. The same
oligonucleotides were used in competition experiments. For supershift
experiments, antibodies against p50 [p50(NLS)-G], p65 [NF
B
p65(A)X], Rel-B [Rel B (C-19], and c-Rel [c-Rel(C)-G] (all from
Santa Cruz Biotechnology Inc., Santa Cruz, Calif.) were used.
 |
RESULTS |
Long-term expression from the CMV immediate-early promoter and
HBV-CMV hybrid promoter.
Long-term expression from viral promoters
is an important issue in liver gene therapy. Several reports have shown
that vectors in which the expression of the transgene is driven by the
CMV promoter did not allow for expression in animal liver for longer than about 2 weeks (21, 27, 39). This phenomenon has been observed for other tissues as well as in vitro (1, 13, 50). Since our previously described HBV-CMV hybrid promoter allowed for
strong and liver-specific expression in vivo (49), we wished to know if long-term expression from this promoter is influenced by the
CMV component of the promoter. Therefore, we monitored expression from
the CMV promoter and from the HBV-CMV hybrid promoter for about 11 weeks. Female C57BL/6 mice were infected with 109 PFU of
Ad5-CMVLDLR or Ad5-EIImCMVLDLR. The animals in each group were
sacrificed on days 3, 7, 14, 28, and 77 after infection, and the
presence of viral DNA and the expression of the human LDL receptor were
monitored. As shown in Fig. 1, adenovirus
DNA was present at each time point at comparable levels in all animals, with a moderate decline on day 77 (Fig. 1B). However, whereas the
level of human LDL receptor RNA expressed from the HBV-CMV hybrid
promoter did not change markedly from day 3 to day 77 after infection,
there was a sharp decline in the level of human LDL receptor RNA
expressed from the CMV promoter, with moderately impaired expression on
day 7, strongly reduced expression on day 14, and no expression on day
28 (Fig. 1A). The integrity of the RNA was confirmed by an RNase
protection assay specific for mouse GAPDH RNA and is shown for the
period when CMV promoter-dependent expression was lost (days 3 through
14 after infection [Fig. 1C]). Thus, since Ad5-CMVLDLR DNA is still
present at a level comparable to that observed with Ad5-EIImCMVLDLR, we
conclude that the CMV promoter is selectively silenced in mouse
hepatocytes in vivo.

View larger version (36K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 1.
Time course of human LDL receptor gene expression in
livers of adenovirus-transduced mice. C57BL/6 mice were infected with
109 PFU of AdCMV-LDLR (CMV) or Ad5-EIImCMVLDLR (EIImCMV),
respectively. The mice were sacrificed at the time points indicated,
and RNA and DNA were isolated from the same tissue sample. (A)
Expression of human LDL receptor RNA as determined by the RNase
protection assay. An in vitro-transcribed human LDL receptor RNA (10 or
25 pg) was used as a size standard and for quantification of the
protected fragment. RNA subjected to the RNase protection assay (10 to
35 µg) was related to the amount of virus DNA present in the same
tissue sample. (B) Quantification of viral DNA in mouse liver. Total
DNA (10 µg) isolated from mouse liver was cleaved with
NcoI, subjected to Southern blot analysis, and detected with
a probe specific for a 1,785-bp adenovirus DNA fragment. As a standard,
10 and/or 25 pg of the same NcoI fragment obtained from
digesting purified Ad5 DNA was used. Each lane represents an individual
animal. (C) Integrity of liver RNA from mice infected with Ad5-CMVLDLR.
Total RNA (5 µg) from livers of mice infected with Ad5-CMVLDLR and
killed 3, 7, and 14 days after infection was subjected to an RNase
protection assay specific for mouse glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate
dehydrogenase RNA. RNA from the liver of a noninfected animal was used
as a control (ni).
|
|
There is no evidence for extensive methylation of the CMV promoter
region.
Methylation of DNA sequences is a common mechanism to
silence gene expression within the mammalian genome. Prösch et
al. (47) have shown that nonspecific methylation of the CMV
promoter with the CpG methyltransferase SssI in vitro caused
a complete loss of promoter activity in HL-60 cells. Therefore, we
tested the CMV promoter sequence present in mouse liver on day 25 after infection with Ad5-CMVLDLR for possible methylation. Since the CMV
promoter sequence does not harbor any appropriate site for enzyme pairs
such as HpaII-MspI, which allow for
discrimination between methylated and unmethylated recognition sites,
we performed two cleavage experiments with enzymes known to be blocked
by CpG methylation. First, BstUI (FnuDII)
recognizes a site distal in the CMV promoter as well as several sites
in the flanking sequences of Ad5-CMVLDLR and cleaves only CGCG but not
m5CGCG (Fig. 2A). DNA from
mouse livers harvested on days 3 and 25 after infection with
Ad5-CMVLDLR was digested with BstUI, and the products were
subjected to Southern blotting. BstUI cleavage results in
the release of a 535-bp fragment from purified Ad5-CMVLDLR DNA (Fig.
2B, lanes 1 and 2). In the case of methylation of the BstUI
sites indicated in Fig. 2A, cleavage by this enzyme would be prevented
and the intensity of the 535-bp fragment should diminish. As shown in
Fig. 2B, the 535-bp fragment signal was present at comparable density
on days 3 and 25 after adenovirus infection and no slower-migrating
band could be detected. In a second experiment, mouse liver DNA
harvested on day 25 after infection was digested with MspI,
which cleaves both methylated and unmethylated sequences. Cleavage with
MspI releases a 1,117-bp fragment from Ad5-CMVLDLR DNA (Fig.
2C), and the appearance of this fragment is independent of potential
methylation of the internal C of its recognition sequence. In contrast,
Eco105I and AatII are blocked by CpG methylation in their recognition sites. Simultaneous incubation of liver DNA with
MspI and Eco105I or AatII should
therefore result in complete degradation of the MspI
fragment only if CpG methylation is absent. As seen in Fig. 2D,
Eco105I and AatII completely cleave the
MspI fragment, indicating that no methylation of adenovirus
DNA in the region of transgene insertion had occurred within 25 days after infection of mice with Ad5-CMVLDLR. Although these experiments do
not prove the absence of any methylation in the CMV promoter region,
they strongly suggest that methylation is not involved in the silencing
of CMV promoter-dependent expression.

