This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Holst, P. J.
Right arrow Articles by Thomsen, A. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Holst, P. J.
Right arrow Articles by Thomsen, A. R.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Journal of Virology, September 2007, p. 10101-10112, Vol. 81, No. 18
0022-538X/07/$08.00+0     doi:10.1128/JVI.01242-07
Copyright © 2007, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

CCR5 and CXCR3 Are Dispensable for Liver Infiltration, but CCR5 Protects against Virus-Induced T-Cell-Mediated Hepatic Steatosis{triangledown}

P. J. Holst,1 C. Orskov,2 K. Qvortrup,2 J. P. Christensen,1 and A. R. Thomsen1*

Institute of Medical Microbiology and Immunology,1 Institute of Medical Anatomy, University of Copenhagen, the Panum Institute, 3C Blegdamsvej, DK-2200 N, Copenhagen, Denmark2

Received 7 June 2007/ Accepted 29 June 2007

CCR5 and CXCR3 are important molecules in regulating the migration of activated lymphocytes. Thus, the majority of tissue-infiltrating T cells found in the context of autoimmune conditions and viral infections express CCR5 and CXCR3, and the principal chemokine ligands are expressed within inflamed tissues. Accordingly, intervention studies have pointed to nonredundant roles of these receptors in models of allograft rejection, viral infection, and autoimmunity. In spite of this, considerable controversy exists, with many studies failing to support a role for CCR5 or CXCR3 in disease pathogenesis. One possible explanation is that different chemokine receptors may take over in the absence of any individual receptor, thus rendering individual receptors redundant. We have attempted to address this issue by analyzing CCR5–/–, CXCR3–/–, and CCR5/CXCR3–/– mice with regard to virus-induced liver inflammation, generation and recruitment of effector cells, virus control, and immunopathology. Our results indicate that CCR5 and CXCR3 are largely dispensable for tissue infiltration and virus control. In contrast, the T-cell response is accelerated in CCR5–/– and CCR5/CXCR3–/– mice and the absence of CCR5 is associated with the induction of CD8+ T-cell-mediated immunopathology consisting of marked hepatic microvesicular steatosis.

* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Institute of Medical Microbiology and Immunology, University of Copenhagen, The Panum Institute, building 22.5.16, 3C Blegdamsvej, DK-2200 Copenhagen N, Denmark. Phone: 45-35-32-78-71. Fax: 45-35-32-78-74. E-mail: a.r.thomsen{at}immi.ku.dk

{triangledown} Published ahead of print on 11 July 2007.

Journal of Virology, September 2007, p. 10101-10112, Vol. 81, No. 18
0022-538X/07/$08.00+0     doi:10.1128/JVI.01242-07
Copyright © 2007, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.





Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology.   For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»