JVI Figure table search 04
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ge, R
Right arrow Articles by Ricciardi, R P
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ge, R
Right arrow Articles by Ricciardi, R P
J Virol. 1992 December; 66(12): 6969-6978

Down-regulation of the major histocompatibility complex class I enhancer in adenovirus type 12-transformed cells is accompanied by an increase in factor binding.

R Ge, A Kralli, R Weinmann and R P Ricciardi

Wistar Institute of Anatomy and Biology, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104.

ABSTRACT

In transformed cells, the E1A gene of adenovirus type 12 (Ad12) represses transcription of class I genes of the major histocompatibility complex. The tumorigenic potential of Ad12-transformed cells correlates with this diminished class I expression. In contrast, the E1A gene of the nontumorigenic Ad5 does not affect class I expression. We show here that a transfected reporter chloramphenicol acetyltransferase plasmid driven by an H-2K promoter (-1049 bp) was expressed at much lower levels in Ad12- than in Ad5-transformed mouse cells. Analysis of mutant constructs revealed that only 83 bp of H-2 DNA, consisting of the enhancer juxtaposed to the basal promoter, was sufficient for this differential expression. Whereas the H-2 basal promoter alone was somewhat less active in Ad12-transformed cells, the H-2 TATA box itself did not appear to be important. The H-2 enhancer proved to be the principal element in Ad12 E1A-mediated repression, since (i) substitution of the H-2 enhancer by simian virus 40 enhancers overcame the repression, and (ii) when juxtaposed to either its native or heterologous basal promoters, the H-2 enhancer was functional in Ad5- but not Ad12-transformed cells. Mobility shift assays showed that there is a DNA-binding activity to the 5' site (R2 element) of the enhancer that is significantly higher in Ad12- than in Ad5-transformed cells. These results suggest that decreased class I enhancer activity in Ad12-transformed cells may, at least in part, be due to the higher levels of an enhancer-specific factor, possibly acting as a repressor.


J Virol. 1992 December; 66(12): 6969-6978




This article has been cited by other articles:




Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
J. Bacteriol. Mol. Cell. Biol. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev.
Clin. Vaccine Immunol. ALL ASM JOURNALS

Copyright © 1992 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.