This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lepik, D.
Right arrow Articles by Ustav, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lepik, D.
Right arrow Articles by Ustav, M.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Journal of Virology, May 2000, p. 4688-4697, Vol. 74, No. 10
0022-538X/00/$04.00+0
Copyright © 2000, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.

Cell-Specific Modulation of Papovavirus Replication by Tumor Suppressor Protein p53

Dina Lepik and Mart Ustav*

Department of Microbiology and Virology, Institute of Molecular and Cell Biology, Tartu University and Estonian Biocentre, Tartu EE2400, Estonia

Received 6 July 1999/Accepted 14 February 2000

Small DNA tumor viruses like human papillomaviruses, simian virus 40, and adenoviruses modulate the activity of cellular tumor suppressor proteins p53 and/or pRB. These viruses replicate as nuclear multicopy extrachromosomal elements during the S phase of the cell cycle, and it has been suggested that inactivation of p53 and pRb is necessary for directing the cells to the S phase. Mouse polyomavirus (Py), however, modulates only the pRB protein activity without any obvious interference with the action of p53. We show here that Py replication was not suppressed by the p53 protein indeed in all tested different mouse cell lines. In addition, E1- and E2-dependent papillomavirus origin replication was insensitive to the action of p53 in mouse cells. We show that in hamster (Chinese hamster ovary) or human (osteosarcoma 143) cell lines the replication of both Py and papillomavirus origins was efficiently blocked by p53. The block of Py replication in human and hamster cells is not caused by the downregulation of large T-antigen expression. The deletion analysis of the p53 protein shows that the RPA binding, proline-rich regulatory, DNA-binding, and oligomerization domains are necessary for p53 action in both replication systems. These results indicate that in mouse cells the p53 protein could be inactive for the suppression of papovavirus replication.


* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Department of Microbiology and Virology, Institute of Molecular and Cell Biology, Tartu University, 23 Riia St., Tartu EE2400, Estonia. Phone: 372-7-375047. Fax: 372-7-420286. E-mail: ustav{at}ebc.ee.


Journal of Virology, May 2000, p. 4688-4697, Vol. 74, No. 10
0022-538X/00/$04.00+0
Copyright © 2000, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.



This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Ilves, I., Maemets, K., Silla, T., Janikson, K., Ustav, M. (2006). Brd4 is involved in multiple processes of the bovine papillomavirus type 1 life cycle.. J. Virol. 80: 3660-3665 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Zobel, T., Iftner, T., Stubenrauch, F. (2003). The Papillomavirus E8{wedge}E2C Protein Represses DNA Replication from Extrachromosomal Origins. Mol. Cell. Biol. 23: 8352-8362 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Zhou, J., Prives, C. (2003). Replication of damaged DNA in vitro is blocked by p53. Nucleic Acids Res 31: 3881-3892 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Del Valle, L., Delbue, S., Gordon, J., Enam, S., Croul, S., Ferrante, P., Khalili, K. (2002). Expression of JC virus T-antigen in a patient with MS and glioblastoma multiforme. Neurology 58: 895-900 [Abstract] [Full Text]