View larger version (29K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 2.
Absence of methylation in the distal region of the human
CMV immediate-early promoter. (A) Schematic of the CMV immediate-early
promoter region present in Ad5-CMVLDLR and the probe used to detect
BstUI fragments. Cleavage of unmethylated DNA results in a
535-bp fragment, whereas methylation of the BstUI sites
in the CMV enhancer would result in larger fragments. (B) Southern blot
analysis of BstUI-cleaved mouse liver DNA 3 or 25 days after
infection. As a standard, 10 and 20 pg of the BstUI fragment
obtained from cleavage of purified Ad5-CMVLDLR DNA were used. Size
marker positions are indicated at the left. (C) Restriction sites for
MspI, Eco105I, and AatII in the CMV
promoter region in Ad5-CMVLDLR DNA. The sizes of the major restriction
fragments are indicated. (D) Southern blot analysis of DNA from CsCl
gradient-purified Ad5-CMVLDLR (lanes 1, 4, and 7) and liver DNA from
two mice 25 days after infection with Ad5-CMVLDLR (lanes 2, 5, and 8 and lanes 3, 6, and 9, respectively). DNA was digested with the
restriction enzymes indicated and was used in Southern analysis with
the CMV promoter probe. Size marker positions are indicated at the
left.
|
|
LPS treatment restimulates expression from the silenced CMV
promoter.
The CMV promoter region harbors four consensus binding
sites for the transcription factor NF
B. Although data about the
presence of NF
B in rodent liver are partially contradictory, it
seems unambiguous that hepatocytes in vivo normally contain no or only very little activated NF
B (11, 16, 17, 55, 60).
Therefore, we asked if activation of NF
B in hepatocytes could
reactivate expression from the CMV promoter in vivo. Bacterial LPS is a
very strong inducer of NF
B and has a strong effect on the activation of this transcription factor in hepatocytes (14a, 17). To
test if LPS could stimulate CMV promoter activity in mouse liver in vivo, mice were infected with 2 × 109 PFU of
Ad5-CMVLDLR via tail vein injection and were injected i.p. with 100 or
50 µg of LPS on day 28 after infection. The mice were killed 20 h after stimulation with LPS, and their livers were analyzed for
expression of the human LDL receptor. As shown in Fig.
3, mice injected with LPS expressed the
human LDL receptor RNA at a moderate level (Fig. 3, lanes 5 and 6)
whereas the mouse injected with NaCl did not express the transgene
(lane 4). Although the level of expression is only about 15 to 20% of
that seen on day 3 after injection (lane 3), the expression from the
CMV promoter is clearly present after LPS treatment. We conclude that
LPS treatment has reactivated the previously silenced CMV promoter.

View larger version (73K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 3.
Reactivation of the CMV promoter in mouse liver by LPS.
Mice were injected with 2 × 109 PFU of Ad5CMVLDLR. On
day 3 after infection, human LDLR RNA is present at a high level (lane
3). On day 28 after infection, mice received a single injection of 200 µl of NaCl (lane 4) or 100 or 50 µg of LPS (lanes 5 and 6). The
livers were removed 20 h later, and 10 µg of total liver RNA was
analyzed for the expression of human LDL receptor RNA by the RNase
protection assay. As a standard, 10 and 25 pg of in vitro-transcribed
RNA were used (lanes 1 and 2).
|
|
Partial hepatectomy restimulates expression from the silenced CMV
promoter.
NF
B was found to be strongly activated in the
regenerating liver shortly after partial hepatectomy in Fisher rats and
C57BL/6 mice (16, 60). We wanted to test if partial
hepatectomy could restimulate the silenced CMV promoter in livers of
adenovirally transduced mice. To this end, mice were infected with
2 × 109 PFU of Ad5-CMVLDLR and partial
hepatectomy was performed on day 28 after infection, when CMV
promoter-dependent expression was no longer detectable. In two mice,
two-thirds of the liver was removed; in two other mice, only one-third
of the liver was resected. The removed liver lobes were frozen
immediately, and RNA was prepared. The mice were sacrificed 16 h
after the partial hepatectomy, the regenerating livers were
harvested, and RNA from livers prior to and after partial
hepatectomy from the same animal was analyzed for presence of human LDL
receptor transcripts. The outcome of the experiment is shown in Fig.
4. At the time point of liver resection
(day 28 after infection), no expression of the human LDL receptor gene
is detectable (Fig. 4, lanes 7, 9, 11, and 13). At 16 h later,
animals which had received one-third partial hepatectomy expressed the
human LDL receptor gene at a low level (lanes 12 and 14) whereas a
two-third partial hepatectomy had a marked effect on CMV
promoter-dependent transgene expression (lanes 8 and 10). The level of
expression of the human LDL receptor was about 30% of that observed in
mouse livers on day 3 after infection with Ad5-CMVLDLR (lanes 3 and 4).
Southern blot analysis of genomic DNA from livers prior to and after
partial hepatectomy did not show any difference in the level of virus
DNA (data not shown), confirming that the elevation in the human LDL
receptor mRNA level is caused by transcriptional activation. We
conclude that partial hepatectomy reactivated the previously silenced
expression from the human CMV promoter.

View larger version (60K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 4.
Reactivation of the CMV promoter in mouse liver by
partial hepatectomy. Mice were injected with 2 × 109
PFU of Ad5CMV-LDLR or Ad5-RSVBG. As determined by the RNase protection
assay, human LDL receptor RNA was expressed at a high level in the
animals treated with Ad5CMVLDLR on day 3 after infection but not in the
animals treated with Ad5-RSVBG (compare lanes 3 and 4 with lanes 5 and
6). On day 28 after infection, each of two animals received a two-third
or one-third partial hepatectomy (PH), respectively. The removed liver
lobes did not contain human LDL receptor RNA (lanes 7, 9, 11, and 13).
