JVI Figure table search 04
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kolman, J. L.
Right arrow Articles by Miller, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kolman, J. L.
Right arrow Articles by Miller, G.

J. Virol., Mar 1996, 1493-1504, Vol 70, No. 3
Copyright © 1996, American Society for Microbiology

Comparing transcriptional activation and autostimulation by ZEBRA and ZEBRA/c-Fos chimeras

JL Kolman, N Taylor, L Gradoville, J Countryman and G Miller
Department of Molecular Biophysics, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut 06520, USA.

The lytic cycle of Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) can be activated by transfection of the gene for ZEBRA, a viral basic-zipper (bZip) transcriptional activator. ZEBRA and cellular AP-1 bZip activators, such as c-Fos, have homologous DNA-binding domains, and their DNA- binding specificities overlap. Moreover, EBV latency can also be disrupted by phorbol esters, which act, in part, through AP-1 activators. It is not known whether ZEBRA and AP-1 factors play equivalent roles in the initial stages of reactivation. Here the contribution of ZEBRA's basic DNA recognition domain to disruption of latency was analyzed by comparing ZEBRA with chimeric mutants in which the DNA recognition domain of ZEBRA was replaced with the analogous domain of c-Fos. Chimeric ZEBRA/c-Fos proteins overexpressed in Escherichia coli bound DNA with the specificity of c-Fos; they bound a heptamer AP-1 site and an octamer TPA response element (TRE). ZEBRA bound the AP-1 site and an array of ZEBRA response elements (ZREs). In assays with reporter genes, both ZEBRA and ZEBRA/c-Fos chimeric mutants activated transcription from Zp, a promoter of the ZEBRA gene (BZLF1) that contains the TRE and multiple ZREs. However, despite their capacity to activate reporters bearing Zp, neither ZEBRA nor the c-Fos chimeras activated transcription from Zp in the context of the intact latent viral genome. In contrast, ZEBRA but not ZEBRA/c-Fos chimeras activated Rp, a second viral promoter that controls ZEBRA expression. Hence, transcriptional autostimulation by transfected ZEBRA occurred preferentially at Rp. Both ZEBRA and the ZEBRA/c-Fos chimeras activated transcription from reporters with multimerized AP-1 sites. However, in the context of the virus, only ZEBRA activated the promoters of two early lytic cycle genes, BMRF1 and BMLF1, that contain an AP-1 site. Thus, overexpression of an activator that recognized AP-1 and TRE sites was not sufficient to activate EBV early lytic cycle genes.


This article has been cited by other articles:



Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
J. Bacteriol. Mol. Cell. Biol. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev.
Clin. Vaccine Immunol. ALL ASM JOURNALS

Copyright © 1996 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.