Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Journal of Virology, February 2006, p. 2019-2033, Vol. 80, No. 4
0022-538X/06/$08.00+0 doi:10.1128/JVI.80.4.2019-2033.2006
Copyright © 2006, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
Michelle Abelson,1,
Cavan Reilly,3
Michael G. Katze,4
Randal J. Kaufman,5
Paul R. Bohjanen,1,6 and
Leslie A. Schiff1*
Department of Microbiology,1 Division of Biostatistics,3 Department of Medicine, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455,6 Departments of Pathology,2 Microbiology, University of Washington Medical School, Seattle, Washington 98195,4 Howard Hughes Medical Institute and Department of Biological Chemistry, University of Michigan Medical Center, Ann Arbor, Michigan 481095
Received 4 October 2005/ Accepted 22 November 2005
Following infection with most reovirus strains, viral protein synthesis is robust, even when cellular translation is inhibited. To gain further insight into pathways that regulate translation in reovirus-infected cells, we performed a comparative microarray analysis of cellular gene expression following infection with two strains of reovirus that inhibit host translation (clone 8 and clone 87) and one strain that does not (Dearing). Infection with clone 8 and clone 87 significantly increased the expression of cellular genes characteristic of stress responses, including the integrated stress response. Infection with these same strains decreased transcript and protein levels of P58IPK, the cellular inhibitor of the eukaryotic initiation factor 2
(eIF2
) kinases PKR and PERK. Since infection with host shutoff-inducing strains of reovirus impacted cellular pathways that control eIF2
phosphorylation and unphosphorylated eIF2
is required for translation initiation, we examined reovirus replication in a variety of cell lines with mutations that impact eIF2
phosphorylation. Our results revealed that reovirus replication is more efficient in the presence of eIF2
kinases and phosphorylatable eIF2
. When eIF2
is phosphorylated, it promotes the synthesis of ATF4, a transcription factor that controls cellular recovery from stress. We found that the presence of this transcription factor increased reovirus yields 10- to 100-fold. eIF2
phosphorylation also led to the formation of stress granules in reovirus-infected cells. Based on these results, we hypothesize that eIF2
phosphorylation facilitates reovirus replication in two waysfirst, by inducing ATF4 synthesis, and second, by creating an environment that places abundant reovirus transcripts at a competitive advantage for limited translational components.
Present address: Minneapolis Medical Research Foundation, Minneapolis, MN 55404.
Present address: ViroMed Laboratories, Minnetonka, MN 55343.
This article has been cited by other articles:
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»