At 16 h after the partial hepatectomy, the mice were sacrificed
and liver RNA was analyzed for LDL receptor RNA (lanes 8, 10, 12, and
14).
|
|
Expression from the CMV promoter in hepatocytes is influenced by
NF
B.
Both LPS and partial hepatectomy stimulate a number of
transcription factors which could be involved in reactivating the CMV promoter. To investigate the roles of transcription factor binding to
the CMV promoter in hepatocytes in more detail, in vitro experiments were performed with the liver-derived cell lines HepG2 and HepSV40. HepG2 cells have nearly no activated NF
B, whereas the nuclei of
HepSV40 cells contain relatively high levels of NF
B (data not
shown). First, HepG2 cells were infected with Ad5CMVBG at a
multiplicity of infection of 0.2. Infection medium was replaced by DMEM
containing 1% FCS, and 10 µM forskolin, 50 ng of PMA per ml, or both
were added. PMA is a strong activator of NF
B in many cell lines,
whereas forskolin stimulates cyclic AMP-dependent transcription.
HepG2 cells are known to contain low nuclear levels of activated
NF
B, which is strongly stimulated by treatment with phorbol esters
(20, 22). At 24 h after stimulation, the cells were
harvested and their
-galactosidase activity was measured. Whereas
forskolin caused only a weak stimulation of the CMV promoter, PMA
treatment resulted in a 7.3-fold stimulation of promoter activity (Fig.
5A). Combined treatment with forskolin
and PMA resulted in a stronger stimulation than activation with either
of the single substances (10.5-fold), indicating that the substances
might act cooperatively to activate the CMV promoter.

View larger version (31K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 5.
NF B modulates expression from the CMV IE promoter in
vitro. (A) HepG2 cells were infected with 0.2 PFU of Ad5-CMVBG for
12 h. The transfection medium was replaced with DMEM containing
1% FCS, and the cells were stimulated with 10 µM forskolin (F), 50 ng of PMA per ml (P), or both (F + P). At 24 h later, the
cells were harvested and analyzed for -galactosidase activity.
-Galactosidase expression was related to the protein content as
determined by the Bradford method. (B) HepSV40 cells (3 × 105 cells) were transfected with 2 µg of pCMVluc and
increasing amounts of pmI B. A 1-µg portion of a plasmid expressing
the E. coli -galactosidase gene under the RSV promoter
was cotransfected as a transfection control. At 24 h after the end
of the transfection, the cells were harvested and luciferase (shaded
bars) and -galactosidase (solid bars) activities were measured.
|
|
Apart from NF
B, PMA stimulates other transcription factors involved
in CMV promoter-dependent transcription. To test the role of NF
B in
CMV promoter activity in hepatocyte-derived cells more specifically, we
cotransfected the dominant-negative I
B mutant (I
B
N
[33]) together with a CMV promoter-driven reporter construct into the mouse cell line HepSV40, which has a high basal level of activated NF
B. The phosphorylation-deficient deletion mutant of I
B prevents nuclear transport of NF
B. As shown in Fig.
5B, coexpression of the dominant-negative I
B mutant with a CMV
promoter-driven luciferase gene resulted in a moderate repression of
CMV promoter activity in HepSV40 cells. This effect was already present
at low doses of cotransfected pI
B
N and was enhanced about twofold
when a 25-fold amount of the I
B
N plasmid was used. In contrast to
CMV promoter-driven luciferase gene expression, expression of the
lacZ gene from the RSV LTR which does not contain NF
B
sites was similar among transfection experiments. Small differences observed in
-galactosidase activity are most probably due to differences in transfection efficiencies. Although it is not clear if
the effect of NF
B on the CMV promoter is direct or indirect, we
conclude that this transcription factor contributes to the basal
activity of the CMV promoter in the HepSV40 mouse liver cell line.
Adenovirus infection results in elevated levels of NF
B in mouse
hepatocytes.
Nuclear extracts of whole rat liver were reported to
contain no activated NF
B (11, 55). However, other authors
found relatively high levels of NF
B in liver nuclear extracts from untreated rats, but the NF
B activity was located in the NPCs (16, 17, 60). Since NF
B is absent from quiscent
hepatocytes, which are the sites of transgene expression in the liver
after adenovirus gene transfer, it was interesting to find if infection with recombinant adenovirus could activate this transcription factor in
mouse hepatocytes, which, in consequence, would stimulate CMV
promoter-dependent transcription. To check for a possible activation of
NF
B in hepatocytes following infection with recombinant adenovirus,
mice were infected with 2 × 109 PFU of Ad5-CMVLDLR,
and at several time points after infection, hepatocyte nuclear extracts
were analyzed for the presence of activated NF
B. To this end, livers
of animals were perfused with collagenase and hepatocytes were
separated from NPCs by several centrifugation steps. To prevent
possible contamination by cytoplasmic NF
B, the nuclei were
centrifuged through a sucrose cushion before the preparation of nuclear
extracts. The hepatocyte nuclear extracts obtained before and at
several time points after adenovirus infection were then subjected to
EMSA with an H-2K probe which contains the NF
B site of the major
histocompatibility complex class I locus. The result of the experiment
is shown in Fig. 6. Whereas nuclei of
hepatocytes from untreated animals contained only very little NF
B
(Fig. 6, lanes 1 and 2), the NF
B level was elevated 16 h after
infection (lanes 3 and 4), peaked on day 4 after infection (lanes 5 and
6), and strongly declined on day 14 (lanes 7 and 8). The shift obtained
with hepatocyte nuclear extracts from day 4 after infection was also
seen with an oligonucleotide probe containing one of the NF
B sites
present in the CMV promoter, and specific bands could be competed for
with an excess of both the CMV and the H-2K oligonucleotide but not by
a nonspecific oligonucleotide (Fig. 7A).
