JVI Figure table search 04
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Melikyan, G. B.
Right arrow Articles by Cohen, F. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Melikyan, G. B.
Right arrow Articles by Cohen, F. S.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Journal of Virology, January 2000, p. 447-455, Vol. 74, No. 1
0022-538X/0/$04.00+0
Copyright © 2000, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.

Role of the Cytoplasmic Tail of Ecotropic Moloney Murine Leukemia Virus Env Protein in Fusion Pore Formation

Grigory B. Melikyan,1 Ruben M. Markosyan,1 Sofya A. Brener,1 Yanina Rozenberg,2 and Fredric S. Cohen1,*

Department of Molecular Biophysics and Physiology, Rush Medical College, Chicago, Illinois 60612,1 and Gene Therapy Laboratories, Norris Cancer Center, University of Southern California School of Medicine, Los Angeles, California 900332

Received 14 June 1999/Accepted 20 September 1999

Fusion between cells expressing envelope protein (Env) of Moloney murine leukemia virus and target cells were studied by use of video fluorescence microscopy and electrical capacitance measurements. When the full-length 632-amino-acid residue Env was expressed, fusion did not occur at all for 3T3 cells as target and only somewhat for XC6 cells. Expression of Env 616*---a construct of Env with the last 16 amino acid residues (617 to 632; the R peptide) deleted from its C terminus to match the proteolytically cleaved Env produced during viral budding---resulted in high levels of fusion. Env 601*, lacking the entire cytoplasmic tail (CT) (identified by hydrophobicity), also led to fusion. Truncation of an additional six residues (Env 595*) abolished fusion. The kinetics of forming fusion pores did not depend on whether cells were first prebound at 4°C and the time until fusion measured after the temperature was raised to 37°C or whether cells were first brought into contact at 37°C and the time until fusion immediately measured. This similarity in kinetics indicates that binding is accomplished quickly compared to subsequent steps in fusion. The fusion pores formed by Env 601* and Env 616* had the same initial size and enlarged in similar manners. Thus, once the R peptide is removed, the CT is not needed for fusion and does not affect formed pores. However, residues 595 to 601 are required for fusion. It is suggested here that the ectodomain and membrane-spanning domain of Env are directly responsible for fusion and that the R peptide affects their configurations at some point during the fusion process, thereby indirectly controlling fusion.

* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Department of Molecular Biophysics and Physiology, Rush Medical College, 1653 W. Congress Pkwy., Chicago, IL 60612. Phone: (312) 942-6753. Fax: (312) 942-8711. E-mail: fcohen{at}rush.edu.

Journal of Virology, January 2000, p. 447-455, Vol. 74, No. 1
0022-538X/0/$04.00+0
Copyright © 2000, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.


This article has been cited by other articles:



Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
J. Bacteriol. Mol. Cell. Biol. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev.
Clin. Vaccine Immunol. ALL ASM JOURNALS

Copyright © 2000 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.