Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Journal of Virology, August 2005, p. 9635-9650, Vol. 79, No. 15
0022-538X/05/$08.00+0 doi:10.1128/JVI.79.15.9635-9650.2005
Copyright © 2005, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
Departments of Molecular Biophysics and Biochemistry,1 Pediatrics,3 Epidemiology and Public Health, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut,4 Department of Tumour Virology, German Cancer Research Center, Im Neuenheimer Feld 242, Heidelberg, Germany2
Received 23 February 2005/ Accepted 11 April 2005
The R transactivator (Rta) protein activates Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) lytic-cycle genes by several distinct mechanisms that include direct binding to viral promoters, synergy with BamHI Z EBV replication activator (ZEBRA), and activation of cellular signaling pathways. In the direct and synergistic mechanisms of action, Rta binds to specific DNA sequences that are present in the promoters of responsive genes. It has been difficult to demonstrate the capacity of Rta expressed in mammalian cells to bind DNA in vitro in order to study the relative affinities of Rta binding elements. We discovered that a short C-terminal region of Rta inhibits the ability of Rta to bind DNA in vitro. C-terminally truncated versions of Rta bind DNA efficiently and thus facilitate a comparison of consensus Rta binding elements (CRBEs) found in promoters of five Rta-responsive genes: BMLF1, BHLF1, BMRF1, BaRF1, and BLRF2. All CRBEs in the promoters of the five genes conform to the proposed recognition sequence GNCCN9GGNG, where N is any nucleotide and N9 represents a sequence of nine nucleotides. Nonetheless, CRBEs varied markedly in their abilities to bind Rta in electrophoretic mobility shift assays. Not all CRBEs bound or responded to Rta. Binding affinities of the CRBEs and the capacity to be activated by Rta in reporter assays were strongly correlated. The CRBEs from the BMLF1 and BHLF1 promoters conferred the greatest response. The response of the BMRF1, BaRF1, and BLRF2 CRBEs was less robust. By creation of chimeras, inversions, and point mutations, differences in binding affinities and transcriptional activation levels could be attributed to N9 sequence variation. The length of N9 was also critical for a maximal response. In Raji and BZLF1-knockout cells, the mRNAs of the five Rta-responsive lytic-cycle genes differed dramatically in kinetics of expression, abundance, and synergistic responses to ZEBRA and Rta. Affinities of Rta response elements for Rta are likely to play an important role in temporal regulation and the level of lytic-cycle EBV gene expression.
This article has been cited by other articles:
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»