This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bishop, K. A.
Right arrow Articles by Broder, C. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bishop, K. A.
Right arrow Articles by Broder, C. C.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
*Gene
*Substance via MeSH

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Journal of Virology, November 2008, p. 11398-11409, Vol. 82, No. 22
0022-538X/08/$08.00+0     doi:10.1128/JVI.02654-07
Copyright © 2008, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Residues in the Stalk Domain of the Hendra Virus G Glycoprotein Modulate Conformational Changes Associated with Receptor Binding{triangledown}

Kimberly A. Bishop,1,{dagger} Andrew C. Hickey,1 Dimple Khetawat,1 Jared R. Patch,1 Katharine N. Bossart,2 Zhongyu Zhu,3,4 Lin-Fa Wang,2 Dimiter S. Dimitrov,3 and Christopher C. Broder1*

Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Uniformed Services University, Bethesda, Maryland 20814,1 CSIRO Livestock Industries, Australian Animal Health Laboratory, Geelong, Victoria 3220, Australia,2 Protein Interactions Group, CCRNP, CCR, NCI-Frederick, NIH, Frederick, Maryland 21702,3 BRP, SAIC-Frederick, Inc., NCI-Frederick, Frederick, Maryland 217024

Received 13 December 2007/ Accepted 22 August 2008

Hendra virus (HeV) is a member of the broadly tropic and highly pathogenic paramyxovirus genus Henipavirus. HeV is enveloped and infects cells by using membrane-anchored attachment (G) and fusion (F) glycoproteins. G possesses an N-terminal cytoplasmic tail, an external membrane-proximal stalk domain, and a C-terminal globular head that binds the recently identified receptors ephrinB2 and ephrinB3. Receptor binding is presumed to induce conformational changes in G that subsequently trigger F-mediated fusion. The stalk domains of other attachment glycoproteins appear important for oligomerization and F interaction and specificity. However, this region of G has not been functionally characterized. Here we performed a mutagenesis analysis of the HeV G stalk, targeting a series of isoleucine residues within a hydrophobic {alpha}-helical domain that is well conserved across several attachment glycoproteins. Nine of 12 individual HeV G alanine substitution mutants possessed a complete defect in fusion-promotion activity yet were cell surface expressed and recognized by a panel of conformation-dependent monoclonal antibodies (MAbs) and maintained their oligomeric structure. Interestingly, these G mutations also resulted in the appearance of an additional electrophoretic species corresponding to a slightly altered glycosylated form. Analysis revealed that these G mutants appeared to adopt a receptor-bound conformation in the absence of receptor, as measured with a panel of MAbs that preferentially recognize G in a receptor-bound state. Further, this phenotype also correlated with an inability to associate with F and in triggering fusion even after receptor engagement. Together, these data suggest the stalk domain of G plays an important role in the conformational stability and receptor binding-triggered changes leading to productive fusion, such as the dissociation of G and F.


* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Uniformed Services University, Bethesda, MD 20814. Phone: (301) 295-3401. Fax: (301) 295-1545. E-mail: cbroder{at}usuhs.mil

{triangledown} Published ahead of print on 17 September 2008.

{dagger} Present address: Biological Defense Research Directorate Annex, Naval Medical Research Center, Rockville, MD 20852.


Journal of Virology, November 2008, p. 11398-11409, Vol. 82, No. 22
0022-538X/08/$08.00+0     doi:10.1128/JVI.02654-07
Copyright © 2008, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.




This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Connolly, S. A., Leser, G. P., Jardetzky, T. S., Lamb, R. A. (2009). Bimolecular Complementation of Paramyxovirus Fusion and Hemagglutinin-Neuraminidase Proteins Enhances Fusion: Implications for the Mechanism of Fusion Triggering. J. Virol. 83: 10857-10868 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Paal, T., Brindley, M. A., St. Clair, C., Prussia, A., Gaus, D., Krumm, S. A., Snyder, J. P., Plemper, R. K. (2009). Probing the Spatial Organization of Measles Virus Fusion Complexes. J. Virol. 83: 10480-10493 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Whitman, S. D., Smith, E. C., Dutch, R. E. (2009). Differential Rates of Protein Folding and Cellular Trafficking for the Hendra Virus F and G Proteins: Implications for F-G Complex Formation. J. Virol. 83: 8998-9001 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Aguilar, H. C., Ataman, Z. A., Aspericueta, V., Fang, A. Q., Stroud, M., Negrete, O. A., Kammerer, R. A., Lee, B. (2009). A Novel Receptor-induced Activation Site in the Nipah Virus Attachment Glycoprotein (G) Involved in Triggering the Fusion Glycoprotein (F). J. Biol. Chem. 284: 1628-1635 [Abstract] [Full Text]