JVI Figure table search 04
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kent, S. J.
Right arrow Articles by Greenberg, P. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kent, S. J.
Right arrow Articles by Greenberg, P. D.

J. Virol., Aug 1996, 4941-4947, Vol 70, No. 8
Copyright © 1996, American Society for Microbiology

Detection of simian immunodeficiency virus (SIV)-specific CD8+ T cells in macaques protected from SIV challenge by prior SIV subunit vaccination

SJ Kent, SL Hu, L Corey, WR Morton and PD Greenberg
Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle 98195, USA.

Vaccines for lentiviruses would ideally induce in the host complete resistance to infection of host cells. However, such sterilizing immunity may be neither readily achievable nor absolutely necessary to provide protection from exposure to the immunodeficiency viruses. To examine the nature of protective immunity to simian immunodeficiency virus (SIV), we studied three macaques that had been immunized with a recombinant vaccinia virus-based SIV subunit vaccine regimen and exhibited protection from a challenge with cell-free SIV (MNE) as determined by viral cultures, serology, and PCR for viral genomes. Peripheral blood mononuclear cells were obtained from the protected macaques and analyzed for CD8+ cytotoxic T-lymphocyte (CTL) responses to SIV proteins. CTL reactive to SIV proteins not included in the subunit vaccine, and thus to which these animals had not been exposed prior to challenge, were detected postchallenge in the vaccine- protected animals and persisted for up to 1 year. These CTL, as reflected by studies of cytolytic lines and derived T-cell clones, were CD8+, did not recognize allogeneic targets, and recognized the SIV proteins in the context of class I major histocompatibility complex molecules. The frequency of precursor CD8+ CTL reactive to SIV proteins was determined by limiting-dilution analysis and demonstrated that the responses elicited following challenge of protected animals to SIV proteins not present in the vaccine were quantitatively similar to those of animals persistently infected with SIV. The presence of these CD8+ CTL responses to SIV proteins present only in the challenge virus suggests that infection of some host cells occurred postchallenge. These results suggest that the development of a low level of SIV infection following exposure of vaccinated hosts to SIV does not preclude protection from lethal SIV disease by vaccine-induced immunity.


This article has been cited by other articles:




Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
J. Bacteriol. Mol. Cell. Biol. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev.
Clin. Vaccine Immunol. ALL ASM JOURNALS

Copyright © 1996 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.