This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Yin, J.
Right arrow Articles by Klimstra, W. B.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Yin, J.
Right arrow Articles by Klimstra, W. B.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Journal of Virology, October 2009, p. 10036-10047, Vol. 83, No. 19
0022-538X/09/$08.00+0     doi:10.1128/JVI.01209-09
Copyright © 2009, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Similarities and Differences in Antagonism of Neuron Alpha/Beta Interferon Responses by Venezuelan Equine Encephalitis and Sindbis Alphaviruses{triangledown}

Jun Yin, Christina L. Gardner, Crystal W. Burke, Kate D. Ryman, and William B. Klimstra*

Center for Molecular and Tumor Virology, Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, Shreveport, Louisiana 71130

Received 12 June 2009/ Accepted 16 July 2009

Venezuelan equine encephalitis virus (VEEV) is highly virulent in adult laboratory mice, while Sindbis virus (SINV) is avirulent regardless of dose or inoculation route, dependent upon functioning alpha/beta interferon (IFN-{alpha}/β) responses. We have examined each virus' resistance to and/or antagonism of IFN-{alpha}/β responses in neurons, a cell type targeted by both viruses in mice, by infecting IFN-{alpha}/β-treated or untreated primary cultures with viruses or virus-derived replicons that lacked the structural proteins. Priming with IFN-{alpha}/β prior to infection revealed that VEEV replication and progeny virion production were resistant to an established antiviral state while those of SINV were more sensitive. Postinfection IFN-{alpha}/β treatment revealed that phosphorylation of STAT1 and STAT2 was partially blocked by infection with either virus, dependent upon expression of nonstructural proteins (nsP), but not structural proteins (sP). However, inhibition of STAT phosphorylation by VEEV replicons was not correlated with inhibition of IFN-stimulated gene (ISG) mRNA induction, yet ISG induction was inhibited when sP were present. Host translation was inhibited by VEEV nsP even when cells were pretreated with IFN-{alpha}/β. SINV blocked ISG induction and translation, associated with nsP-mediated shutoff of macromolecular synthesis, but both activities were sensitive to IFN-{alpha}/β pretreatment. We conclude that both VEEV and SINV limit ISG induction in infected neurons through shutoff of host transcription and translation but that inhibition by VEEV is more resistant to IFN-{alpha}/β priming. Likewise, both viruses inhibit IFN receptor-initiated signaling, although the effect upon host responses is not clear. Finally, VEEV appears to be more resistant to effectors of the preestablished antiviral state.

* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Center for Molecular and Tumor Virology, Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, Shreveport, LA 71130. Phone: (318) 675-5771. Fax: (318) 675-5764. E-mail: wklims{at}lsuhsc.edu

{triangledown} Published ahead of print on 29 July 2009.

Journal of Virology, October 2009, p. 10036-10047, Vol. 83, No. 19
0022-538X/09/$08.00+0     doi:10.1128/JVI.01209-09
Copyright © 2009, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.





Copyright © 2010 by the American Society for Microbiology.   For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»