JVI Figure table search 04
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ketas, T. J.
Right arrow Articles by Pope, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ketas, T. J.
Right arrow Articles by Pope, M.
Journal of Virology, February 2003, p. 2762-2767, Vol. 77, No. 4
0022-538X/03/$08.00+0     DOI: 10.1128/JVI.77.4.2762-2767.2003
Copyright © 2003, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Attachment, Coreceptor, and Fusion Inhibitors Are Active against both Direct and trans Infection of Primary Cells

Thomas J. Ketas,1 Ines Frank,2 Per Johan Klasse,3 Brian M. Sullivan,1 Jason P. Gardner,1 Catherine Spenlehauer,4 Mirjana Nesin,5 William C. Olson,1 John P. Moore,4 and Melissa Pope2*

Progenics Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Tarrytown, New York 10591,1 Department of Microbiology and Immunology,4 Department of Pediatrics, Weill Medical College of Cornell University,5 Center for Biomedical Research, Population Council, New York, New York 10021,2 Jefferiss Research Trust Laboratories, Wright-Fleming Institute, Imperial College, London W2 1PG, United Kingdom3

Received 21 August 2002/ Accepted 18 November 2002

Inhibitors of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 attachment (CD4-immunoglobulin G subclass 2), CCR5 usage (PRO 140), and fusion (T-20) were tested on diverse primary cell types that represent the major targets both for infection in vivo and for the inhibition of trans infection of target cells by virus bound to dendritic cells. Although minor cell-type-dependent differences in potency were observed, each inhibitor was active on each cell type and trans infection was similarly vulnerable to inhibition at each stage of the fusion cascade.


* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Center for Biomedical Research, Population Council, 1230 York Ave., New York, NY 10021. Phone: (212) 327-7794. Fax: (212) 327-7764. E-mail: mpope{at}popcbr.rockefeller.edu.


Journal of Virology, February 2003, p. 2762-2767, Vol. 77, No. 4
0022-538X/03/$08.00+0     DOI: 10.1128/JVI.77.4.2762-2767.2003
Copyright © 2003, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.




This article has been cited by other articles:




Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
J. Bacteriol. Mol. Cell. Biol. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev.
Clin. Vaccine Immunol. ALL ASM JOURNALS

Copyright © 2003 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.