JVI Figure table search 04
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Zong, C S
Right arrow Articles by Wang, L H
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Zong, C S
Right arrow Articles by Wang, L H
J Virol. 1993 November; 67(11): 6453-6462

Molecular and biochemical bases for activation of the transforming potential of the proto-oncogene c-ros.

C S Zong, B Poon, J Chen and L H Wang

Department of Microbiology, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, New York 10029-6574.

ABSTRACT

The transforming gene of avian sarcoma virus UR2, v-ros, encodes a receptor-like protein tyrosine kinase and differs from its proto-oncogene, c-ros, in its 5' truncation and fusion to viral gag, a three-amino-acid (aa) insertion in the transmembrane (TM) domain, and changes in the carboxyl region. To explore the basis for activation of the c-ros transforming potential, various c-ros retroviral vectors containing those changes were constructed and studied for their biological and biochemical properties. Ufcros codes for the full-length c-ros protein of 2,311 aa, Uppcros has 1,661-aa internal deletion in the extracellular domain, CCros contains the 3' c-ros cDNA fused 150 aa upstream of the TM domain to the UR2 gag, CVros is the same as CCros except that the 3' region is replaced by that of v-ros, and VCros is the same as CCros except that the 5' region is replaced by that of v-ros. The Ufcros, Uppcros, CCros, and CVros are inactive in transforming chicken embryo fibroblasts, whereas VCros is as potent as UR2 in cell-transforming and tumorigenic activities. Upon passages of CCros and CVros viruses, the additional extracellular sequence in comparison with that of v-ros was delected; concurrently, both viruses (named CC5d and CV5d, respectively) attained moderate transforming activity, albeit significantly lower than that of UR2 or VCros. The native c-ros protein has a very low protein tyrosine kinase activity, whereas the ppcros protein is constitutively activated in kinase activity. The inability of CCros and CVros to transform chicken embryo fibroblasts is consistent with the inefficient membrane association, instability, and low kinase activity of their encoded proteins. The CC5d and CV5d proteins are indistinguishable in kinase activity, membrane association, and stability from the v-ros protein. The reduced transforming potency of CC5d and CV5d proteins can be attributed only to their differential substrate interaction, notably the failure to phosphorylate a 88-kDa protein. We conclude that the 5' rather than the 3' modification of c-ros is essential for its oncogenic activation; the sequence upstream of the TM domain has a negative effect on the transforming activity of CCros and CVros and needs to be deleted to activate their biological activity.


J Virol. 1993 November; 67(11): 6453-6462




This article has been cited by other articles:




Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
J. Bacteriol. Mol. Cell. Biol. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev.
Clin. Vaccine Immunol. ALL ASM JOURNALS

Copyright © 1993 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.