This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Reprints and Permissions Copyright Information Books from ASM Press MicrobeWorld Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Krishna, N. K. Articles by Wills, J. W. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Krishna, N. K. Articles by Wills, J. W.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

J. Virol., 03 1996, 1570-1579, Vol 70, No. 3
Copyright © 1996, American Society for Microbiology

Transport and processing of the Rous sarcoma virus Gag protein in the endoplasmic reticulum

NK Krishna, RA Weldon Jr and JW Wills
Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Pennsylvania State University College of Medicine, Hershey 17033, USA.

The Gag proteins of replication-competent retroviruses direct budding at the plasma membrane and are cleaved by the viral protease (PR) just before or very soon after particle release. In contrast, defective retroviruses that bud into the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) have been found, and morphologically these appear to contain uncleaved Gag proteins. From this, it has been proposed that activation of PR may depend upon a host factor found only at the plasma membrane. However, if Gag proteins were cleaved by PR before the particle could pinch off the ER membrane, then the only particles that would remain visible are those that packaged smaller-than-normal amounts of PR, and these would have an immature morphology. To distinguish between these two hypotheses, we made use of the Rous sarcoma virus (RSV) Gag protein, the PR of RSV IS included on each Gag molecule. To target Gag to the ER, a signal peptide was installed at its amino terminus in place of the plasma membrane-binding domain. An intervening, hydrophobic, transmembrane anchor was included to keep Gag extended into the cytoplasm. We found that PR-mediated processing occurred, although the cleavage products were rapidly degraded. When the anchor was removed, allowing the entire protein to be inserted into the lumen of the ER, Gag processing occurred with a high level of efficiency, and the cleavage products were quite stable. Thus, PR activation does not require targeting of Gag molecules to the plasma membrane. Unexpectedly, molecules lacking the transmembrane anchor were rapidly secreted from the cell in a nonmembrane-enclosed form and in a manner that was very sensitive to brefeldin A and monensin. In contrast, the wild-type RSV and Moloney murine leukemia virus Gag proteins were completely insensitive to these inhibitors, suggesting that the normal mechanism of transport to the plasma membrane does not require interactions with the secretory pathway.

This article has been cited by other articles:

• Scheifele, L. Z., Rhoads, J. D., Parent, L. J. (2002). Specificity of Plasma Membrane Targeting by the Rous Sarcoma Virus Gag Protein. J. Virol. 77: 470-480 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Krishna, N. K., Wills, J. W. (2001). Insertion of Capsid Proteins from Nonenveloped Viruses into the Retroviral Budding Pathway. J. Virol. 75: 6527-6536 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Mariani, R., Rutter, G., Harris, M. E., Hope, T. J., Kräusslich, H.-G., Landau, N. R. (2000). A Block to Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Assembly in Murine Cells. J. Virol. 74: 3859-3870 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Mardassi, H., Gonin, P., Gagnon, C. A., Massie, B., Dea, S. (1998). A Subset of Porcine Reproductive and Respiratory Syndrome Virus GP3 Glycoprotein Is Released into the Culture Medium of Cells as a Non-Virion-Associated and Membrane-Free (Soluble) Form. J. Virol. 72: 6298-6306 [Abstract] [Full Text]