Supershift analysis with antisera against NF
B components revealed
that the NF
B complexes present in mouse hepatocytes on day 4 after
infection consist of p50 and p65 (Fig. 7B). Thus, adenovirus infection
results in activation of NF
B in mouse hepatocytes, the nuclear
presence of which shows a similar temporal course to the activity of
the human CMV promoter.

View larger version (78K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 6.
Time course of the presence of NF B in hepatocytes of
adenovirus-infected mice. Mice were infected with 2 × 109 PFU of Ad5-CMVLDLR. At the indicated time points after
infection, the livers were perfused, hepatocytes were separated from
NPCs, and hepatocyte nuclear extracts were prepared. Nuclear extracts
(4 µg) were analyzed for the presence of NF B by EMSA with the H-2K
probe. The positions of NF B complexes are indicated by arrows. n.i.,
not infected.
|
|

View larger version (57K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 7.
Specificity of the NF B complexes present in mouse
hepatocytes after adenovirus infection. (A) Hepatocyte nuclear extract
(4 µg) obtained from mouse liver on day 4 after infection was
subjected to EMSA with a probe specific for the NF B site present
three times in the CMV promoter. Complex formation was competed for by
a 200-fold molar excess of the unlabelled CMV promoter NF B
oligonucleotide (CMV, lane 2) as well as of the unlabelled H-2K
oligonucleotide (H-2K, lane 3). No competition was seen with an excess
of a nonspecific oligonucleotide (ATF-2, lane 4). (B) Supershifts with
antisera specific for NF B components. Hepatocyte nuclear extract (4 µg) obtained from mouse liver on day 4 after adenovirus infection was
hybridyzed to the H-2K probe and incubated with antisera raised against
NF B components after complex formation. The complexes were analyzed
by EMSA. The antisera used are indicated at the top of the panel.
|
|
Adenovirus infection results in activation of the CMV promoter in
the livers of transgenic mice.
Mice from the CMV-1 line contain
the E. coli lacZ gene driven by the CMV promoter and have
been described previously (30). To test if adenovirus
infection can stimulate CMV promoter-dependent expression in mouse
liver, 8-week-old female animals were infected with low and high doses
of recombinant adenovirus or treated with sodium chloride, and the
-galactosidase activity in the liver cell extracts was determined
luminometrically 4 days after infection. To prevent contamination of
liver extract with protein from blood cells, livers were perfused with
PBS before being removed. Weak
-galactosidase activity was detected
in the livers of untreated animals, which correlated with positive
X-Gal staining of fewer than 5% of hepatocytes (data not shown). Tail
vein infection of mice with 2 × 109 PFU of
Ad5-CMVLDLR resulted in an about 9-fold activation of
-galactosidase activity, and injection of 1 × 1010
PFU of the same virus stimulated
-galactosidase activity 14-fold (Fig. 8). In the latter case, 40 to 50%
of hepatocytes stained positive for
-galactosidase whereas no
increase in the proportion of stained cells was found in the sodium
chloride-treated control group (data not shown). Thus, infection with
recombinant adenovirus results in a strong stimulation of the CMV
promoter in mouse liver.

View larger version (34K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 8.
Stimulation of CMV promoter activity in transgenic mice.
Female HCMV-1 mice (8 weeks old) were infected via the tail vein with
2 × 109 or 1 × 1010 PFU of
Ad5-CMVLDLR. NaCl-injected animals were used as negative controls. At 4 days after infection, the livers were perfused with PBS and
homogenized, and the -galactosidase activity was determined
luminometrically. Basal -galactosidase activity present in NaCl
treated animals was set 100%. Values represent the means of two
independent experiments.
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
The inability of the CMV promoter to drive long-term expression in
liver has been reported by several authors. However, this phenomenon
had not been investigated in detail so far. In this paper, we show (i)
that the CMV promoter is specifically silenced in mouse liver although
virus DNA is still present at a level comparable to that observed
shortly after adenovirus transduction, (ii) that the CMV promoter can
be reactivated after being silenced in liver by treatment with LPS or
partial hepatectomy, (iii) that the in vitro activity of the CMV
promoter in hepatocyte-derived cell lines is modulated by NF
B, (iv)
that the CMV promoter activity is paralleled by the activation of
NF
B in mouse hepatocytes in vivo after adenovirus transduction, and
(v) that transgene expression can be strongly stimulated by adenovirus
infection in the livers of mice transgenic for the lacZ gene
driven by the CMV promoter.
Two reports have shown that nonspecific in vitro methylation of the CMV
promoter results in complete loss of its activity (40, 47).
Therefore, we checked the virus DNA present in mouse liver 25 days
after infection with Ad5-CMVLDLR for potential methylation and found no
evidence of methylation in the region of transgene insertion. Since the
absence of methylation was shown for only 6 of about 40 CpG sites
present in the CMV promoter region, we cannot preclude methylation of
other sites that might be critical for CMV promoter activity. However,
specific methylation of single CpGs is rather unlikely to occur in
mouse liver, and the reactivatibility of the CMV promoter-dependent
expression 28 days after infection rather contradicts a role of DNA
methylation in the process of silencing the CMV promoter. Therefore, we
suggest that methylation is not involved in silencing of the CMV
promoter in mouse liver after adenovirus gene transfer.
At least two further possibilities could explain the silencing and
reactivation of the CMV promoter. First, a labile repressor which binds
to sequences within the CMV promoter could be present, thereby
preventing or impairing transcription from the promoter. Kothari et al.
(31) reported a factor called MBF1 whose appearance correlated with a moderate repression of CMV promoter activity in
undifferentiated teratocarcinoma T2 and monocytic cells. After differentiation, MBF1 disappeared and CMV promoter activity was enhanced (31, 52). The same group suggested a role for YY1 in downregulation of CMV promoter activity (36).
