Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Journal of Virology, August 2008, p. 7369-7378, Vol. 82, No. 15
0022-538X/08/$08.00+0 doi:10.1128/JVI.00562-08
Copyright © 2008, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
,
Laboratory of Nucleic Acid Vaccines, Department of Medicine, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, Massachusetts 01655,1 Torrey Pines Institute for Molecular Studies, San Diego, California 92121,2 Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina 277103
Received 13 March 2008/ Accepted 12 May 2008
A major challenge in human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) vaccine development is to elicit potent and broadly neutralizing antibodies that are effective against primary viral isolates. Previously, we showed that DNA prime-protein boost vaccination using HIV-1 gp120 antigens was more effective in eliciting neutralizing antibodies against primary HIV-1 isolates than was a recombinant gp120 protein-only vaccination approach. In the current study, we analyzed the difference in antibody specificities in rabbit sera elicited by these two immunization regimens using peptide enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and a competitive virus capture assay. Our results indicate that a DNA prime-protein boost regimen is more effective than a protein-alone vaccination approach in inducing antibodies that target two key neutralizing domains: the V3 loop and the CD4 binding site. In particular, positive antibodies targeting several peptides that overlap with the known CD4 binding area were detected only in DNA-primed sera. Different profiles of antibody specificities provide insight into the mechanisms behind the elicitation of better neutralizing antibodies with the DNA prime-protein boost approach, and our results support the use of this approach to further optimize Env formulations for HIV vaccine development.
Published ahead of print on 21 May 2008.
Supplemental material for this article may be found at http://jvi.asm.org/.
This article has been cited by other articles:
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»