Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Journal of Virology, October 2000, p. 9317-9321, Vol. 74, No. 19
Respiratory Viruses
Section1 and Experimental Primate
Virology Section,3 Laboratory of Infectious
Diseases, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases,
Bethesda, Maryland, 20892, and Bioqual, Inc., Rockville,
Maryland, 208502
Received 11 May 2000/Accepted 28 June 2000
Mutant recombinant respiratory syncytial viruses (RSV) which cannot
express the NS1 and M2-2 proteins, designated rA2
0022-538X/00/$04.00+0
Recombinant Respiratory Syncytial Virus That Does
Not Express the NS1 or M2-2 Protein Is Highly Attenuated and
Immunogenic in Chimpanzees
NS1 and rA2
M2-2,
respectively, were evaluated as live-attenuated RSV vaccines. The
rA2
NS1 virus contains a large deletion that should have the
advantageous property of genetic stability during replication in vitro
and in vivo. In vitro, rA2
NS1 replicated approximately 10-fold less
well than wild-type recombinant RSV (rA2), while rA2
M2-2 had delayed
growth kinetics but reached a final titer similar to that of rA2. Each
virus was administered to the respiratory tracts of RSV-seronegative
chimpanzees to assess replication, immunogenicity, and protective
efficacy. The rA2
NS1 and rA2
M2-2 viruses were 2,200- to
55,000-fold restricted in replication in the upper and lower
respiratory tracts but induced a level of RSV-neutralizing antibody in
serum that was only slightly reduced compared to the level induced by
wild-type RSV. The replication of wild-type RSV in immunized
chimpanzees after challenge was reduced more than 10,000-fold at each
site. Importantly, rA2
NS1 and rA2
M2-2 were 10-fold more
restricted in replication in the upper respiratory tract than was the
cpts248/404 virus, a vaccine candidate that retained mild
reactogenicity in the upper respiratory tracts of 1-month-old infants.
Thus, either rA2
NS1 or rA2
M2-2 might be appropriately attenuated
for this age group, which is the major target population for an RSV
vaccine. In addition, these results show that neither NS1 nor M2-2 is
essential for RSV replication in vivo, although each is important for
efficient replication.
*
Corresponding author. Mailing address: LID, NIAID, 7 Center Dr., MSC 0720, Bethesda, MD 20892-0720. Phone: (301) 496-4205. Fax: (301) 496-8312. E-mail: pcollins{at}niaid.nih.gov.
This article has been cited by other articles:
| J. Bacteriol. | Mol. Cell. Biol. | Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. |
|---|
| Clin. Vaccine Immunol. | ALL ASM JOURNALS |
|---|