Unfortunately, it is not clear from their data if binding of YY1 to the
21-bp repeat plays a role in CMV promoter repression or if repression by YY1 is due mainly to the dyad symmetry element in the far-upstream modulator region of the CMV promoter which is not present in most CMV
promoter expression constructs. However, hepatocytes are highly differentiated cells, which are unlikely to express the same factor(s) responsible for CMV promoter repression in undifferentiated T2 or
monocytic cells. Moreover, we did not detect any specific binding of a
protein to the 21-bp repeat in mouse liver and hepatocytes before or
after adenovirus infection (data not shown). Second, adenovirus
infection could elevate the level of transcription factors which are
normally not present in differentiated hepatocytes and thereby could
enable transcription from the CMV promoter. Until now, changes in the
level of transcription factors in the liver following administration of
recombinant adenovirus lacking E1 have not been reported. Since both
LPS and partial hepatectomy result in the activation of a number of
transcriptionally active molecules including NF
B, we suggest that
CMV promoter activation by both stimuli is the consequence of
activation of such molecules.
As a first step toward the investigation of factors involved in the
temporal activity of the CMV promoter in mouse liver in vivo, we
focused on NF
B for several reasons. First, activation of NF
B is
an early event in CMV infection, and reactivation of this promoter in
persisting CMV infection depends on tumor necrosis factor alpha
(TNF
)-mediated induction of NF
B (32, 46, 61). Therefore, NF
B was likely to play a role in CMV promoter-dependent transcription in the liver, which is not a target organ for CMV infection. Second, activated NF
B is not present in hepatocytes of
rats and mice in vivo, and several lines of mice transgenic for CMV
promoter-driven reporter genes exhibited no or only little expression
of the transgene in the liver. In contrast, cultured rodent
hepatocytes, which usually allow for CMV promoter-dependent expression,
contain activated NF
B (16, 17, 23). Third, the presence
of four NF
B binding sites in the CMV promoter is the most striking
characteristic of this promoter, and efficient expression from the CMV
promoter has been shown to depend on the presence of these NF
B sites
in certain cell types such as lymphocytes and VSMCs in vitro. However,
in other cell types, for instance HeLa cells, CMV promoter activity was
shown to be less dependent on the NF
B sites (6, 43, 48).
In our experiments, the activity of the CMV promoter was shown to
depend on NF
B in hepatocyte-derived cell lines. PMA strongly stimulated the activity of this promoter in HepG2 cells, which are
negative for activated NF
B, and prevention of nuclear transport of
NF
B by coexpression of a dominant-negative I
B
mutant inhibited CMV promoter activity in HepSV40 cells, whose nuclei harbor p50/p65 complexes. However, the effect of the dominant-negative mutant was only
moderate (fourfold inhibition), which is in agreement with our
hypothesis that NF
B might be only one of several factors involved in
CMV promoter activation in vitro. For example, both AP1 and CREB/ATF
binding activities are present in HepSV40 cells and could partially
compensate for the depletion of NF
B.
The dependence of the in vivo activity of the CMV promoter in mouse
liver on NF
B was supported by three lines of evidence. First,
partial hepatectomy and LPS both stimulated the previously silenced CMV
promoter-driven transcription in mouse liver. Both partial hepatectomy
and LPS have been shown to activate NF
B in hepatocytes (11, 12,
16, 17, 55, 60). Second, infection with recombinant adenovirus
led to activation of NF
B in mouse hepatocytes, and the observed time
course of NF
B activation in mouse hepatocytes paralleled the
expression from the CMV promoter in mouse liver. Third, infection of
mice transgenic for a CMV promoter-driven lacZ gene with
recombinant adenovirus resulted in strong activation of transgene
expression in the liver. Although no separation of hepatocytes and NPCs
was performed in this experiment, activation of
-galactosidase
expression clearly occurred in hepatocytes, as was observed after X-Gal
staining (data not shown). Moreover, partial hepatectomy in these mice
also stimulated the CMV promoter (data not shown). The fact that the
same dose of recombinant adenovirus both strongly activates CMV
promoter-dependent expression in mouse liver and induces NF
B
activity in hepatocytes strongly suggests that CMV promoter activity in
hepatocytes after infection with recombinant adenovirus is dependent on
NF
B.
We are aware that other transcription factors, like AP1 and CREB/ATF,
which bind to the CMV promoter, might also play a role in the
reactivation as well in the short-term activity of the CMV promoter in
hepatocytes. After partial hepatectomy, several transcription factors
are activated in a characteristic temporal manner (for a recent review,
see reference 54). For instance, the AP1 level in
liver is strongly elevated after partial hepatectomy (12,
60). Therefore, AP1 might contribute to the reactivation of the
CMV promoter. However, we did not detect an activity binding to the CMV
promoter AP1 site after adenovirus infection in hepatocyte nuclear
extracts (data not shown), which would imply that induction of this
transcription factor is not involved in the short-term activity of the
CMV promoter in liver. Thus, certain transcription factors might
contribute to the temporal activity and reactivation of the CMV
promoter to different extents. We think that NF
B is critical for
full activity of the CMV promoter in mouse liver. This idea is
supported by our in vitro results, which show that inhibition of NF
B
translocation represses expression from the CMV promoter without
completely silencing it.
The mechanism of NF
B activation in mouse hepatocytes following
infection with recombinant adenovirus remains unknown. It is possible
that an immune response to adenovirus infection is responsible for the
elevation in NF
B level observed in hepatocytes. NF
B is
efficiently induced by interleukin-1 (IL-1), IL-6 and TNF
. The main
sources of IL-1 and TNF
are activated mononuclear monocytes in the
liver, namely, Kupffer cells. However, depletion of macrophages from
the liver still allowed for expression from the CMV promoter
(58). IL-6, which plays an important part in liver
regeneration and activation of acute-phase proteins, acts via
activation of NF
B in hepatocytes. Although increases in the IL-6
level after systemic administration of low doses of recombinant adenovirus (1 × 109 to 2 × 109
PFU/mouse) have not been reported so far, it is possible that this
cytokine is involved. In the lungs, local administration of
E1-deficient virus at minimal doses between 107 and
108 PFU resulted in elevation of IL-6 levels in serum
(38). Thus, cytokine response to virus infection could
stimulate NF
B and thereby CMV promoter-dependent transcription. This
mechanism can also account for the temporal activity of the CMV
promoter in the context of other gene transfer systems.
