JVI Figure table search 04
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Blasco, R
Right arrow Articles by Moss, B
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Blasco, R
Right arrow Articles by Moss, B
J Virol. 1992 July; 66(7): 4170-4179

Role of cell-associated enveloped vaccinia virus in cell-to-cell spread.

R Blasco and B Moss

Laboratory of Viral Diseases, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, Bethesda, Maryland 20892.

ABSTRACT

The roles of intracellular naked (INV), cell-associated enveloped (CEV), and extracellular enveloped (EEV) forms of vaccinia virus in cell-to-cell and longer-range spread were investigated by using two closely related strains of vaccinia virus, WR and IHD-J. We confirmed previous results that WR and IHD-J produced similar amounts of INV and formed similar-size primary plaques but that IHD-J produced 10 to 40 times more EEV and spread to distant cells much more efficiently than did WR. Nevertheless, cells infected with WR and IHD-J had similar amounts of CEV, indicating that wrapping and transport of WR virions were unimpaired. A WR mutant with a deletion in VP37, the major outer envelope protein, formed normal amounts of INV; however, the generation of CEV was blocked and plaque formation was inhibited. These results suggested that CEV is the form of virus that mediates cell-to-cell spread. Marker rescue experiments indicated that the differences in EEV production by WR and IHD-J were not due to sequence differences in VP37. The low amount of WR EEV could be attributed to retention of CEV on the cell membrane. In support of this hypothesis, mild treatment with trypsin released as much or more infectious virus from cells infected with WR as it did with cells infected with IHD-J. Most of the virus released by trypsin sedimented with the buoyant density of EEV. Also, addition of trypsin to cells following inoculation with WR led to a comet-shaped distribution of secondary plaques characteristic of IHD-J. These results demonstrated that the release of CEV from the cell surface was limiting for extracellular virus formation and affirmed the role of EEV in long-range spread.

J Virol. 1992 July; 66(7): 4170-4179




This article has been cited by other articles:



Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
J. Bacteriol. Mol. Cell. Biol. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev.
Clin. Vaccine Immunol. ALL ASM JOURNALS

Copyright © 1992 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.