JVI Figure table search 04
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Supplemental material
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ruby, T.
Right arrow Articles by Zoorob, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ruby, T.
Right arrow Articles by Zoorob, R.
Journal of Virology, September 2006, p. 9207-9216, Vol. 80, No. 18
0022-538X/06/$08.00+0     doi:10.1128/JVI.00929-06
Copyright © 2006, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Transcriptional Profiling Reveals a Possible Role for the Timing of the Inflammatory Response in Determining Susceptibility to a Viral Infection{dagger}

Thomas Ruby,1 Catherine Whittaker,2 David R. Withers,2 Mounira K. Chelbi-Alix,3 Veronique Morin,1 Anne Oudin,1 John R. Young,2 and Rima Zoorob1*

CNRS, UPR 1983, 7 rue Guy Moquet, 94800 Villejuif, France,1 Institute for Animal Health, Compton, Berks RG20 7NN, United Kingdom,2 CNRS FRE 2944, 7 rue Guy Moquet, 94800 Villejuif, France3

Received 5 May 2006/ Accepted 5 July 2006

Using a novel cDNA microarray prepared from sources of actively responding immune system cells, we have investigated the changes in gene expression in the target tissue during the early stages of infection of neonatal chickens with infectious bursal disease virus. Infections of two lines of chickens previously documented as genetically resistant and sensitive to infection were compared in order to ascertain early differences in the response to infection that might provide clues to the mechanism of differential genetic resistance. In addition to major changes that could be explained by previously described changes in infected tissue, some differences in gene expression on infection, and differences between the two chicken lines, were observed that led to a model for resistance in which a more rapid inflammatory response and more-extensive p53-related induction of apoptosis in the target B cells might limit viral replication and consequent pathology. Ironically, the effect in the asymptomatic neonatal infection is that more-severe B-cell depletion is seen in the more genetically resistant chicken. Changes of expression of many chicken genes of unknown function, indicating possible roles in the response to infection, may aid in the functional annotation of these genes.


* Corresponding author. Mailing address: CNRS, UPR 1983, 7 rue Guy Moquet, 94800 Villejuif, France. Phone: (33) 1 49583500. Fax: (33) 1 49583381. E-mail: zoorob{at}vjf.cnrs.fr.

{dagger} Supplemental material for this article may be found at http://jvi.asm.org/.


Journal of Virology, September 2006, p. 9207-9216, Vol. 80, No. 18
0022-538X/06/$08.00+0     doi:10.1128/JVI.00929-06
Copyright © 2006, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.




This article has been cited by other articles:




Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
J. Bacteriol. Mol. Cell. Biol. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev.
Clin. Vaccine Immunol. ALL ASM JOURNALS

Copyright © 2006 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.