Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Journal of Virology, February 2009, p. 1892-1910, Vol. 83, No. 4
0022-538X/09/$08.00+0 doi:10.1128/JVI.01373-08
Copyright © 2009, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
,
Laboratory of Infectious Diseases, Respiratory Viruses Section, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Department of Health and Human Services, Bethesda, Maryland 20892-8007
Received 1 July 2008/ Accepted 24 November 2008
Human parainfluenza virus type 1 (HPIV1) is an important respiratory pathogen in children and the most common cause of viral croup. We performed a microarray-based analysis of gene expression kinetics to examine how wild-type (wt) HPIV1 infection altered gene expression in human respiratory epithelial cells and what role beta interferon played in this response. We similarly evaluated HPIV1-P(C–), a highly attenuated and apoptosis-inducing virus that does not express any of the four C proteins, and HPIV1-CF170S, a less attenuated mutant that contains a single point mutation in C and, like wt HPIV1, does not efficiently induce apoptosis, to examine the role of the C proteins in controlling host gene expression. We also used these data to investigate whether the phenotypic differences between the two C mutants could be explained at the transcriptional level. Mutation or deletion of the C proteins of HPIV1 permitted the activation of over 2,000 cellular genes that otherwise would be repressed by HPIV1 infection. Thus, the C proteins profoundly suppress the response of human respiratory cells to HPIV1 infection. Cellular pathways targeted by the HPIV1 C proteins were identified and their transcriptional control was analyzed using bioinformatics. Transcription factor binding sites for IRF and NF-
B were overrepresented in some of the C protein-targeted pathways, but other pathways were dominated by less-known factors, such as forkhead transcription factor FOXD1. Surprisingly, the host responses to the P(C–) and CF170S mutants were very similar, and only subtle differences in the expression kinetics of caspase 3 and TRAIL receptor 2 were observed. Thus, changes in host cell transcription did not reflect the striking phenotypic differences observed between these two viruses.
Published ahead of print on 3 December 2008.
Supplemental material for this article may be found at http://jvi.asm.org/.
This article has been cited by other articles:
Copyright © 2010 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»