It was recently shown that recombinant E1-deficient adenovirus by
itself can stimulate NF
B in the infected cell. For instance, Bruder
and Kovesdi (9) showed that adenovirus infection of HeLa
cells resulted in rapid activation of the Raf/MAPK pathway. Raf-1 was
shown to be involved in the activation of NF
B (7). However, this mechanism cannot account for the time course of NF
B
activation observed in our experiments. Transfection experiments by
Pahl et al. (44) showed that retention of the adenovirus E3/19K protein in the endoplasmic reticulum and subsequent endoplasmic reticulum overload activated NF
B in vitro. The adenovirus vector used in our study theoretically can produce this E3 protein, although efficient transcription of E3 genes requires E1A gene products. Since
transfection of low doses of the E3 gene was sufficient to induce
strong NF
B activation in the experiments of Pahl et al.
(44), it is possible that despite low expression of E3
genes, this mechanism plays a part in the in vivo induction of NF
B. The idea that an intrinsic property of the adenovirus vector might play
a role in CMV promoter activation is supported by the X-Gal staining
pattern in the livers of transgenic mice after adenovirus infection,
which is similar to patterns observed after systemic infection of mice
with Ad5-RSVBG (data not shown).
While our experiments were in progress, Armentano et al. (1)
reported an unaltered expression from the CMV promoter in the lungs of
nude mice for 21 days. In their study, sustained expression was
observed only in immunodeficient animals and was dependent on the
integrity of the adenovirus E4 region. Since in their study coinfection
with E4-positive vectors could reconstitute CMV promoter-driven
transgene expression from E4-defective vectors, a role of E4 products
in CMV promoter activity was suggested. However, it is possible that
this phenomenon refers to the specific situation in the lungs of
immunodeficient animals, since we and others (21) observed
silencing of the CMV promoter in the livers of immunocompetent animals
when using vectors that contain a complete E4 region. We also cannot
exclude that differences in the adenovirus serotype and subtle
differences in the vector backbone, apart from E4, account for the
observed differences.
In summary, we have shown that the activity of a previously silenced
CMV promoter can be restored in the liver, and we suggest a role for
NF
B in the temporal activity of this promoter in vivo. It will be
interesting to analyze additional factors activated in the liver after
infection with low doses of adenovirus vectors with E1 deleted.
Moreover, alternative stimuli of CMV promoter-dependent transcription
in transgenic mice will be tested and could provide further insight
into the mechanisms involved in the frequently observed silencing of
this strong promoter in vivo.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
We thank Heidemarie Riedel and Alexandra-V. Bohne for expert
technical assistance, and we are grateful to Grit Sandig and Vigo
Heissmeyer for helpful suggestions. We thank Susanna Prösch, Manal Morsy, and Claus Scheidereit for critical readings of the manuscript. We are particularly grateful to Pamela J. Mitchell for
providing the CMV-1 transgenic mice and to Daniel Krappmann and Claus
Scheidereit for their generous gift of the dominant-negative I
B
mutant.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
Corresponding author. Mailing address: MDC,
Robert-Rössle-Str. 10, D-13122 Berlin-Buch, Germany. Phone:
49/30/94063307. Fax: 49/30/94063306. E-mail: mstrauss{at}mdc.berlin.de.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Armentano, D.,
J. Zabner,
C. Sacks,
C. C. Sookdeo,
M. P. Smith,
J. A. St. George,
S. C. Wadsworth,
A. E. Smith, and R. Gregory.
1997.
Effect of the E4 region on the persistence of transgene expression from adenovirus vectors.
J. Virol.
71:2408-2416[Abstract].
|
| 2.
|
Baeuerle, P. A., and T. Henkel.
1994.
Function and activation of NF- B in the immune system.
Annu. Rev. Immunol.
12:141-179[Medline].
|
| 3.
|
Baeuerle, P. A., and D. Baltimore.
1996.
NF- B: ten years after.
Cell
87:13-20[Medline].
|
| 4.
|
Barr, D.,
J. Tubb,
D. Ferguson,
A. Scaria,
A. Lieber,
C. Wilson,
J. Perkins, and M. A. Kay.
1995.
Strain related variations in adenovirally mediated transgene expression from mouse hepatocytes in vivo: comparisons between immunocompetent and immunodeficient inbred strains.
Gene Ther.
2:151-155[Medline].
|
| 5.
|
Baskar, J. F.,
P. P. Smith,
G. Nilaver,
R. A. Jupp,
S. Hoffmann,
N. J. Peffer,
D. J. Tenney,
A. M. Colberg-Poley,
P. Ghazal, and J. A. Nelson.
1996.
The enhancer domain of the human cytomegalovirus immediate-early promoter determines cell type-specific expression in transgenic mice.
J. Virol.
70:3207-3214[Abstract].
|
| 6.
|
Bellas, R. E.,
J. S. Lee, and G. E. Sonenshein.
1995.
Expression of a constitutive NF- B-like activity is essential for proliferation of cultured bovine vascular smooth muscle cells.
J. Clin. Invest.
96:2521-2527.
|
| 7.
|
Bertrand, F.,
C. Philippe,
P. J. Antoine,
L. Baud,
A. Groyer,
J. Capeau, and G. Cherqui.
1995.
Insulin activates nuclear factor NF B in mammalian cells through a Raf-1-mediated pathway.
J. Biol. Chem.
270:24435-24441[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 8.
|
Boshart, M.,
F. Weber,
G. Jahn,
K. Dorsch-Häsler,
B. Fleckenstein, and W. Schaffner.
1985.
A very strong enhancer is located upstream of an immediate early gene of human cytomegalovirus.
