JVI Figure table search 04
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Granzow, H.
Right arrow Articles by Mettenleiter, T. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Granzow, H.
Right arrow Articles by Mettenleiter, T. C.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

J. Virol., Mar 1997, 2072-2082, Vol 71, No. 3
Copyright © 1997, American Society for Microbiology

Ultrastructural analysis of the replication cycle of pseudorabies virus in cell culture: a reassessment

H Granzow, F Weiland, A Jons, BG Klupp, A Karger and TC Mettenleiter
Institutes of Diagnostic Virology, Friedrich-Loeffler-Institutes, Federal Research Centre for Virus Diseases of Animals, Insel Riems, Germany. Harald.Granzow@rie.bfav.de

We reinvestigated major steps in the replicative cycle of pseudorabies virus (PrV) by electron microscopy of infected cultured cells. Virions attached to the cell surface were found in two distinct stages, with a distance of 12 to 14 nm or 6 to 8 nm between virion envelope and cell surface, respectively. After fusion of virion envelope and cell membrane, immunogold labeling using a monoclonal antibody against the envelope glycoprotein gE demonstrated a rapid drift of gE from the fusion site, indicating significant lateral movement of viral glycoproteins during or immediately after the fusion event. Naked nucleocapsids in the cytoplasm frequently appeared close to microtubules prior to transport to nuclear pores. At the nuclear pore, nucleocapsids invariably were oriented with one vertex pointing to the central granulum at a distance of about 40 nm and viral DNA appeared to be released via the vertex region into the nucleoplasm. Intranuclear maturation followed the typical herpesvirus nucleocapsid morphogenesis pathway. Regarding egress, our observations indicate that primary envelopment of nucleocapsids occurred at the inner leaflet of the nuclear membrane by budding into the perinuclear cisterna. This nuclear membrane-derived envelope exhibited a smooth surface which contrasts the envelope obtained by putative reenvelopment at tubular vesicles in the Golgi area which is characterized by distinct surface projections. Loss of the primary envelope and release of the nucleocapsid into the cytoplasm appeared to occur by fusion of envelope and outer leaflet of the nuclear membrane. Nucleocapsids were also found engulfed by both lamella of the nuclear membrane. This vesiculation process released nucleocapsids surrounded by two membranes into the cytoplasm. Our data also indicate that fusion between the two membranes then leads to release of naked nucleocapsids in the Golgi area. Egress of virions appeared to occur via transport vesicles containing one or more virus particles by fusion of vesicle and cell membrane. Our data thus support biochemical data and mutant virus studies of (i) two steps of attachment, (ii) the involvement of microtubules in the transport of nucleocapsids to the nuclear pore, and (iii) secondary envelopment in the trans-Golgi area in PrV infection.


This article has been cited by other articles:



Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
J. Bacteriol. Mol. Cell. Biol. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev.
Clin. Vaccine Immunol. ALL ASM JOURNALS

Copyright © 1997 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.