This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Nelle, T. D.
Right arrow Articles by Wills, J. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Nelle, T. D.
Right arrow Articles by Wills, J. W.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

J Virol, February 1998, p. 1103-1107, Vol. 72, No. 2
0022-538X/98/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1998, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.

The Major Site of Phosphorylation within the Rous Sarcoma Virus MA Protein Is Not Required for Replication

Timothy D. Nelle,1,dagger Michael F. Verderame,2 Jonathan Leis,3 and John W. Wills1,*

Department of Microbiology and Immunology,1 and Department of Medicine,2 Pennsylvania State University College of Medicine, Hershey, Pennsylvania 17033, and Department of Biochemistry, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio 441063

Received 21 July 1997/Accepted 22 October 1997

About one-third of the MA protein in Rous sarcoma virus (RSV) is phosphorylated. Previous analyses of this fraction have suggested that serine residues 68 and 106 are the major sites of phosphorylation. As a follow-up to that study, we have characterized mutants which have these putative phosphorylation sites changed to alanine, either separately or together. None of the substitutions (S68A, S106A, or S68/106A) had an effect on the budding efficiency or infectivity of the virus. Upon examination of the 32P-labeled viral proteins, we found that the S68A substitution did not affect phosphorylation in vivo at all. In contrast, the S106A substitution prevented all detectable phosphorylation of MA, suggesting that there is only one major site of phosphorylation in MA. We also found that the RSV MA protein is phosphorylated on tyrosine, but the amount was low and detectable only with large numbers of virions and an antibody specific for phosphotyrosine.


* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Department of Microbiology and Immunology, College of Medicine, Pennsylvania State University, Hershey, PA 17033. Phone: (717) 531-3528. Fax: (717) 531-6522. E-mail: jwills{at}bcmic.hmc.psu.edu.

dagger Present address: Virology Division, United States Army Medical Research Institute of Infectious Diseases, Fort Detrick, MD 21702.




This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Garbitt, R. A., Albert, J. A., Kessler, M. D., Parent, L. J. (2001). trans-Acting Inhibition of Genomic RNA Dimerization by Rous Sarcoma Virus Matrix Mutants. J. Virol. 75: 260-268 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Callahan, E. M., Wills, J. W. (2000). Repositioning Basic Residues in the M Domain of the Rous Sarcoma Virus Gag Protein. J. Virol. 74: 11222-11229 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Parent, L. J., Cairns, T. M., Albert, J. A., Wilson, C. B., Wills, J. W., Craven, R. C. (2000). RNA Dimerization Defect in a Rous Sarcoma Virus Matrix Mutant. J. Virol. 74: 164-172 [Abstract] [Full Text]