JVI Figure table search 04
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by McBride, M. S.
Right arrow Articles by Panganiban, A. T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by McBride, M. S.
Right arrow Articles by Panganiban, A. T.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

J. Virol., Mar 1997, 2050-2058, Vol 71, No. 3
Copyright © 1997, American Society for Microbiology

Position dependence of functional hairpins important for human immunodeficiency virus type 1 RNA encapsidation in vivo

MS McBride and AT Panganiban
McArdle Laboratory for Cancer Research, University of Wisconsin Medical School, Madison 53706, USA.

At least two hairpins in the 5' untranslated leader region, stem-loops 1 and 3 (SL1 and SL3), contribute to human immunodeficiency virus type 1 RNA encapsidation in vivo. We used a competitive assay, which measures the relative encapsidation efficiency of mutant viral RNA in the presence of competing wild-type RNA, to compare the contributions of SL1, SL3, and two adjacent secondary structures, SL2 and SL4, to encapsidation. SL2 is not required for RNA encapsidation, while SL1, SL3, and SL4 all contribute approximately equally to encapsidation. To determine whether these hairpins function in a position-dependent manner, we interchanged the positions of two of these stem-loop structures. This resulted in substantial diminution of encapsidation, indicating that the secondary structures that comprise E, the encapsidation signal, function only in their correct contexts. Mutation of nucleotides flanking SL1 and SL3 had little effect on encapsidation. We also showed that SL1, while present on both genomic and subgenomic viral RNAs, nonetheless contributes to selective encapsidation of genomic RNA. Taken together, these data are consistent with the formation of a higher-order RNA structure, partially composed of SL1, SL3, and SL4, that functions to effect concurrent encapsidation of full- length RNA and exclusion of subgenomic RNA. Finally, it has been reported that E is required for efficient translation of Gag mRNA in vivo. However, we have found that a variety of mutants, including a mutant lacking the entire region encompassing SL1, SL2, and SL3, still produce RNAs that are efficiently translated. These data indicate that E is unlikely to contribute to efficient Gag mRNA translation in vivo.


This article has been cited by other articles:



Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
J. Bacteriol. Mol. Cell. Biol. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev.
Clin. Vaccine Immunol. ALL ASM JOURNALS

Copyright © 1997 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.