JVI Figure table search 04
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Other Versions of this Article:
JVI.02569-06v1
81/7/3574    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Vatakis, D. N.
Right arrow Articles by Zack, J. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Vatakis, D. N.
Right arrow Articles by Zack, J. A.
Journal of Virology, April 2007, p. 3574-3582, Vol. 81, No. 7
0022-538X/07/$08.00+0     doi:10.1128/JVI.02569-06
Copyright © 2007, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Immediate Activation Fails To Rescue Efficient Human Immunodeficiency Virus Replication in Quiescent CD4+ T Cells{triangledown}

Dimitrios N. Vatakis,1 Gregory Bristol,1 Thomas A. Wilkinson,2 Samson A. Chow,2,4 and Jerome A. Zack1,3,4*

Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine,1 Department of Molecular and Medical Pharmacology,2 Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Molecular Genetics,3 UCLA AIDS Institute, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, California 900954

Received 21 November 2006/ Accepted 4 January 2007

Unlike activated T cells, quiescent CD4+ T cells have shown resistance to human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection due to a block in the early events of the viral life cycle. To further investigate the nature of this block, we infected quiescent CD4+ T cells with HIV-1NL4-3 and immediately stimulated them. Compared to activated (prestimulated) cells, these poststimulated cells showed slightly decreased viral entry and delays in the completion of reverse transcription. However, the relative efficiency of integration was similar to that of prestimulated cells. Together, this resulted in decreased expression of tat/rev mRNA and synthesis of viral protein. Furthermore, based on cell cycle staining and BrdU incorporation, poststimulated cells expressing viral protein failed to initiate a second round of their cell cycle, independently of Vpr-mediated arrest. Together, these data demonstrate that the early stages of the HIV life cycle are inefficient in these poststimulated cells and that efficient replication cannot be induced by subsequent activation.


* Corresponding author. Mailing address: David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, 650 Charles Young Dr. South, Box 951678, 11-934 Factor, Los Angeles, CA 90095-1678. Phone: (310) 825-0876. Fax: (310) 825-6192. E-mail: jzack{at}ucla.edu.

{triangledown} Published ahead of print on 17 January 2007.


Journal of Virology, April 2007, p. 3574-3582, Vol. 81, No. 7
0022-538X/07/$08.00+0     doi:10.1128/JVI.02569-06
Copyright © 2007, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.




This article has been cited by other articles:




Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
J. Bacteriol. Mol. Cell. Biol. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev.
Clin. Vaccine Immunol. ALL ASM JOURNALS

Copyright © 2007 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.