JVI Figure table search 04
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gibbons, D. L.
Right arrow Articles by Kielian, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Gibbons, D. L.
Right arrow Articles by Kielian, M.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Journal of Virology, September 2000, p. 7772-7780, Vol. 74, No. 17
0022-538X/00/$04.00+0
Copyright © 2000, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.

Formation and Characterization of the Trimeric Form of the Fusion Protein of Semliki Forest Virus

Don L. Gibbons, Anna Ahn, Prodyot K. Chatterjee, and Margaret Kielian*

Department of Cell Biology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York 10461

Received 3 April 2000/Accepted 8 June 2000

Enveloped animal viruses infect cells via fusion of the viral membrane with a host cell membrane. Fusion is mediated by a viral envelope glycoprotein, which for a number of enveloped animal viruses rearranges itself during fusion to form a trimeric alpha -helical coiled-coil structure. This conformational change from the metastable, nonfusogenic form of the spike protein to the highly stable form involved in fusion can be induced by physiological activators of virus fusion and also by a variety of destabilizing conditions. The E1 spike protein subunit of Semliki Forest virus (SFV) triggers membrane fusion upon exposure to mildly acidic pH and forms a homotrimer that appears necessary for fusion. We have here demonstrated that formation of the E1 homotrimer was efficiently triggered under low-pH conditions but not by perturbants such as heat or urea, despite their induction of generalized conformational changes in the E1 and E2 subunits and partial exposure of an acid-specific E1 epitope. We used a sensitive fluorescence assay to show that neither heat nor urea treatment triggered SFV-liposome fusion at neutral pH, although either treatment inactivated subsequent low-pH-triggered fusion activity. Once formed, the low-pH-induced E1 homotrimer was very stable and was only dissociated under harsh conditions such as heating in sodium dodecyl sulfate. Taken together, these data, as well as protein structure predictions, suggest a model in which the less stable native E1 subunit specifically responds to low pH to form the more stable E1 homotrimer via conformational changes different from those of the coiled-coil type of fusion proteins.

* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Department of Cell Biology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, 1300 Morris Park Ave., Bronx, NY 10461. Phone: (718) 430-3638. Fax: (718) 430-8574. E-mail: kielian{at}aecom.yu.edu.

Journal of Virology, September 2000, p. 7772-7780, Vol. 74, No. 17
0022-538X/00/$04.00+0
Copyright © 2000, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.


This article has been cited by other articles:



Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
J. Bacteriol. Mol. Cell. Biol. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev.
Clin. Vaccine Immunol. ALL ASM JOURNALS

Copyright © 2000 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.