This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Grapes, M.
Right arrow Articles by O'Hare, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Grapes, M.
Right arrow Articles by O'Hare, P.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Journal of Virology, November 2000, p. 10112-10121, Vol. 74, No. 21
0022-538X/00/$04.00+0
Copyright © 2000, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.

Differences in Determinants Required for Complex Formation and Transactivation in Related VP16 Proteins

Matthew Grapesdagger and Peter O'Hare*

Marie Curie Research Institute, Oxted, Surrey RH8 OTL, United Kingdom

Received 1 June 2000/Accepted 26 July 2000

VP16-H is an essential structural protein of herpes simplex virus type 1 (HSV-1) and is also a potent activator of virus immediate-early (IE) gene expression. Current models of functional determinants within VP16-H indicate that it consists of two domains, an N-terminal domain involved in recruiting VP16-H to a multicomponent DNA binding complex with two host proteins, Oct-1 and host cell factor (HCF), and an acidic C-terminal domain exclusively involved in transactivation. VP16-E, from equine herpesvirus 1 (EHV-1), exhibits strong conservation with the N-terminal domain of VP16-H but, with the exception of a short segment at the extreme C terminus, lacks almost the entire acidic C-terminal domain. Studies of key activation determinants within the C terminus of VP16-H would predict that VP16-E may activate poorly, if at all. However, VP16-E is a potent activator of both EHV-1 and HSV-1 IE gene transcription. We show that VP16-E does not follow the simple two-domain model of VP16-H. Thus, despite the conservation in the N-terminal domains, this region in VP16-E is not sufficient for assembly into the DNA binding complex with Oct-1 and HCF. The short conserved determinant close to the C terminus is completely dispensable in VP16-H but is absolutely required in VP16-E. In activation studies, the potency of intact VP16-E was not recapitulated in chimeric proteins in which it was fused with a GAL4 DNA binding domain. Furthermore, a chimeric protein consisting of the C-terminal region of VP16-E fused to the N-terminal domain of VP16-H, while able to promote complex formation, nevertheless exhibited very weak activation. These results indicate that the mode of recruitment of the activation domain, i.e., through complex formation with Oct-1 and HCF, may be crucial for activation and that key determinants required for activation in VP16-E, and possibly VP16-H, may involve interactions between regions of the C terminus and the N terminus rather than discrete domains with independent functions.


* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Marie Curie Research Institute, The Chart, Oxted, Surrey RH8 OTL, United Kingdom. Phone: 44 1883 715028. Fax: 44 1883 714375. E-mail: P.OHare{at}mcri.ac.uk.

dagger Present address: Montreal Neurological Institute, Montreal, Quebec, Canada H3A 2B4.


Journal of Virology, November 2000, p. 10112-10121, Vol. 74, No. 21
0022-538X/00/$04.00+0
Copyright © 2000, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.



This article has been cited by other articles:

  • von Einem, J., Schumacher, D., O'Callaghan, D. J., Osterrieder, N. (2006). The {alpha}-TIF (VP16) Homologue (ETIF) of Equine Herpesvirus 1 Is Essential for Secondary Envelopment and Virus Egress. J. Virol. 80: 2609-2620 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Pellerin, M., Lopez-Aguirre, Y., Penin, F., Dhumeaux, D., Pawlotsky, J.-M. (2004). Hepatitis C Virus Quasispecies Variability Modulates Nonstructural Protein 5A Transcriptional Activation, Pointing to Cellular Compartmentalization of Virus-Host Interactions. J. Virol. 78: 4617-4627 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Boyer, J. L., Swaminathan, S., Silverstein, S. J. (2002). The Epstein-Barr Virus SM Protein Is Functionally Similar to ICP27 from Herpes Simplex Virus in Viral Infections. J. Virol. 76: 9420-9433 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Loiacono, C. M., Myers, R., Mitchell, W. J. (2002). Neurons Differentially Activate the Herpes Simplex Virus Type 1 Immediate-Early Gene ICP0 and ICP27 Promoters in Transgenic Mice. J. Virol. 76: 2449-2459 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Zhou, H.-J., Wong, C.-M., Chen, J.-H., Qiang, B.-Q., Yuan, J.-G., Jin, D.-Y. (2001). Inhibition of LZIP-mediated Transcription through Direct Interaction with a Novel Host Cell Factor-like Protein. J. Biol. Chem. 276: 28933-28938 [Abstract] [Full Text]