JVI Figure table search 04
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mal, A.
Right arrow Articles by Harter, M. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Mal, A.
Right arrow Articles by Harter, M. L.

J. Virol., 05 1996, 2911-2921, Vol 70, No. 5
Copyright © 1996, American Society for Microbiology

Cyclin-dependent kinases phosphorylate the adenovirus E1A protein, enhancing its ability to bind pRb and disrupt pRb-E2F complexes

A Mal, A Piotrkowski and ML Harter
Department of Molecular Biology, Cleveland Clinic Research Institute, Ohio 44195, USA.

The adenovirus E1A protein of 243 amino acids has been shown to affect a variety of cellular functions, most notably the immortalization of primary cells and the promotion of quiescent cells into S phase. The activity of E1A is derived, in part, from its association with various cellular proteins, many of which play important roles in regulating cell cycle progression. E1A is known to have multiple sites of phosphorylation. It has been suggested that cell cycle-dependent phosphorylation may also control some of E1A's functions. We find now that immune complexes of cyclin-dependent kinases such as cdk4, cdk2, and cdc2 are all capable of phosphorylating E1A in vitro. Additionally, the sites on E1A phosphorylated by these kinases in vitro are similar to the E1A sites phosphorylated in vivo. We have also found that a phosphorylated E1A is far more efficient than an unphosphorylated E1A in associating with pRB and in disrupting E2F/DP-pRB complexes as well. On the basis of our findings and the differences in timing and expression levels of the various cyclins regulating cdks, we suggest that E1A functions at different control points in the cell cycle and that phosphorylation controls, to some extent, its biological functions.


This article has been cited by other articles:




Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
J. Bacteriol. Mol. Cell. Biol. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev.
Clin. Vaccine Immunol. ALL ASM JOURNALS

Copyright © 1996 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.