JVI Figure table search 04
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hanssens, F P
Right arrow Articles by Pensaert, M B
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hanssens, F P
Right arrow Articles by Pensaert, M B

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

J Virol. 1993 August; 67(8): 4492-4496

Involvement of membrane-bound viral glycoproteins in adhesion of pseudorabies virus-infected cells.

F P Hanssens, H J Nauwynck and M B Pensaert

Laboratory of Veterinary Virology, University of Gent, Belgium.

ABSTRACT

Cell-associated spread of pseudorabies virus (PrV) plays an important role in the pathogenesis of the disease. Besides the already known direct cell-to-cell spread of the virus in monolayers, adhesion and subsequent fusion of suspended PrV infected cells to monolayers of uninfected cells are thought to occur. To study the adhesion of PrV-infected cells, an in vitro model was developed in SK-6 cells. Specific adhesion of PrV-infected cells to an uninfected monolayer started 5 h after infection of the cells and reached a maximum 6 h later. A correlation was found between the surface expression of PrV glycoproteins on the infected cells and the adhesion of these cells. PrV hyperimmune serum completely inhibited binding of the infected cells. To investigate which PrV envelope glycoproteins were responsible for the cell adhesion, the infected cells were incubated with antisera against glycoproteins gII, gIII, and gp50. Antiserum against either gII or gIII inhibited cell adhesion, and antisera against gII and gIII together had a cooperative effect. Antiserum against gp50 had no effect on binding when used alone but enhanced the inhibition induced by gII and gIII antisera. Heparin and neomycin inhibited adhesion, showing that the receptor for adhesion was a heparinlike substance. SK-6 cells infected with a gIII deletion mutant of PrV exhibited a much lower adhesion. This binding was heparin and neomycin independent and was not blocked by anti-gII serum. Nevertheless, it was completely inhibited with PrV hyperimmune serum and with anti-gp50 serum. This finding demonstrates that the ligand for adhesion of gIII(-)-infected cells is glycoprotein gp50. These results strongly suggest that the mechanism for adhesion of a PrV-infected cell to an uninfected monolayer is similar to the mechanism of adsorption and penetration of a PrV virion to a host cell.


J Virol. 1993 August; 67(8): 4492-4496




This article has been cited by other articles:




Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
J. Bacteriol. Mol. Cell. Biol. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev.
Clin. Vaccine Immunol. ALL ASM JOURNALS

Copyright © 1993 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.