JVI Figure table search 04
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Yu, A
Right arrow Articles by Haggård-Ljungquist, E
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Yu, A
Right arrow Articles by Haggård-Ljungquist, E

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

J Virol. 1994 July; 68(7): 4220-4226

Regulation of int gene expression in bacteriophage P2.

A Yu, V Barreiro and E Haggård-Ljungquist

Department of Cell and Molecular Biology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.

ABSTRACT

The int gene of bacteriophage P2 is the only viral gene necessary for the integration of P2 into the Escherichia coli host chromosome. This gene is situated between the phage attachment site, attP, and the repressor C gene, and is cotranscribed with C from the Pc promoter, towards attP. The Pc promoter is negatively controlled by the cox gene, which is the first gene of the early operon. In vitro recombination assays have indicated that in P2 an overproduction of Int is deleterious to the integrative process. We report here that the level of int expression is affected by several different mechanisms after transcriptional initiation. First, a partial transcription termination signal located between the int and C genes reduces the the transcriptional readthrough by about 30%. Second, the ribosome binding site and AUG codon of the int gene are located in a putative stem-loop structure, which may inhibit the initiation of translation. The nip1 mutation (a G to A substitution at the 22nd coding nucleotide of int which results in an increased efficiency of excision) is shown to relieve this inhibition, possible through the formation of an alternative mRNA secondary structure. However, the third and probably most important control of int expression in P2 seems to be that of posttranscriptional autoregulation. The binding site of the Int protein on int gene mRNA is shown to extend into the ribosome binding site of int, supporting our earlier proposed model of competitive binding between Int and ribosomes.


J Virol. 1994 July; 68(7): 4220-4226




This article has been cited by other articles:




Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
J. Bacteriol. Mol. Cell. Biol. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev.
Clin. Vaccine Immunol. ALL ASM JOURNALS

Copyright © 1994 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.