JVI Figure table search 04
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bhattacharyya, S.
Right arrow Articles by Prives, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bhattacharyya, S.
Right arrow Articles by Prives, C.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

J. Virol., Dec 1995, 7579-7585, Vol 69, No. 12
Copyright © 1995, American Society for Microbiology

Murine polyomavirus and simian virus 40 large T antigens produce different structural alterations in viral origin DNA

S Bhattacharyya, HE Lorimer and C Prives
Department of Biological Sciences, Columbia University, New York, New York 10027, USA.

Murine polyomavirus (Py) and simian virus (SV40) encode homologous large T antigens (T Ags) and also have comparable sequence motifs in their core replication origins. While the ability of SV40 T Ag to produce specific distortions within the SV40 core replication origin (ori) in a nucleotide-dependent fashion has been well documented, little is known about related effects of Py T Ag on Py ori DNA. Therefore, we have examined viral origin DNA binding in the presence of nucleotide and the resulting structural changes induced by Py and SV40 T Ags by DNase I footprinting and KMnO4 modification assays. The structural changes in the Py ori induced by Py T Ag included sites within both the A/T and early side of the core origin region, consistent with what has been shown for SV40. Interestingly, however, Py T Ag also produced sites of distortion within the center of the origin palindrome and at several sites within both the early and late regions that flank the core ori. Thus, Py T Ag produces a more extensive and substantially different pattern of KMnO4 modification sites than does SV40 T Ag. We also observed that both T Ags incompletely protected and distorted the reciprocal ori region. Therefore, significant differences in the interactions of Py and SV40 T Ags with ori DNA may account for the failure of each T Ag to support replication of the reciprocal ori DNA in permissive cell extracts.


This article has been cited by other articles:




Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
J. Bacteriol. Mol. Cell. Biol. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev.
Clin. Vaccine Immunol. ALL ASM JOURNALS

Copyright © 1995 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.