JVI Figure table search 04
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Benson, K H
Right arrow Articles by Kreuzer, K N
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Benson, K H
Right arrow Articles by Kreuzer, K N

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

J Virol. 1992 December; 66(12): 6960-6968

Plasmid models for bacteriophage T4 DNA replication: requirements for fork proteins.

K H Benson and K N Kreuzer

Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina 27710.

ABSTRACT

Bacteriophage T4 DNA replication initiates from origins at early times of infection and from recombinational intermediates as the infection progresses. Plasmids containing cloned T4 origins replicate during T4 infection, providing a model system for studying origin-dependent replication. In addition, recombination-dependent replication can be analyzed by using cloned nonorigin fragments of T4 DNA, which direct plasmid replication that requires phage-encoded recombination proteins. We have tested in vivo requirements for both plasmid replication model systems by infecting plasmid-containing cells with mutant phage. Replication of origin and nonorigin plasmids strictly required components of the T4 DNA polymerase holoenzyme complex. Recombination-dependent plasmid replication also strictly required the T4 single-stranded DNA-binding protein (gene product 32 [gp32]), and replication of origin-containing plasmids was greatly reduced by 32 amber mutations. gp32 is therefore important in both modes of replication. An amber mutation in gene 41, which encodes the replicative helicase of T4, reduced but did not eliminate both recombination- and origin-dependent plasmid replication. Therefore, gp41 may normally be utilized for replication of both plasmids but is apparently not required for either. An amber mutation in gene 61, which encodes the T4 RNA primase, did not eliminate either recombination- or origin-dependent plasmid replication. However, plasmid replication was severely delayed by the 61 amber mutation, suggesting that the protein may normally play an important, though nonessential, role in replication. We deleted gene 61 from the T4 genome to test whether the observed replication was due to residual gp61 in the amber mutant infection. The replication phenotype of the deletion mutant was identical to that of the amber mutant. Therefore, gp61 is not required for in vivo T4 replication. Furthermore, the deletion mutant is viable, demonstrating that the gp61 primase is not an essential T4 protein.


J Virol. 1992 December; 66(12): 6960-6968




This article has been cited by other articles:




Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
J. Bacteriol. Mol. Cell. Biol. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev.
Clin. Vaccine Immunol. ALL ASM JOURNALS

Copyright © 1992 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.