Cell
41:521-530[Medline].
|
| 9.
|
Bruder, J. T., and I. Kovesdi.
1997.
Adenovirus infection stimulates the Raf/MAPK signaling pathway and induces interleukin-8 expression.
J. Virol.
71:398-404[Abstract].
|
| 10.
|
Clesham, G. J.,
H. Brown,
S. Efstathiou, and P. L. Weissberg.
1996.
Enhancer stimulation unmasks latent gene transfer after adenovirus-mediated gene delivery to human vascular smooth muscle cells.
Circ. Res.
79:1188-1195[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 11.
|
Cressman, D. E.,
L. E. Greenbaum,
B. A. Haber, and R. Taub.
1994.
Rapid activation of post-hepatectomy factor/nuclear factor B in hepatocytes, a primary response in the regenerating liver.
J. Biol. Chem.
269:30429-30435[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 12.
|
Cressman, D. E.,
L. E. Greenbaum,
R. A. DeAngelis,
G. Ciliberto,
E. E. Furth,
V. Poli, and R. Taub.
1996.
Liver failure and defective hepatocyte regeneration in interleukin-6-deficient mice.
Science
274:1379-1383[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 13.
|
Dai, Y.,
M. Roman,
R. K. Naviaux, and I. M. Verma.
1992.
Gene therapy via primary myoblasts: long-term expression of factor IX protein following transplantation in vivo.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
89:10892-10895[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 14.
|
Dai, Y.,
E. M. Schwarz,
D. Gu,
W.-W. Zhang,
N. Sarvetnick, and I. M. Verma.
1995.
Cellular and humoral immune response to adenoviral vectors containing factor IX gene: tolerization of factor IX and vector antigens allow for long-term expression.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
92:1401-1405[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 14a.
|
Essani, N. A.,
G. M. McGuire,
A. M. Manning, and H. Jaeschke.
1996.
Endotoxin-induced activation of the nuclear transcription factor B and expression of E-selectin messanger RNA in hepatocytes, Kupffer cells, and endothelial cells in vivo.
J. Immunol.
156:2956-2963[Abstract].
|
| 15.
|
Fietze, E.,
S. Prösch,
P. Reike,
J. Stein,
W.-D. Döcke,
G. Staffa,
S. Löning,
S. Devaux,
F. Emmerich,
R. von Baehr,
D. H. Krüger, and H.-D. Volk.
1994.
Cytomegalovirus infection in transplantation patients.
Transplantation
58:675-680[Medline].
|
| 16.
|
FitzGerald, M. J.,
E. M. Webber,
J. R. Donovan, and N. Fausto.
1995.
Rapid DNA binding by nuclear factor B in hepatocytes at the start of liver regeneration.
Cell Growth Differ.
6:417-427[Abstract].
|
| 17.
|
Freedman, A. R.,
R. J. Sharma,
G. J. Nabel,
S. G. Emerson, and G. E. Griffin.
1992.
Cellular distribution of nuclear factor B binding activity in rat liver.
Biochem. J.
287:645-649.
|
| 18.
|
Furth, P. A.,
L. Hennighausen,
C. Baker,
B. Beatty, and R. Woychick.
1991.
The variability in activity of the universally expressed human cytomegalovirus immediate early gene 1 enhancer/promoter in transgenic mice.
Nucleic Acids Res.
19:6205-6208[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 19.
|
Ghazal, P.,
H. Lubon,
B. Fleckenstein, and L. Hennighausen.
1987.
Binding of transcription factors and creation of a large nucleoprotein complex on the human cytomegalovirus enhancer.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
84:3658-3662[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 20.
|
Gruber, P. J.,
A. Torres-Rosado,
M. L. Wolak, and T. Leff.
1994.
Apo Ciii gene transcription is regulated by a cytokine inducible NF- B element.
Nucleic Acids Res.
22:2417-2422[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 21.
|
Guo, Z. S.,
L.-H. Wang,
R. C. Eisensmith, and S. C. L. Woo.
1996.
Evaluation of promoter strength for hepatic gene expression in vivo following adenovirus-mediated gene transfer.
Gene Ther.
3:802-810[Medline].
|
| 22.
|
Hansen, S. K.,
P. A. Baeuerle, and F. Blasi.
1994.
Purification, reconstitution, and IkB association of the c-Rel-p65 (RelA) complex, a strong activator of transcription.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
14:2593-2603[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 23.
|
Hattori, M.,
A. Tugores,
J. K. Westwick,
L. Veloz,
H. L. Leffert,
M. Karin, and D. A. Brenner.
1993.
Activation of activating protein 1 during hepatic acute phase response.
Am. J. Physiol.
264:G95-G103[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 24.
|
Hickman, A. E.,
R. W. Malone,
K. Lehmann-Bruinsma,
T. R. Sih,
D. Knoell,
F. C. Szoka,
R. Walzem,
D. M. Carlson, and J. S. Powell.
1994.
Gene expression following direct injection of DNA into liver.
Hum. Gene Ther.
5:1477-1483[Medline].
|
| 25.
|
Hunninghake, G. W.,
M. M. Monick,
B. Liu, and M. F. Stinski.
1989.
The promoter-regulatory region of the major immediate-early gene of human cytomegalovirus responds to T-lymphocyte stimulation and contains functional cyclic AMP response elements.
J. Virol.
63:3026-3033[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 26.
| Jennings, G. S., J. Bartkova, S. Herwig, J. Lukas,
J. Bartek, and M. Strauss. Submitted for publication.
|
| 27.
|
Kay, M. A.,
Q. Li,
T.-J. Liu,
F. Leland,
C. Toman,
M. Finegold, and S. Woo.
1992.
Hepatic gene therapy: persistent expression of human 1-antitrypsin in mice after direct gene delivery in vivo.
Hum. Gene Ther.
