JVI Figure table search 04
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Whalen, K. A.
Right arrow Articles by Schaffhausen, B. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Whalen, K. A.
Right arrow Articles by Schaffhausen, B. S.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Journal of Virology, August 2005, p. 9982-9990, Vol. 79, No. 15
0022-538X/05/$08.00+0     doi:10.1128/JVI.79.15.9982-9990.2005
Copyright © 2005, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Genetic Analysis of the Polyomavirus DnaJ Domain

Kerry A. Whalen, Rowena de Jesus, Jennifer A. Kean, and Brian S. Schaffhausen*

Department of Biochemistry, Tufts University School of Medicine, 136 Harrison Avenue, Boston, Massachusetts 02111

Received 10 January 2005/ Accepted 5 April 2005

Polyomavirus T antigens share a common N-terminal sequence that comprises a DnaJ domain. DnaJ domains activate DnaK molecular chaperones. The functions of J domains have primarily been tested by mutation of their conserved HPD residues. Here, we report detailed mutagenesis of the polyomavirus J domain in both large T (63 mutants) and middle T (51 mutants) backgrounds. As expected, some J mutants were defective in binding DnaK (Hsc70); other mutants retained the ability to bind Hsc70 but were defective in stimulating its ATPase activity. Moreover, the J domain behaves differently in large T and middle T. A given mutation was twice as likely to render large T unstable as it was to affect middle T stability. This apparently arose from middle T's ability to bind stabilizing proteins such as protein phosphatase 2A (PP2A), since introduction of a second mutation preventing PP2A binding rendered some middle T J-domain mutants unstable. In large T, the HPD residues are critical for Rb-dependent effects on the host cell. Residues Q32, A33, Y34, H49, M52, and N56 within helix 2 and helix 3 of the large T J domain were also found to be required for Rb-dependent transactivation. Cyclin A promoter assays showed that J domain function also contributes to large T transactivation that is independent of Rb. Single point mutations in middle T were generally without effect. However, residue Q37 is critical for middle T's ability to form active signaling complexes. The Q37A middle T mutant was defective in association with pp60c-src and in transformation.


* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Department of Biochemistry, Tufts University School of Medicine, 136 Harrison Ave., Boston, MA 02111. Phone: (617) 636-6868. Fax: (617) 636-2409. E-mail: brian.schaffhausen{at}tufts.edu.


Journal of Virology, August 2005, p. 9982-9990, Vol. 79, No. 15
0022-538X/05/$08.00+0     doi:10.1128/JVI.79.15.9982-9990.2005
Copyright © 2005, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.







Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
J. Bacteriol. Mol. Cell. Biol. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev.
Clin. Vaccine Immunol. ALL ASM JOURNALS

Copyright © 2005 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.