JVI Track the topics, authors and articles important to you
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] --
JVI Accepts, published online ahead of print on 11 April 2007
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Other Versions of this Article:
JVI.00441-07v1
81/12/6307    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Katpally, U.
Right arrow Articles by Smith, T. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Katpally, U.
Right arrow Articles by Smith, T. J.
J. Virol. doi:10.1128/JVI.00441-07
Copyright (c) 2007, American Society for Microbiology and/or the Listed Authors/Institutions. All Rights Reserved.

Pocket factors unlikely play a major role in the life cycle of human rhinovirus

Umesh Katpally and Thomas J. Smith*

Donald Danforth Plant Science Center, 975 North Warson Road, Saint Louis, MO 63132

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. Email: tsmith{at}danforthcenter.org.


   Abstract

Human rhinovirus 14 is a member of the rhinovirus genus that belongs to the picornavirus family that includes clinically and economically important members such as poliovirus, foot and mouth disease virus (FMDV), and endomyocarditis virus (EMCV). Capsid stability plays an important role in the viral infection process, in that it needs to be stable enough to move from cell to cell and yet be able to release its genetic material upon the appropriate environmental cues from the host cell. It has been suggested that certain host cell molecules, ‘pocket factors’, bind to the WIN drug binding cavity beneath the canyon floor and provide transient stability to a number of the picornaviruses. To directly test this hypothesis, HRV14 was mutated in (V1188M, C1199W and V1188M/C1199W) and around (S1223G) the drug-binding pocket. Infectivity, limited proteolysis, and MALDI analyses indicate that filling the drug-binding pocket with bulky side chains is not deleterious to the viral life cycle and lend some stabilization to the capsid. In contrast, studies on the S1223G mutant suggest that this mutation at least partially overcomes WIN drug-mediated inhibition of cell attachment and capsid breathing. Finally, HRV16, which is inherently more stable than HRV14 in a number of respects, was found to ‘breath’ only at 37° C and did not tolerate stabilizing mutations in the drug-binding cavity. These results suggest that it is the drug binding cavity itself, and not the putative pocket factor, that is crucial for capsid dynamics that is, in turn, necessary for infection.




This article has been cited by other articles:




Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] --
J. Bacteriol. Mol. Cell. Biol. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev.
Clin. Vaccine Immunol. ALL ASM JOURNALS

Copyright © 2007 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.