3:641-647[Medline].
|
| 28.
|
Kay, M. A.,
S. Rothenberg,
C. N. Landen,
D. A. Bellinger,
F. Leland,
C. Toman,
M. Finegold,
A. R. Thompson,
M. S. Read,
K. M. Brinkhous, and S. L. C. Woo.
1993.
In vivo correction of hemophelia B: sustained partial correction in factor IX-deficient dogs.
Science
262:117-119[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 29.
|
Kiwaki, K.,
Y. Kanegae,
I. Saito,
S. Komaki,
K. Nakamura,
J.-I. Miyazaki,
F. Endo, and I. Matsuda.
1996.
Correction of ornithine transcarbamylase deficiency in adult spffash mice and in OTC-deficient human hepatocytes with recombinant adenovirus bearing the CAG promoter.
Hum. Gene Ther.
7:821-830[Medline].
|
| 30.
|
Koedodd, M.,
A. Fichtel,
P. Meier, and P. J. Mitchell.
1995.
Human cytomegalovirus (HCMV) immediate-early enhancer/promoter specificity during embryogenesis defines target tissues of congenital HCMV infection.
J. Virol.
69:2194-2207[Abstract].
|
| 31.
|
Kothari, S.,
J. Baullie,
J. G. P. Sissons, and J. H. Sinclair.
1991.
The 21 bp repeat element of the human cytomegalovirus major immediate early enhancer is a negative regulator of gene expression in undifferentiated cells.
Nucleic Acids Res.
29:1767-1771.
|
| 32.
|
Kowalik, T. F.,
B. Wing,
J. S. Haskill,
J. C. Azizkhan,
A. S. Baldwin, Jr., and E. S. Huang.
1993.
Multiple mechanisms are implicated in the regulation of NF-kappa B activity during human cytomegalovirus infection.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
90:1107-1111[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 33.
|
Krappmann, D.,
F. G. Wulczyn, and C. Scheidereit.
1996.
Different mechanisms control signal-induced degradation and basal turnover of the NF- B inhibitor IkB in vivo.
EMBO J.
15:6716-6726[Medline].
|
| 34.
|
Lang, D.,
H. Fickenscher, and T. Stamminger.
1992.
Analysis of proteins binding to the proximal promoter region of the human cytomegalovirus IE-1/2 enhancer/promoter reveals both consensus and aberrant recognition sequences for transcription factors Sp1 and CREB.
Nucleic Acids Res.
20:3287-3295[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 35.
|
Lieber, A.,
V. Sandig, and M. Strauss.
1993.
A mutant T7 phage promoter is specifically transcribed by T7-RNA polymerase in mammalian cells.
Eur. J. Biochem.
217:387-394[Medline].
|
| 36.
|
Liu, R.,
J. Baillie,
J. G. P. Sissons, and J. H. Sinclair.
1994.
The transcription factor YY1 binds to negative regulatory elements in the human cytomegalovirus major immediate early enhancer/promoter and mediates repression in non-permissive cells.
Nucleic Acids Res.
22:2453-2459[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 37.
|
Löser, P.,
V. Sandig,
I. Kirillova, and M. Strauss.
1996.
Evaluation of HBV promoters for use in hepatic gene therapy.
Biol. Chem. Hoppe-Seyler
377:187-193[Medline].
|
| 38.
|
McElvaney, N. G., and R. G. Crystal.
1995.
IL-6 release and airway administration of human CFTR cDNA adenovirus vector.
Nat. Med.
1:182-184[Medline].
|
| 39.
|
Miyanohara, A.,
P. A. Johnson,
R. L. Elam,
Y. Dai,
J. L. Witztum,
I. M. Verma, and T. Friedmann.
1992.
Direct gene transfer to the liver with herpes simplex virus type 1 vectors: transient production of physiologically relevant levels of circulating factor IX.
New Biol.
4:238-246[Medline].
|
| 40.
|
Muiznieks, I., and W. Doerfler.
1994.
The impact of 5'-CG-3' methylation on the activity of different eukaryotic promoters: a comparative study.
FEBS Lett.
344:251-254[Medline].
|
| 41.
|
Müller, U.,
T. Kleinberger, and T. Shenk.
1992.
Adenovirus E4orf4 protein reduces phosphorylation of c-Fos and E1A proteins while simultaneously reducing the level of AP-1.
J. Virol.
66:5867-5878[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 42.
|
Naumann, M., and C. Scheidereit.
1994.
Activation of NF-kappa B in vivo is regulated by multiple phosphorylations.
EMBO J.
13:4597-4607[Medline].
|
| 43.
|
Niller, H. H., and L. Hennighausen.
1991.
Formation of several specific nucleoprotein complexes on the human cytomegalovirus immediate early enhancer.
Nucleic Acids Res.
19:3715-3721[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 44.
|
Pahl, H. L.,
M. Sester,
H.-G. Burgert, and P. A. Baeuerle.
1996.
Activation of transcription factor NF- B by the adenovirus E3/19K protein requires its ER retention.
J. Cell Biol.
132:511-522[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 45.
|
Paul, D.
1988.
Immortalized differenciated hepatocyte lines derived from transgenic mice harbouring SV40-T-antigen.
Exp. Cell Res.
175:354-362[Medline].
|
| 46.
|
Prösch, S.,
K. Staak,
J. Stein,
C. Liebenthal,
T. Stamminger,
H.-D. Volk, and D. H. Krüger.
1995.
Stimulation of the human cytomegalovirus IE enhancer/promoter in HL-60 cells by TNF is mediated via induction of NF- B.
Virology
208:197-206[Medline].
|
| 47.
|
Prösch, S.,
J. Stein,
K. Staak,
C. Liebenthal,
H.-D. Volk, and D. H. Krüger.
1996.
Inactivation of the very strong HCMV immediate early promoter by DNA CpG methylation in vitro.
Biol. Chem. Hoppe-Seyler
377:195-201[Medline].
|
| 48.
|
Sambucetti, L. C.,
J. M. Cherrington,
G. W. G. Wilkinson, and E. S. Mocarski.
1989.
NF- B activati |