JVI Figure table search 04
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cornelis, J J
Right arrow Articles by Rommelaere, J
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Cornelis, J J
Right arrow Articles by Rommelaere, J
J Virol. 1990 June; 64(6): 2537-2544

Susceptibility of human cells to killing by the parvoviruses H-1 and minute virus of mice correlates with viral transcription.

J J Cornelis, Y Q Chen, N Spruyt, N Duponchel, S F Cotmore, P Tattersall and J Rommelaere

Unité d'Oncologie Moléculaire, Institut Pasteur de Lille, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale U186, France.

ABSTRACT

Human fibroblasts and epithelial cells differing in their susceptibility to killing by the autonomous parvoviruses H-1 and minute virus of mice were compared for their capacity to express viral mRNAs and proteins. The transition from a parvovirus-resistant to a parvovirus-sensitive phenotype correlated with a proportional increase in the production of the three major viral transcripts and of structural and nonstructural proteins. In contrast, cell sensitization to parvovirus could not be correlated with detectable changes in virus uptake, intracellular localization of gene products, stability of viral mRNAs, or phosphorylation of viral nonstructural polypeptides. Moreover, the H-1 virus-sensitive keratinocyte line studied did not sustain a greater level of viral DNA amplification than its resistant derivative. Therefore, the differential susceptibility of the human cells tested to parvovirus infection appears to be mainly controlled at the level of transcription of the viral genome. Parvoviral gene expression could not be elevated by increasing the input multiplicity of infection in either of the cell systems analyzed. Together, these data suggest that a cellular factor(s) regulating parvoviral transcription may be modulated by oncogenic transformation or by differentiation, as both features have been shown to affect cell susceptibility to parvoviruses.


J Virol. 1990 June; 64(6): 2537-2544




This article has been cited by other articles:




Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
J. Bacteriol. Mol. Cell. Biol. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev.
Clin. Vaccine Immunol. ALL ASM JOURNALS

Copyright © 1990 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.