JVI Figure table search 04
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Yu, D.
Right arrow Articles by Wang, A. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Yu, D.
Right arrow Articles by Wang, A. L.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

J. Virol., 05 1995, 2825-2830, Vol 69, No. 5
Copyright © 1995, American Society for Microbiology

Maturation of giardiavirus capsid protein involves posttranslational proteolytic processing by a cysteine protease

D Yu, CC Wang and AL Wang
Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, University of California, San Francisco 94143, USA.

The double-stranded RNA genome of giardiavirus (GLV) has only two large open reading frame (ORFs). The 100-kDa capsid polypeptide (p100) is encoded by ORF1, whereas the only other viral polypeptide, the 190-kDa GLV RNA-dependent RNA polymerase (p190), is synthesized as an ORF1-ORF2 fusion protein by a (-1) ribosomal frameshifting. Edman degradation revealed that p100 was N-terminally blocked except for 2 to 5% of it that showed free N terminus starting from amino acid residue 33 of ORF1. Studies using antiserum targeted against amino acid residues 6 to 27 indicated that this region (NT) is absent from viral p100 and p190, while pulse-labelling experiments showed that NT is present in nascent p100 synthesized in GLV-infected Giardia lamblia but removed subsequently. In contrast, this region was retained in the two viral proteins synthesized in vitro, and it was not removed upon prolonged incubation or inclusion of microsomal fraction in the in vitro translation reaction mixtures. These results suggest that endoplasmic reticulum is not involved in the protein processing and that the precursors of p100 and p190 are incapable of cleaving themselves or each other. This specific cleavage was reproduced when lysates from GLV- infected G. lamblia were added, but not those from uninfected cells. The cleavage activity was relatively insensitive to phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, but it was inhibitable by leupeptin or E- 64, two known specific inhibitors of cysteine protease. The possible origin of this processing activity is discussed.


This article has been cited by other articles:



Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
J. Bacteriol. Mol. Cell. Biol. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev.
Clin. Vaccine Immunol. ALL ASM JOURNALS

Copyright © 1995 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.