This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Côté, M.
Right arrow Articles by Liu, S.-L.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Côté, M.
Right arrow Articles by Liu, S.-L.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Journal of Virology, November 2009, p. 11447-11455, Vol. 83, No. 22
0022-538X/09/$08.00+0     doi:10.1128/JVI.00748-09
Copyright © 2009, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Receptor Binding and Low pH Coactivate Oncogenic Retrovirus Envelope-Mediated Fusion{triangledown}

Marceline Côté, Yi-Min Zheng, and Shan-Lu Liu*

Department of Microbiology and Immunology, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec H3A 2B4, Canada

Received 10 April 2009/ Accepted 26 August 2009

Fusion of enveloped viruses with host cells is triggered by either receptor binding or low pH but rarely requires both except for avian sarcoma leukosis virus (ASLV). We recently reported that membrane fusion mediated by an oncogenic Jaagsiekte sheep retrovirus (JSRV) envelope (Env) requires an acidic pH, yet receptor overexpression is required for this process to occur. Here we show that a soluble form of the JSRV receptor, sHyal2, promoted JSRV Env-mediated fusion at a low pH in normally fusion-negative cells and that this effect was blocked by a synthetic peptide analogous to the C-terminal heptad repeat of JSRV Env. In contrast to the receptor of ASLV, sHyal2 induced pronounced shedding of the JSRV surface subunit, as well as unstable conformational rearrangement of its transmembrane (TM) subunit, yet full activation of JSRV Env fusogenicity, associated with strong TM oligomerization, required both sHyal2 and low pH. Consistently, sHyal2 enabled transduction of nonpermissive cells by JSRV Env pseudovirions, with low efficiency, but substantially blocked viral entry into permissive cells at both binding and postbinding steps, indicating that sHyal2 prematurely activates JSRV Env-mediated fusion. Altogether, our study supports a model that receptor priming promotes fusion activation of JSRV Env at a low pH, and that the underlying mechanism is likely to be different from that of ASLV. Thus, JSRV may provide a useful alternate model for the better understanding of virus fusion and cell entry.


* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Department of Microbiology and Immunology, McGill University, Montreal, Canada. Phone: (514) 398-4582. Fax: (514) 398-7052. E-mail: shan-lu.liu{at}mcgill.ca

{triangledown} Published ahead of print on 2 September 2009.


Journal of Virology, November 2009, p. 11447-11455, Vol. 83, No. 22
0022-538X/09/$08.00+0     doi:10.1128/JVI.00748-09
Copyright © 2009, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.