JVI Figure table search 04
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Other Versions of this Article:
JVI.00003-07v1
81/9/4510    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wang, W.
Right arrow Articles by Simmons, D. T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Wang, W.
Right arrow Articles by Simmons, D. T.
Journal of Virology, May 2007, p. 4510-4519, Vol. 81, No. 9
0022-538X/07/$08.00+0     doi:10.1128/JVI.00003-07
Copyright © 2007, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Role of the Hydrophilic Channels of Simian Virus 40 T-Antigen Helicase in DNA Replication{triangledown}

Weiping Wang, David Manna, and Daniel T. Simmons*

Department of Biological Sciences, University of Delaware, Newark, Delaware 19716-2590

Received 2 January 2007/ Accepted 10 February 2007

The simian virus 40 (SV40) hexameric helicase consists of a central channel and six hydrophilic channels located between adjacent large tier domains within each hexamer. To study the function of the hydrophilic channels in SV40 DNA replication, a series of single-point substitutions were introduced at sites not directly involved in protein-protein contacts. The mutants were characterized biochemically in various ways. All mutants oligomerized normally in the absence of DNA. Interestingly, 8 of the 10 mutants failed to unwind an origin-containing DNA fragment and nine of them were totally unable to support SV40 DNA replication in vitro. The mutants fell into four classes based on their biochemical properties. Class A mutants bound DNA normally and had normal ATPase and helicase activities but failed to unwind origin DNA and support SV40 DNA replication. Class B mutants were compromised in single-stranded DNA and origin DNA binding at low protein concentrations. They were defective in helicase activity and unwinding of the origin and in supporting DNA replication. Class C and D mutants possessed higher-than-normal single-stranded DNA binding activity at low protein concentrations. The class C mutants failed to separate origin DNA and support DNA replication. The class D mutants unwound origin DNA normally but were compromised in their ability to support DNA replication. Taken together, these results suggest that the hydrophilic channels have an active role in the unwinding of SV40 DNA from the origin and the placement of the resulting single strands within the helicase.


* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Department of Biological Sciences, University of Delaware, Newark, DE 19716-2590. Phone: (302) 831-8547. Fax: (302) 831-2281. E-mail: dsimmons{at}udel.edu

{triangledown} Published ahead of print on 14 February 2007.


Journal of Virology, May 2007, p. 4510-4519, Vol. 81, No. 9
0022-538X/07/$08.00+0     doi:10.1128/JVI.00003-07
Copyright © 2007, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.







Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
J. Bacteriol. Mol. Cell. Biol. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev.
Clin. Vaccine Immunol. ALL ASM JOURNALS

Copyright © 2007 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.