This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Aguilar, H. C.
Right arrow Articles by Lee, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Aguilar, H. C.
Right arrow Articles by Lee, B.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Journal of Virology, May 2007, p. 4520-4532, Vol. 81, No. 9
0022-538X/07/$08.00+0     doi:10.1128/JVI.02205-06
Copyright © 2007, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Polybasic KKR Motif in the Cytoplasmic Tail of Nipah Virus Fusion Protein Modulates Membrane Fusion by Inside-Out Signaling{triangledown}

Hector C. Aguilar,1 Kenneth A. Matreyek,1 Daniel Y. Choi,1 Claire Marie Filone,4 Sophia Young,1 and Benhur Lee1,2,3*

Department of Microbiology, Immunology, and Molecular Genetics,1 Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine,2 AIDS Institute, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, California 90095,3 Department of Microbiology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 191044

Received 6 October 2006/ Accepted 31 January 2007

The cytoplasmic tails of the envelope proteins from multiple viruses are known to contain determinants that affect their fusogenic capacities. Here we report that specific residues in the cytoplasmic tail of the Nipah virus fusion protein (NiV-F) modulate its fusogenic activity. Truncation of the cytoplasmic tail of NiV-F greatly inhibited cell-cell fusion. Deletion and alanine scan analysis identified a tribasic KKR motif in the membrane-adjacent region as important for modulating cell-cell fusion. The K1A mutation increased fusion 5.5-fold, while the K2A and R3A mutations decreased fusion 3- to 5-fold. These results were corroborated in a reverse-pseudotyped viral entry assay, where receptor-pseudotyped reporter virus was used to infect cells expressing wild-type or mutant NiV envelope glycoproteins. Differential monoclonal antibody binding data indicated that hyper- or hypofusogenic mutations in the KKR motif affected the ectodomain conformation of NiV-F, which in turn resulted in faster or slower six-helix bundle formation, respectively. However, we also present evidence that the hypofusogenic phenotypes of the K2A and R3A mutants were effected via distinct mechanisms. Interestingly, the K2A mutant was also markedly excluded from lipid rafts, where ~20% of wild-type F and the other mutants can be found. Finally, we found a strong negative correlation between the relative fusogenic capacities of these cytoplasmic-tail mutants and the avidities of NiV-F and NiV-G interactions (P = 0.007, r2 = 0.82). In toto, our data suggest that inside-out signaling by specific residues in the cytoplasmic tail of NiV-F can modulate its fusogenicity by multiple distinct mechanisms.


* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Department of MIMG, 3825 MSB, 609 Charles E. Young Drive East, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA 90095. Phone: (310) 206-8792. Fax: (310) 267-2580. E-mail: bleebhL{at}ucla.edu

{triangledown} Published ahead of print on 14 February 2007.


Journal of Virology, May 2007, p. 4520-4532, Vol. 81, No. 9
0022-538X/07/$08.00+0     doi:10.1128/JVI.02205-06
Copyright © 2007, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.




This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Aguilar, H. C., Ataman, Z. A., Aspericueta, V., Fang, A. Q., Stroud, M., Negrete, O. A., Kammerer, R. A., Lee, B. (2009). A Novel Receptor-induced Activation Site in the Nipah Virus Attachment Glycoprotein (G) Involved in Triggering the Fusion Glycoprotein (F). J. Biol. Chem. 284: 1628-1635 [Abstract] [Full Text]